
Why Keir Starmer risks making the same mistake as David Cameron when it comes to Europe
The justice secretary joined calls for an overhaul of the convention, warning that 'public confidence in the rule of law is fraying' and 'there is a growing perception human rights laws are a tool for criminals to avoid responsibility'.
It comes after similar comments were made by Tory Party leader Kemi Badenoch, who this month warned human rights laws had gone from being a 'shield' to a 'sword used to attack democracies'.
Falling in line with those calling for the ECHR to be overhauled, but stopping short of calling for the UK to pull out, Ms Mahmood told European ambassadors: 'The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved.
'Now, it must do so again.'
So will Sir Keir be able to quell the grumblings of the Conservatives and Reform UK – or does he risk falling into the same trap as David Cameron, failing to deliver and emboldening his Eurosceptic critics?
The debate over Britain's role in the ECHR has been given a renewed burst of life by the rise of Nigel Farage, Ms Badenoch all-but pledging the Tories would pull the UK out, but most importantly, the head of the Council of Europe saying there should be 'no taboo' on rewriting its rules.
Critics of the convention argue that, without a fundamental overhaul, it will be impossible for the UK to deport foreign criminals en masse and remove those who arrive in Britain illegally, such as via the English Channel in small boats.
Many go further, saying that reform of the agreement would be impossible given its 46 signatories, and that the UK must pull out altogether.
Sir Keir and Ms Mahmood are pursuing the softer option, attempting to take a leadership role in the drive to update the binding legal text.
The move could prove a masterstroke for Labour, run by a man derided by so many as a liberal left-wing lawyer who does not understand the concerns of those impacted by soaring migration and the small boats crisis.
In taking the issue by the horns, Sir Keir can defy his doubters on the right and take on his left-wing critics, painting himself as somebody prepared to do what is right for the country without fear or favour.
But the road to reform is fraught with risk, and could even see Sir Keir suffer the same fate as his predecessor Lord Cameron – who paved the path for Brexit before quitting in shame at the result.
The then prime minister sought to quell frustration about the UK's membership of the EU by promising reforms of his own. He was battling rebels in his own Conservative Party and a challenge from UKIP on the right, and emerged from marathon talks in Brussels in 2016 having secured 'special status' for the UK in the bloc.
But despite his efforts, the tweaks were not enough – with Britain voting to leave the EU just four months later.
In the same way, by promising reform of the ECHR Sir Keir risks two things.
The first is giving ground to right-wing critics of the convention, both raising its salience with the general public and legitimising their concerns.
The second is overpromising and underdelivering, with just four years to force changes the public will experience before heading back to the polls for a general election.
If the prime minister promises a programme of reforms that will help him stop the small boats crisis in the Channel and remove more foreign offenders, he will need to deliver.
If polling day rolls around and the boats are still arriving, taxpayers are still spending huge sums to house those seeking asylum and voters do not feel the difference,
With a slew of recent headlines about deportations being blocked on sometimes ridiculous-sounding grounds, it is clear something needs to be done.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Warwickshire Reform's Pride flag focus is pathetic, says Green MP
An MP has accused Reform UK of "getting its knickers in a twist" over a Progress Pride flag flown outside a council headquarters - and also told the party to focus on more important issues rather than "posturing and performative politics".Ellie Chowns, the Green Party member for North Herefordshire, was referring to a row in Warwickshire where Reform UK requested the county council it leads to remove such a told BBC Politics Midlands that Reform's focus on flags was "pretty pathetic" and voters were more interested in potholes and bin on the same programme, Reform UK's Ian Cooper, leader of Staffordshire Council, said: "We are defending the public interest." He added: "We were elected on a mandate and we intend to do it."Also among the guests for Sunday's broadcast were Conservative MP for Kenilworth and Southam Sir Jeremy Wright who said the flag row in Warwickshire was a "distraction" and was not what most people cared about."For heaven's sake, are we really going to discuss what flag flies outside Shirehall in Warwick as a priority for the people of Warwickshire?" he row began when the county council's acting leader - Reform UK's George Finch - wrote to the authority's chief executive, asking for the flag to be removed during Pride chief executive refused, stating in an email response that such decisions rested with her - a stance described as a coup d'etat by Zia Yusuf, head of the national party's department of government efficiency. It later emerged that the authority did not have the technical advertising consent required to fly a Progress Pride flag outside HQ. The flag's design differs from the standard Pride rainbow flag which is not subject to permission. The flag has since been removed following the end of Pride said there was "nothing whatsoever" wrong with the Pride flag, but council buildings should "represent the people of the county and of the United Kingdom"."If you want to fly a Pride flag or any other flag, go and find a flag pole and fly it," he said. Another guest, Sureena Brackenridge, the Labour MP for Wolverhampton, said that in her constituency "not many people are really concerned about what flag flies outside the council buildings".Her comments were echoed by Chowns and Sir said she believed "people care about potholes, about bin collections, people care about social care and looking after vulnerable adults and children in the community".Sir Jeremy said Warwickshire County Council had huge challenges which should be taking up the council's time, instead of flag policy."I really do worry that this is a demonstration of what many of us are concerned about, which is that Reform is all about slogans and not much about delivering things that people really care about," he added that if Reform wanted to set a flag policy, it needed to be debated by councillors. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Warwickshire County Council apologises for SEND communication failings
A council has apologised for communication issues over changes to mandatory training for councillors around children with special educational needs. Nigel Minns, Warwickshire County Council's executive director for children and young people, acknowledged that, while the training had been produced with help from families involved, the language used in communications might have led councillors to believe otherwise. The new Reform UK administration was not involved in the changes, which began before the May councillors unanimously committed to annual training in the wake of a public storm over comments made by three councillors during a scrutiny meeting. However in June 2025, concerns were raised when the in-person, co-produced sessions appeared to be replaced with online modules.A council communication on 2 June described the online training as "mandatory," with extra sessions "offered" to relevant councillors. This led to confusion, with several councillors believing the online course was the only requirement. Mr Minns later clarified that co-produced training remains mandatory for cabinet and committee members - and open to all officer denied any intent to drop co-produced training, admitting the communication could have been clearer. "It is unfortunate that our communication with councillors wasn't clearer and I am happy to accept responsibility for that," he whether he would go as far as to apologise, he added: "I am sorry if we gave the impression that the training wasn't going to take place and certainly, if that has caused an erosion of trust then I am sorry about that."This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jersey firearms law to be updated to reduce risk to public safety
The government is planning changes to Jersey's firearms law, following recommendations from a review committee of constables and States of Jersey Richard Honeycombe, head of the review panel, said the changes were about "reducing risk" to public safety and ensuring all gun owners had "good reason" to hold changes are likely to be enacted using ministerial orders after the Justice and Home Affairs Minister Deputy Mary Le Hegarat previously postponed a complete review of the 25-year-old Hegarat told a scrutiny hearing the planned review was put on hold in 2024 to prioritise changes to legislation preventing violence against women and girls. What changes are planned? Applications for firearms and ammunition will become a separate processPreviously, 5,000 rounds of ammunition were automatically applied to a firearms licence. Honeycombe said there were people on the island who had not shot for years but had a considerable amount of ammunition stored at people will have to apply for both a firearms licence and an ammunition licence. These will be considered by the parish constable - who has the authority to grant firearms licences - and assessed on their own merits. Honeycombe said this should mean a "huge reduction" in the amount of ammunition on the island, but also help officials know much was actually being Hegarat said the change would "mitigate the risk of certificate holders having easy access to firearms and ammunition outside of a club environment".To contain ammunition to the club shooting environment, Le Hegarat said she planned to change the law so clubs could become registered firearms dealers, although only with the right to buy and sell ammunition, not import it. The cost of a firearms licence is to increase Honeycombe said it had been agreed with the minister the cost of a firearms licence would increase, as would the cost of varying an aspect of your firearms licence - such as adding or removing a gun. The number and type of guns an applicant can ask for will decreaseAt present, people applying for a firearms licence can have an authorised "wish list" where they request a variety of guns, of different types and approved, each applicant only has to notify the constable when they purchase a new firearm, instead of requiring Hegarat said there were currently examples of individuals who had the right to buy in excess of 25 different future, constables would be asked to make amendments to these types of licences to ensure each applicant genuinely had good reason to own each type of said the review committee was also considering making a request to have certain types of large calibre rifles, especially those that have been converted from a fully automatic, military grade firearm, added to the list of prohibited items. Honeycombe said he would like to see the changes introduced in added the review panel had more work to do and would be suggesting further legal amendments.