US Troops Given Authority to Detain Illegal Immigrants Trespassing in Newly Militarized Land
U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM)
On April 15, the Interior Department announced the
On April 21, USNORTHCOM announced that a 60-foot-wide portion of land, known as the New Mexico National Defense Area (NMNDA), has been added to the U.S. Army's Fort Huachuca installation. The land covers parts of California, Arizona, and New Mexico.
As such, service members operating in NMNDA are now authorized to carry out several security support operations.
This includes temporarily detaining trespassers until law enforcement authorities take custody of them, searching for trespassers, and implementing crowd control measures to ensure the safety of service members and Department of Defense (DOD) property.
On request, military personnel can also assist with installing temporary barriers, signage, and fencing activities.
Related Stories
4/16/2025
4/20/2025
'Through these enhanced authorities, U.S. Northern Command will ensure those who illegally trespass in the New Mexico National Defense Area are handed over to Customs and Border Protection or our other law enforcement partners,' Gen. Gregory Guillot, commander of U.S. Northern Command, said in a statement.
'Joint Task Force-Southern Border will conduct enhanced detection and monitoring, which will include vehicle and foot patrols, rotary wing, and fixed surveillance site operations.'
USNORTHCOM is
More than 10,000 service members have been
'DoD keeps delivering for the American people. President Trump said to LOCK-DOWN the border—and we are,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
Strengthening the Border
The April 11 memorandum issued by Trump
Such operations include deploying detection and monitoring systems and constructing barriers along the border.
'Our southern border is under attack from a variety of threats. The complexity of the current situation requires that our military take a more direct role in securing our southern border than in the recent past,' Trump wrote in the memo.
Trump's use of the military for border and immigration purposes has faced criticism from Democrats. On Feb. 13, two Democratic lawmakers wrote a
'NORTHCOM's and SOUTHCOM's new immigration-related operations place significant—and unnecessary֫—burdens on DoD resources, personnel, and readiness,' the letter reads.
The Defense Department 'has estimated that its southern border operations will cost almost $1 billion over just eight months, through the end of this fiscal year, compared to its estimate of $1 billion over three years during the first Trump administration,' the lawmakers wrote.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is pushing ahead with additional plans to secure the border. On April 8, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem
This was the first waiver issued by the DHS under the current Trump administration and is related to building 2.5 miles of barrier outside of San Diego.
'To cut through bureaucratic delays, DHS is waiving environmental laws—including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)—that can stall vital projects for months or even years,' the department said in a statement announcing the measure.
'This waiver clears the path for the rapid deployment of physical barriers where they are needed most, reinforcing our commitment to national security and the rule of law.'
The Border Patrol
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
‘Rights are under attack': S.F. Pride parade kicks off with mix of flamboyance, resistance
As San Francisco's month-long LGBTQ+ Pride celebration culminated Sunday in a massive rainbow-laden party packing city streets, event leaders made one thing clear: These were no ordinary festivities. President Donald Trump's recent assault on queer and transgender protections prompted some of San Francisco Pride's biggest corporate sponsors to flee, raising important questions about the iconic event's future. Should it become more of a protest than a party? And, present political climate aside, could a budget shortfall force organizers to scale things back? With Pride at an inflexion point of sorts, prominent officials tried to strike a delicate balance: voice defiance against many of the Trump administration's LGBTQ+-related policies, all while trumpeting Pride's potential as a unifying force during turbulent times. The result was a one-of-a-kind event that reflected the complexities of the moment and epitomized this year's theme of 'Queer Joy is Resistance.' 'This Pride hits different than recent prides,' Delaware Rep. Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender person elected to Congress, said in an interview with the Chronicle as she visited San Francisco for the Pride events. But, she added, it's also a moment to remember how far the LGBTQ+ movement has come, and to 'rediscover our superpower as a community.' As hundreds of thousands of spectators flooded Market Street and the Civic Center for one of the nation's largest Pride parades, they saw the zany antics and flamboyant fun that have long been Pride's signature. There was a lone nudist applying sunscreen, a group of dancers in glittering cowboy hats bobbing to Lady Gaga's 'Applause,' and rainbow-bedazzled attendees wearing Pride flags as butterfly wings. Through it all, somber reminders of the challenges LGBTQ+ people and other minority groups face peppered the festivities. At one point, San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto and a handful of SFPD officers passed through a mostly silent crowd, passing out rainbow flags. Wearing a purple hologram jacket, State Sen. Scott Wiener waved to the crowd atop a truck trailer as he held a sign that read, 'ICE out of SF.' Emblazoned across the T-shirts of San Francisco City Attorney's Office employees were the words, 'See You in Court,' with the Statue of Liberty and a rainbow flag. This was a not-so-subtle reference to the eight lawsuits filed by the city against the Trump administration. 'As the Trump administration violates the Constitution and undermines the rule of law every day, we have to defend our city and our communities,' City Attorney David Chiu said while riding atop a dinosaur float. 'Everyone's rights are under attack.' By taking a more obstinate stance than in recent years, Sunday's festivities conjured memories of Pride celebrations from the 1970s and '80s — a time when politics were at the forefront, and corporate sponsors remained an afterthought. The throwback vibe seemed warranted. After all, just days after the 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling that recognized same-sex marriage nationwide, many LGBTQ+ people feel quite under attack. 'Trump is trying to take away the rights of human beings,' said Kristina Corrozza, who waited 30 years to come to their first Pride. 'San Franciscans won't stand for it.' Just in the five months since Trump took office for a second, non-consecutive term, he has removed transgender people from the military, prevented federal insurance programs from paying for gender-affirmation surgeries for young people, and attempted to keep transgender athletes out of girls and women's sports. Then the Southern Baptist Convention, empowered by the overturning of Roe v. Wade, set its sights this month on ending same-sex marriage. Some agendas, like Trump's move to rename the Harvey Milk naval ship, have felt like a direct shot at San Francisco — a city that has long taken pride in being a bastion for the LGBTQ+ community. In the process, S.F. Pride organizers had to reckon with a sobering truth: Major corporations tend to value moving product over inclusivity. Since Trump was elected again, LGBTQ+ allyship has become increasingly unprofitable. This helps explain why five major corporate donors — including Comcast and Anheuser-Busch — pulled out of the event this year. Despite a late fundraising push spearheaded by smaller businesses, S.F. Pride entered Sunday about $180,000 short of its $2.3 million fundraising target. 'If we, somehow, in these next 10 days, can find another $175,000, and people show up on Pride Sunday, and our beverage program does well and our donations increase at the gate, we might get through this difficult period,' Suzanne Ford, the executive director of San Francisco Pride, recently told the Chronicle. All that raised the stakes for what was once a lighthearted celebration of the LGBTQ+ community. For many of the families who flocked to Market Street and the Civic Center for parade floats, musical acts and general pandemonium, Sunday's festivities represented a vital opportunity — not just to show the world that inclusivity is worth celebrating, but to reaffirm that political oppression can only make allies stronger, corporate sponsors or not. Marcella Pesavento lives in the neighborhood and walks her dog by every parade. But for this Pride, she stopped and climbed atop a traffic bollard to show her support. 'With everything going on with Trump, it feels important to stand up and be ourselves,' she said. 'It makes people feel they are not alone.'
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Warner says DOJ letter to University of Virginia president was ‘explicit'
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) said in a Sunday interview that University of Virginia President James Ryan, who submitted his resignation on Friday, was given an 'explicit' deadline to step aside, in a letter last week from the Trump administration. In an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation,' Warner condemned the Trump administration's pressure campaign against Ryan, who resigned on Friday to avoid funding cuts to the university. Trump's Department of Justice had been investigating allegations that the school was not in compliance with President Trump's January executive order barring DEI practices at institutions that receive federal funding. 'This is the most outrageous action, I think, this crowd has taken on education. We have great public universities in Virginia. We have a very strong governance system, where we have an independent board of visitors appointed by the Governor,' Warner said. 'Jim Ryan had done a very good job; just completed a major capital campaign.' 'For him to be threatened, and, literally, there was indication that they received the letter that if he didn't resign on a day last week, by five o'clock, all these cuts would take place,' Warner added. 'It was that explicit?' moderator Margaret Brennan asked. 'It was that explicit,' Warner said. The New York Times reported Thursday night that the Justice Department demanded Ryan resign as a condition of a settlement in its civil rights investigation into diversity practices at the university. Ryan posted a letter publicly on Friday, confirming his resignation, saying he was 'inclined to fight for what I believe in,' but could not 'make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job.' 'To do so would not only be quixotic but appear selfish and self-centered to the hundreds of employees who would lose their jobs, the researchers who would lose their funding, and the hundreds of students who could lose financial aid or have their visas withheld,' Ryan said in the letter.
Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Republican Senate tax bill would add $3.3 trillion to the US debt load, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The changes made to President Donald Trump's big tax bill in the Senate would pile trillions onto the nation's debt load while resulting in even steeper losses in health care coverage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis, adding to the challenges for Republicans as they try to muscle the bill to passage. The CBO estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill, which CBO has projected would add $2.4 to the debt over a decade. The analysis also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, an increase over the scoring for the House-passed version of the bill, which predicts 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage. The stark numbers are yet another obstacle for Republican leaders as they labor to pass Trump's bill by his self-imposed July 4th deadline. Even before the CBO's estimate, Republicans were at odds over the contours of the legislation, with some resisting the cost-saving proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid and food aid programs even as other Republicans say those proposals don't go far enough. Republicans are slashing the programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks put in place during his first term. The push-pull was on vivid display Saturday night as a routine procedural vote to take up the legislation in the Senate was held open for hours as Vice President JD Vance and Republican leaders met with several holdouts. The bill ultimately advanced in a 51-49 vote, but the path ahead is fraught, with voting on amendments still to come. Still, many Republicans are disputing the CBO estimates and the reliability of the office's work. To hoist the bill to passage, they are using a different budget baseline that assumes the Trump tax cuts expiring in December have already been extended, essentially making them cost-free in the budget. The CBO on Saturday released a separate analysis of the GOP's preferred approach that found the Senate bill would reduce deficits by about $500 billion. Democrats and economists decry the GOP's approach as 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. In addition, Democrats note that under the traditional scoring system, the Republican bill bill would violate the Senate's 'Byrd Rule' that forbids the legislation from increasing deficits after 10 years. In a Sunday letter to Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, CBO Director Phillip Swagel said the office estimates that the Finance Committee's portion of the bill, also known as Title VII, 'increases the deficits in years after 2034' under traditional scoring.
