Expelling Elon Musk would make the Royal Society look like ‘pathetic woke hypocrites'
It's so he can get as far away as possible from all the idiots he has to put up with on Earth.
That, at any rate, was my first thought when I read the ludicrous following story. At a crisis meeting next month, members of the Royal Society – the scientific institution founded in 1660 – will discuss whether to strip Musk of the fellowship he was awarded in 2018. Why? Because of his supposedly 'disreputable' comments and behaviour since Donald Trump won last year's US election. In November, one Oxford professor resigned her own fellowship after likening Musk to ' a Bond villain '. Now, more than 2,000 scientists have signed an open letter calling on the Society to 'take a stand' against him.
Honestly. Let's hope their colleagues have more sense. Because expelling Musk would make the Royal Society look like pathetic woke hypocrites.
First of all: even if Musk is a horrid man who says and does nasty things, so what? Does this make his contributions to science (such as in the fields of electric cars and space travel) any less significant? Should we only honour scientists who express opinions of which we approve, and who strike us as jolly nice chaps to have round for dinner? Whenever it emerges that a great poet or painter was a ghastly cad with politically incorrect views, sensible people do not call for him to be stripped of his honours, and for his work to be removed from the school curriculum, because we're capable of separating the art from the artist. So why not separate the science from the scientist?
In any case, if the Royal Society decides that fellows should be cancelled for 'disreputable' comments and behaviour, it's going to be pretty busy. Because in the past it awarded fellowships to people who were even more horrid than Musk.
Take Isaac Newton – who, as Warden of the Royal Mint, gleefully had men disembowelled, hanged or burnt for the crime of counterfeiting coins. He also relished destroying the reputations of his intellectual rivals. After the death of the German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz, for example, Newton boasted that he'd taken great pleasure in 'breaking Leibniz's heart'. Little wonder that, in A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking describes Newton as 'not a pleasant man'.
Then there's Charles Darwin – who made a number of frightfully problematic remarks about what he called the 'lower races', and wrote that it was damaging for 'civilised men' to 'build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick', and 'to institute poor laws', because as a result 'the weak members of civilised society' were able to 'propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man.'
If Newton and Darwin were alive today, would the twits throwing a tantrum over Musk be demanding their expulsion, too? In fact, will they strip these great but not terribly PC men of their fellowships posthumously, as a warning to others?
Personally, I think the Royal Society should listen to another of its most celebrated fellows: Benjamin Franklin. In 1722 (under the pseudonym 'Silence Dogood'), Franklin wrote that nothing was more important than free speech. 'Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom,' he explained, 'and no such Thing as publick Liberty, without Freedom of Speech; which is the Right of every Man [sic].'
And, as he might have added, had he been able to foresee the invention of social media: 'Yes, that includes Men who write mean Things on the Internet.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Lottie Woad fires final-round 68 to claim victory on her professional debut
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Get over it': some middle America Trump supporters remain unfazed over Epstein files tumult
It has united luminaries of the far right, from media personality Tucker Carlson to activist Laura Loomer, from tech billionaire Elon Musk to congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Typically unwavering in support of Donald Trump, all have criticised his administration's handling of files about the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But in towns and cities across the US, a more complicated and nuanced picture emerges, serving as a reminder that – like any other political constituency – Trump voters are not a monolith. Some of the US president's supporters are undoubtedly animated by the Epstein issue and urging Congress to push for greater transparency. 'It's the number one phone call that we get. By far,' Eric Burlison, a Republican congressman from Missouri, told CNN this week. 'It's probably 500 to one.' But others seem to be shrugging off the crisis as they have so many others that seemed to threaten Trump's political career. They remain fiercely loyal to a president they believe is delivering low inflation, strong border security and sweeping reversals of progressive policies. They are willing to take White House advice to 'trust in Trump'. That was the prevailing mood this week in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, a former steel town and Democratic stronghold that swung heavily for Trump in last November's election. 'Trump is right about everything, no matter what he does,' was the blunt take of Teddy, 55, wearing a Stars and Stripes hat and sitting on a bench in Central Park in downtown Johnstown. 'Epstein – he's dead, that's it, it's over.' Did he have no concern that Trump's name is reportedly listed in the Epstein files which have yet to be made public? 'That's a bunch of bullshit,' said Teddy, who didn't want to give his last name. 'The world should move on, get over it.' Curt, 51, another Trump supporter in Central Park, who was recently released from state prison, expressed similar views. The only people who were in a nervous state about Trump's relationship with Epstein were Democrats, he said. 'Epstein was a piece of shit and got what he deserved. As for Trump, they haven't come up with any evidence that he actually did anything,' he said. Pennsylvania was crucial in tipping Trump over the line of 270 electoral college votes needed to win the White House. Rural areas in the west of the state responded especially favourably to his promises to bring back manufacturing, reduce living costs and drive out immigrants. Trump won Cambria county, which includes Johnstown, by 68% to Joe Biden's 31%. At the local Walmart, Pam, who also asked not to give her last name, said she didn't believe that Trump's name was in the files. 'Trump has morals – it may not seem like he does, but deep down he does. He wanted to protect the United States when nobody else did.' As for media coverage of the story, she said: 'My uncle was in the Secret Service. He used to tell me that everything you see on TV is what they want you to believe, not what is actually happening.' Trump has been under growing pressure from political friends and foes alike to release more information about the justice department's investigation into Epstein, a disgraced financier who officials ruled died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. After Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, promised to disclose additional materials related to possible Epstein clients and the circumstances surrounding his death, the justice department reversed course this month and said there was no basis to continue investigating and no evidence of a client list. That sparked an outcry from some of Trump's base of supporters who have long believed the government was covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful. On Friday, Trump denied reports that he was told by Bondi in May that his own name appeared in the Epstein files. Yet interviews by the Guardian in multiple states found Republicans generally willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt – and suspicious that he is the victim of a double standard. Gavin Rollins, a lawyer from Orlando, Florida, acknowledged disappointment in the way the administration's initial communications raised expectations but praised Trump for doing a 'phenomenal job' overall. 'I think on the Epstein thing, I wish things had been handled a little bit differently,' he admitted. 'I think the rollout was less than smooth. I would say that it's important but I also believe in giving grace to people and he's gotten so many things right.' Jeff Davis, the Republican party chair in Greenville county, South Carolina, accused the media of using the Epstein controversy to falsely portray a divide in the Maga (Make America great again) movement. He said: 'I think the Epstein issue is obviously critical and important but I think what most people care about is that the Trump agenda – the Maga 'America first' agenda – is being promoted. I think [Epstein is] being used as a distraction.' Davis added: 'We can walk and chew gum at the same time. They need to pursue the Epstein thing to the nth degree but I think most people are interested in the results of the things that the Trump administration is doing, as opposed to analysing this issue from the old days.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Mary Smith, the party chair in Dickson county, Tennessee, said: 'If Donald Trump's name is linked to something, it's like a shark fest, whereas if it's somebody else's name attached, 'Oh, it's no big deal,' and it's swept under the rug. I get so tired of that whole focus on Trump.' Despite Democrats' efforts to keep attention focused on the Epstein saga, some are ready to move on. James Bennett, who runs a lumber company and is Republican party chair in Calhoun county, Alabama, said: 'As far as I'm concerned with Trump, it's about run its course. I know the Democrats are the ones out there trying to put gas on the fire, but you know, the fire's about out.' That may prove wishful thinking. Just 17% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of the Epstein case, a weaker rating than the president received on any other issue in a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll last week. Among Republicans, 35% approve and 29% disapprove, while the rest said they are unsure or did not answer the question. Whit Ayres, a Republican consultant and pollster, draws a distinction between Trump voters who identify as part of the Maga movement and those attracted by his pledges to bring down inflation, juice the economy, close the southern border and tackle 'woke' culture. 'For the Maga group, this is a very big deal,' Ayres said. 'Many of them bought into all the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein, whether it was the fact that he abused a bunch of kids and then covered it up or symptomatic of a widespread deep state conspiracy protecting elites and the privileged in general. 'For the other people who voted for Trump, it is disturbing but not as compelling as it is for the Maga crowd. They are more interested in whether he is going to be able to bring inflation down than they are in Epstein. That's not to say that Epstein is not a disturbing story for them, but it's more a matter of perspective.' Yet another survey published this week again challenged the conventional wisdom. An Economist/YouGov poll found that Republican voters who identify as 'Maga' were more likely to approve of how the president is dealing with the Epstein investigation (56%) than those who do not (38%). Overall among Republicans, 45% approve and 25% disapprove, with the remaining 30% unsure. One such Maga voter is Mike Boatman, 57, who has attended about a hundred Trump campaign rallies, including the one last year in Butler, Pennsylvania, where the then Republican nominee survived an assassination attempt. His faith remains unshaken. 'I'm backing President Trump,' said Boatman, an independent contractor from Evansville, Indiana. 'He knows more than what we know about the situation. There's more important concerns for me than the Epstein files. 'There's so much that President Trump needs to get done. He's got three and a half years to get it done. Don't get me wrong, I'm against paedophiles and whoever has done that with Epstein should be punished. But there's more important things.' Still, the story continues to dominate headlines and put heat on Republicans in the House of Representatives. They went on recess a day early to avoid holding a vote on releasing Epstein material. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, insisted the Epstein case is 'not a hoax' despite Trump using that very word. The president has been defiant, describing supporters hung up on the issue as 'weaklings' who were helping Democrats. 'I don't want their support anymore!' Trump said in a social media post. This week, he sought to distract his followers by making the baseless claim that Barack Obama and his officials fabricated intelligence reports to assert that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, accusing his predecessor of treason. Next he might try something even more extreme to change the narrative. Reed Galen, president of the Union, a pro-democracy coalition, said: 'My real fear is that he gets us into some sort of Wag the Dog thing where all of the distraction isn't working so he decides to throw up some gigantic bright, shiny object that gets us all in trouble.' But otherwise Galen is sceptical that the Epstein scandal will have far-reaching political implications. 'To me, the flip side of this is: what difference does it make? I shouldn't say that as a means of diminishing the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein or the pain of his victims. I'm looking at this from a purely electoral perspective. 'He's not going to leave office. The midterms are 15 months, 16 months away. Do I think this is fodder for the left and the media and even the true Magas who are like, 'What's happening?' Yeah. Do I think that ultimately, a year from now, we'll be talking about this? Hard to believe.'
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
AI robot 'drills into biggest concerns of our time', Oxford creator says
The creator of the first ultra-realistic robot artist has said that working with a robot has evoked "lots of questions about the relationship we have with ourselves".The artificial intelligence (AI) robot Ai-Da has been devised in Oxford by Aidan Meller, a specialist in modern and contemporary art, and built in the UK by Engineered has been specifically designed as a humanoid to be able to do art and has recently unveiled a portrait of King Charles Meller said Ai-Da and her artwork "drills into some of the biggest concerns and thoughts of our time". Ai-Da has cameras in her eyes, which she uses to take thanks to AI algorithms, she is able to interrogate the image which goes through to her arm to be converted into real-time coordinates - that enables her to hold a paintbrush to paint and draw."You can meet her, you can talk to her using her language model and she's then able to paint and draw you from sight," Mr Meller said."People have got very much 1950s robots in their head - the reality is that actually they're very engaging."It's not until you look a robot in the eye and they say your name that the reality of this new sci-fi world that we are now currently in really takes hold." Ai-Da has been asked to produce and showcase work at the United Nations' AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva, 2024, she did a triptych of Enigma code-breaking mathematician Alan Turing, which was sold for more than £1m at an year, she turned her focus onto King Charles III."With extraordinary strides that are taking place in technology and again, always questioning our relationship to the environment, we felt that King Charles was a really good subject," Mr Meller said that even though Ai-Da had not met the King, Buckingham Palace had authorized permission for the artwork to be asked how she chooses her subjects, Mr Meller said: "Uncannily, and rather nerve-wrackingly, we just ask her". "Ai-Da is connected to the internet [and] she's able to speak at length about different people because she has a great deal of data to hand. "It was through those conversations that the artwork is then able to be done."Ai-Da also painted a picture King Charles' mother, Queen Elizabeth II in 2023. Mr Meller said the biggest realisation from the six years working with Ai-Da was "not so much about how human she is but actually how robotic we are"."Working with a robot is throwing up lots of questions about the relationship we have actually with ourselves," he said."We hope that Ai-Da's artwork is able to be a provocation to have that discussion." You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
