Iran to send Russia launchers for short-range missiles, sources say
Iran denied it had such plans and dismissed the idea as "utterly absurd."
The delivery of the Fath-360 launchers -- if it occurs -- would help support Russia's grinding assault on its neighbor and reaffirm the deepening security ties between Moscow and Tehran.
With a 120-kilometer range, the Fath-360 would give Moscow's forces a new weapon to fire at Ukrainian frontline troops, nearby military targets, and population centers close to the border with Russia, analysts said.
The US last September said that Iran delivered the missiles to Russia on nine Russian-flagged ships -- which it sanctioned -- and three sources told Reuters at that time that the launchers were not included.
The Western security officials and the regional official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the delivery of the Fath-360 launchers was imminent.
They declined to provide further details of the pending transfer, including why they thought the launchers were not delivered with the missiles.
Iran's permanent mission to the United Nations dismissed what it called "baseless allegations" against Tehran.
"So long as conflict persists between the parties, Iran will abstain from rendering any form of military assistance to either side," it said in an emailed statement.
Russia's Defense Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The US National Security Council referred inquiries to the State Department, which did not respond immediately. The CIA declined comment.
Russia and Iran have previously denied that Tehran had shipped the missiles or any other arms to aid the full-scale invasion of Ukraine that Moscow launched in February 2022. US, Ukrainian and European officials say Iran has provided Russia thousands of drones and artillery shells.
In an apparent reference to the Fath-360s, US Army General Christopher Cavoli, the commander of US Central Command, last month told US lawmakers that Iran had donated to Russia more than 400 short-range ballistic missiles.
There have been no public reports of Iran transferring any other kinds of short-range ballistic missiles to Moscow or of Russian forces using the Fath-360.
Russia's deployment of the missiles could complicate US President Donald Trump's efforts to arrange a ceasefire and peace talks between Ukraine and Russia and to strike a separate deal with Iran to curb its nuclear program.
The regional official said that the indirect US-Iran nuclear talks mediated by Oman are among "several reasons" for the delayed delivery of the launchers.
The talks have encountered turbulence, although Iran on Friday said it agreed to hold a fourth round in Oman on Sunday.
Jack Watling, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute think tank, said that Iranian officials would consider the issue of sending arms to Russia as separate from the nuclear talks.
"That the Iranians are negotiating on nuclear issues with the US will not be seen as connected to what they might do in collaboration with the Russians," he said.
Analysts said there could have been another complication: Iran had to modify European-made commercial trucks on which to mount the launchers for its own Fath-360 arsenal, and it may have had to do the same for Russia given its massive losses of vehicles in Ukraine.
With the launchers, Russia will be able to increase pressure on Ukraine, said the experts.
"It would be much easier (for Russian forces) to launch a strike much faster ... against high-value targets," said Fabian Hinz, a research fellow with the International Institute for Strategic Studies. "They (Fath-360s) don't need a lot of launch preparations. Their flight time is incredibly short." Deploying the Fath-360 could allow Russia to reserve its more advanced missiles, like the Iskander, for longer-range strikes at critical infrastructure, including the power grid, straining Ukraine's precious missile defenses, the analysts said.
The Fath-360 "is designed to be handled and operated by people with relatively little training," said Ralph Savelsberg, an associate professor at the Netherlands Defense Academy.
"Why would they (Russia) buy inferior Iranian missiles? The only reason I could think of is that they cannot produce a sufficient number of their own missiles," he said.
"They're not super accurate and they don't carry a very large payload. But it just adds to Ukraine's headaches."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Editorial] Knotty trade issue](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Knotty trade issue
US said to demand Korea further open agricultural, livestock markets Further opening of the Korean agricultural and livestock markets has emerged as a major issue in Korea's tariff and trade negotiations with the US. Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said that trade negotiations on the agricultural sector always come with pain, but that there are some parts in which the country can make strategic decisions for a broader trade deal. He made the remark Monday during a meeting held with reporters to brief them on the progress of tariff negotiations he had during his visit to the US. Washington is said to demand that Seoul increase rice imports from the US; import American beef from cattle aged 30 months or older and living modified organism potatoes, a genetically modified crop; and ease quarantine on US apples. The Korean government is expected to finalize its proposals this week for tariff negotiations with the Donald Trump administration. Increasing the imports of rice and beef, among others, is a socially and politically sensitive matter for Korea. It is directly related to the foundation of the country's agricultural industry, its food sovereignty, the existence of its farm villages and regional economy Opposition from farmers is already strong. For these reasons, Korea has not fully opened its rice market. It obligatorily imports 408,700 metric tons of rice each year from five countries, including the US, at a low tariff rate of 5 percent. The figure amounts to about 11 percent of the 3.7 million tons that Korea produces at home annually. The US quota of some 132,000 tons takes up about 32 percent of Korea's rice imports. Korea imposes a 513 percent tariff on imports in excess of the quota, effectively banning imports of rice that go beyond the obligatory minimum. Unlike Japan, Korea has not experienced a shortage of rice. Rather, there is a surplus. Arguments for an increase in rice imports are less convincing here. Korea has only imported US beef from cattle younger than 30 months since fear of mad cow disease sparked nationwide protests against US beef imports in 2008. Despite these restrictions, Korea is still the largest importer of American beef in the world. Nearly half of the beef that Korea imported last year was American. The US does not appear likely to make a great profit from the additional opening of the Korean beef market. Yet, it has pointed to Korea's restriction on US beef imports as a typical non-tariff trade barrier. Koreans' aversion to US beef appears to have dropped remarkably, but US beef from cattle aged 30 months or older is likely to revive fears of mad cow disease and memories of protests. US-grown LMO potatoes were assessed as safe by the Rural Development Administration in March. Justification for the import ban on LMO potatoes has weakened. Importing apples is expected to cause vehement opposition from farmers. Many farmers grow apples in Korea, taking up 23 percent of its fruit cultivation area. Considering this, the government has practically banned apple imports since 1993 on the grounds that harmful insects could be brought in from abroad. Even when apple prices soared due to a poor harvest, Korea moved to increase imports of alternative fruits such as bananas, pineapples and mangoes, but not apples. Importing apples has been considered taboo. Proposals for negotiations are not yet finalized, but some Korean farmer groups are condemning the government for trying to make agriculture a scapegoat again. It will not be easy to persuade farmers within the two weeks left till the July 31 deadline for tariff negotiations. Yet, it is not easy to reject all of the US demands, either. Should the 25 percent "reciprocal" tariff be imposed on Korean items exported to the US, the Korean economy will reel from shock. In a macro perspective of national interests, a flexible attitude for strategic decisions is needed. Selective or conditional acceptance is more realistic than blanket refusal.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Thousands of Afghans secretly moved to Britain after data leak
LONDON (Reuters) -- Britain set up a secret scheme to bring thousands of Afghans to the UK after their personal details were disclosed in one of the country's worst ever data breaches, putting them at risk of reprisals from the Taliban after their return to power. Concerns that individuals could be targeted by the Taliban led the previous Conservative government to set up the relocation scheme, involving thousands of people and estimated to cost the government about 2 billion pounds ($2.7 billion). The leak by the Ministry of Defense in early 2022, which led to data being published on Facebook the following year, and the secret relocation program, were subject to a so-called superinjunction preventing the media reporting what happened, which was lifted on Tuesday by a court. British Defense Minister John Healey apologized for the leak, which included details about members of parliament and senior military officers who supported applications to help Afghan soldiers who worked with the British military and their families relocate to the UK. "This serious data incident should never have happened," Healey told lawmakers in the House of Commons. "It may have occurred three years ago under the previous government, but to all whose data was compromised I offer a sincere apology." The incident ranks among the worst security breaches in modern British history because of the cost and risk posed to the lives of thousands of Afghans, some of whom fought alongside British forces until their chaotic withdrawal in 2021. Healey said about 4,500 Afghans and their family members have been relocated or were on their way to Britain under the previously secret scheme. But he added that no-one else from Afghanistan would be offered asylum because of the data leak, citing a government review which found little evidence of intent from the Taliban to seek retribution against former officials. The review, a summary of which was also published on Tuesday, said more than 16,000 people affected by it had been relocated to the UK as of May this year, though some of those had been relocated to the UK under existing schemes. News of the leak comes as Britain's public finances are tight and the right-wing, anti-immigration Reform UK political party leads in the opinion polls. The government is facing lawsuits from those affected by the breach, further adding to the ultimate cost of the incident. Sean Humber, a lawyer at Leigh Day who has acted for Afghan citizens affected by previous data breaches, said those affected were "likely to have strong claims for substantial compensation" for the anxiety and distress caused by the leak. British forces were first deployed to Afghanistan in 2001 following the Sept. 11 attacks on the US, and they played a major role in combat operations there until 2014. In early 2022, a spreadsheet containing details of Afghans who had worked for the British government prior to the Taliban takeover in 2021 and had applied for relocation to Britain was emailed to someone outside of government systems by mistake. The superinjunction was first granted in 2023 after the Ministry of Defense, under the former Conservative government, argued that a public disclosure of the breach could put people at risk of extra-judicial killing or serious violence by the Taliban. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's center-left government, which was elected last July, launched a review into the injunction, the breach and the relocation scheme.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Trump says Ukraine should not target Moscow
WASHINGTON (AFP) -- US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Ukraine should not target Moscow, after the Kremlin charged that a new US plan to supply weapons to Kyiv along with sanctions threats against Russia would delay peace efforts. Trump on Monday gave Russia 50 days to strike a peace deal with Ukraine, voicing exasperation with Moscow, and announcing that NATO members would supply Kyiv with new military aid. In what would be an even more extraordinary shift, the Financial Times reported that Trump spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about providing US missiles to hit Moscow. But asked by reporters at the White House if Zelenskyy should look at striking the Russian capital, Trump replied, "No, he shouldn't target Moscow." Trump had taken office vowing to end the conflict swiftly and to stop the flow of billions of dollars of US weapons to Ukraine. The Republican put heavy pressure on Zelenskyy and initially touted his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Under pressure from Trump, Moscow and Kyiv opened talks on the conflict, which has ground on for more than three years, but the only concrete result has been prisoner exchanges. Russia has rejected calls for a ceasefire and launched a record number of drones and missiles at Ukraine in recent months. Moscow said it needed more time to respond fully to Trump's Monday announcement, but suggested it was not conducive to diplomacy. "It seems that such a decision made in Washington and in NATO countries and directly in Brussels will be perceived by Kyiv not as a signal for peace but for the continuation of the war," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "President Trump's statement is very serious. We certainly need time to analyze what was said in Washington," he told reporters in Moscow's first reaction to the comments. Trump warned that if no deal was concluded, he would slap severe tariffs on Russia's remaining trade partners in a bid to impede Moscow's ability to finance its military offensive. Pumped up by huge state spending on soldiers and weapons, as well as by redirecting vital energy exports to the likes of China and India, Russia's economy has so far defied US and EU attempts to push it into a deep recession through sanctions. Most European allies have cheered the return of a hard US line, although Slovakia, led by Moscow-friendly populist Robert Fico, has resisted new EU sanctions on Russia. But EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas also called for the United States to help fund the new weapons. "We welcome President Trump's announcement to send more weapons to Ukraine, although we would like to see US share the burden," Kallas said after a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels. "If you promise to give the weapons, but say that it's somebody else who is going to pay for it, it is not really given by you." Trump has been pushing allies to step up defense spending -- and to buy from US manufacturers -- and has long said the US shoulders too much of NATO's burden. Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden -- which joined NATO after Russia sent troops into Ukraine in 2022 -- all said they wanted to participate in Trump's plan. Sweden's Defense Minister Pal Jonson in a statement to Agence France-Presse said his country "would contribute" and said Ukraine was in "great need of more air defense," given Russia's "constant bombings and attacks." Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its offensive, with millions forced to flee their homes in eastern and southern Ukraine, which has been decimated by aerial attacks and ground assaults. In Moscow, residents dismissed Trump's statement as little more than politics. "It's a game of chess," Svetlana, an aviation engineer said. Trump "gave 50 days, and then there will be more. ... We are waiting for the next move of our president," the 47-year-old said. Ukrainian soldiers fighting in the east were hopeful but cautious about Trump's position. "I don't believe him. There have been too many promises that haven't been kept," said one soldier with the call sign "Shah." Others were worried it might be too little, too late. "Of course it's good, but at the same time, time has been lost. Those Patriots could have been sent sooner and could have helped a lot," another fighter called "Master" told AFP. Ruslan, a 29-year-old soldier, said, "If there is even the slightest chance to improve the situation for us and worsen it for them, then that's already positive."
