Whitmer is trying to leverage her relationship with Trump again — this time on tariffs and Medicaid
Donald Trump
TariffsFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is trying to use her recent positive relationship with President Donald Trump to get some breaks for her state — on both tariffs and Medicaid changes.
Whitmer met with Trump at the White House on Tuesday, where she laid out the negative impacts that tariffs would have on Michigan's substantial auto industry. She also asked for a longer grace period before certain changes to Medicaid under Republicans' new mammoth domestic policy law would take effect.
'I've always said that I'll work with anyone to get things done for Michigan. That's why I've continued to go to Washington, D.C. to make sure that Michiganders are front and center when critical decisions are being made,' Whitmer said in a statement to CNN. 'I will always do whatever I can to make life a little easier for Michiganders and strengthen our economy. We should do everything in our power to lower costs and grow more good-paying jobs in Michigan.'
Whitmer has an uncommonly amicable relationship with Trump for a Democratic governor, and she's used it to lobby for Michigan before — including by successfully pushing for additional fighter jets for the state's Selfridge Air National Guard Base. But it's still uncomfortable optics for Whitmer, as her party frequently excoriates Trump. That dynamic was famously illustrated in April, when the president invited the press into the Oval Office for an impromptu press conference and she hid her face behind a folder.
Contrast that with another Midwest Democrat, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who has traded insults with Trump in recent days after Pritzker invited Democratic lawmakers to his state who are resisting Republican attempts to redraw Texas' congressional maps.
During the meeting Tuesday, Whitmer particularly pressed Trump on Canada and Mexico tariffs that affect the auto industry, according to a readout from Whitmer's office. In April, Trump imposed 25% tariffs on imported cars and auto parts. Canada responded with 25% tariffs on US-made cars outside current existing trade agreements under USMCA.
'Michigan's economy is tied to the auto industry, and tariffs have a disproportionate impact on this industry. She also discussed economic opportunity in Genesee, with the best advanced manufacturing site in the country, and encouraged the president to work with her and other Michiganders on using this site to grow American jobs,' Whitmer's office said.
Specifically on Medicaid, Whitmer asked for a three-year transition period before certain funding changes to the Insurance Provider Assessment take full effect. Whitmer is concerned about a provision in the big, beautiful bill that will limit certain states' ability to levy taxes on providers, which also bring in more federal matching funds. States use the money to help pay for their share of Medicaid expansion and increase provider rates, among other things.
The limitation, which starts to take effect in October 2027 and phases down over five years, is expected to blow a hole in the budgets of many states. That includes Michigan, where provider taxes have a statewide impact of about $2.7 billion, according to the governor's office. Whitmer also asked for 'tighter collaboration with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to establish a framework that ensures provider assessments meet current policy,' according to her office.
Whitmer also saw Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and chief of staff Susie Wiles during her visit to the White House, according to her office.
Whitmer touted her prior bipartisan efforts with Trump in her Tuesday statement, adding that she appreciated 'the president's time and attention to the matters we discussed.' Trump had insisted on inviting Whitmer when he visited Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Michigan to announce the new fighter jets, crediting her for pushing for the planes. Whitmer 'has done a very good job' Trump said at the time.
Whitmer, who ended up briefly speaking alongside the president during the visit, said she was 'really damn happy' to be on hand for the announcement.
Tami Luhby, Elisabeth Buchwald and Chris Isidore contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Michael Goodwin: Sen. Warren backing Mamdani is the latest example of Dems floundering — and their zany agenda
More than six months into Donald Trump's highly consequential second term, Democrats are still looking for their sputtering resistance movement to deliver some big victories. Instead, they've suffered repeated failures and are responding with an increasingly angry radicalism that has zero appeal to the hearts and minds of most voters. A recent Wall Street Journal poll found that a mere 33% of national respondents hold a favorable view of Dems, which the Journal called the party's lowest point in its polls over three decades. Advertisement It also found that a stunning 63% of voters hold an unfavorable view of the party. Those dismal results are the fruit of a run of bad candidates —think Kamala Harris and Tim Walz — and a scatter-shot strategy that consistently defies common sense and traditional American middle-class values. The impression is that party leaders and high-profile advocates are lurching from one temper tantrum about Trump to another, each delivered with the desperation of a Hail Mary pass. Advertisement They seem more concerned about the welfare of illegal immigrants, including gang-bangers, than about the physical safety and financial security of innocent, tax-paying Americans. Comes now the latest example of their zany agenda, this one courtesy of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. In a few brief remarks Monday, she managed to prove that the passing years have not dimmed her gift for poor judgment and terrible ideas. Major party headache Her new brainstorm threatens to become another major headache for her party. Advertisement Appearing in Gotham with socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, Warren declared that 'New York City is the place to start the conversation for Democrats on how affordability is the central issue, the central reason to be a Democrat, and that delivering on it in meaningful, tangible ways that will touch working families is why we're here.' It's a pretty strange thing to say given that it was almost exclusively Democratic mayors, governors and lawmakers that created the affordability crisis she now bemoans. She went on to claim that Mamdani, the 33–year-old nepo-baby radical who won the Dems' mayoral primary, should be the party's national face. 'Bring it on!' Republicans say, convinced that he would be a major drag for Dems in the 2026 elections. Advertisement The GOP would be delighted to run against a party that features a radical leftist who never held a real job in his life. It's worth noting that four years ago, then-Mayor-elect Eric Adams declared himself 'the new face of the Democratic Party.' The idea never gained much traction, with his tenure soon swamped by the tide of illegal border crossers waved in by Joe Biden, as hundreds of thousands made their way to New York for free housing, food and medical care. Adams never quite recovered, and that was even before he faced federal corruption charges brought under Biden that the Trump Justice Department dropped. Nonetheless, the turmoil and critical coverage were such a burden that Adams passed up his party's primary and is seeking re-election in November as an independent. Although he and the NYPD deserve great credit for driving shootings to historic lows, recent polls show the mayor's support is stuck in single digits and sometimes falls below the slice of voters who say they are undecided. NY Dems shun him As for Warren's idea about making Mamdani the national model for the party, she is so deep in fantasy land that she's even out of step with leading New York Dems. They are avoiding the far-leftist candidate like the plague, which is what he could be politically in areas that are more balanced than the People's Republic of New York, where there is just one registered Republican for every six registered Dems. Advertisement And so Gov. Hochul, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries all have declined to endorse Mamdani, which is an exceptional rebuke to him and his platform. Normally, they would reflexively back the winner of the party's mayoral primary, but they look ahead and see his major positions — defund the police, hike taxes, boycott Israel and support the anti-Jewish mobs disrupting cities and college campuses — as a toxic brew that even if it prevails in the city, won't fly around the rest of the state or across the nation. They see him as a major burden next year, when Hochul will be seeking re-election and Schumer and Jeffries will be trying to guide Dems to victory in their respective chambers. Of the group, Hochul has been the most outspoken and explicit in shunning him. Advertisement Mamdani's plan to tax high-income New Yorkers would require legislative approval and her signature, and the governor made it clear that's not going to happen. Days before the late June primary, Hochul threw cold water on the tax proposals he aims to use to fund his long list of free things, including buses and child care. 'I'm not raising taxes at a time where affordability is the big issue,' she said in a TV interview. 'I don't want to lose any more people to Palm Beach. We've lost enough . . . so let's be smart about this.' Advertisement Hochul's answer was surprising in that she's usually an automatic yes vote for new taxes, congestion pricing being a recent example. But her answer was also clever in that she adopted Mamdani's theme of an 'affordability crisis' and turned it on its head to use it as a reason not to support him. She's right in the sense that when it comes to affordability, New York governments' addiction to high spending and taxing already are major causes. Trickle-down pain City and state regulations also amount to a mountain of expensive red tape that discourage construction as well as business and job creation. Advertisement Her congestion tax is a good example of the trickle-down impact. The price of every loaf of bread, bottle of beer and bag of potato chips sold in Midtown now includes a portion of the added tax she slapped on delivery trucks. Meanwhile, the state's enormous budget reflects the way the government mafia grabs a piece of every action. Albany is now spending $254 billion this year, more than $100 billion more than it spent a decade ago. Florida has millions of more people than New York, but somehow manages to make do with spending $117 billion. That's almost identical to the city's budget alone, which is $116 billion this year, up from $75 billion over the last decade. These exploding expense budgets do not include the numerous 'off-the-books' entities such as the MTA, public colleges and universities, the Dormitory Authority and scores of other lesser-known units that spend multiple billions of dollars they collect from the public. Just remember: As bad as things are, they can always get worse. And if Mamdani is elected, everything definitely would get worse.
Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Korea Sees Favorable Treatment in New US Levies on Chips, Pharma
South Korea's finance minister said the country has secured a commitment from the US that it won't face less favorable treatment than any other nation if Washington pushes ahead with new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. 'The US made a commitment to give us top-tier treatment to sectors like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors,' Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol told lawmakers during a parliamentary committee hearing Wednesday. 'We're not completely satisfied, but it's still meaningful that Korea won't be at a disadvantage compared to other countries.'
CNN
2 minutes ago
- CNN
Judge blocks four districts from enforcing Arkansas law requiring Ten Commandments in classroom
FacebookTweetLink A new Arkansas law requiring public classrooms to display the Ten Commandments cannot be enforced in a handful of the state's largest school districts where parents brought challenges on the grounds that it violates the separation of church and state, a federal judge ruled Monday. But the ruling by US District Judge Timothy L. Brooks, an appointee of former President Obama, only narrowly applied to four of the state's 237 districts. That left the impact of the decision limited as thousands of Arkansas students prepared to return to class this month. The injunction is the latest legal turn in a widening push in Republican-led states to give religion a bigger presence in public schools. Texas and Louisiana have passed similar laws requiring classrooms to display the Ten Commandments and the issue is expected to eventually reach the US Supreme Court. 'Why would Arkansas pass an obviously unconstitutional law?' Brooks wrote in his 35-page ruling. 'Most likely because the state is part of a coordinated strategy among several states to inject Christian religious doctrine into public-school classrooms.' The Arkansas law, signed earlier this year by Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, takes effect Tuesday and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. 'The court saw through this attempt to impose religious doctrine in public schools and upheld every student's right to learn free from government-imposed faith,' John L. Williams, legal director of ACLU of Arkansas said in a statement. 'We're proud to stand with our clients — families of many different backgrounds — who simply want their kids to get an education.' Attorney General Tim Griffin, whose office defended the law, said he was reviewing the decision and assessing legal options. The lawsuit says the requirement violates the families' constitutional rights and pressures students into observing a religion favored by the state. It was not immediately clear if the groups would seek an broader block of the law beyond the four districts. ACLU of Arkansas Executive Director Holly Bailey said through a spokesperson that 'it is clear from this order and long established law that all should refrain from posting' the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms. Similar requirements enacted in Texas and Louisiana are also being challenged in court. A group of families and faith leaders filed a lawsuit seeking to block Texas' requirements days after it was signed into law. Last month in Louisiana — the first state that mandated the Ten Commandments be displayed in classrooms — a panel of three appellate judges ruled that the law was unconstitutional. The ruling marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the law violates the separation of church and state. But the legal battle is likely far from over. Many, including Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, expect the case to eventually reach the US Supreme Court. Most recently, Murrill filed a petition seeking the full US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit's review in the matter.
