With ‘No Kings' protests upcoming, has SC's approval of Trump shifted at all?
Saturday's planned demonstration at the State House is one of several 'No Kings' protests being organized across the country to coincide with a planned military parade in Washington, D.C., to mark the Army's 250th birthday — and which also falls on the president's 79th.
The protests are also taking place with the backdrop of Trump's deployment of thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration raids in the city, a move that was resisted by local officials who fear it could increase tensions and the potential for violence.
Other demonstrations held at the State House so far this year have drawn hundreds upset by the Trump administration's actions on immigration and other issues. Which raises the question of whether those numbers represent any waning enthusiasm for the president in a state that voted for Trump by 18 percentage points seven months ago.
Winthrop University has conducted three statewide polls of South Carolina voters since Trump assumed office on Jan. 20. In February, April and May, Trump's approval among all voters has been consistently around 45%. The disapproval rate was at 40% and rose to 45% and 43% in the next two months, respectively. But that's largely because the percentage answering 'don't know' fell from 16% to 11% to 9%.
'That may not be the same after the protests' in California, said Scott Huffmon, director of the Winthrop Poll. 'There's a clear difference over [Kilmar Abrego] Garcia being brought back, but that's really the only strong immigration story that's bubbled up to public attention.'
Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who previously lived in Maryland after entering the country without documentation. He and several other immigrants the Trump administration accused of gang ties were deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador under an emergency war powers act that courts later blocked. A judge ordered that the U.S. 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. because his deportation violated a previous court order that found Abrego Garcia was likely to face persecution if he was returned to El Salvador, and the Supreme Court later upheld the decision.
Trump initially insisted he was unable to remove Abrego Garcia from Salvadoran custody, but earlier this month he was brought back to the U.S. to face charges of human smuggling.
The May Winthrop poll showed that 44% of South Carolinians said Trump should comply with court orders to return Abrego Garcia to the United States. 33% said he should not, and 23% were unsure.
'We shouldn't assume that all of the respondents knew the particulars of the Abrego Garcia case,' Huffmon noted when releasing the poll results. 'If they didn't, this becomes more of a referendum on whether the Trump administration should be bound by court orders when it comes to immigration.'
The same poll shows that 45% of South Carolinians disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, while 43% approve. But Trump is much stronger on immigration, with 50% approving of his handling of the issue and 40% disapproving.
'The people who constantly follow the news forget that the average person doesn't pay attention closely until something like the protests erupt, and then they see it as coming out of nowhere,' Huffmon said. 'It's possible that people who like the idea of Trump deporting folks have a problem with using the National Guard and military against U.S. citizens. That could produce a shift among those moderately supporting Trump.'
But the Winthrop University pollster was unsure how representative that subset of the population will be of the people at Saturday's protests.
'People at protests are going to be of two flavors,' he said. 'The largest number are the most liberal and active, but among them are people who normally wouldn't attend a rally for the Democratic Party, but became concerned because of this. They will be the minority among the protesters, but there will be some people who wouldn't have shown up except for the extreme nature of what was happening.'
But Greg Brewer, an engineer and self-described 'limited government fiscal conservative' living in Lexington, was weary of what a mass protest in the state's capital might mean. He remembers the last large protest in the Midlands, when a march against the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd in 2020 ended with vandalism and a police car set on fire.
'I think if you haven't learned from the past, you're doomed to repeat it, and the last time a protest came through the Vista, it ripped things apart,' he said. 'So if that's what's indicated, we need to learn from the past and make sure the resources are deployed to make sure that doesn't happen.'
Brewer used to live in California, and moved back to South Carolina amid the strict lockdown requirements imposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
'California in general is completely mismanaged, with its debt, its catastrophes,' Brewer said. 'The vegetation isn't managed, which is why they have these wildfires. I think there's nothing impressive about Gavin Newsom, he's a disaster.'
'Trump got elected because of concerns about sovereignty and border protection,' he said. 'That's what he campaigned on, and he's delivering on it.'
He encourages any protesters to find peaceful ways to channel their concerns into constructive action.
'Regular people can engage each other in civil and respectful ways,' Brewer said. 'You can speak to your representative at the State House or find a way to handle it locally.'
But another Lexington conservative had a different reaction to the week's news. Anne Marie Green, the former chair of the Lexington 1 school board, posted on Facebook that she was surprised to be heading to the protest herself.
'As a Christian, a lifelong Republican, and someone who grew up on the principled, conservative leadership of Ronald Reagan and Governor Carroll Campbell, I never imagined I would attend a protest,' Green wrote. 'I'll be standing with others at the No Kings protest to affirm something simple but vital: In America, we don't worship politicians. We hold them accountable. Our leaders are servants, not kings.'
'If you believe that our nation's strength lies in humility, not showmanship, and that faith and patriotism should never be used as tools for personal power or glory, join me tomorrow as we peacefully and prayerfully protest,' she said.
State Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Richland, minority leader in the state House of Representatives, said he was unsure who would be involved in Saturday's protest.
'I've been involved with protests since college, and I can never tell,' Rutherford said. 'I remember at every single George Floyd protest, I was shocked at how many people showed up. It really depends on what's on people's social media feeds.'
Rutherford believes that at least some people who voted for Trump are reconsidering, citing Arab American voters in Michigan who abandoned the Democrats over the Biden administration's approach to the war in Gaza, or Cuban Americans who have seen the revocation of immigrants' protected status under Trump.
'Republican businessmen see their 401(k)s plummet, and then when a court rules he did something illegal, the stock market goes up,' he said. 'Even the business community feels like they did not get what they pay for.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: CEOs have a new boss — Trump
If you're an American CEO, you might wake up one day to discover that President Trump has helped himself to a seat on your board of directors. Since first running for president in 2015, Trump has fashioned himself as a businessman-politician who knows what's best for American companies. Many CEOs appreciate his focus on deregulation and lowering taxes. But there's a catch: Trump has strong views on how managers should run their businesses and no compunctions about using the power of the presidency to bully bosses into doing it his way. Many CEOs are learning how to accommodate the micromanager in chief, some through lip service and others through actual business decisions. Some of Trump's interventions are remarkably mundane. He wants Coca-Cola to use real cane sugar in its soda instead of corn syrup. Coke says it will actually do what Trump wants, even though sugar is more expensive and Trumpa-Cola will probably cost more. Other demands are far more problematic. He wants the Washington Commanders football team and the Cleveland Guardians baseball team to revert to their former names, the racially insensitive Redskins and Indians, respectively. That's Trump using professional sports franchises to push his anti-woke agenda to the extreme, which may not hurt Trump, but it puts the two teams in a lose-lose position by reigniting controversies they thought they had finally put behind them. Trump's most meddlesome gambit is his trade policy, which is meant to literally force thousands of US companies to reorganize the way they do business by buying less abroad and more domestically. He directly threatened Apple with a 25% tax if it doesn't start making iPhones in the United States. After Mattel said it would have to raise prices because of Trump's tariffs, Trump threatened a 100% tax on products the toymaker imports and threatened that Mattel "won't sell one toy in the United States." Trump said he'd hit Harley-Davidson with a "big tax" if it went through with a plan to move some motorcycle production overseas. When Walmart said it would likely pass along the cost of Trump's tariffs to its own customers, Trump told Walmart it should "eat the tariffs" — pay the cost and accept lower profits — and warned, "I'll be watching." Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs Trump's manhandling of corporate America is hitting the bottom line. General Motors (GM) said on July 22 that Trump's tariffs shaved $1.1 billion off its second quarter profits and will likely cost the company as much as $5 billion this year. The day before, Jeep maker Stellantis (STLA) said the Trump tariffs contributed to a $2.7 billion loss in the first half of 2025. The second quarter earnings season is just getting started, so that may just be a taste of the losses related to Trump's rewiring of global supply chains. There's another category of Trump strong-arming: revenge. Trump has punished a dozen or so prominent law firms for working with Democrats or contributing to lawsuits or prosecutions targeting Trump himself. Trump typically issues an order limiting those firms' ability to work with the federal government, and in some cases makes deals in which those firms agree to do pro bono work for Trump's pet causes. Trump becomes the de facto chair of the firm's pro bono there's Trump's anti-woke crusade targeting Harvard, Columbia, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Virginia, and dozens of other universities for policies Trump considers too liberal. Trump has canceled billions of dollars' worth of federal grants to those schools, in some cases securing his desired policy changes as part of a settlement. Many companies have tried to preempt a Trump anti-woke crusade by rolling back diversity policies, including Google, (GOOG), Deloitte, Goldman Sachs (GS), Bank of America (BAC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Paramount (PARA), UnitedHealth (UNH), and IBM (IBM). Trump, in these instances, runs the HR department for a stint. Trump's micromanaging is a stark departure from the free-market capitalism the Republican Party has espoused for decades. University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers likens Trump's interventionism to Soviet-style central planning. "There is not a single institution this guy doesn't want to call to tell them how to do their jobs," Wolfers said recently. There are at least three lessons for CEOs. One is to hide for as long as Trump is president and hope he never notices your company or any of its products. Trump seems to have targeted Coke for his new beverage formula because he's a famous fan of its products. He hasn't said anything about Pepsi using a similar formula. Pepsi probably hopes he never does, though CEO Ramon Laguarta is clearly hedging his bets. Another lesson is that it's OK to blame Trump's intervention for losing money, but not for raising prices. Trump hasn't publicly criticized any company for saying his tariffs have cost them money, as GM and Stellantis have done and many more are sure to do. Eating the cost of his policies causes Trump no heartburn. But if you publicly blame him for any pain that afflicts voters, he blows his stack and sometimes seeks revenge. Lose money loudly, raise prices quietly. A third lesson is to pal up with Trump — and watch your back. Nvidia (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang has become Trump's new business BFF, accompanying him on a high-visibility Mideast trip in May and counseling him behind the scenes on technology and trade policy. Nvidia benefited earlier this month when Trump reversed a prior position and once again allowed the sale of advanced Nvidia chips to China. The company's stock popped more than 5% on the news. Other corporate titans have courted Trump — and then fallen out of favor. Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, once considered Trump's "tech whisperer," seems to have offended Trump by declining to join his Mideast trip in May. That's when Trump threatened a 25% tax specifically on imported iPhones. Trump's most spectacular business breakup has been with Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk, who contributed millions to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign and became head of the DOGE commission. But Musk grew disillusioned with some of Trump's policies, criticized them publicly, and broke ties with the Trump administration. Trump retaliated by threatening to deport Musk to his home country of South Africa and cancel contracts or subsidies involving Tesla and another Musk company, SpaceX. Crony capitalism only works if the cronyship lasts. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump pick Alina Habba is out\u00a0as interim US attorney for New Jersey
President Donald Trump's former lawyer Alina Habba was rejected as the state's top federal prosecutor. WASHINGTON – A panel of judges in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey declined to permanently appoint President Donald Trump's former lawyer, Alina Habba, to serve as the state's top federal prosecutor, according to an order from the court. Habba has been serving as New Jersey's interim U.S. attorney since her appointment by Trump in March, but was limited by law to 120 days in office unless the court agreed to keep her in place. The U.S. Senate has not yet acted on her formal nomination to the role, submitted by Trump this month. The court instead appointed the office's No. 2 attorney, Desiree Grace, the order said. More: Trump's team promised transparency on Epstein. Here's what they delivered. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York last week declined to keep Trump's U.S. attorney pick John Sarcone in place after his 120-day term neared expiration. Sarcone managed to stay in the office after the Justice Department found a workaround by naming him as "special attorney to the attorney general," according to The New York Times. Habba's brief tenure as New Jersey's interim U.S. attorney included the filing of multiple legal actions against Democratic elected officials. Her office brought criminal charges against Democratic U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver, as she and other members of Congress and Newark's Democratic mayor, Ras Baraka, tried to visit an immigration detention center. The scene grew chaotic after immigration agents tried to arrest Baraka for trespassing, and McIver's elbows appeared to make brief contact with an immigration officer. Habba's office charged McIver with two counts of assaulting and impeding a law enforcement officer. McIver has pleaded not guilty. Habba's office did not follow Justice Department rules, which require prosecutors to seek permission from the Public Integrity Section before bringing criminal charges against a member of Congress for conduct related to their official duties. Habba's office also charged Baraka, but later dropped the case, prompting a federal magistrate judge to criticize her office for its handling of the matter. Prior to March, Habba had never worked as a prosecutor. She represented Trump in a variety of civil litigation, including a trial in which a jury found Trump liable for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll after she accused him of raping her in the mid-1990s in a department store dressing room. In 2023, a federal judge in Florida sanctioned Trump and Habba and ordered them to pay $1 million for filing a frivolous lawsuit, which alleged that Hillary Clinton and others conspired to damage Trump's reputation in the investigation into Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Golden Dome set to get another $13B as project leader takes helm
President Trump's Golden Dome missile defense project officially has a new team lead and gained potentially another $13 billion, setting the effort on a race to hit its ambitious three-year timeline. The office will be led by Vice Chief of Space Operations Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, unanimously confirmed by the Senate on Thursday as the first Golden Dome for America Direct Reporting Program Manager, according to a Pentagon statement released Tuesday. Guetlein, who Trump named as the Golden Dome lead in May, will be 'responsible for developing the Golden Dome portfolio of capabilities,' and report directly to Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg. 'Golden Dome for America requires a whole-of-nation response to deter and, if necessary, to defeat attacks against the United States,' the Pentagon said in the release. 'We have the technological foundation, national talent, and decisive leadership to advance our nation's defenses. We are proud to stand behind Gen. Mike Guetlein as he takes the helm of this national imperative.' Intended to protect the skies over the continental United States, Golden Dome promises a network of space-based missiles launched from satellites to intercept missiles launched from the ground, an expensive, untested technology. The Trump administration has insisted the project is necessary to protect against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks and will only cost $175 billion. To fund the effort, $24.4 billion was included for the project in the One Big, Beautiful Bill, signed by Trump on July 4. Then on July 17, the House voted to pass the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, which includes roughly $13 billion for advanced initiatives to support Golden Dome. But the purported price tag, also announced by Trump in May, is far below estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, which pegged the figure at more than $500 billion over 20 years to develop. Other estimates have placed the cost at $1 trillion. What's more, missile defense experts highly doubt a Golden Dome system as Tump has described can be created in under three years. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) last month called out 'the physics' of Golden Dome, pressing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to seek out viability analysis from scientists instead of defense and space firms. 'This idea, you know, might not be fully baked,' Kelly, an engineer by trade, told Hegseth during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on June 18. 'You've got to go back and take a look at this. . . . You could go down a road here and spend hundreds of billions of dollars of the taxpayers' money, get to the end, and we have a system that is not functional,' Kelly added. In its statement, the Pentagon said Golden Dome would establish partnerships with industry, academia, national labs and other government agencies to rapidly develop and field the system, with an architecture to be developed within the next 60 days.