Is SA next? Elon Musk celebrates as Lesotho gets Starlink
Elon Musk has announced that Starlink is officially operating in Lesotho. Images via X
Elon Musk has announced news that Starlink has finally launched in Lesotho, a landlocked country in South Africa.
ADVERTISEMENT
This comes as the world's richest man – born in Pretoria – called out 'racist laws' which he believes have halted the operating licence in his home country.
In March, US President Donald Trump brazenly claimed that 'nobody has heard of' Lesotho. A month later, he imposed a 50% tariff on imports from the small region, the highest among all countries.
ELON MUSK MARKS STARLINK'S OPERATION IN LESOTHO
On his X account, Elon Musk marked another Starlink milestone – it was now operating in Lesotho.
Shortly after President Trump imposed the high tariffs on the small country, Lesotho announced that it had granted Musk's parent company, SpaceX, a 10-year operating licence for Starlink.
ADVERTISEMENT
The move – which reportedly was under review – challenged the country's foreign investment policy.
Like SA's Black Economic Empowerment laws, Lesotho's Section 2 body (similar to ICASA) called on SpaceX to make 30% of Starlink's equity in the country available to the Basotho people as a licensing condition.
In April, the organisation said in a statement: 'While Section 2 recognises the potential benefits of expanded internet access, we respectfully oppose the issuance of this license to Starlink due to the complete absence of local ownership in the company.'
On the X platform, some social media users claimed that the country had been 'pressured' into 'bending the rules' for Elon Musk.
ADVERTISEMENT
Others bemoaned the fact that other countries were launching Starlink, while South Africa seemingly lagged.
WILL INTERNET SATELLITE SERVICE COME TO SOUTH AFRICA?
According to recent reports, Elon Musk has been presented with the possibility that Starlink could be granted an operating licence in South Africa, by allegedly 'side-stepping' Black Economic Empowerment (BEE).
Musk initially slammed the legislature that his company was required to adhere to a 30% local shareholding investment as a 'racist law', as he was 'not black'.
Minister of Communications Solly Mahlatsi has fuelled rumours he is giving Elon Musk's Starlink the greenlight. Images via X: @starlink
Last month, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction for his department on 'alternatives' such as equity equivalent investment programmes (EEIPs).
ADVERTISEMENT
Without mentioning Starlink, the minister claimed that the policy would 'attract investment,' specifically in operating licensing.
The minister revealed that a 30% local shareholding BEE requirement for foreign investments 'did not allow companies to contribute to transformation goals in ways other than traditional ownership'.
As such, Malatsi revealed that the EEIP policy direction would allow qualifying multinationals to engage with the department through 'alternatives' to local ownership.
This included investments in :
ADVERTISEMENT
Local suppliers
Enterprise and skills development
Job creation
Infrastructure support
Research and innovation,
Digital inclusion initiatives,
and funding for SMMEs.
DO YOU THINK THAT ELON MUSK WILL BE GRANTED A LICENCE TO OPERATE STARLINK IN SOUTH AFRICA?
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Oh hash! Musk bans ‘aesthetic nightmare' hashtags from X
Musk made another bold move in his ongoing campaign to reinvent the the social media platform. If you are still using hashtags on X, formerly known as Twitter, be warned, billionaire Tesla CEO and owner of X, Elon Musk, is coming for what he called an 'aesthetic nightmare.' The South Africa-born Musk made another bold move in his ongoing campaign to reinvent the social media platform on Friday, banning hashtags in paid advertisements. Musk said the decision is part of a broader effort to promote cleaner, sleeker ad visuals on the platform. 'Starting tomorrow (Friday), the aesthetic nightmare that is hashtags will be banned from ads on X,' he wrote in a post. The move has left X users frustrated as they add relevant and specific hashtags that align with the ad's content and target audience. They also sometimes create a unique branded hashtag to build brand awareness and encourage user-generated content. ALSO READ: Elon Musk fires Twitter board, becomes sole director What does Grok think? Musk has long criticised the use of hashtags on his social media platform and urged users not to use them. However, Grok, X's AI assistant, deems hashtags still useful when asked by a user. 'Yes, hashtags are still useful for regular posts on X, despite the ad ban starting June 27, 2025. They boost visibility and engagement. Use 1-2 relevant hashtags per post to avoid looking spammy. Research trending, niche hashtags with tools like X's search. 'Engage with hashtag communities and post during peak times for maximum reach. Rotate hashtags to stay fresh and avoid filters. Place hashtags mid-tweet for better engagement or at the end for a cleaner look. While Elon Musk has criticised hashtags, data supports their effectiveness for regular posts,' Grok said. Twitter changes In 2023, Musk stripped the iconic bird logo from the Twitter headquarters, replacing it with a glaring X, then just as abruptly had it removed. Musk also removed verified blue ticks from users, replacing them with a subscription service. The world's richest man bought the social media company in 2022 for a whopping $44 billion through a combination of his own wealth, investment funds and bank loans. ALSO READ: New Twitter boss Elon Musk wants you to pay for your blue tick
eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
Freedom Front Plus visits Washington to mend SA-US relations
WASHINGTON, DC - Freedom Front Plus leader, Dr Corne Mulder says he's in the United States, to fly the South African flag high. The FF-Plus is in Washington DC, for what it says is a genuine concern for the country's future. Dr Murder says President Cyril Ramaphosa and his delegation's visit to the White House was not a success, and therefore, through their visit to Washington, hope to fix South Africa's relationship with the United States. The party with some business representatives and farming groups believe some preconditions need to be met before ties are restored. These preconditions include prioritising farm murders and exempting US companies from BEE. Freedom Front Plus leader, Dr Corne Mulder had a discussion with eNCA's Gareth Edwards about their trip to the US.
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
The privatisation agenda will not save South Africa
For the many who rightly feel abandoned by the government, and are sick of the state's failures, the private sector stepping in to solve problems with energy, water and logistics might appear rational and necessary. (John McCann/MG) The World Bank has approved a $1.5 billion loan to South Africa. The Does this new loan not contradict and undermine the government's stated efforts to practice fiscal responsibility and restrained government spending? For the past several years, the treasury has nourished Since 2010, the government has taken on As irrational as treasury's loan agreements with the World Bank might seem to the public, it operates within a logic that justifies the broader agenda being pursued by the government of national unity (GNU). Behind the curtain of political theatre surrounding debates on education, land reform and black economic empowerment (BEE), the GNU is united by an unwavering commitment to a series of structural reforms that will extend an exploitative, undemocratic and costly dependence on private investment for public infrastructure development and operation. For the many who rightly feel abandoned by the government, and are sick of the state's failures, the private sector stepping in to solve problems with energy, water and logistics might appear rational and necessary. The idea that private sector firms, and the capitalists who run them, are inherently more efficient, less corrupt and unburdened by political ideology is so pervasive an assumption that it barely receives any interrogation. Perhaps the most potent illusion this unexamined assumption instills is that what is best for big business is best for people. In reality, maintaining profitability, cutting operational costs, minimising risk to investors, maximising shareholder value, ensuring returns on investment, remaining competitive and being exposed to the fluctuation of markets means that private sector firms — as an unavoidable imperative of surviving in a capitalist economy — will always put their prosperity over the welfare of the public. This is evidenced by international experiences in both developed and developing countries. In the The adoption of the Rather than capacitating municipalities to deliver services on the basis of human need, national budget transfers to municipalities were reduced, non-core functions were outsourced to expensive private contractors and municipalities were compelled to pursue A central component of placing public utilities and services into the hands of private operators is fiscal consolidation, that is, austerity. Austerity then shrinks the role of the state, weakening its ability to service the public and enforces reliance on private firms, clearing space for market competition. Austerity measures in nations such as Private companies also need to reduce the cost of labour, requiring workers who are easy to hire and easy to fire, unprotected by collective bargaining and often compelled to work without the lifeline of a minimum wage. Around the world, creating The set of reforms being proposed, and gradually implemented, by the GNU are not novel inventions but belong to a tradition of economic practice that has dominated macroeconomic policymaking in South Africa and around the world since the 1980s. This economic practice has come to be known as neoliberalism. Although a term often casually tossed around, a concrete definition of neoliberalism recognises that it is both an economic The theory proposes that 'human well-being can be best advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedom and skills within a framework characterised by strong property rights, free markets and free trade'. As a political project, neoliberalism aims to 're-establish the conditions for capital accumulation and to restore the power of economic elites'. To achieve the aims of neoliberalism, the role of the state is to create and preserve the institutional framework appropriate to the practice of capital accumulation. The coalition government is advancing a surrender of public infrastructure development, basic service provision and equitable economic growth to the profit-maximising interests of domestic private companies, multinational corporations and international financial institutions. As an example, the World Bank's use of the term 'modernisation' is merely a euphemism for the continued liberalisation of the energy and logistics sector, further commercialising state-owned enterprises and eventually leading to their privatisation. Liberalisation — which is the removal of government regulations, the breaking down of monopolies and facilitation of competition — precedes or coincides with commercialisation, setting the scene for private participation and market competition. Through commercialisation, public utilities and services that should have a mandate to serve the public good are turned into enterprises that prioritise revenue and profitability. Their services are brought into a competitive market consisting of private firms with a mandate to make profits. Privatisation, the process of transferring ownership and control of public assets and services to private entities to be run on a commercial basis, is often preceded by the liberalisation of public sector utilities and the commercialisation of public services. The logic behind the GNU's agenda is for the government, using its authority to create legislation and enforce policy, to forge the most hospitable conditions for capital accumulation by cultivating a business friendly environment that will attract private investment in infrastructure, increase the efficiency of key economic sectors and grow our economy, producing jobs and reducing poverty. Weaving sermons in the editorial rooms of the corporate-sponsored media and evangelising in the offices of the treasury, the priests of this trickle-down gospel portray private investment as South Africa's sole salvation. The policy plans of government are not a rhetorical wishlist, but are clearly laid out in The unbundling of Eskom and creation of a competitive electricity market to introduce private sector participation in generation, distribution and private The Continued fiscal consolidation — that is, austerity measures (budget cuts or limits on social welfare, public employment stimulation, tight monetary policy and regressive taxation to achieve a budget-surplus); Mobilising up to R1 trillion in financing from the private sector for infrastructure development through Increased reliance on The gradual imposing of labour-market flexibility, that is, deregulating the labour market to decrease the cost of labour for employers (weaken collective bargaining, lower minimum wage requirements and reduce employment benefits). What we are witnessing is the exploitation of crises — specifically the crises of unemployment, economic stagnation and state incapacity — to justify the enforcement of policies that have failed to deliver desired outcomes in both developed and developing countries across the world for the past 50 years. The most important element of the GNU's structural reform agenda is the drive for private financing of public infrastructure development through public-private partnerships. Global institutional investors — be it the World Bank or multinational investment banks — are using the burden of sovereign debt (which limits fiscal space for domestic resource mobilisation and state-driven investment), alongside the justification of meeting In the past several years this has largely occurred through Because infrastructure projects, especially for natural monopolies such as electricity or water provision, require immense capital investment and come with a series of risks (design defects, project delays, foreign exchange volatility, land acquisition, labour protections and so forth), governments have to ensure infrastructure development is This is done to make infrastructure projects investable and profitable. The state takes on risk through providing private investors credit guarantees, enforcing cost-reflective tariffs, providing subsidies or tax breaks. Through these de-risking mechanisms, risk is transferred onto the government's balance sheet, coming at the cost of public investment, which a country like South Africa needs to eradicate unemployment, poverty and inequality. In countries such as Spain, Mexico, India, Peru, Nepal, Scotland and Liberia the commercialisation or partial privatisation of public utility and services through public-private partnerships Moreover, democratic accountability and the need for transparency in the provision of public goods has been undermined when crucial infrastructure is handed over to private hands. In developing countries such as South Africa, the growing reliance on private companies to deliver public services and build public infrastructure The government has retained a commitment to neoliberalism for decades, whether through the Growth, Employment and Redistribution, the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiatives for South Africa, the National Development Plan or the Reconstruction and Recovery Plan. We keep trying the same things while expecting different results. About 12.7 million are unemployed and half the population of the country lives in poverty. Such conditions are unsustainable and explosive. New, politically imaginative and effective policy solutions are needed. Andile Zulu is with the Alternative Information and Development Centre in Cape Town.
