Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
LONDON (Reuters) -Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on Monday, with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI.
The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to "train" its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs.
Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion.
Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights.
A Stability AI spokesperson said that "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas," adding: "Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression."
Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the U.S. and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago.
WIDER IMPACT
Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists.
Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI.
"Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said.
She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits.
Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development".
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Andrew Heavens)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Aifeex Accelerates Global Strategy with Seven AI Ecosystems to Lead the Future of AI Finance
KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA - Media OutReach Newswire - 28 July 2025 - On July 22, 2025, Aifeex hosted the '2025 Global Artificial Intelligence Summit' in Kuala Lumpur, unveiling its strategic layout of seven innovative AI financial ecosystems. Attended by top experts and institutions, the event marked a key milestone in global AI finance. From high-frequency AI trading funds to smart DeFi systems and personalized AI agents, Aifeex showcased its strong technological capabilities and forward-looking vision. This move underscores Aifeex's commitment to shaping an AI-driven financial future and advancing global intelligent asset #Aifeex The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Daily Express
2 hours ago
- Daily Express
Caution on AI in arbitration
Published on: Monday, July 28, 2025 Published on: Mon, Jul 28, 2025 By: Sisca Humphrey Text Size: Moderator and panelists during the talk session. Kota Kinabalu: Legal experts are urging the arbitration community to tread carefully as Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools become increasingly integrated into dispute resolution processes. The warnings were delivered during the final panel session at the Bicam Global ADR Horizon 2025 event, themed 'Opportunities and Risks of Generative AI in Arbitration.' The discussion, moderated by High Court of Malaya (Commercial Division) Judge Justice Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad, brought together senior practitioners from across Asia to examine both the practical applications and legal grey areas surrounding the use of AI in arbitration. 'An arbitrator's responsibility is to apply judgment, not to rely on auto-generated text. 'We can benefit from technology, but we cannot delegate our core function,' he said. Senior Partner at EPLegal Tony Nguyen emphasised on how generative AI is already being used to streamline legal workflows, including drafting, document review and issue spotting. 'There's no doubt that these tools improve efficiency, especially for large-scale commercial disputes. 'But speed cannot come at the expense of accuracy or legal coherence,' he said. Tony cautioned against uncritical use of AI-generated content in formal submissions, stressing that most tools are trained on datasets that do not reflect regional legal practices or current arbitration rules. 'We need to ask, is this tailored to the tribunal before us or is it just generic output that sounds plausible?' he said. Head of International Litigation and Arbitration at Skadden Asia Friven Yeoh warned of the risks of factual errors and fabricated references often produced by generative systems. 'What concerns me most is not the occasional mistake. It's that these tools present their results with a tone of certainty, which can mislead even experienced users,' Friven said. He stressed the need for legal practitioners to retain full accountability for any materials produced with AI assistance. 'If you submit it, you're responsible for it. That doesn't change just because you used a machine to help draft it,' he said. He also urged the arbitration community to develop internal guidelines rather than wait for regulation to be imposed externally. Dispute Resolution Lawyer from Singapore Chew Kei-Jin highlighted the limitations of AI in assessing human factors which is a key element in many arbitrations. 'No machine can interpret tone, facial expressions or a witness's hesitation during cross-examination. 'These things influence credibility and outcomes. That's not something AI can replicate,' he said. He acknowledged that AI may be useful in certain backend functions, such as document translation and legal research, but insisted these benefits should not be confused with legal judgment. 'It's a tool, not an advisor, not an advocate and certainly not a decision-maker,' he said. Partner at Kim & Chang in Seoul Matthew Christensen raised concerns over a lack of consistent guidance across jurisdictions. 'Some courts are asking whether AI was used to draft legal documents. Others haven't even considered the question,' he said. He maintained that in arbitration, where confidentiality is crucial that even limited use of AI warrants full disclosure, especially when sensitive data is involved. 'If arbitrators or counsel use AI, parties deserve to know. That transparency matters. 'And we should be careful not to expose client data to third-party systems without clear safeguards,' he said. The panel closed with a reminder from Atan that Malaysia and the wider Southeast Asian region, must engage in structured discussions to clarify expectations around the use of AI in legal practice. 'This is not about rejecting technology. It's about developing a responsible approach to its use in proceedings that affect rights, reputations and businesses,' he said. While no clear consensus was reached on how to regulate AI in arbitration, all speakers agreed that the conversation must continue and that human oversight will remain essential for the foreseeable future. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
China warns of AI ‘monopoly' as US effort quickens
International cooperation: People watch a robot performing tasks at an exhibition during the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai. Premier Li says going forward, China will seek to propel AI development in the Global South. — AFP SHANGHAI: China will spearhead the creation of an international organisation to jointly develop artificial intelligence (AI), the country's premier says, seeking to ensure that world-changing technology doesn't become the province of just a few nations or companies. AI harbours risks from widespread job losses to economic upheaval that require nations to work together to address, Premier Li Qiang told the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai on Saturday. That means more international exchanges, Beijing's No 2 official said during China's most important annual technology summit. Li didn't name any countries in his short address to kick off the event. But Chinese executives and officials have taken aim at Washington's efforts to curtail the Asian country's tech sector, including by slapping restrictions on the export of Nvidia Corp chips crucial to AI development. On Saturday, Li acknowledged a shortage of semiconductors was a major bottleneck, but reaffirmed President Xi Jinping's call to establish policies to propel Beijing's ambitions. The government will now help create a body – loosely translated as the World AI Cooperation Organisation – through which countries can share insights and talent. 'Currently, key resources and capabilities are concentrated in a few countries and a few enterprises. 'If we engage in technological monopoly, controls and restrictions, AI will become an exclusive game for a small number of countries and enterprises,' Li told hundreds of delegates huddled at the conference venue on the banks of Shanghai's iconic Huangpu river. China and the US are locked in a race to develop a technology with the potential to turbocharge economies and – over the long run – tip the balance of geopolitical power. Last week, US President Donald Trump signed executive orders to loosen regulations and expand energy supplies for data centres – a call to arms to ensure companies like OpenAI and Google help safeguard America's lead in the post-ChatGPT era. At the same time, the breakout success of DeepSeek has inspired Chinese tech leaders and startups to accelerate research and roll out products such as open-sourced models, robots and AI agents. That parade of technology represents Chinese developers' efforts to set world standards and benchmarks, and grab a bigger slice of the global market. They also dovetail with Beijing's broader efforts to ensure self-reliance on critical technologies in the face of tensions between the world's economic superpowers. The weekend conference in Shanghai – gathering star founders, Beijing officials and deep-pocketed financiers by the thousands – is designed to catalyse that movement. This year's attendance may hit a record because it's taking place at a critical juncture in the global race to lead the development of generative AI. It's already drawn some notable figures: Nobel Prize laureate Geoffrey Hinton and former Google chief Eric Schmidt were among industry heavyweights who met Shanghai party boss Chen Jining last Thursday, before they were due to speak at the conference. Going forward, China will seek to propel AI development in the Global South, Li said, referring to a loose gathering that includes Brazil and Africa. Schmidt later echoed Li's call for nations to work together – particularly China and the United States. 'The upsides are phenomenal,' he told delegates. 'As the largest and most significant economic entities in the world, the United States and China should collaborate on these issues,' he said. 'We have a vested interest to keep the world stable, keep the world not at war, to keep things peaceful, to make sure we have human control of these tools.' — Bloomberg
