Some tenants are evicted to make way for renovations. Here's how L.A. plans to curb that
On July 1, the City Council unanimously voted to amend a rule that granted landlords the ability to evict tenants in order to take on a substantial remodel or renovation of their property.
Under the current 'just cause' ordinance, a substantial remodel that would allow a landlord to evict tenants included structural, mechanical or plumbing work.
The approved amendment will prevent landlords from using a substantial remodel as a legal reason to evict their tenants, unless they get a Government Agency Order.
A Government Agency Order happens when a local government agency, including the Los Angeles Housing Department, Los Angeles Building and Safety, the Los Angeles County Health Department or the Los Angeles Fire Department, gives a landlord an order to vacate or abate a unit based on the need to address housing code violations.
Tenant rights groups say some landlords will use a renovation as an excuse to evict tenants, only to charge higher rents to a whole new set of tenants after the renovation. This is called a 'renoviction.'
'To make it clear, what we're doing today is we're denying renovictions, but we're also creating a clear pathway to renovations that works for both tenants and the landlords,' said Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, an advocate of the proposed policy whose district includes Canoga Park, Reseda, Tarzana and Woodland Hills.
The decision comes four months after the council voted in favor of an interim ordinance with the same goal: preventing landlords from using 'just cause' to evict tenants when implementing a remodel.
The temporary protection lasts only until Aug. 1 because the city has been exploring permanent legislation for several months.
In addition to the amendment, the city has instructed the Los Angeles Housing Department and the city attorney to create rules for relocation during the remodel and amend penalties for violators of the proposed ordinance.
'We want to have a clear pathway for legitimate renovations not renovictions,' Blumenfield said.
In 90 days, the Los Angeles Housing Department will bring forth a proposal to the City Council to consider which will include what is required of a landlord if a tenant must be relocated during a remodel.
The proposal will provide rules for:
The proposal will also include an updated penalty for violators of three times compensatory damages including mental or emotional distress, reasonable attorney's fees and civil penalties of up to $10,000 but not less then $2,000 per violation, according to the city's report. Additional penalties could be added per violation if a tenant is older than 65 or is disabled.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chesapeake's water, sewer rates will see 5% bump in January
CHESAPEAKE — Water and sewer customers in Chesapeake can expect the rates they pay to go up by nearly 5% beginning in January — a move city leaders believe will help keep up with routine maintenance and improvement projects. Chesapeake City Council on Tuesday approved an additional 2% bump to the rates charged for water and sewer services, adding on to the 2.9% already approved for the current budget. That means customers will see a 4.9% bump in their rates in January, and they can expect a similar hike in future years. Chesapeake Public Utilities Director David Jurgens told The Virginian-Pilot that an average single family using 5,000 gallons of water can expect their bimonthly bill to be about $281 starting in January. That includes all charges on the bill: 60 days of water and sewer usage as well as increases implemented by the Hampton Roads Sanitation District. That's also up from the average monthly bill of $264. Council members were briefed earlier this year on a rate sufficiency utilities analysis that suggested increases to maintain reserve balances and debt service coverage through fiscal 2035 due to increased construction costs and deferred capital needs for a host of utility-related projects. Super Girl action sports festival expanding to Virginia Beach in 2026 Chesapeake leaders to consider more water, sewer rate increases New Camp Morrison plan could turn Newport News WWI-era industrial park into housing 'Make a better life': Fort Monroe naturalization ceremony welcomes nearly 100 new citizens Norfolk housing authority chooses a developer for Calvert Square and Young Terrace The utility fund faces an estimated $61 million in annual capital needs, with debt financing making up two-thirds of costs. The analysis suggested at the current rates, the reserve fund balance would be completely drained by fiscal 2035, and debt service coverage would fall below target by fiscal 2029 and in default territory by fiscal 2035. Council's vote Tuesday, which was only opposed by council member Ella Ward, also established a multiyear plan to increase rates by 4.9% through fiscal 2032, which puts Chesapeake in line with Portsmouth's established 5% annual rate increases. City staff have said routine maintenance costs have 'far outpaced' the rate increases implemented, creating a backlog of critical maintenance and capital projects. Without the increase, the city runs the risk of critical failures in an aging water and sewer system. Ward wanted to allow more time for the public to digest and weigh in on the proposal, but council moved forward with the vote after a handful of people spoke in opposition at Tuesday's meeting. A previous presentation to council members showed that the 4.9% annual increase will generate $73.6 million for the multiyear capital improvement plan, allowing the city to address several improvements and upgrades to existing infrastructure and for projects to replace a water main at Bainbridge Creek Crossing and a sewer main on Freeman Avenue. Natalie Anderson, 757-732-1133,
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Toronto's proposed rat attack plan faces 1st hurdle
A Toronto municipal committee is set to look over a newly-proposed rat control plan on Wednesday. Last month, city manager Paul Johnson unveiled his response to the city's growing rat problem — laying out a plan that pushes disparate city departments to work together and focuses on eliminating food and shelter for the rodents, rather than on exterminating them. "Efforts to 'eliminate' rats often result in reactive, short term fixes that miss the root causes. High-quality municipal service delivery is more impactful," says the plan. which came about after councillors requested it last year amid rising complaints from residents. "We're building more and construction shakes the ground, rats are released into neighbourhoods, and we need to figure out how to get ahead of it," said Davenport Coun. Alejandra Bravo at the time. If the economic and community development committee gives the green light, Johnson's plan will next go to city council for a final decision, before possibly being implemented next year. Rats on the rise Toronto residents and business have always had to do battle with rat infestations — with some sharing unpleasant photo evidence along the way — but there are clear signs the problem has been growing in recent years. In 2019, there were 940 property standards-related rodent service requests to the city. After a brief dip during the pandemic, those numbers had surged to 1,600 by 2023. A study early this year also tracked a growing rat population in Toronto and 10 other cities around the world, with the authors linking the population boom to climate change and calling for a "dedicated response team" in the besieged municipalities. A key part of the city's new rat response plan is the creation of a team that coordinates between the many city divisions that deal with rats — from parks and construction to municipal licensing and standards. Johnson says that will come at an initial cost of $351,000, in order to hire two new people. He's also asking council to pony up $150,000 annually to pay for "public communication and staff training related to rat management." The city's plan would also involve advising both private developers and Metrolinx-led transit projects on how to stop rats from moving into neighbouring properties when they're displaced by construction. Looping Metrolinx into the city's approach is something Toronto—Danforth Coun. Paula Fletcher has been vocal about. She said she's been hearing complaints from her constituents about rats showing up in areas near the Ontario Line construction. The city's proposed plan notes that it can't add rat-related conditions to either Metrolinx applications or private building permit applications, but says proactive advising "is an effective way to prevent infestations."
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Norfolk School Board won't promise to meet City Council's school closure plan deadline
NORFOLK, Va. (WAVY) — The chair of Norfolk's School Board has indicated the body may not meet City Council's Aug. 1 deadline to submit a facility closure and consolidation action plan. Instead, Board chairwoman Sarah DiCalogero said she plans to try and set up a meeting with Mayor Kenny Alexander to inform him of where the board is in the process. Tuesday, the board received their first formal presentation of what their Educational and Facilities Planning Advisory Committee came up with to meet a goal of having newer and fewer schools. Student enrollment has been on a steady decline since 2015, dropping 21% between 2010 and 2025. Meanwhile, the city's aging buildings have more than $900 million in needs. A consultant hired to guide the process stated the plan would eliminate an estimated $211 million of the nearly $900 million in current school facility needs. Over the next eight years, the committee recommended 10 schools to close, five to be repurposed and three to be rebuilt. However, DiCalogero and other board members said they feel the process is moving too fast. Many not pleased with NPS preliminary list of possible school closures 'I'm not going to promise to meet the deadline,' DiCalogero said. 'I understand that we need to make decisions quickly, but we need to involve the community, and I feel like the Aug. 1 deadline is a little arbitrary, considering that today was the first day we've been officially presented with the plan.' It was in March when City Council passed a resolution officially requesting the school board deliver a plan close and consolidate 10 schools in five years. However, the request for downsizing dates back at least six years. In a 2018 survey by the School Board's consultant, it was said the school division has, since 2013, operated at three to 17 schools above its need based on population served, with more than half of the city's schools at less than 80% capacity. Two years ago during a joint-meeting between the City Council and the School Board, Vice Mayor Martin Thomas pleaded for a plan to close and consolidate facilities, saying 'over the last 10 years, that surplus capacity has cost the taxpayers of Norfolk $81 million.' City Council's resolutions threaten to provide consequences to the School Board for any delay, including changing the city's appropriation to Norfolk Public Schools from a lump-sum one to a directed appropriation to give council more control over school division appropriations 'in order to ameliorate the estimated loss of funds due to surplus capacity of school buildings.' DiCalogero is confident the City Council and School Board can work together. 'You know, one thing I'm going to ask the City Council to do is, where they told us to 'be bold,' and they would support us, to ask them to come out to some of these community meetings so they become aware of the issues in the communities, the concerns in the community as well, and realize that it's not just a quantitative, hard data decision,' DiCalogero said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
