Tom Oda Appointed USRA Fellow--The Organization's Highest Internal Recognition of Scientific and Technical Excellence
The USRA Fellows program recognizes USRA's most distinguished scientific and technical staff for their sustained accomplishments. Appointments to this distinction are determined by the Fellows' Committee, which includes the Vice President of Science and Technology, two members of the Board of Trustees, the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Human Resources Officer.
Dr. Elsayed Talaat, President and CEO of USRA, noted, 'Being named a USRA Fellow is a significant honor, and it reflects not only scientific excellence but also a career dedicated to advancing knowledge and impact. We are incredibly proud of Dr. Tomohiro Oda for his well-deserved recognition. His work continues to inspire scientists and advance scientific endeavors.'
Dr. Oda, who serves as Interim Director of the Earth from Space Institute, is an internationally recognized expert in anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. With more than 15 years of experience, his research integrates satellite remote sensing, atmospheric modeling, and emissions inventory approaches to advance global understanding of the carbon cycle and support science-based climate mitigation.
He is the architect of a widely used, high-resolution global carbon emissions dataset that supports atmospheric CO₂ simulations and informs policy and scientific communities worldwide. In collaboration with leading space agencies, Dr. Oda has developed and delivered value-added environmental data products, including GHG emission maps and nighttime environmental datasets derived from satellite observations.
Dr. Oda's work has had a significant influence at the global policy level. He was selected to serve on the U.S. National Academies' Consensus Study Committee on GHG Information and currently serves as a Lead Author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2027 Methodology Report on Inventories for Short-lived Climate Forcers. He leads USRA's observer delegation to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) COP conferences, where he plays a key role in facilitating dialogue among scientists, policymakers, and global stakeholders.
In 2023, Dr. Oda was honored with the President's Distinguished Service Award, USRA's highest level of individual recognition, in acknowledgment of his sustained excellence and impact.
He joined USRA in 2014. He has authored more than 40 publications in international journals with over 7000 citations. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering from Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. He joins previous USRA Fellows Dr. William (Bill) Meyer and Dr. Davide Venturelli as the third USRA Fellow.
About USRA
Universities Space Research Association operates scientific institutes and conducts major research and workforce development programs, engaging the government, academic, and industrial communities.
Founded in 1969, under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences at the request of the U.S. Government, the Universities Space Research Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered to advance space-related science, technology, and engineering.
PR Contact:
Suraiya Farukhi
[email protected]
443-812-6945
View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/tom-oda-appointed-usra-fellowthe-organizations-highest-internal-recognition-of-scientific-and-technical-excellence-302499848.html
SOURCE Universities Space Research Association
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
China proposes global cooperation body on AI
SHANGHAI, July 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- A news report from The Chinese government has proposed the establishment of a world AI cooperation organization as part of its efforts to bolster open, inclusive and equitable artificial intelligence development and governance globally. Premier Li Qiang announced the initiative when addressing the opening ceremony of the 2025 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance in Shanghai. Li emphasized the need for collaborative approaches to global AI governance to ensure that intelligent technologies are developed for the good of all. More than 1,000 high-level representatives from upwards of 40 countries and international organizations attended the opening ceremony of the three-day event, themed 'Global Solidarity in the AI Era'. Li said that the risks and challenges brought by AI development, such as machine hallucinations, deep fakes and AI proliferation, have aroused widespread attention. There is an urgent need to further consolidate a societal consensus on how to achieve a balance between development and security in the AI sector, he said. Li said greater emphasis should be placed on collective governance to ensure that AI ultimately benefits humanity. Given that global AI governance appears fragmented, it is essential to enhance coordination and alignment among countries around the world to establish a framework and rules for global AI governance with a broad consensus, he added. Noting that China places great importance on global AI governance and actively participates in promoting multilateral and bilateral cooperation in this regard, the premier said the nation is willing to offer more Chinese solutions to the international community and contribute more Chinese wisdom to global AI governance. In 2023, China proposed the Global AI Governance Initiative to promote an open, inclusive and fair approach to the development and governance of AI technologies. Last year, China proposed the AI Capacity-Building Action Plan for Good and for All to bridge the AI and digital divides, and to ensure the Global South benefits equitably from AI development. China actively promotes open source development, and is willing to collaborate with countries around the world to promote progress in software and hardware technologies, intensify open source initiatives, and collectively propel AI development to higher levels, Li said. Also on July 26, the conference adopted the Global AI Governance Action Plan, which calls on all parties to work in solidarity to advance AI development and governance. For more information: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
China proposes global cooperation body on AI
SHANGHAI, July 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- A news report from The Chinese government has proposed the establishment of a world AI cooperation organization as part of its efforts to bolster open, inclusive and equitable artificial intelligence development and governance globally. Premier Li Qiang announced the initiative when addressing the opening ceremony of the 2025 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance in Shanghai. Li emphasized the need for collaborative approaches to global AI governance to ensure that intelligent technologies are developed for the good of all. More than 1,000 high-level representatives from upwards of 40 countries and international organizations attended the opening ceremony of the three-day event, themed "Global Solidarity in the AI Era". Li said that the risks and challenges brought by AI development, such as machine hallucinations, deep fakes and AI proliferation, have aroused widespread attention. There is an urgent need to further consolidate a societal consensus on how to achieve a balance between development and security in the AI sector, he said. Li said greater emphasis should be placed on collective governance to ensure that AI ultimately benefits humanity. Given that global AI governance appears fragmented, it is essential to enhance coordination and alignment among countries around the world to establish a framework and rules for global AI governance with a broad consensus, he added. Noting that China places great importance on global AI governance and actively participates in promoting multilateral and bilateral cooperation in this regard, the premier said the nation is willing to offer more Chinese solutions to the international community and contribute more Chinese wisdom to global AI governance. In 2023, China proposed the Global AI Governance Initiative to promote an open, inclusive and fair approach to the development and governance of AI technologies. Last year, China proposed the AI Capacity-Building Action Plan for Good and for All to bridge the AI and digital divides, and to ensure the Global South benefits equitably from AI development. China actively promotes open source development, and is willing to collaborate with countries around the world to promote progress in software and hardware technologies, intensify open source initiatives, and collectively propel AI development to higher levels, Li said. Also on July 26, the conference adopted the Global AI Governance Action Plan, which calls on all parties to work in solidarity to advance AI development and governance. For more information: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
18 hours ago
- Fast Company
Is ChatGPT making us stupid? Depends on how it's used
Back in 2008, The Atlantic sparked controversy with a provocative cover story: ' Is Google Making Us Stupid? ' In that 4,000-word essay, later expanded into a book, author Nicholas Carr suggested the answer was yes, arguing that technology such as search engines worsened Americans' ability to think deeply and retain knowledge. At the core of Carr's concern was the idea that people no longer needed to remember or learn facts when they could instantly look them up online. While there might be some truth to this, search engines still require users to use critical thinking to interpret and contextualize the results. Fast-forward to today, and an even more profound technological shift is taking place. With the rise of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, internet users aren't just outsourcing memory—they may be outsourcing thinking itself. Generative AI tools don't just retrieve information; they can create, analyze, and summarize it. This represents a fundamental shift: Arguably, generative AI is the first technology that could replace human thinking and creativity. That raises a critical question: Is ChatGPT making us stupid? As a professor of information systems who's been working with AI for more than two decades, I've watched this transformation firsthand. And as many people increasingly delegate cognitive tasks to AI, I think it's worth considering what exactly we're gaining and what we are at risk of losing. AI and the Dunning-Kruger effect Generative AI is changing how people access and process information. For many, it's replacing the need to sift through sources, compare viewpoints, and wrestle with ambiguity. Instead, AI delivers clear, polished answers within seconds. While those results may or may not be accurate, they are undeniably efficient. This has already led to big changes in how we work and think. But this convenience may come at a cost. When people rely on AI to complete tasks and think for them, they may be weakening their ability to think critically, solve complex problems, and engage deeply with information. Although research on this point is limited, passively consuming AI-generated content may discourage intellectual curiosity, reduce attention spans and create a dependency that limits long-term cognitive development. To better understand this risk, consider the Dunning-Kruger effect. This is the phenomenon in which people who are the least knowledgeable and competent tend to be the most confident in their abilities, because they don't know what they don't know. In contrast, more competent people tend to be less confident. This is often because they can recognize the complexities they have yet to master. This framework can be applied to generative AI use. Some users may rely heavily on tools such as ChatGPT to replace their cognitive effort, while others use it to enhance their capabilities. In the former case, they may mistakenly believe they understand a topic because they can repeat AI-generated content. In this way, AI can artificially inflate one's perceived intelligence while actually reducing cognitive effort. This creates a divide in how people use AI. Some remain stuck on the ' peak of Mount Stupid,' using AI as a substitute for creativity and thinking. Others use it to enhance their existing cognitive capabilities. In other words, what matters isn't whether a person uses generative AI, but how. If used uncritically, ChatGPT can lead to intellectual complacency. Users may accept its output without questioning assumptions, seeking alternative viewpoints, or conducting deeper analysis. But when used as an aid, it can become a powerful tool for stimulating curiosity, generating ideas, clarifying complex topics, and provoking intellectual dialogue. The difference between ChatGPT making us stupid or enhancing our capabilities rests in how we use it. Generative AI should be used to augment human intelligence, not replace it. That means using ChatGPT to support inquiry, not to shortcut it. It means treating AI responses as the beginning of thought, not the end. AI, thinking, and the future of work The mass adoption of generative AI, led by the explosive rise of ChatGPT (it reached 100 million users within two months of its release) has, in my view, left internet users at a crossroads. One path leads to intellectual decline: a world where we let AI do the thinking for us. The other offers an opportunity: to expand our brainpower by working in tandem with AI, leveraging its power to enhance our own. It's often said that AI won't take your job, but someone using AI will. But it seems clear to me that people who use AI to replace their own cognitive abilities will be stuck at the peak of Mount Stupid. These AI users will be the easiest to replace. It's those who take the augmented approach to AI use who will reach the path of enlightenment, working together with AI to produce results that neither is capable of producing alone. This is where the future of work will eventually go. This essay started with the question of whether ChatGPT will make us stupid, but I'd like to end with a different question: How will we use ChatGPT to make us smarter? The answers to both questions depend not on the tool but on users.
