logo
Crowds turn out in force to celebrate Milford Haven's 235th birthday

Crowds turn out in force to celebrate Milford Haven's 235th birthday

CAMPAIGNERS warned it will be 'impossible' to hold the Welsh Government to account on progress against its disabled people's rights plan due to a lack of concrete targets.
Mark Isherwood, who chairs the Senedd's cross-party group on disability, raised concerns that many of the long-term objectives in the draft ten-year plan lack firm commitments.
He said Natasha Hirst, who was part of ministers' disability rights taskforce, pointed to a lack of funding to implement the plan as well as a scarcity of clear, robust targets.
Mr Isherwood also quoted Joe Powell, chief executive of All Wales People First, who said: 'For this plan to succeed we need the appropriate investment into the infrastructure and services to make this aspiration a reality.
'We need clear targets about how we are going to achieve this. Without these, it is very difficult to see how the plan will make a difference to disabled people in Wales.'
The Conservative told the Senedd: 'Damian Bridgeman, who chaired the disability rights taskforce's housing and community working group, said the draft document was a smokescreen rather than a plan.
'He pointed to the absence of new money and a mechanism to track delivery of the action plan further, adding that, 'disabled people have been reviewed to death, what we need is action – and there's none of that here'.'
He said Mr Bridgeman described the plan as a 'collection of vague intentions dressed up as progress', with 'no targets, no teeth and no real-world accountability'.
Mr Isherwood, who has campaigned on disability rights for decades, warned the plan lacks a commitment to enshrine the UN convention on the rights of disabled people into Welsh law.
The north Walian also warned the UK Government's plans to cut benefits risk further disabling people in Wales by compounding poverty and exclusion.
During a statement on June 3, Jane Hutt described the plan as a landmark moment in the Welsh Government's commitment to ensuring an inclusive and accessible society for all.
Wales' social justice secretary said: 'This plan is a ten-year blueprint for progress, designed to ensure its outcomes are realised through actions taken across government.'
Ms Hutt cautioned that UK Government welfare reforms risk overlooking the circumstances and needs of disabled people, and more so in Wales than some other parts of the UK.
Jane Hutt, secretary for social justice, trefnydd and chief whip
She said the plan seeks to position Wales as a world leader in the social model of disability, which says people are disabled by barriers in society – not by their impairment or condition.
Ms Hutt urged organisations and disabled people to have their say by responding to a consultation on the draft plan, which runs until August 7.
Sioned Williams warned the plan has been a 'long time coming', with the taskforce set up after a 2021 report, entitled Locked out, into the impact of the pandemic on disabled people.
Ms Williams told the Senedd: 'We must never forget that disabled people comprised 60% of deaths from Covid-19 in Wales, and many of those deaths were preventable and rooted in socioeconomic inequality.'
Plaid Cymru's shadow social justice minister, Sioned Williams
The Plaid Cymru politician stressed the importance of legally enforceable rights – 'rights that can literally be the difference between life and death'.
Ms Williams warned planned welfare cuts cast a long, dark shadow over the plan, saying: 'The removal of this vital support doesn't simply reduce income, it rips away the safety net that many disabled people rely on to live with dignity.'
She called for assurances that disabled and neurodivergent people will no longer be detained in secure hospitals in Wales, as highlighted by the Stolen Lives campaign.
Jenny Rathbone supported efforts to embed the social model of disability because 'it is society that needs to change, not the individual who happens to have an impairment'.
But she recognised that a huge amount of work still needs to be done.
Julie Morgan, a fellow Labour backbencher, said the plan clearly shows the Welsh Government's commitment to making Wales an open, inclusive and accessible place.
But Conservative Laura Anne Jones warned the plan 'falls short in many critical areas', with disabled people still facing systemic barriers to work, transport and access to services.
South Wales East MS Laura Anne Jones
She said: 'With rising living costs and sweeping cuts to support services alongside welfare, this plan feels more like a statement of intent than a blueprint for real action.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Amess's widow claims ‘cover-up' over Prevent failures
David Amess's widow claims ‘cover-up' over Prevent failures

Telegraph

time4 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

David Amess's widow claims ‘cover-up' over Prevent failures

The widow of murdered MP Sir David Amess has accused the Government of a 'cover-up' following a review into the Prevent programme's handling of the case. In a letter to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, Lady Julia Amess described the review as an 'insult to Sir David's memory' and said that questions about the case can only be answered 'by way of a public inquiry'. The Amess family instructed lawyers to scrutinise Independent Prevent Commissioner Lord Anderson KC's report, with lawyers criticising how 'too much investigation ... has been conducted behind closed doors'. Hudgell Solicitors said 'too many doors have been closed when challenging questions have been raised' – highlighting that only one counter-terrorism case officer with first-hand experience of killer Ali Harbi Ali's Prevent referral was spoken to as part of the review. Ali was referred to Prevent seven years before the Islamic State fanatic stabbed the veteran MP at his constituency surgery in Essex in October 2021. He was sentenced to a whole-life order the following year. Lord Anderson's report said 'intensive' efforts have been made to improve processes within Prevent, but the 'jury is out' on some of the changes. It also said Ali was described as a ' great person ' by a counter-terrorism case officer shortly before his case was dropped by Prevent. Ms Cooper previously wrote to the Amess family, in which she said she realised the 'seriousness' of the failings in Sir David's case and that she hoped the family found Lord Anderson's report to be 'thorough and considered'. But in her letter to Ms Cooper, Lady Amess said: 'I have to say that, once again, my family has been disrespected and insulted by the Government. 'Your letter implies that you have our best interests at heart – which could not be further from the truth.' 'Whole sorry saga is a cover-up' Lady Amess continued: 'As you and the Prime Minister requested, we met with Lord Anderson during the review process. From my point of view, it was a very pleasant meeting with a man who was given a job to do and would do it to the best of his ability. 'However, it was absolutely clear to me at the time that he would be unable to give the answers we are seeking. 'He did not have the authority to 'dig below the surface' and find out exactly what happened, who is responsible for the failings (it appears there are several unidentified people) and what will be done to somehow ease the pain and suffering we are still experiencing because the truth is not being told. 'One can only conclude that this whole sorry saga is a cover-up.' She added: 'We should have been taken under the wing of the Government, cared for sympathetically and shown a little compassion. Instead, we have been treated disgracefully. 'It is an insult to Sir David's memory and, as I said during our meeting, I will fight until my dying day for my husband, our children and their children.' 'Deeply unsatisfactory' Solicitor Neil Hudgell said answers to the Amess family's questions regarding Ali's referral to Prevent 'remain deeply unsatisfactory'. He said: 'Far too much investigation into Sir David's murder and the interactions between Prevent and Ali Harbi Ali has been conducted behind closed doors, and too many doors have been closed when challenging questions have been raised in search of accountability and transparency. 'Lord Anderson did not interview any other member of the Prevent panel, which dealt with the Ali case, other than the one counter-terrorism case officer, who only consented to being interviewed on strict conditions. 'Even the coroner declined to engage with Lord Anderson, citing judicial independence. 'Answers to important questions with regard to his referral, the lack of proper intervention, follow-up sessions and review remain deeply unsatisfactory.' He added: 'A statutory public inquiry is needed as only this forum can compel witnesses to appear and give evidence under oath, and be questioned as to what was known, and why decisions were made.'

Revealed: The councils pushing for a four-day week
Revealed: The councils pushing for a four-day week

Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Revealed: The councils pushing for a four-day week

Councils are increasingly pushing to let staff work a four-day week, analysis by The Telegraph has found. Five councils across the UK have publicly expressed interest in the overhaul, which would see council employees get full pay while working only 80 per cent of their usual hours. South Cambridgeshire became the first council to permanently adopt a four-day week last week, including for bin collectors, council tax administrators and social housing officials. Glasgow, Edinburgh, Belfast and Fermanagh and Omagh have also taken steps to explore the idea, such as launching feasibility studies or passing motions to investigate. All five councils have taken steps towards a four-day week while increasing council taxes, with hikes of between three per cent and eight per cent forced on locals last year. It is understood around 25 councils are also privately talking to the Four Day Week Foundation, the campaign pushing for the change. Elliot Keck, the head of campaigns at the TaxPayers' Alliance, a group that scrutinises government waste, said: 'Millions of local taxpayers still face the looming threat of a part-time council if these radical experiments are allowed to begin. ' Angela Rayner [the Communities Secretary] should immediately link central government funding to whether these trials go ahead. 'This would simply involve calculating the budgets of staffing bills at local authorities where the trials are taking place and reducing grants by an amount equal to one fifth of that budget.' Supporters of the four-day week claim it can deliver more efficient working and attract better candidates for jobs. Paul Holmes, the Conservative shadow housing minister, said: 'The residents are being short-changed by these councils. 'Despite paying for full levels of council tax – yet another tax that is rising under this Labour Government – residents are now getting part-time representation, with the councils seemingly more concerned with pursuing these mad ideologies than delivering the services local people need. 'The Conservatives have never tolerated this nonsense and will keep fighting to give the public the representation they deserve.' Nothing to stop councils When the Tories were in office, they attempted to order councils not to pursue four-day weeks in guidance the party issued in October 2023. One line in the guidance read: 'Councils which are undertaking four-day working week activities should cease immediately and others should not seek to pursue in any format.' But it is for councils, not the central Government, to decide whether to adopt the approach, meaning there is nothing strictly stopping local government leaders from making the change. South Cambridgeshire district council voted last week to become the first council in the UK to permanently adopt a four-day week for its staff. It described the new approach as staff carrying out '100 per cent of their work in around 80 per cent of their contracted hours without reduction in pay '. The vote made permanent a trial that has been running since 2023. Currently, 735 of the council employees are now on a four-day week, according to a council source. Four staff members have opted out of the change. South Cambridgeshire district council is run by the Liberal Democrats. An independent analysis cited by the council found that 21 out of 24 of its services improved or stayed the same during the trial period. However, a survey of residents looking at 13 services found that nine became worse under the scheme, four stayed the same and none improved during the trial. Council tax increases At least four other councils have taken steps to investigate a four-day week. The City of Edinburgh council passed a motion to explore the approach. Glasgow city council carried out a feasibility study, though no decision has been taken on its results. Belfast city council is considering launching a trial of the four-day week. Fermanagh and Omagh district council is talking to South Cambridgeshire to better understand the idea. All five councils, which run local services for a combined population of 1.8 million, increased council taxes – or the Northern Ireland equivalent – this year. The increases were 2.99 per cent (South Cambridgeshire), 3.76 per cent (Fermanagh and Omagh), 5.99 per cent (Belfast), 7.5 per cent (Glasgow), and eight per cent (Edinburgh). All five councils are also not currently run by the Tories or Reform UK, who have both been critics of the four-day working week. Edinburgh has a Labour council leader, Glasgow has an SNP minority administration, Belfast has no party in overall control, while the Fermanagh and Omagh district is run by Sinn Féin. Joe Ryle, the campaign director of the Four Day Week Foundation, said: 'As hundreds of British companies in the private sector have already shown, a four-day week with no loss of pay can be a win-win for both businesses and workers. 'The extremely positive results from the first council trial should be the catalyst for more councils across the country to modernise and transform their ways of working by adopting a four-day week. 'The five-day working week was invented 100 years ago and no longer suits the realities of modern life. We are long overdue an update.'

Porn block backfires? VPN searches in Wales surge by nearly 600%
Porn block backfires? VPN searches in Wales surge by nearly 600%

Pembrokeshire Herald

time36 minutes ago

  • Pembrokeshire Herald

Porn block backfires? VPN searches in Wales surge by nearly 600%

New UK law to age-restrict adult sites may be pushing young people to bypass it, critics warn SEARCHES for VPNs in Wales have skyrocketed following the introduction of new UK legislation requiring age verification on pornographic websites. The controversial rules, which came into force on Friday (July 19), aim to prevent under-18s from accessing online adult content by forcing users to prove their age before viewing pornographic material. But rather than reducing access, the policy appears to have triggered a surge in people seeking ways to get around it—particularly in Wales. According to new data from sexual health platform Talking Kinky, VPN (Virtual Private Network) searches increased by a staggering 589% in Wales, the highest of any UK nation. Northern Ireland recorded a 331% increase, Scotland 160%, and England the lowest at 99%. VPNs allow users to hide their true location and appear as though they are browsing from abroad, effectively bypassing UK restrictions. The Herald understands that search traffic for VPNs peaked at around 2:00am on the morning the law took effect—suggesting many users were already actively seeking a workaround. Concerns over effectiveness The law, which forms part of the Online Safety Act, has been widely criticised by digital rights groups and internet freedom campaigners, who warn it could be easily circumvented and may push users—particularly young people—towards more dangerous or unregulated sites. A previous attempt to implement age verification laws in 2019 was abandoned after widespread concern over privacy, enforcement, and the potential for data breaches. Critics say the resurgence of this policy under the current government may again backfire. Sex educators: Focus on honest conversations, not just bans Tom and Isabelle, co-founders of Talking Kinky, say the figures highlight a deeper issue: poor sex education and a lack of open communication with young people. 'Current sex education often leaves out crucial elements, like pleasure and emotional connections,' Isabelle said. 'It's like giving teenagers a cookbook with no recipes.' Tom added: 'Abstinence-only messages aren't effective. Young people will still explore sexuality. But without comprehensive education, they're less equipped to do so safely and confidently.' The pair are calling on parents to fill in the gaps, with open, honest discussions—not just scare tactics or blanket bans. 'When parents talk openly about pleasure, teens are less likely to turn to unreliable sources to answer crucial questions,' said Isabelle. 'Sex education must highlight joy, exploration, and connection—not just risk avoidance.' Welsh digital habits under the spotlight The unusually high spike in VPN searches in Wales may be a reflection of broader digital behaviour or simply a strong interest in personal online freedom. But the data also raises questions for Welsh schools and health boards: Is enough being done to provide age-appropriate, inclusive, and informative sex education? And are government-led bans really the best way to protect young people from harm? The debate is far from over.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store