Why Asian and Mexican immigrants, moments away from being deported to Libya, never left the U.S.
The flight never took off and he was sent back to solitary confinement in the Texas facility along with the other 12 detainees, mostly from Asian countries, the immigrant's lawyer, Johnny Sinodis, told NBC News. The immigrant requested anonymity due to fear of retaliation.
The immigrants, including people from the Philippines, Vietnam, Laos and Mexico, would later learn that their attorneys filed an emergency motion after reports that the Trump administration had planned to send a group of immigrants to Libya.
A federal judge then enforced a previous order Wednesday afternoon, halting deportations to third countries.
Tin Nguyen, another immigration attorney whose client was aboard the bus, said that though the deportation was halted, many continue to be on edge over the possibility of being sent to a country that is unfamiliar to them and has been criticized for major human rights abuses.
'Libya or El Salvador or Rwanda … it's very scary for people,' Nguyen, who's based in North Carolina, said. 'People don't know anything about these countries, and what they have heard about them is very terrifying.'
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to NBC News' request for comment on questions related to the deportation flight and legal motion.
Last week, a judge granted a preliminary injunction, ruling that prior to removing any noncitizen to a third country, the Trump administration must take several steps to ensure they receive adequate due process.
Sinodis said that his client had been told earlier this week by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents that he was being sent to Libya. Days later, the detainees were given a few minutes to gather their belongings before being processed out of the facility, shackled and shuffled onto a bus, the attorney said.
The detainees were eventually taken back to the facility and released to the facility's general population by the next morning.
Sinodis criticized the process as both legally concerning and inefficient. Sending an immigrant from Mexico across the world, for example, makes little sense, he said.
'I mean how much money does it cost to send someone from Mexico to Libya?' he said. 'You can just drive someone to Mexico.'
Nguyen recounted a similar chain of events, adding that his client, who's Vietnamese, had previously been threatened with the prospect of being sent to Libya. At one point, the detainee and others were ordered to sign a document agreeing to be deported to the country, according to the emergency motion filed on Wednesday, in which Nguyen's client is a plaintiff.
'He didn't read the document. He can't read [English] and it wasn't translated in Vietnamese, or through an interpreter. So he refused to sign,' Nguyen said. 'And because he refused to sign, he was separated from the other folks.'
The emergency motion said that detainees who refused to sign off on the removal to Libya were put in separate rooms, 'cuffed in' and forced to provide their signatures for the document.
After hours on the tarmac, Nguyen said his client called his wife.
'They were not intermingling with the general population or with each other, but they were able to make phone calls,' Nguyen said.
Nguyen said it's unclear what will happen next, but his client would rather be sent back to Vietnam than a third country.
'This time around I'm helping folks speed up the process of actually trying to get the travel documents from Vietnam, so people can just go to Vietnam,' the attorney said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last month at a Cabinet meeting that the United States is 'actively searching for other countries to take people.'
'We are working with other countries to say, 'We want to send you some of the most despicable human beings to your countries,'' Rubio said. ''Will you do that as a favor to us?' And the further away the better, so they can't come back across the border.'
Reports of plans to send migrants to Libya drew backlash from immigration and humanitarian advocates.
Libya has long been criticized for its treatment of migrants. The Independent Fact-Finding Mission on Libya, established by the United Nations Human Rights Council, found in its report from 2023 that it was likely that 'crimes against humanity were committed against Libyans and migrants throughout Libya.'
The report documented examples of 'arbitrary detention, murder, torture, rape, enslavement, sexual slavery, extrajudicial killing and enforced disappearance, confirming their widespread practice in Libya.'
The State Department's own website cautioned against traveling to Libya, classifying the country as under a Level 4, the highest advisory level due to a 'greater likelihood of life-threatening risks.'
Libya's provisional Government of National Unity said on social media that it is not coordinating deportations with the United States and that it rejects using the country as a destination for deported immigrants without its knowledge or consent.
'The Government categorically denies the existence of any agreement or coordination with it regarding the reception of any migrants deported from the United States,' it said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
6 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas House panel passes new redistricting map that adds more GOP seats
A Texas House panel on Saturday advanced a draft congressional map aimed at adding five new Republican districts next year over protests from Democrats that the proposal would suppress the votes of people of color. The chamber's redistricting committee approved the map on party lines, 12 to 6, after spending much of Friday hearing testimony from U.S. House Democrats from Texas and members of the public largely opposed to the plan. The map could be considered by the entire state House as early as next week. Earlier in the hearing, GOP lawmakers said that they are redrawing the state's congressional map to advantage Republican candidates, setting aside a legal justification offered by the U.S. Department of Justice and making their political motivations explicit for the first time. "Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush," Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican carrying the bill, said about the goal of the map. "We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance." Texas Republicans launched the redistricting effort after pressure from President Donald Trump's political operatives, who demanded state leaders redraw the map to help Republicans maintain their slim House majority ahead of a potentially difficult midterm election. The House redistricting committee released its proposed redo of the map Wednesday. It slices up districts in the Houston, Austin and the Dallas areas, yielding five additional districts that would have voted for Trump by at least 10 percentage points in 2024. In 2024, Trump won 56.2% of votes in Texas. Under the current lines, Republicans hold 66% of Texas' 38 House seats. The new map aims to push that share to 79%. "Political performance does not guarantee electoral success — that's up to the candidates," Hunter said. "But it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts." Gov. Greg Abbott, in adding redistricting to the special session agenda, cited a letter from the Justice Department claiming that four Texas districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered. But on Friday, state Republicans were unequivocal that their goal was not to fix racial gerrymandering — which several have testified under oath does not exist in the current map — but to give the GOP the greatest chance of controlling as many as 30 congressional districts. "These districts were drawn primarily using political performance," Hunter said, citing Republican gains made across the state since the Legislature last redistricted in 2021, especially among Latino voters. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds. But under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the map cannot diminish the voting power of people of color. At Friday's hearing, Democrats argued that the proposed map unconstitutionally packed voters of color into some districts while spreading them throughout others to reduce their ability to elect their preferred candidates. "Every citizen should have equal access to choose their representation, instead of crowding Black people to the point that all the Black people in the state only have two representatives, and all the Latinos in the state are crowded up to the extent that their voting power is diminished," U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas told state lawmakers during the hearing. Though people of color make up most of Texas and have driven almost all of the state's population growth in recent years, the new map creates 24 districts that are majority-white — two more than the current map, which is under trial for possibly violating the Voting Rights Act. Republicans rejected the idea that the proposed map would suppress voters of color, noting that it would create one new majority Hispanic district and two new majority Black districts. But all three are almost precisely 50% Black or Hispanic, which Democratic lawmakers said at the hearing is not enough to ensure they're able to elect their candidates of choice. U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, whose seat would be partially dismantled under the new lines, noted that his district was drawn by a federal court "to ensure that communities of color, Black and brown Texans, could finally have a voice in Congress." "Now, that voice is again under threat," he said. "This is a map that was drawn behind closed doors — as we've heard here today — to dismantle representation and weaken our power in turn." It could take months, if not years, to resolve any legal challenge against the proposed map. A lawsuit against Texas' current maps, passed in 2021, finally went to trial last month, almost four years and several election cycles after they went into effect. In the meantime, Republicans in the Legislature have the votes to pass the map as it's drafted. Democrats, locked out of power in the statehouse, have few tools at their disposal to fight the map's passage. The nuclear option is to flee the state and deny Republicans a quorum to pass any legislation — an expensive and politically tenuous move that state House Democrats were still considering ahead of the full chamber vote. At Friday's hearing, the only time the public would have to comment on the House's proposed map, Democrats begged Republicans to slow or stop redistricting entirely. "This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map," said U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin Democrat. "It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas Legislature."
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Deep Reads: Cracks in the dream
The Vitals had settled in Springfield from Haiti during President Donald Trump's first term and saved money through the Biden administration. Business leaders in their reliably red county praised immigrants for reviving the local economy. Americans struggled to pass drug tests, one factory boss told a TV news crew. Not Haitians. Fernande Vital earned $21 an hour at a Japanese automotive plant, monitoring robots forging car parts, while her husband, Rocher, led a strip-mall church. Even as the GOP and some of their neighbors called for mass deportations, the Vitals were sure nobody meant them, immigrants here legally. So inJuly of last year, they made a down payment of $8,000, their entire nest egg. In August, they moved in, installed lace curtains and hung a family portrait in the dining room. One month later came the cracks. This story follows the Vitals after they dealt with the structural woes in their home and their feeling of belonging in this country. Danielle Paquette reported, wrote and narrated the piece. Bishop Sand composed music and produced audio. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Economic fears of investors are here — and fed by Trump's reaction
For months, the U.S. economy appeared to be weathering the disruptive effects of President Donald Trump's trade and immigration policies. But over the course of 72 hours, that sunny outlook darkened, as the latest government data this week showed the president's revolutionary remaking of the world's largest economy had hit a snag.
