logo
SC refuses to entertain Baghel's plea against nephew's election petition

SC refuses to entertain Baghel's plea against nephew's election petition

New Delhi, Jul 22 (UNI) The Supreme Court today refused to entertain a plea by former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel challenging an election petition filed against him by his nephew and BJP leader Vijay Baghel, which alleged violation of the mandated silence period norms during the 2023 Assembly elections.
A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi dismissed the petition as withdrawn while granting Baghel liberty to approach the High Court-cum-Election Tribunal to raise the issue of maintainability as a preliminary issue.
'If such an application is filed, the High Court is requested to decide it after giving an opportunity of being heard to the other side and before proceeding on merits.
Observations made in the said order shall have no bearing on the application sought to be moved,' the Bench clarified.
Baghel had approached the apex court against the Chhattisgarh High Court's dismissal of his application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of Vijay Baghel's election petition.
Appearing for Baghel, Senior Advocate Vivek Tankha, along with Advocate Sumeer Sodhi, argued that breach of silence period norms does not amount to 'corrupt practice' under election law and hence, the election petition was not maintainable.
However, the Bench suggested that the issue be raised before the High Court-cum-Election Tribunal.
In the 2023 Chhattisgarh Assembly elections, Bhupesh Baghel (Indian National Congress) and Vijay Baghel (Bharatiya Janata Party) contested against each other from the Patan constituency, with Bhupesh Baghel emerging victorious.
Subsequently, Vijay Baghel filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices, including violation of the 48-hour silence period mandated under Section 126 of the Representation of the People Act.
It was claimed that Bhupesh Baghel organised a rally or roadshow during the silence period, where slogans were raised in his favour. This was allegedly video-graphed and photographed by Vijay Baghel's election agent.
In his defence, Bhupesh Baghel contended that the election petition was vague and did not disclose any triable cause of action.
Upon dismissal of his application by the High Court, he approached the Supreme Court, which today declined to interfere. UNI SNG SSP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CBI takes over probe into assault on Army Colonel in Patiala over parking dispute
CBI takes over probe into assault on Army Colonel in Patiala over parking dispute

India Today

time38 minutes ago

  • India Today

CBI takes over probe into assault on Army Colonel in Patiala over parking dispute

The Punjab-Haryana has granted the investigation into the assault of Army Colonel Pushpinder Singh Bath and his son, Rajinder, to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).The incident, which occurred on March 21, 2025, at Harbhans Dhaba near Rajindra Hospital in Patiala, has now become a high-profile case following public outrage and intervention by the Punjab and Haryana High CBI registered the case and began its probe after receiving orders from the High Court. The agency has taken over the investigation from Patiala Police and filed a fresh FIR in the In March, Colonel Bath alleged that 12 Punjab Police personnel assaulted him and his son during a parking dispute outside a dhaba in Patiala. According to the Colonel, four inspectors and their armed subordinates attacked them without provocation, seized his ID card and mobile phone, and threatened him with a "fake encounter". The entire sequence of events, which was caught on CCTV, left Colonel Bath with a broken arm and his son with a head the incident, the Colonel's family approached Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann and met with Union Ministers and the Punjab Police DGP. However, the family claims that justice has still not been Punjab Police initially failed to act promptly. It was only after eight days, when the incident gained traction on social media and news outlets, that an FIR was lodged. In response to growing public pressure, twelve policemen were suspended. However, both the victim's family and the public demanded a fair and impartial investigation into the Punjab and Haryana High Court had also rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Punjab Police Inspector Ronnie Singh Salh, one of the key accused in the assault the four police inspectors involved, Salh was the only one who applied for bail in the High Court, which was rejected on Friday. The other three inspectors - Harjinder Dhillon, Harry Boparai and Shaminder Singh - are also implicated in both the assault case and a separate encounter case in Patiala. They are currently on the run and could be arrested under the FIR, having been fugitives for the past two months.- EndsMust Watch

American-born babies are American: Judge halts Trump birthright citizenship order
American-born babies are American: Judge halts Trump birthright citizenship order

India Today

time38 minutes ago

  • India Today

American-born babies are American: Judge halts Trump birthright citizenship order

A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's attempt to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to undocumented or temporary immigrant parents, calling the move unconstitutional and legally ruling by US District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston marks the third federal court to stop the executive order in its tracks since the Supreme Court last month narrowed the authority of lower courts to issue nationwide Sorokin ruled that an exception applied in this case, where more than a dozen states demonstrated real financial harm tied to the order. 'A patchwork approach to the birthright order would not protect the states,' Sorokin wrote, noting the high mobility of residents between states and slamming the administration's failure to explain how a more limited injunction would function.'They have never addressed what renders a proposal feasible or workable The defendants' position in this regard defies both law and logic.'The decision maintains a nationwide injunction that preserves birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, pending further review by the courts. Sorokin added that his ruling is not the final word on the issue, but emphasized the constitutional implications of the executive action.'The President cannot change that legal rule with the stroke of a pen,' Sorokin said. 'Trump and his administration are entitled to pursue their interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment but for purposes of this lawsuit at this juncture, the Executive Order is unconstitutional.'The lawsuit was brought by a coalition of states led by New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, who hailed the ruling as a critical defence of constitutional norms.'American-born babies are American, just as they have been at every other time in our Nation's history,' Platkin said in a statement. 'I'm thrilled the district court again barred President Trump's flagrantly unconstitutional birthright citizenship order from taking effect anywhere.'Government lawyers had argued that the injunction should be limited in scope to states' financial interests. Still, Sorokin rejected the idea, saying the administration failed to offer any coherent legal or administrative plan for how such limits would is the third time the executive order has been blocked. Earlier this month, a federal judge in New Hampshire prohibited the rule in a class-action lawsuit. That decision went into effect after no appeal was filed. On Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco also ruled against the order, upholding a nationwide injunction.A fourth ruling may be on the way. A Maryland judge said she would issue a similar decision if the appeals court agrees. - EndsWith inputs from Associated Press

No FIR yet by Parbhani cops in Santosh Suryawanshi custodial death case despite high court directive
No FIR yet by Parbhani cops in Santosh Suryawanshi custodial death case despite high court directive

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

No FIR yet by Parbhani cops in Santosh Suryawanshi custodial death case despite high court directive

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The Parbhani police have not yet registered an FIR in the Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death case more than three weeks after the Bombay high court's Aurangabad bench issued a directive to this effect. State govt on July 10 moved the Supreme Court against the high court bench's order of July 4 but the apex court has not yet taken cognisance of the appeal. There is no stay on the HC order that required the Parbhani police to register the FIR within a week (by July 11). The state's application to HC seeking an extension to implement its directive, is pending. "State govt's appeal was listed for a hearing today (Friday) before the SC bench but was adjourned to July 30," Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Maharashtra's chief standing counsel in the Supreme Court, told TOI. He preferred not to get into the specifics of the matter, explaining that the same was sub judice. On Friday, TOI made repeated calls and also sent text messages to Parbhani superintendent of police Ravindra Singh Pardeshi seeking his response on the matter. However, there was no response till the time of going to press. Lawyer Milind Sandanshiv, who represented Somnath's mother and petitioner Vijayabai in the high court, told TOI, "The Parbhani police should have registered the FIR. They have failed to take cognisance of the HC order as well as the reminder applications we have made to them to register the FIR. We will take a call on the next step at an appropriate time." On Dec 11, 2024, protests and a riot broke out in Parbhani over reports of an alleged desecration of a replica of the Indian Constitution. Somnath (35), a law student residing with his family in Pune and pursuing his studies at a college in Parbhani, was among the people arrested by the police in connection with the rioting case. After his initial custody remand, he was sent to jail in magisterial custody but succumbed on Dec 15, 2024, to injuries sustained in alleged police brutalities. His mother, Vijayabai, filed a petition in the HC seeking registration of an FIR against the policemen responsible for the alleged brutality. On July 4, the high court, while observing in an interim order that there was "prima facie material" indicating "custodial brutality and violation of constitutional rights, had directed the FIR to be registered at Mondha police station in Parbhani district within a week (by July 11). The FIR was to be based on a complaint application of Dec 18, 2024, by Vijayabai.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store