logo
North Providence Mayor Lombardi made ex-town employee work on his personal properties, lawsuit says

North Providence Mayor Lombardi made ex-town employee work on his personal properties, lawsuit says

Yahoo7 days ago
A former North Providence employee is suing Mayor Charles A. Lombardi Sr. and the head of public works, accusing them of making him do work at their residences during work hours, and of charging the construction materials to the town credit card.
Michael Charbatji, who worked for the town from 2017 until he was fired in 2022, sued Lombardi and Department of Public Works Director James M. Fuoroli in Superior Court on June 10, alleging they violated the Whistleblowers' Act and retaliated against him after he refused to perform work on their personal properties during work hours.
'Based on my preliminary investigation, it is clear that the town has wrongfully discharged him and has unlawfully retaliated against him in violation of the Whistleblowers Protection Act, as well as other violations of Rhode Island and federal laws,' his lawyer, Lisa S. Holley, wrote to the town in December, putting officials on notice of Charbatji's intention to sue based on his wrongful termination.
Charbatji is seeking compensation for back pay, lost benefits, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney fees and cost for the alleged unlawful employment practice and intentional infliction of emotional distress. He asks, too, for the court to declare his termination from employment a violation of Whistleblowers Protection Act and to get his job back.
Holley declined to comment beyond saying 'the complaint speaks for itself.'
Lombardi said he had been 'threatened' with the lawsuit for the past six months.
'I will comment on these accusations at the appropriate time,' he said.
According to the lawsuit, Charbatji owned a successful private contracting company, Mike's Remodeling, LLC, providing contracting services to both residential and commercial customers.
Lombardi told him that the town would be building a new school and asked him to come on board, adding that the town "offered good benefits" and he would "get lot of overtime." The mayor assured him he would be getting several raises that would be financially advantageous to him, the lawsuit claims.
Lombardi owns several dry-cleaning businesses as "Luxury Cleaners," with locations in Lincoln and North Providence, as well as multiple houses, including a summer home in Narragansett.
Charbatji was hired in 2017 and dissolved his private contracting company on April 11, 2018. Fuoroli was his supervisor and his job duties included providing general maintenance and repairs to town buildings," the lawsuit says.
He intended to work for North Providence until he turned 75 so that he would be eligible for full retirement benefits.
But Charbatji soon found himself performing work at the mayor's summer house at 10 Irving Path in Narragansett multiple times when he was supposed to be at work, as well as being asked to work at Lombardi's commercial businesses, residences and rental properties at the mayor and Fuoroli's direction. He also did work at Fuoroli's personal property located at 53 Kiley Street, North Providence, the lawsuit states.
On many occasions, Charbatji was unable to make it back to the town to use the fingerprint scan to log out of the attendance program and Fuoroli would indicate on the computer-generated time record that he "forgot" to punch out.
Fuoroli directed him to use his own personal vehicle when working on Lombardi's properties," according to the lawsuit. He would also provide the materials needed by purchasing supplies by using the town's Lowe's store credit card.
On one occasion, while he was working on the Narragansett rental, he was approached by a North Providence firefighter, who was at a neighboring home, and called Fuoroli to tell him he was approached by the firefighter. He told Fuoroli he was uncomfortable performing personal repairs during work hours and was told to "be careful of him; he's rat."
A second firefighter told him "Do you think you are the only one who knows you go to Narragansett to work on the mayor's property? Everyone knows and talks."
Charbatji began experiencing severe stress about doing work on Lombardi's properties during work hours, according to the lawsuit. He became increasingly concerned that he was being directed by Lombardi and Fuoroli to do something wrong or potentially illegal. He worried, too, that he'd be fired if he refused.
On one occasion, he purchased doors for the mayor's summer home and wasn't reimbursed. Fuoroli directed him and another employee, Romeo D'Andrea, to do various repairs at the home.
Lombardi told him that he could not give him a raise, but if he needed money, he "would give him cash to work on his property in the back of Town Hall" and he would be paid overtime by the town.
Charbatji informed Lombardi that he would no longer work on personal properties during work hours, that he was very uncomfortable.
Lombardi got angry and said "If you tell anyone about this conversation, I will lie and deny, deny, deny that this conversation ever happened."
Roger Achille, then the human resources director, asked him if he had done work on Lombardi's house behind town hall," the lawsuit says. He told Achille he wanted a meeting with Lombardi and Fuoroli and that he didn't want to meet with them alone because they were 'liars.'
The day of the August 2022 meeting; however, Charbatji says he experienced chest pains due to stress and was taken to the emergency room at Miriam Hospital.
His primary doctor referred him to Providence Behavioral Health due to the extreme stress he was experiencing. He received Temporary Disability Insurance until his benefits expired on Dec. 10, 2022.
In September 2022, Achille advised Charbatji that he had exhausted his "paid leave and protected FMLA," and that he would be placing him on unpaid leave. Achille told Charbatji that such requests had to be approved by Lombardi, the lawsuit states.
Achille told him he had to call Lombardi personally to request to remain out of work. Charbatji responded that he could not speak with Lombardi due to his mental health and stated, "he is the reason I am out on stress … [he] put me in this situation and put me in the hospital."
On Nov. 18, 2022, Lombardi sent a North Providence Police officer to his home to deliver a letter terminating his employment, stating that as a pretext that he was on "unauthorized and unexcused leave."
North Providence used the pretext of "unauthorized and unexcused leave" to wrongfully terminate Charbatji after he requested a meeting with Achille to advise him of the violations of law which he had been ordered to commit over the course of his employment, the complaint says.
This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Lawsuit says NP Mayor Lombardi used town workers on personal properties
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge authorizes Tim Hortons Roll Up to Win class action for Quebec customers
Judge authorizes Tim Hortons Roll Up to Win class action for Quebec customers

Hamilton Spectator

time2 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Judge authorizes Tim Hortons Roll Up to Win class action for Quebec customers

MONTREAL - A judge has authorized a class action lawsuit over emails Tim Hortons sent out in error to participants in its popular Roll Up to Win promotion — but only for Quebec residents. Montreal-based firm LPC Avocats claims some 500,000 customers across Canada received an email in April 2024 saying they had won a boat through the promotion. Superior Court Justice Donald Bisson ruled last week that the class action can move forward, but limited it to Quebec residents because the case hinges on that province's consumer protection laws. Lawyer Joey Zukran says his clients should be awarded the boat and trailer they were told they won, plus damages. He says the Quebec law states that merchants and not customers should be held responsible for errors. A spokesperson for Tim Hortons says the company apologized last year to the customers who received the email, and declined to comment further because the case is before the courts. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 29, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Diddy And Justin Combs Hit With 'Gang Rape' Allegations
Diddy And Justin Combs Hit With 'Gang Rape' Allegations

Black America Web

time2 days ago

  • Black America Web

Diddy And Justin Combs Hit With 'Gang Rape' Allegations

Source: Jason Koerner / Getty According to reports, a startling new lawsuit has been filed against Diddy and his son, Justin Combs, accusing them of luring a woman to California to be raped by Diddy and two other 'masked men' in 2017. The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday (June 23), alleges that Justin Combs used his father Diddy's celebrity and position to lure the victim (referred to as Jane Doe in the filing) to California with the promise of a job in television. But Jane Doe claims that she was 'held prisoner for a weekend' after being plied with drugs and alcohol, and subjected to a 'brutal gang rape' enacted by Diddy and two other 'masked men.' According to the lawsuit, the woman connected with Justin Combs in April 2017 via the Snapchat social media platform. He asked her for explicit photographs of herself, and she consented to send them to him. Shortly afterward, Combs invited her to California for a weekend, promising that he could help her get a job using his father's connections. After a time at the home in Beverly Hills known as 'The Glass House,' Jane Doe said that she was given pills, alcohol, and marijuana she believed was laced. It was shortly after that when three masked men arrived at the home, one who she alleged was Diddy due to his mannerisms and the fact that Justin was calling that person 'Pops.' Jane Doe then said that she was guided to a bedroom and told, 'You better let this happen. Or else.' She claimed that she was then raped repeatedly by the men taking turns from that Saturday evening into the following afternoon. She was allegedly then taken to the airport on Monday, but not before Combs, now 31, reminded her of the explicit photos she sent 'which he had saved and could release at his pleasure,' according to documents. 'No matter how many lawsuits are filed it won't change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor,' a statement from Combs' media team said, adding: 'We live in a world where anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason. Fortunately, a fair and impartial judicial process exists to find the truth, and Mr. Combs is confident he will prevail in court.' The lawsuit comes as the sex trafficking case against Diddy in New York City was set to have closing arguments take place on Friday (June 27) before jury deliberations. SEE ALSO Diddy And Justin Combs Hit With 'Gang Rape' Allegations was originally published on

California court rules state insurance policy on smoke damage is unlawful

time4 days ago

California court rules state insurance policy on smoke damage is unlawful

A California judge has ruled the state's bare-bones home insurance program's handling of smoke damage claims is unlawful, a decision that could have wide-ranging implications as insurers increasingly deal with the aftermath of wildfires. Home insurance broadly covers fire damage, but there is a growing dispute over what damage must be covered when flames don't torch the property. The decision Tuesday by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Stuart M. Rice is a victory for homeowners in a state where the risk of catastrophic wildfires has intensified alongside a brewing home insurance crisis. The specific case involved Jay Aliff, who sued in 2021 over the insurance payout for his house near Lake Tahoe, which was damaged in the November 2020 Mountain View fire. His lawsuit challenged the California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan, or the FAIR Plan, the state's high-risk insurance pool or the last-resort option for those dropped by private insurance companies. With high premiums and basic coverage, the FAIR Plan was designed as a temporary safety net until policyholders could find a more permanent option. Today, it has become the default option for many, with the number of residential policies reaching 550,000 in March, more than double from 2020, state data shows. Reports from other urban wildfires, in which building materials, appliances, cars and more burn at incredibly high temperatures, show increased levels of heavy metals including lead and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as benzene that are tied to negative health risks. But insurance companies haven't standardized testing for those contaminants. The FAIR Plan has been scrutinized for years over allegations of summarily denying smoke damage claims unless there's proof of permanent physical change, even though the California Department of Insurance has long determined that that threshold is illegal. Aliff's lawsuit claims that FAIR Plan at the time offered a fraction of the money he expected to cover the costs to remediate the damages, citing a partial denial letter that said the fire debris could be cleaned up –- and therefore didn't qualify for coverage as a 'direct physical loss' to the home. 'The things that burn are terrifying like lead, cyanide. It's not possible to get that out with Swiffer,' said Aliff's attorney, Dylan Schaffer, referring to the brand of disposable mops. Schaffer, who is also the attorney in a number of other lawsuits against the FAIR Plan related to the smoke damage issue, said the new court ruling was a game-changer in California insurance law at a time when thousands of homeowners in the recent Palisades and Eaton wildfires are still fighting for coverage. 'It is the most important decision in California insurance law in decades,' Schaffer said. 'It draws a line in the sand as it relates to where carriers can start carving out their liability and avoiding liability.' The ruling said the way the FAIR Plan limits smoke damage coverage to its definition of 'direct physical loss' was a violation of the law, stating that 'this language limits coverage reasonably expected by an insured in a manner which is not conspicuous, plain and clear.' The judge also said it was unlawful that the FAIR Plan required smoke damage to be 'visible to the unaided human eye' or capable of being 'detected by the unaided human nose of an average person' rather than "the subjective senses of (the insured) or by laboratory testing.' 'Being unable to resort to their own senses or laboratory tests, it is entirely unclear how an insured could determine whether a particular loss is covered or not,' the court decision noted. FAIR Plan spokeswoman Hilary McLean said in a statement that the insurer has been working with the state insurance agency to update its policy language and has already eliminated the so-called sight and smell test. 'Our goal is to continue providing fair and reasonable coverage for wildfire-related losses while maintaining the financial integrity of the FAIR Plan for all policyholders," McLean said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store