Canada: Indian-origin persons among 18 charged for extortion, acts of violence
Eighteen persons, several among them of Indian origin, have been arrested and charged in Canada's Peel region for extortion and acts of violence in connection with an organised criminal network linked to the towing industry.
The Peel Regional Police said on Monday that they had recovered more than $4.2 million in assets after dismantling the network as part of a joint operation with local and provincial law enforcement agencies.
The police said that the operation, titled Project Outsource, was launched in 2024 to look into the network believed to be behind a significant number of extortion cases and related acts of violence.
'As the investigation progressed, it became clear that the criminal network operated with two distinct, but interconnected components: one dedicated to extortion and violence, and the other rooted in the towing industry,' the statement said.
Several suspects were found to be linked to towing companies operating under the names Certified Roadside and Humble Roadside, the statement said.
Evidence was uncovered that these persons were engaged in insurance fraud by staging vehicle collisions, and using threats, assaults, and firearms to exert control over local towing operations, it added.
The police said that 17 men from Brampton and a 37-year-old woman, identified as Haleh Javady Torabi from King City, have been arrested and charged in connection with the investigation as of June 10.
The men were Inderjit Dhami, Paritosh Chopra, Gurbinder Singh, Kulwinder Puri, Parminder Puri, Inderjit Bal, Varun Aul, Ketan Chopra, Norman Tazehkand, Pawandeep Singh, Dipanshu Garg, Rahul Verma, Karan Boparai, Mankirat Boparai, Simar Boparai, Jovan Singh and Abhinav Bhardwaj.
The police statement said that the persons arrested in the matter faced 97 criminal charges related to criminal organisation, extortion, fraud, firearms, among others.
'Three individuals were charged and released to attend court at a later date, while 15 were held for a bail hearing at the Ontario Court of Justice in Brampton,' the authorities said. 'Of the 18, almost half were on a form of judicial release at the time of arrest.'
Several weapons, including firearms and ammunition, were seized over the course of the investigation, the statement added
'This investigation has delivered a significant blow to a well-organised criminal network that has been spreading fear and violence in our communities,' Nishan Duraiappah, Peel Regional Police chief, said. 'These individuals and their actions have no place here, and they will be held fully accountable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Indians charged by CBI for 2008 & 2011 murders in UAE & Bahrain—the cases & law barring extradition
These are among unique cases investigated by the CBI, based on recommendations from the government and material evidence shared with the agency by the Ministry of External Affairs as provided by the foreign authorities. More than 14 years later, on 10 June 2025, India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet against Mahla for the alleged murder. A week before that, the agency filed a chargesheet against another Indian national for a 2008 murder in Abu Dhabi. New Delhi: On the morning of 31 January 2011, Bahraini national Mohammed Sultan Al-Motawa was killed allegedly by his driver, an Indian citizen. Bahraini courts found evidence conclusive enough to order life imprisonment for Subhash Chander Mahla in absentia. He had fled the kingdom after committing the alleged offence. The agency has charged Mahla under section 302 (murder) and 404 (dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by a deceased person at the time of their death) of the Indian Penal Code based on forensic evidence and other related material shared by the Bahraini authorities with the Government of India. An agency spokesperson said Friday the investigation revealed that Mahla was aggrieved by his employer's continued misbehaviour and planned to kill him. On 31 January 2011 when his boss was alone, the accused assaulted him with a solid, traumatising tool, leaving him dead. After Al-Motawa's death, Mahla also stole the money from his slain employer, the spokesperson further said. In the second case, the agency filed a chargesheet against Inder Jit Singh on 17 June 2025 for allegedly murdering another Indian citizen, Rama Lingam Natesan, in Abu Dhabi in August 2008. Natesan used to sell international SIM cards in Abu Dhabi and Singh would purchase them from him on a credit basis, the CBI spokesperson said, 'Over a period of time, the debt of Inder Jit Singh reached AED (Arab Emirates dirham) 300. Due to this, a dispute broke out between them. When Rama Lingam Natesan asked the employer of Inder Jit Singh to deduct his outstanding dues from his salary, Inder Jit Singh hatched a plan to kill Rama Lingam Natesan. On 28.08.2008, finding Rama Lingam Natesan alone, Inder Jit Singh assaulted him with a sharp knife causing grievous injuries to him, to which he later succumbed,' the spokesperson said. CBI FILES CHARGE SHEETS AGAINST TWO INDIAN NATIONALS FOR MURDER IN UAE AND BAHRAIN — Central Bureau of Investigation (India) (@CBIHeadquarters) June 27, 2025 Before filing the chargesheets, the agency obtained sanctions from the central government after the conclusion of investigations and examined the accused based on evidence shared by U.A.E. and Bahraini authorities, officials said. However, neither was arrested as they never evaded examination by the agency, ThePrint has learnt. Trials of crimes committed abroad Investigation into crimes committed by foreign nationals in a country are covered by the extradition treaties signed between the nationalities involved. In the instant cases, the need for local prosecution arose from the treaties India has signed with the U.A.E. and Bahrain. The treaties bar extradition. In Singh's case, the Abu Dhabi trial court-Criminal Circuit handed him the death penalty in April 2009, and ordered him to pay the blood money (monetary support for the victim's kin) of 200 AED. UAE authorities reached out to their Indian counterparts for extradition, which is barred by Article 5 of the treaty between the two countries. So, the public prosecution in Abu Dhabi requested its counterparts in New Delhi in September 2012 to try the accused in a competent court. 'The nationals of the Contracting States shall not be extradited to the other Contracting State, provided that the requested State shall submit the case to its competent authorities for prosecution if the act committed is considered as an offence under the laws of both Contracting States,' says the Article 5 of the India-UAE extradition treaty signed in 1999. Following on, the UAE embassy in New Delhi issued a note verbale in May 2016 seeking Singh's prosecution in India. A month later, the Ministry of External Affairs responded to the note, seeking additional information beyond the dossier shared by the UAE authorities to establish the identity of the accused. It had sought a certified copy of the accused's passport, as well as his photograph, to verify identity, fulfilling a total of four requirements. Diplomatic exchanges flew back and forth between the MEA and the UAE embassy in New Delhi until November 2016, when the ministry wrote to the CBI to launch local prosecution in the matter. The agency was mandated to perform this task earlier in May of that year by the Ministry of Personnel and Public Grievances, and to seek sanction for it from the MHA under Section 188 of the CrPC, which deals with offences committed outside India. Based on the letter from the MEA, the agency finally booked Inder Jit Singh, a resident of Punjab's Jalandhar, on 22 January 2020, under Section 302 of the IPC. A similar provision was applied in the case of Mahla, who hails from Rajasthan's Sikar district. A Bahraini court handed him life sentence in his absence. As his extradition was not possible under the terms of the treaty, the Bahraini authorities sought to prosecute him locally. 'Extradition shall be refused if the person wanted is a national of the requested State. For the purpose of this Treaty, nationality of the person sought for extradition shall be determined to be that at the time of the commission of the offence,' says the Article 6 of the India-Bahrain treaty signed in January 2004. Based on material evidence shared with the Ministry of External Affairs, Mahla was booked under sections 302 and 404 of the IPC on 28 April 2022. 'The available information and documents as received from Kingdom of Bahrain through Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi are self-explanatory and disclose that there is sufficient evidence against Mr. Subhash Chandar Mahla to charge him for committing murder of Mohammed Sultan Al-Motawa at Bahrain on 31/01/2011,' the FIR stated. It also revealed that Mahla fled to India immediately after committing the murder. 'In view of the Extradition Agreement dt. 13/01/2004 between Republic of India and Kingdom of Bahrain, Local Prosecution against Mr. Subhash Chandar Mahla is being launched and he is charged for committing murder of Mohammed Sultan Al-Motawa at Bahrain on 31/01/2011 and also for committing Criminal Misappropriation of property possessed by deceased at the time of death which is an offence u/s 302 and 404 of IPC,' the FIR adds. (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: Prioritising extradition requests, speeding up legal assistance — high-level UK delegation visits CBI
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Criminal Justice season 4 finale set for July 3: Will Pankaj Tripathi aka Madhav Mishra finally crack the case?
The courtroom drama that has kept India on edge is nearing its final verdict. Criminal Justice: A Family Matter , the fourth season of the acclaimed legal thriller, will air its final episode soon. With the mystery of nurse Roshni Saluja's murder still unresolved, fans are expecting a dramatic conclusion. A season of secrets, lies, and legal twists Starring Pankaj Tripathi as the ever-resourceful lawyer Madhav Mishra, Season 4 has plunged viewers into a tangled web of family secrets and courtroom intrigue. The case revolves around Dr. Raj Nagpal, who is accused of murdering his girlfriend Roshni, a nurse, while his estranged wife Anju and daughter Ira are caught in the emotional crossfire. Each episode has unveiled new layers of the case, with Episode 7 ending on a suspenseful note involving a random lactose-free milk bottle and a new piece of evidence that might change everything. When and where to watch A recent Wikipedia edit mistakenly led fans to believe the finale had already aired on June 26. However, the show's creators clarified that Episode 7 was released on that date. The actual finale, Episode 8, will stream at midnight on July 3, 2025, exclusively on JioHotstar. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo What to expect With Madhav Mishra's legal team closing in on the truth and public speculation running wild, the finale promises to deliver high-stakes drama and long-awaited answers. The key questions remain: Will justice be served? Or will the truth remain buried beneath layers of privilege and manipulation? About the show Criminal Justice is an adaptation of the acclaimed 2008 British series of the same name. Written by Shridhar Raghavan and directed by Tigmanshu Dhulia and Vishal Furia, the Indian version delves deep into the complex, emotional, and often harrowing journey of individuals caught in the country's criminal justice system. The series made its debut on April 5, 2019, on Hotstar and was instantly praised for its intense storytelling and powerful performances. Featuring a cast that includes Vikrant Massey, Jackie Shroff, Anupriya Goenka, and Mita Vashisht, with Pankaj Tripathi leading as the protagonist, Criminal Justice has resonated strongly with both audiences and critics.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'As if people like Mahatma Gandhi...': Republican leader says Zohran Mamdani has no idea how cops work
Zohran Mamdani earlier said he would redirect NYPD's budget and won't hire more cops. Amid a major meltdown over the victory of Indian-origin Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary of the New York mayoral election, Republican NYC mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa said Mamdani has no understanding about how the police department works, and that's why he promised to create a new Department of Community Safety separately from the police department. This would effectively neuter the police department if cops are forced to become social workers, Sliwa said to the New York Post, which reported apprehension over NYC becoming unsafe if Mamdani becomes the mayor. 'He has a weird notion of how policing is, as if it should be people like Mahatma Gandhi walking around, you know, functioning as a social worker. That does not work," Sliwa said. Zohran Mamdani's police reform positions Mamdani promised major NYPD reform, including redirecting funds from the police department towards housing, healthcare and mental health services. He said the NYPD's budget was bloated and harmful and community investment was more important over policing. Scott Munro, president of the NYPD Detectives Endowment Association, told NYP the city would be totally unsafe if Mamdani becomes the mayor. 'If you put a guy like him in there, our people are going to get hurt, and nobody's going to want the job. It's going to put recruitment back five more steps,' Munro said. NYPD insiders said Mamdani clearly hates the NYPD, though he accepted round-the-clock police protection. Sliwa blamed the rise of Mamdani on Eric Adams' time in office, which was marked by scandals, and said he is not going anywhere, leaving the mayoral battle. "I'm in it until November 4," he said. 'We have to go after the hipster millennials and Gen Zers. It's the same group that Donald Trump appealed to," Sliwa said. 'There is no Zohran Mamdani if Eric Adams had done a decent job,' Sliwa said. 'He created the atmosphere so that somebody that nobody knew that was at one per cent in the polls back in February could suddenly win a Democratic primary against an iconic figure like Andrew Cuomo.'
