Water pollution: Minister determined to chart path for delayed plan
Farmers accused the minister of being "out of touch" and criticised the consultation document as "flawed". The Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera) has since published an addendum to the consultation document, clarifying some issues and correcting some "inconsistencies". Water pollution from agricultural sources is the main contributor to blue-green algal blooms in Lough Neagh.
Muir said the NAP was vital given "the crisis declared at Lough Neagh" and called on "urgent and critical endeavour".The independent group, including farmers, environmental groups and agri-food industry representatives, will be led by an external facilitator and is to be set up after 24 July when the initial consultation ends.After considering the consultation responses and "any other potential solutions", the stakeholder group will be asked to bring forward "measures and actions, that are evidence based and workable at farm level within realistic timeframes, as well as meeting legislative requirements".He added that officials were "considering" the financial requirements of some measures in the draft document.That revised proposal and draft Economic Impact Assessment will then go to a further eight-week public consultation.The Mr Muir said he would "work with everyone", adding that "no final decisions have been taken".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Palestine Action's co-founder wins bid to challenge UK terror group ban
LONDON, July 30 (Reuters) - The co-founder of a pro-Palestinian campaign group on Wednesday won her bid to bring a legal challenge against the British government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Huda Ammori, who helped found Palestine Action in 2020, asked London's High Court to give the go-ahead for a full challenge to the group's proscription, which was made on the grounds it committed or participated in acts of terrorism. Earlier this month, the High Court refused Ammori's application to pause the ban and, following an unsuccessful last-ditch appeal, Palestine Action's proscription came into effect just after midnight on July 5. Proscription makes it a crime to be a member of the group, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Judge Martin Chamberlain granted permission for Ammori to bring a judicial review, saying her case that proscription amounted to a disproportionate interference with her and others' right to freedom of expression was "reasonably arguable".
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge allows Palestine Action to challenge Home Office over terrorism ban
Banned group Palestine Action will be able to challenge the Home Office over its proscription as a terrorist organisation, a judge has ruled. The co-founder of the pro-Palestinian action group, Huda Ammori, has sought to challenge the government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Home secretary Yvette Cooper decided to proscribe the group, effectively branding it a terrorist organisation, after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two military planes with red paint. She also cited the group's protest at a weapons equipment factory in Glasgow in 2022, which reportedly caused more than £1m worth of damage, and its targeting of Elbit Systems UK, a defence technology company. The ban came into force in early July making supporting Palestine Action a criminal offence, with membership or expressing support for the group punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Over 80 organisations are already proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000, including al-Qaeda and the Wagner group. Britain's proscription of Palestine Action was condemned as a 'disturbing misuse' of counter-terror laws by the United Nations human rights chief last week. Volker Turk urged the UK to lift the ban, which he said was 'disproportionate and unnecessary'. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring a High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the court that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' Sir James Eadie KC, for the Home Office, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the g overnment, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.'
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Palestine Action can challenge UK ban, court rules
Palestine Action has won a bid to bring a legal challenge after the government banned the group as a terror for the group's co-founder told the High Court that the proscription of Palestine Action had made the UK an international outlier and placed legitimate protesters at risk of being criminalised if they speak out over the war in group's co-founder Huda Ammori asked judges for permission to directly and swiftly challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's ban means that membership or support for Palestine Action is a crime under terrorism legislation that can lead to up to 14 years in jail. Court documents, disclosed to the BBC, reveal how officials and ministers deliberated for at least eight months over whether to ban Palestine Action under terrorism UK's terrorism laws focus on banning groups that use serious violence to further a cause. But the definition also allows ministers to outlaw organisations that cause serious criminal damage. Palestine Action is the first group to be proscribed under that part of the the group's launch in July 2020, Palestine Action Group (PAG) has carried out more than 385 direct actions against firms it links to Israel's military, leading to more than 676 last month's ban, police have made at least 200 more arrests of people suspected of taking part in protests in support of the cross-government debate over a ban began in earnest last November after an assessment of the damage that PAG members had been accused of causing during a break-in at Elbit Systems, an Israeli defence firm, in Bristol the previous August. Eighteen people have been charged in relation to that incident, which includes allegations of assaults on a security guard and two police individuals have all denied wrongdoing and trials start later this papers in the legal challenge, brought by Huda Ammori, Palestine Action's co-founder, reveal police chiefs told the Home Office the network's activity was "unaffected" by ordinary criminal investigations."Operationally, existing legislation is seen as insufficient to address high-level offences, which meet the definition of terrorism," officials wrote in March."There is currently no existing legislation to deal with [PAG] holistically, meaning the network can only be dealt with on a case-by-case basis in response to isolated incidents of direct action."From the perspective of regional police forces, it is argued that this fractured case-by-case approach has proven operationally ineffective, considerably limiting preventative and disruptive opportunities."The police argued banning PAG would help prevent crime - but they also warned that it could look like "state repression" and the use of "draconian counter-terrorism legislation". That fear was partly echoed by the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in the advice it sent to Home Office there said a ban would be read by some international partners as a stand against antisemitism, but added: "Acting in this way may be interpreted as an overreaction by the UK."Palestine Action's activity is largely viewed by international partners as activism and not extremism or terrorism."They advised that Palestinians themselves and Arab states could regard banning PAG as an attempt to shut down activism - and a Home Office analysis of potential tensions in the UK also highlighted risks."Proscribing PA would almost certainly be perceived as evidence of bias against the British Muslim community in favour of British Jews and Israel more broadly," wrote officials in one of the documents disclosed in the case."[Proscripton] is likely to generate significant discontent and could introduce new social cohesion challenges."By the end of March, papers show that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was considering banning the group - but had raised a series of papers indicate she consulted other ministers during May - and finally decided to ban the group after the 20 June break-in to RAF Brize Norton, which the Ministry of Defence estimates caused £7m of damage to two jets.
