Google adds AI features to Chromebook Plus devices
Google's adding a slew of AI features to its productivity-focused Chromebook Plus line of devices, including a screen selection tool for search and text capture, a tool that explains complex text, and NotebookLM.
The new screen selection tool works similarly to Google Lens and the 'Circle to search' feature in Chrome on smartphones: long-press the launcher button or use the screenshot tool to select what is on your screen, and Google will instantly search for it. The tool also lets you select text and quickly add an event to the calendar.
Image Credit: Google
Last year, Google added a new 'Quick Insert' key to some Chromebook Plus models that let you trigger shortcuts. Users can now access Google's AI image generation features with this key, as well as AI-powered writing tools.
Meanwhile, the new 'Simplify' feature lets you use AI to explain, simplify or summarize any text you have selected.
Google's also giving all new Chromebook Plus users one year's subscription to the Google AI Pro plan, which includes access to the Gemini app; video editing tool Flow; image-to-video creation tool Whisk; Gemini in Gmail, docs and Chrome; and 2TB of storage. The AI Pro plan otherwise costs $240 per year.
Alongside these features, Google is launching two exclusive AI features for Lenovo's new Chromebook Plus 14: One uses AI to recommend tab and document organization, while the second lets users edit images using the Gallery app to remove backgrounds or make stickers.
Lenovo's new Chromebook comes with an OLED touch screen, and runs on an ARM-based MediaTek Kompanio Ultra chip. It comes in 12GB and 16GB RAM variants, costing $649 and $749, respectively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
Delete Every App That's On This List—‘Risks Are Too Great'
You should never use these apps on your phone. Republished on June 28 with new national security warnings over use of these apps. Tens of millions of Android and iPhone users are being warned they have installed free apps that leave them at serious risk. Those users could now be sending their sensitive data to companies under the control of the Chinese government. Earlier this week, I reported on the list of iPhone and Android apps issued by the Tech Transparency Project (TTP). These are all VPNs — virtual private networks. Apps which are meant to make users safer and more secure but are doing the very opposite. 'Millions of Americans have downloaded apps that secretly route their internet traffic through Chinese companies,' TTP says. It last reported on this threat in April, and now says 'Apple and Google app stores continue to offer private browsing apps that are surreptitiously owned by Chinese companies… six weeks after they were identified.' A raft of warnings now have followed that report, urging users to delete the apps. 'The risks are too great' to keep them on your phone, warns Top10VPNs Simon Migliano. 'In light of these findings, I strongly urge users to avoid Chinese-owned VPNs altogether." For its part, Google says it is "committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws. When we locate accounts that may violate these laws, our related policies or Terms of Service, we take appropriate action.' While Apple makes similar assurances, and says it enforces App Store rules but does not differentiate its handling of apps by the location of their developers. It does say where VPNs are concerned that data sharing with third parties is prohibited. vpnMentor's Lisa Taylor says this is 'no surprise,' that "China usually uses different methods to gain other countries' citizen's personal information, most of which are often covered behind a legal front.' And that 'free VPNs are perfect cover up to these kind of operations,' often recording user activity even when they say they don't. BeyondTrust's James Maude agrees. 'If you aren't paying for a product, you are the product. These VPN services are a perfect example of the hidden costs of free apps where users seeking more privacy online are potentially unknowingly feeding data to a foreign nation state out of fear their local coffee shop Wi-Fi is spying on them.' While Black Duck's Vijay Dilwale calls TTP's report 'a sobering wake-up call that VPNs, which claim to protect privacy, can pose very serious security risks, especially when their true ownership is hidden. These apps have access to all user traffic, and when handled by Chinese-based entities, the implications are well beyond individual privacy.' TTP reports that all of the VPNs it has identified "are listed as free in the app stores. But during TTP's May spot check, researchers observed that some of the VPNs offered in-app purchases on top of whatever users get with the 'free' app.' This lack of transparency, Taylor told me, 'is one of the main reasons why we do not recommend free VPNs and we are concerned that with all the content restrictions throughout the world, people are flocking to free VPNs.' Migliano says "true internet freedom and privacy depend on transparency and trust. Yet despite being made aware of glaring privacy failures and opaque corporate structures, Google and Apple continue to permit these high-risk apps on their platforms.' There are also some more serious national security concerns that have been raised. The nature of these apps on devices with obscure geographical locations and ownership is a major issue when it comes to those handling sensitive data or making their locations. Cequence Security's Randolph Barr warns 'there's no question Apple and Google can and should do more to mitigate the national security and privacy risks posed by VPN apps with undisclosed foreign ownership, particularly those tied to hostile nation-states.' Which raises a question around an added layer of app store security. 'While they have frameworks in place for data protection and transparency,' Barr told me, 'enforcement is often inconsistent or delayed, especially when developers obscure their true ownership through complex corporate structures. Conducting deeper vetting requires significant legal, technical, and geopolitical effort, something these platforms have been slow to scale.' This leaves a vacuum others may need to fill. Barr suggests the following mitigating actions, and says if they can't be handled at app store level, they must be done by organizations needing to control such risks: Deepwatch's Chad Cragle has issued the same warning. 'When owned by Chinese companies and hidden behind layers of shell companies, it becomes a serious concern. Apple advocates for protecting our privacy, yet these apps are still accessible. Google?' Cragle says 'they often allow nearly any app on their store. It's time for the platforms to take responsibility and set the example. You can't claim to prioritize privacy if you're letting other parties control the playbook. If they don't properly scrutinize these apps, they're not just passively allowing it—they're helping to create the problem. And let's be honest, this isn't just about privacy; it's about national security, too.' Here is the list of apps from TTP's report: Apple App Store: Google Play Store: The Android app vpnify is also in TTP's report, but has now relocated outside China and has contacted TTP to update its information and to be removed from the report.
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Google Confirms Upgrade Choice For 2 Billion Android Users
Decide carefully as new upgrade confirmed. Republished on June 28 withy new warnings despite Google's reassurances. Google's 2 billion Gmail users face a critical decision, as the company upgrades the world's leading email platform to make more use of AI. This means Google's cloud-based AI accessing all your content — however personal and sensitive. I've warned before that Gmail users need to understand the risks before using all these new default updates. It's no accident or surprise that Gmail's AI upgrades conflict with its quasi end-to-end encryption upgrade. One is secure, the other is not. The issue with smart AI search and smart AI replies has been privacy — pure and simple. This week, all Android users have been hit with similar warnings, as a poorly written email from Google seemed to suggest AI would access sensitive apps — including Messages and WhatsApp — even if Gemini Activity is disabled. 'Gemini will soon be able to help you use Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, and Utilities on your phone, whether your Gemini Apps Activity is on or off,' the email told users. As Gizmodo reported: 'Google to Gemini users: We're going to look at your texts whether you like it or not.' And understandably, everyone read that email the same way. Google has now told me this is misleading — the update 'is good for users.' Android phones will 'use Gemini to complete daily tasks on their mobile devices like send messages, initiate phone calls, and set timers while Gemini Apps Activity is turned off.' What that actually means is that turning off Gemini Activity doesn't stop it working on phones, which would have happened before. But 'with Gemini Apps Activity turned off, Gemini chats are not being reviewed or used to improve our AI models.' Before, if you wanted to use Gemini with messaging apps, you'd need to keep Gemini Activity on which would mean those interactions being saved. That's a privacy nightmare and it's what Google has in effect fixed. This choice is good news. This welcome clarity reflects user concerns. But that's what is still missing in the Gmail AI debate, which has been more a take it or leave it offer. I would like to see the same transparent and easy privacy choice for Gmail as well, before this goes much further. One note of caution. Any use of Gemini on Android does still save interactions for 72-hours within your account, even if Activity is turned off. Keep that in mind. And the privacy warnings have not gone away. Per Android Headlines, 'Google's Gemini AI will soon be able to access apps like Phone and Messages, even if 'Gemini Apps Activity' is off, starting July 7, 2025. While Google clarifies that turning off activity still prevents data from being used for AI training, the change sparks user privacy concerns, balancing convenience with trust in Google's data handling.' This new report warns that 'deeper integration inevitably brings legitimate concerns to the forefront for many users. The prospect of an AI having access, even if temporary, to highly personal data within call logs, private messages, and WhatsApp chats immediately raises red flags regarding individual privacy and overall data security.' This was always going to happen — it was clear from the early days of Gemini's integration into email and messages and other apps, just as it's clear with the new news that WhatsApp is to do the same with its own users' messages. As Futurism puts it, 'WhatsApp is now offering AI summaries of text threads for those too lazy to read through their messages themselves… Because what says 'I care' like breezing through an AI-generated summary of the family group chat?" A balance needs to be struck, and the risk is that users do not know enough yet about the complex web of privacy polices to make those decisions.
CNBC
34 minutes ago
- CNBC
At 20 years old, Reddit is defending its data and fighting AI with AI
For 20 years, Reddit has pitched itself as "the front page of the internet." AI threatens to change that. As social media has changed over the past two decades with the shift to mobile and the more recent focus on short-form video, peers like MySpace, Digg and Flickr have faded into oblivion. Reddit, meanwhile, has refused to die, chugging along and gaining an audience of over 108 million daily users who congregate in more than 100,000 subreddit communities. There, Reddit users keep it old school and leave simple text comments to one another about their favorite hobbies, pastimes and interests. Those user-generated text comments are a treasure trove that, in the age of artificial intelligence, Reddit is fighting to defend. The emergence of AI chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude and Google's Gemini threaten to inhale vast swaths of data from services like Reddit. As more people turn to chatbots for information they previously went to websites for, Reddit faces a gargantuan challenge gaining new users, particularly if Google's search floodgates dry up. CEO Steve Huffman explained Reddit's situation to analysts in May, saying that challenges like the one AI poses can also create opportunities. While the "search ecosystem is under heavy construction," Huffman said he's betting that the voices of Reddit's users will help it stand out amid the "annotated sterile answers from AI." Huffman doubled down on that notion last week, saying on a podcast that the reality is AI is still in its infancy. "There will always be a need, a desire for people to talk to people about stuff," Huffman said. "That is where we are going to be focused." Huffman may be correct about Reddit's loyal user base, but in the age of AI, many users simply "go the easiest possible way," said Ann Smarty, a marketing and reputation management consultant who helps brands monitor consumer perception on Reddit. And there may be no simpler way of finding answers on the internet than simply asking ChatGPT a question, Smarty said. "People do not want to click," she said. "They just want those quick answers." In a sign that the company believes so deeply in the value of its data, Reddit sued Anthropic earlier this month, alleging that the AI startup "engaged in unlawful and unfair business acts" by scraping subreddits for information to improve its large language models. While book authors have taken companies like Meta and Anthropic to court alleging that their AI models break copyright law and have suffered recent losses, Reddit is basing its lawsuit on the argument of unfair business practices. Reddit's case appears to center on Anthropic's "commercial exploitation of the data which they don't own," said Randy McCarthy, head of the IP law group at Hall Estill. Reddit is defending its platform of user-generated content, said Jason Bloom, IP litigation chair at the law firm Haynes Boone. The social media company's repository of "detailed and informative discussions" are particularly useful for "training an AI bot or an AI platform," Bloom said. As many AI researchers have noted, Reddit's large volume of moderated conversations can help make AI chatbots produce more natural-sounding responses to questions covering countless topics than say a university textbook. Although Reddit has AI-related data-licensing agreements with OpenAI and Google, the company alleged in its lawsuit that Anthropic has been covertly siphoning its data without obtaining permission. Reddit alleges that Anthropic's data-hoovering actions are "interfering with Reddit's contractual relationships with Reddit's users," the legal filing said. This lack of clarity regarding what is permitted when it comes to the use of data scraping for AI is what Reddit's case and other similar lawsuits are all about, legal and AI experts said. "Commercial use requires commercial terms," Huffman said on The Best One Yet podcast. "When you use something — content or data or some resource — in business, you pay for it." Anthropic disagrees "with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously," a company spokesperson told CNBC. Reddit's decision to sue over claims of unfair business practices instead of copyright infringement underscores the differences between traditional publishers and platforms like Reddit that host user-generated content, McCarthy said. Bloom said that Reddit could have a valid case against Anthropic because social media platforms have many different revenue streams. One such revenue stream is selling access to their data, Bloom said. That "enables them to sell and license that data for legitimate uses while still protecting their consumers privacy and whatnot," Bloom said. Reddit isn't just fending off AI. It launched its own Reddit Answers AI service in December, using technology from OpenAI and Google. Unlike general-purpose chatbots that summarize others' web pages, the Reddit Answers chatbot generates responses based purely on the social media service, and it redirects people to the source conversations so they can see the specific user comments. A Reddit spokesperson said that over 1 million people are using Reddit Answers each week. Huffman has been pitching Reddit Answers as a best-of-both worlds tool, gluing together the simplicity of AI chatbots with Reddit's corpus of commentary. He used the feature after seeing electronic music group Justice play recently in San Francisco. "I was like, how long is this set? And Reddit could tell me it's 90 minutes 'cause somebody had already asked that question on Reddit," Huffman said on the podcast. Though investors are concerned about AI negatively impacting Reddit's user growth, Seaport Senior Internet Analyst Aaron Kessler said he agrees with Huffman's sentiment that the site's original content gives it staying power. People who visit Reddit often search for information about things or places they may be interested in, like tennis rackets or ski resorts, Kessler said. This user data indicates "commercial intent," which means advertisers are increasingly considering Reddit as a place to run online ads, he said. "You can tell by which page you're on within Reddit what the consumer is interested in," Kessler said. "You could probably even argue there's stronger signals on Reddit versus a Facebook or Instagram, where people may just be browsing videos."
