Man caused €26,000 worth of damage to Irish Rail
Rokas Kalytis (24) pleaded guilty to counts of criminal damage on dates between January 2020 and May 2022.
Advertisement
He was sentenced on Monday and ordered to carry out 240 hours community service in lieu of a two year prison term.
Judge Elva Duffy said that should Kalytis come to further garda attention or not carry out the community service work, he will serve those two years in prison.
Dublin Circuit Criminal Court previously heard that CCTV footage recorded Kalytis graffitiing the internal panels in train carriages using permanent marker.
Following one incident in January 2020, Irish Rail spent €10,800 repairing these panels. A further €11,500 had to be spent the following October repairing graffitied panels in another rail carriage.
Advertisement
€3,500 was spent on repairs in the wake of another incident of vandalism of a rail carriage by Kalytis in January 2022.
He was also seen on CCTV graffitiing an underpass at Connolly Station using permanent markers, with €500 spent on repairs after this.
Kalytis was identified from CCTV by Irish Rail staff. His home was searched with clothing, permanent markers and a sample of writing seized.
He then moved to the Netherlands but returned in August 2023, meeting gardaí voluntarily for interview in March 2024 for interview.
Advertisement
Kalytis, with addresses in Castlemartin Close, Bettystown, Co Meath and Mountjoy Square made full admissions, telling gardaí it was a way of expressing himself.
He has nine previous convictions, including for criminal damage.
Garda Karl Bolger agreed with defence counsel that Kalytis was co-operative, apologetic and entered an early guilty plea.
A statement from Irish Rail was provided to the court.
Advertisement
Kalytis's background was outlined to the court. He has a difficult family background and was in foster care between the ages of 16 and 18, before experiencing homelessness.
A friend offered him accommodation in Co Meath, but he was asked to leave after the search warrant was executed.
Defence counsel previously told the court that one of Kalytis's previous conviction is for a similar summary offence, for which he received a community service order. However, Kalytis left the jurisdiction without completing community service and has contacted the Probation Service to make arrangements to do this.
The court heard on Monday that this community service order has since been struck out.
Counsel said the probation report was positive in parts, but noted that his client is still using cannabis.
Kalytis was working full-time, and has since left and obtained his construction work safe pass. Counsel said his client has made changes in his life, has developed greater maturity and a forensic psychological report puts him at low risk of re-offending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
West Ham's Lucas Paquetá expected to be cleared of spot-fixing over bookings
Lucas Paquetá is expected to be found not guilty in relation to spot-fixing charges. The West Ham player was charged by the Football Association with four counts of being deliberately booked to influence betting markets and two of failing to cooperate with its investigation. The charges were announced in May 2024 after a 10-month investigation. The Brazilian could have faced up to a life ban if he were found guilty in one of the most high-profile cases the FA have brought. The FA had been looking into allegations that Paquetá deliberately picked up yellow cards against Leicester, Aston Villa, Leeds and Bournemouth in 2022 and 2023 and alleged that he 'directly sought to influence […] these matches by intentionally seeking to receive a card from the referee, for the improper purpose of affecting the betting market in order for one or more persons to profit from betting'. About 60 bets were placed on Paquetá to be shown a yellow card in those games. A source with knowledge of the FA's investigation said that one of the bets was for £7, with the highest £400. Paquetá denied any wrongdoing. 'I am extremely surprised and upset that the FA has decided to charge me,' he said on Instagram in May last year. 'For nine months, I have cooperated with every step of their investigation and provided all the information I can. I deny the charges in their entirety and will fight with every breath to clear my name.' West Ham said at the time: 'Lucas categorically denies the breach and will continue to robustly defend his position. The club will continue to stand by and support the player throughout the process.' The FA investigation came to light when Paquetá was close to joining Manchester City for about £80m and scuppered his hopes of a move to the then treble-winners. Now 27, he cost West Ham a club-record £51m when he joined from Lyon in August 2022. Paquetá's trial concluded in early June and the player was told he must wait four to eight weeks for a verdict. West Ham were unhappy with that given the disruption it would cause to their summer transfer window, leaving their head coach, Graham Potter, uncertain over whether a key player would be part of his squad next season. A month previously, Potter said the investigation had taken a mental and physical toll on Paquetá. 'In fairness to Lucas I think he's handled it brilliantly,' Potter said. Paquetá's wife, Maria Fournier, wrote on Instagram at about the same time: 'My husband has a posture and a strength that I admire and impresses me. We have been living this nightmare for two years.'
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
FA set to deliver Paqueta verdict
The Football Association is set to formally deliver its verdict in West Ham midfielder Lucas Paqueta's long-running spot-fixing has been under investigation since August 2023 and was charged by the FA in May 2024 for allegedly getting booked deliberately "for the improper purpose of affecting the betting market".BBC Sport understands that the player and club have now been informed of the governing body's ruling in relation to those accusations, which related to matches during the 2022-23 and 23-24 Premier League hearing over the charges finished towards the end of April this source with knowledge of the situation has told BBC Sport that the final ruling is largely in Paqueta's favour and that the Brazil international is effectively "in the clear".The FA has been seeking a lifetime ban for Paqueta but indications are that scenario has been remains to be seen, however, if there is any level of punishment for Sport has contacted West Ham, the FA and Paqueta's legal team but all have declined to comment. The four charges against him relate to a Premier League game against Leicester City on 12 November 2022, as well as 2023 fixtures against Aston Villa on 12 March, Leeds United on 21 May and Bournemouth on 12 was also charged with two counts of failing to cooperate with the FA's investigation after breaching "FA Rule F3 in respect of alleged failures to comply pursuant to FA Rule F2", which relates to providing information and 27-year-old scored four goals in 33 Premier League appearances for West Ham during in was in tears after being booked against Tottenham in May, with his wife Maria Fournier saying in an Instagram post the same evening that they had "been living this nightmare for two years".After being charged by the FA last year, Paqueta had said he was "extremely surprised and upset" by the charges."For nine months, I have co-operated with every step of their investigation and provided all the information I can. I deny all the charges in their entirety and will fight with every breath to clear my name," he joined the Hammers from Lyon for an initial £36.5m in August 2022 and helped the club win the Europa Conference League during his debut season. Since 2014, FA rules have stated that anyone associated with a club in the top eight tiers of English football cannot bet on any aspect of the sport worldwide. The games in question West Ham 0-2 Leicester - 12 November 2022Paqueta booked for a 'lunge' on Leicester midfielder Boubakary Soumare in the 60th is booked at 1-0 and the match finishes 2-0 to Ham 1-1 Aston Villa - 12 March 2023Paqueta booked for what is described as a 'lunging challenge' on John McGinn in the 70th minute, with the score at Ham 3-1 Leeds United - 21 May 2023Paqueta is booked for pulling back Leeds winger Crysencio Summerville on the counter-attack in the 65th happens at 1-1, with West Ham going on to win Ham 1-1 Bournemouth - 12 August 2023In the opening game of this season, Paqueta is booked for handball in the 94th minute, with the match finishing 1-1.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump says he was never briefed on his name being in Epstein files
President Donald Trump on Friday denied ever being briefed by Attorney General Pam Bondi that his name was in the Jeffrey Epstein files. 'No, I was never briefed. No,' he told reporters after he landed in Scotland to visit his golf courses. But Bondi briefed Trump during a May 2025 meeting that his name was found in the Epstein documents 'multiple times,' according to reports. Other high-profile individuals are also named in the investigation about Epstein's [sexual] crimes. Just because the president is named in the files does not implicate him in any wrongdoing or connect him to Epstein's child [sexual] trafficking crimes. The Wall Street Journal originally broke the news of Bondi's briefing to Trump. The Justice Department told the news outlet that Trump was made aware of the findings of the Epstein files as part of the 'routine briefing.' Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche reportedly said that nothing was found in the files that would mandate an additional investigation - or even prosecution. 'As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,' they told the Journal. White House communications director Steven Cheung slammed the report as 'fake news' in a statement to the Daily Mail. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep. This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media, just like the Obama Russiagate scandal, which President Trump was right about,' he said when the report came out earlier this week. But, try as he might, Trump cannot move on from questions about Epstein, who died in a New York prison in 2019 while awaiting charges related to [sexual] crimes. His death, ruled to be a suicide, sparked endless conspiracy theories that questioned how he may have really died and who among the rich and powerful would have benefitted from it. The most recent questions came as Ghislaine Maxwell, the only person currently behind bars for Epstein's child [sexual] trafficking ring, wrapped a second day of meetings with the Justice Department. Maxwell, 63, appears to be angling for a pardon from the president after she 'didn't hold back' during secret questioning session. Her attorney David Oscar Markus claimed that she spoke with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche about '100 different people' related to Epstein's child [sexual] trafficking ring. 'They asked about every possible thing you could imagine – everything,' Markus claimed. He also said Maxwell is being used as the 'scapegoat' in the entire Epstein case and has been 'treated unfairly for the last five years.' Her attorney said that they had not put in a formal request with the White House for a pardon for Maxwell following the conclusion of Day 2 of questioning. But Markus didn't rule out taking that action in the future, saying 'things are happening so quickly.' 'The president said earlier he has the power to do so, we hope he exercises that power in the right way,' he said of a potential commutation. Trump refused to rule out invoking his presidential pardon powers for Maxwell when asked on Friday morning. 'I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I haven't thought about,' he said. But, asked again about the matter later Friday, Trump, meanwhile, declined to talk about Maxwell and said 'this is no time to be talking about pardons.' 'I really have nothing to say about it. She is being talked to by a very smart man, a very good man, Todd Blanche. And I don't know anything about the conversation. I haven't really been following it,' he said. 'A lot of people are asking me about pardons. This is no time to be talking about pardons. But a lot of people have asked about pardons. This is just not the time to be talking about it,' he added.
