Who is Robin L Rosenberg? Florida judge denies DOJ's request to unseal Epstein's grand jury files
An Obama appointee, Judge Rosenberg was giving her verdict on the DOJ's request last week that the transcripts of the grand jury be unsealed over the "extensive public interest" on the matter and for maintaining "transparency to the American public."
However, Judge Rosenberg denied the request, saying that the judiciary's "hands are tied" and the DOJ has failed to furnish sufficient justification for the release of the grand jury files on the Jeffrey Epstein probe, as per a memo released on Wednesday.
Who Is Judge Robin L Rosenberg?
Judge Rosenberg, born in 1962 in West Palm Beach, Florida, currently serves as a federal judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. She was nominated by President Barack Obama on February 26, 2014, to fill the seat vacated by Adalberto Jose Jordan, as per the Federal Judiciary Center.
Also read: US judge rejects request to unseal grand jury transcripts tied to Jeffery Epstein
Her legal career began as a law clerk for Judge James C Paine in the same district she now serves. She worked as a trial attorney in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, and later held various positions in both public and private sectors, including assistant city attorney for West Palm Beach, vice president and general counsel for Slim-Fast Foods, and principal at ARC Mediation.
Before her federal appointment, she served as a circuit court judge in Florida's Fifteenth Judicial Circuit from 2007 to 2014.
Rosenberg holds a B.A. from Princeton University (1983) and both a J.D. and M.A. from Duke University (1989).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘We'll wipe it out faster…'; Trump again threatens ‘very nasty' and ‘stupid' Iran over nuclear enrichment
Donald Trump has renewed his threats against Iran, just weeks after carrying out military attacks on three of its nuclear sites. The US President's statement comes in reaction to Tehran's stand that it will continue to enhance nuclear enrichment for civilian purposes. U.S. President Donald Trump meets with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Trump Turnberry golf course in Turnberry, Scotland, Britain, July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein(REUTERS) Speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at a press conference in Scotland, Trump claimed that Iran was 'sending very bad signals, very nasty signals.' He called Iran's determination on enrichment 'stupid' and promised to completely shut it down. Trump warns Iran over nuclear enrichment Stressing that they shouldn't pursue nuclear enrichment, Trump said, 'We wiped out their nuclear possibilities. They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it.' 'We will do that gladly, openly and gladly,' he continued. Trump denounced Iran's rhetoric, stating that it has been quite offensive in both their words and their mouth. 'They got the hell knocked out of them and they…I don't think they know it. I actually don't think they know.' Also Read: Trump reveals why he cut ties with Epstein, claims his name was planted in files: 'He stole people who…' Iran says nuclear enrichment 'is so dear to us' Ahead of negotiations with the UK, France, and Germany this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi recently affirmed Tehran's right to enrich uranium. 'Our enrichment is so dear to us,' he said, calling it an achievement of Iranian scientists. While breakthroughs were reported, Iranian authorities characterized the negotiations as 'serious, frank, and detailed,' marking the first significant diplomatic flurry since the US assaults and the consequent conclusion of the confrontation with Israel. US forces attacked Iran's nuclear installations in Fordow, Esfahan, and Natanz on June 22 after an Israeli offensive that lasted 12 days. In response to American aggression, Iran targetted the biggest American military facility in the Middle East, Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. US and Qatari officials said all missiles were intercepted and there were no fatalities or significant damage, despite Iran's claims of successful strikes.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
There is a Trump deal within the trade deal, which is making things tricky
Put on that poker face India seems to have hit a Trump wall in its trade deal negotiations with the US. Unlike other segments of the relationship like security and terrorism, where India has been able to nudge its pieces through the American system, the trade deal has got looped into a different White House orbit - an orbit with shifting goalposts and changing what's holding up the deal? After all, India was among the early movers on initiating a trade conversation with the Trump regime. And, yet, an agreement has eluded both sides, while others appear to be closing the gap sooner, including the EU, which struck a deal with US on a 15% tariff slab on Monday. In India's case, White House changed the frame last minute. Both sides had agreed in February to work on an early harvest agreement by September, which would cover close to 40% tariff lines. This was to be a concrete deliverable during a planned Trump visit to India around the same time. The early harvest was to be followed by widening negotiations on to more tariff lines with the object of covering 90% tariff lines that would then close Phase 1 of the trade deal. The second phase was to be a more detailed and protracted negotiation on aligning standards and adopting mutually acceptable quality control Trump, it appears, changed his mind when the proposed early harvest agreement reached his table. White House now feels Phase 1 should be completed in its entirety before any agreement is signed. Efforts are on to get Trump to reconsider. But, for now, negotiators are headed back to the table to pick up the threads again to rejig, and, if needed, recast the entire frame. Next month's talks would probably be the 50th round of negotiations with the US, making it by far the longest trade negotiation the Trump regime has held with any country or grouping. A big part of the reason is India has a comparatively higher tariff structure, which only complicates line-by-line negotiation. But New Delhi has, on this occasion, extended a bold offer going by its own track record. Yet, it will miss Trump's August 1 tariff it be extended for India, given that a US team is headed to Delhi for another round? The jury is still out on this because Trump has generally maintained a 'no-extension' stand. But with 15% slab agreed with the EU, revenues will swell, giving him room to accommodate some an Indian standpoint, the pattern emerging in the larger picture from Trump's negotiation with the EU and other countries is that focus is on arriving at an understanding on a single overall tariff figure. All tariff line negotiations will eventually have to settle at that one number. For Britain, it was 10%, the EU and Japan settled at 15%, Indonesia 19%, and Vietnam was about about 20%- this is the 'Trump deal' within the trade deal. It's unprecedented and, until now, not even properly documented as a model. However, that's the way the pattern has held. India doesn't have a number on offer yet from the US. But, in all probability, this is the direction in which negotiations are likely to head. The problem for India is its own complicated high-tariff structure, which will make it a more difficult exercise to reconcile, as opposed to generally low-tariff economies like the EU and tricky bit will be to figure out the minutiae of the Trump deal in the trade deal, which is also bundled into a number by way of procurements from the US, business deals and investment opportunities to US companies as well as crypto mining - not to forget the interests of the Trump Organisation and its India can, and must, do is prise open win-win opportunities like civil nuclear energy cooperation. Though not listed until now in Parliament's monsoon session agenda, GoI ought to consider expediting the introduction of a new or amended nuclear liability bill, along with relevant amendments to the Atomic Energy Act. A continuous emphasis on the criticality of strategic relationship from a security perspective is vital. On that score, Trump's inclination to play the Pakistan card is counterproductive - one that India will have to counter at all levels. On a broader plane, what's noteworthy is that the EU, for its 15% tariff deal, has committed to purchasing US energy supplies worth $750 bn over three years in a strategic shift from Russian fuel. France is already expressing concerns over the entire deal. The number for Japan is $550 bn worth of investment, which the Japanese government is scrambling to explain as loans to its domestic audience. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have announced $1.3 tn and $1.4 tn, respectively, of investments, procurements and business partnerships over 10 years with the are staggering numbers for GoI, which is still working on US defence procurement plans in the $8-10 bn range. In India's domestic politics, deals like these are a minefield for any government to navigate. This is a politically awkward situation on which the future of the trade deal may just rest, one that will require constant strategic bargaining, while at the same time considering doable commitments on the Trump commercial agenda. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Will TCS layoffs open the floodgates of mass firing at Indian IT firms? Sebi's settlement with market intermediaries: More mystery than transparency? Indian IT firms never reveal the truth hiding behind 'strong' deal wins Did Meesho's Valmo really deliver a knockout punch to e-commerce logistics? Piaggio sues former employee for 'Coldplay' reference on CEO Apple has a new Indian-American COO. What it needs might be a new CEO. Stock Radar: This pharma stock breaks out from a 9-month long consolidation phase; likely to fresh record highs Understand 'Market Coupling Approved' before reacting to IEX stock price movement and making any decision
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Aircraft crashes to regulatory hurdles: Despite several challenges, Boeing may be benefitting big from Donald Trump's trade war
The US aerospace giant has globally been in the news for all the wrong reasons. US President Donald Trump's trade war seems to be benefitting one aviation sector giant in America - Boeing! As Trump seals trade deals with countries around the world, he is also bringing in deals, and Boeing is reaping the rewards. Boeing is bagging new orders through these trade deals which could prove advantageous for the company as it recovers from recent difficulties, according to a New York Times report. Additionally, these deals enable Trump to demonstrate the effectiveness of his distinctive trade strategies in supporting American industry. Boeing's Recent Troubles The US aerospace giant has globally been in the news for all the wrong reasons - the biggest being the recent crash of Air India 's AI-171 aircraft which was a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Investigations on the cause of the crash, which killed all but onboard, are ongoing. Additionally, Boeing faces critical challenges before it can convert its new orders into revenue. The manufacturer lags significantly in obtaining regulatory clearance for key aircraft models, including both the smallest and largest versions of the 737 Max, as well as the 777-9, which initiated FAA certification test flights twelve months ago. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mini House for 60 sqm for Seniors with Toilet and Bath (Price May Surprise You) Pre Fabricated Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo Boeing's operational difficulties have created significant setbacks. Following two tragic crashes, its bestselling 737 Max was suspended from service for approximately 24 months. A recent Reuters report quoted FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford saying that Boeing hasn't requested the removal of the 38-plane monthly production limit for 737 MAX aircraft. The agency will conduct a thorough assessment of the manufacturer's supply chain before reaching any conclusions. The production restriction was established by the FAA following a January 2024 incident where an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 aircraft experienced an emergency situation mid-flight due to missing crucial bolts. In June this year, The National Transportation Safety Board issued a stern critique regarding Boeing's inadequate safety measures, which led to the cabin panel blowout incident on a 737 MAX 9 aircraft in January 2024. The incident triggered a significant crisis for the aircraft manufacturer. According to a Reuters report, the safety board delivered a scathing assessment of Boeing's safety protocols and highlighted the company's oversight failure in installing four crucial bolts during the production of an Alaska Airlines MAX 9. Meanwhile, Boeing's suppliers may face financial strain due to Trump's imposed tariffs, whilst potential retaliatory measures from trading partners, particularly the European Union, could adversely affect the aircraft manufacturer's business. Boeing New Order Book Industry experts suggest that the trade agreements could lead to additional orders, as potential buyers might feel compelled to secure their positions now to avoid future delays. Aircraft ordered at present will be delivered in subsequent years. Recent announcements include orders for numerous Boeing aircraft from Indonesia and Japan this month, following earlier agreements with Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. However, aviation industry experts express doubt about the necessity of US trade negotiators' intervention in securing Boeing aircraft orders. The procurement of aircraft involves meticulous planning by airlines, including state-owned carriers, spanning several months to years. The limited choice between Boeing and Airbus, the sole manufacturers of large commercial aircraft, further influences purchasing decisions. Nevertheless, analysts acknowledge the strategic emphasis placed by Trump's administration on Boeing contracts within trade agreements. This focus aligns with Boeing's significant role as a major American employer and prominent export contributor. The financial markets have responded positively to the new order announcements, with Boeing's stock value showing consistent growth since April, coinciding with Trump's introduction of tariffs. The company's CEO Kelly Ortberg accompanied Trump during his Middle East visit in May when the Qatar agreement was disclosed. "If the president of the country says, 'Come with me and be certain that we sign something big that says there will be many jobs in the US,' what will you do?" said Adam Pilarski, president of Avitas, an aviation consulting firm, according to the New York Times report. However, Pilarski and additional industry specialists advised that these orders might not be as significant as they appeared. Trump's Role Overstated? The specifics of these agreements remain largely undisclosed, indicating ongoing complex discussions between the aircraft manufacturer and various airlines. A case in point from this month shows Trump's announcement of Indonesia's commitment to 50 Boeing aircraft, whilst an Indonesian official later clarified that negotiations were still ongoing between Garuda, their state carrier, and Boeing. "I suspect these orders are, as we used to joke at air shows, MOUTHLs — memoranda of understanding to have lunch," said Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory, a consulting firm. "The real hard work of contract negotiation and finance package negotiation takes place after the president's plane has left the country,' he said according to the New York Times report. Industry analysts suggest that many of these orders would likely have materialised regardless of Trump's involvement. In May, Qatar Airways, a significant international carrier, confirmed a substantial order of 150 Boeing wide-body aircraft. This particular announcement was notably comprehensive in its details. Whilst political influence may drive some orders, circumstances can shift substantially before aircraft delivery. Both Boeing and Airbus maintain extensive order books spanning multiple years of manufacturing. Airlines retain the option to withdraw from agreements, albeit potentially losing deposits. Additionally, carriers can request delivery postponements or order reductions. Manufacturers might accommodate such adjustments, particularly if it enables them to redirect aircraft to other airlines with urgent requirements for new aircraft. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
