Mahmoud Khalil, free speech rights and the legal battle ahead
Farbiarz said on June 20 that there was no evidence that Khalil, a Columbia University graduate, would be a flight risk or danger to the community if he was released.
The administration has cited a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 in its effort to deport Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who was born in Syria. The clause allows the secretary of state to remove individuals from the country if they have reason to believe the person's actions or presence undermines foreign policy interests.
Earlier in June, Farbiarz said the application of the provision to Khalil's case violated his First Amendment right to free speech.
Trump has referred to Khalil as a "radical, foreign, pro-Hamas student." Khalil's lawyers have said there is no evidence he supports the organization, which the federal government has long designated as a terror group.
David Keating, president of the Institute for Free Speech, said he doesn't think international students or visa holders should "take any comfort from (Khalil's release) at all."
While Khalil's case garnered publicity and resources for his defense, Keating said that may not be the case for others if the Trump administration targets student protesters at a larger scale.
The administration's actions thus far stand to have a "pretty stark" chilling effect on students, he said, adding that they may prompt some to reconsider their plans to study in the U.S.
"I think we're sending a really bad lesson about freedoms in America," Keating said. "We should be a beacon of freedom to the world, and I think one way to do that is to let even temporary visitors express their political views."
White House says Khalil's case is 'not about free speech'
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) similarly believes the "fight for free speech is far from over," according to FIRE attorney Conor Fitzpatrick.
The organization filed an amicus brief in support of Khalil that said Secretary of State Marco Rubio having the authority to deport non-citizens based on his sole assessment "places free expression in mortal peril."
Farbiarz ruled against granting Rubio such authority earlier in June, saying that the government's actions were chilling Khalil's right to free speech and negatively impacting his career and reputation, which "adds up to irreparable harm."
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told USA TODAY that Khalil's case was "not about 'free speech.'"
"This is about individuals who don't have a right to be in the United States siding with Hamas terrorists and organizing group protests that made college campuses unsafe and harassed Jewish students," Jackson said, adding that the administration "expect(s) to be vindicated on appeal" and "look(s) forward to removing Khalil from the United States."
While Fitzpatrick said individuals who disagree with the administration's stance and actions toward Khalil can write to Congress or attend rallies to make their voices heard, the fate of student protesters like Khalil ultimately lies in judges' hands.
"Realistically, a lot of this is going to have to be resolved in the courts," he said. "There's only so much activism can do on that front."
ACLU lawyer says Khalil's case has 'McCarthyite overtones'
The American Civil Liberties Union, which is part of Khalil's legal counsel, was "overjoyed" by his release, but the organization said its celebration is tempered by the reality of the long legal road ahead.
"I'd say this is a victory in a critically important battle, but it's a long war and we intend to fight it all the way through," ACLU attorney Brian Hauss told USA TODAY.
Hauss noted that the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed noncitizens' right to First Amendment protections in 1945's Bridges v. Wixon decision. The case surrounded the government's attempt to deport a man based on his alleged affiliation with the Communist Party.
There are "similar McCarthyite overtones" in Khalil's case, Hauss said, referencing the senator who spearheaded the government's anticommunist crusade.
While it's "certainly possible" that a deportation case involving student protesters could end up at the Supreme Court, which has reversed long-standing rulings such as Roe v. Wade in recent years, Hauss said he's optimistic the court would rule in their favor given its rulings upholding the First Amendment in recent years.
"For the Supreme Court to step back from those freedoms would be truly surprising, and I hope I'm not surprised," he said.
Another high-profile case related to Khalil's surrounds Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested in Boston in March after writing a pro-Palestinian opinion article that criticized the school's response to the Israel-Gaza war in its student newspaper. A federal judge in Vermont ordered Ozturk to be released in May.
Contributing: Hannan Adely and Michael Loria
BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@usatoday.com.
USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Thanks to the humbling of Iran, a new reshaped, peaceful Middle East is within our grasp
Several years ago, I stood at the northernmost tip of Israel, just behind the border with Lebanon. A pale-grey concrete wall divided the two countries. Just a few yards away, on the other side, a road snaked into the distance. It turned sharp right, then left, a physical manifestation of the absurdity of the arbitrary lines drawn across the dun-coloured scrubland. A blue road sign was clearly visible, indicating the way to Beirut, and a stream of cars headed up the Lebanese coast. Behind us, in Israel, were the green fields of a border kibbutz. On the other side, the hills were dotted with large, multi-storey villas, shimmering in the heat. For a moment, I imagined that the frontier was open, that it was possible to drive north from Tel Aviv to Tyre, Sidon and then Beirut. Back in the 1960s, the Lebanese capital was a smart, sophisticated city, renowned for its glamorous nightlife and known as the Paris of the Middle East. It's still one of the most cosmopolitan cities in the Levant, and would be a natural tourism partner for Tel Aviv. A few yards behind us was one key reason that has not happened yet. Operatives for Hezbollah, the Shi'ite terrorist organisation that controls much of southern Lebanon, had dug a tunnel under the fence. The tunnel had been discovered a few yards inside Israeli territory and blocked up. There was little doubt that had the Hezbollah operatives succeeded in infiltrating, they would have carried out atrocities such as those committed by Hamas on October 7. Hamas documents captured during the Gaza war, published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, in Israel, outline a plan for a joint Hamas-Hezbollah onslaught on Israel, together with militias from other Arab states, co-ordinated with Iran. For now, at least, such an attack is much less likely. America's bunker-buster bombs not only destroyed – or severely damaged – Iran's nuclear capabilities, but also its power as regional hegemon. Hezbollah, Iran's client terrorist militia in southern Lebanon, had already been crippled by Israel's audacious 'beeper' operation, which killed or wounded thousands of operatives. Hamas, also a client of Tehran, is still killing Israeli soldiers in Gaza, but will soon be written out of any future peace settlement, its leaders likely exiled and living in hiding for the rest of their lives. As the dust settles over Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, Iran's nuclear sites, the contours of a new Middle East can be glimpsed. Far in the distance, perhaps, but visible none the less. Much of the Middle East's current woes can be traced back to the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement, which carved up the dying Ottoman empire into areas of British and French control. The British zone, for example, included much of Mesopotamia in modern-day Iraq, while France was granted what became Syria and Lebanon. After the Second World War, when the Western powers retreated, unitary nation-states were imposed on multi-ethnic societies with little sense of national identity. Minorities, fearful for their future, took control and instituted reigns of terror. The Assad dynasty in Syria was Alawite. Saddam Hussein in Iraq was a Sunni Muslim. The Kurds, spread across the region, were denied any kind of state. Yet even if the borders of the Arab states are not redrawn, Sykes-Picot and its legacy are not immutable. An autonomous de facto Kurdistan exists in part of north-eastern Iraq, with its own elected parliament and government. Shimon Peres, the late veteran Israeli statesman, once proposed a 'Jordanian option', where Israel, a Palestinian entity and Jordan would form a confederation, with open borders, free movement internally and shared institutions. The European Union, where open borders and free trade have largely rendered old territorial disputes irrelevant, could offer a model for a new Middle East. The Abraham Accords, between Israel and several Arab countries, most notably the United Arab Emirates, provide a foundation for a future regional settlement. The UAE is reportedly already mediating secret talks between Syria and Israel. The way is clearing for a gradual opening of diplomatic and economic relations. Where Syria goes, Lebanon will soon follow. Saudi Arabia's accession to the accords is regarded in Jerusalem as the greatest prize. Normalisation with Israel's immediate neighbours would bring rapid economic benefits for all parties. Shared tourism could bring substantial investment to Jerusalem, Damascus and Beirut. Such a vision, of a Middle East with open borders and modern transport links, where Israel and its neighbours trade freely, may still seem remote. There remains widespread anger in Arab countries about the devastation in Gaza. Islamist movements such as the Muslim Brotherhood, resolutely opposed to any normalisation with the Jewish state, remain influential. In public, Arab leaders have condemned Israel's attack on Iran, even though the theocracy also menaced its neighbours, such as Saudi Arabia. But in private, there is widespread relief that the ayatollahs have been severely weakened, and their client terrorist movements disabled. Before the 1948 war, after Israel declared independence, taxis would go back and forth from Clock Tower Square in Jaffa to Beirut. Nowadays, such a journey still seems fanciful – but less so by the day. The potential rewards of normalisation for Israel and its neighbours are enormous. As Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern political Zionism, wrote of his own plan for a Jewish state: 'If you will it, it is no dream.'
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Israel close to accomplishing objectives in Gaza, says IDF
Israel is close to accomplishing its current objectives in Gaza, according to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Their claim comes amid reports that ceasefire prospects between Israel and Hamas are improving, again raising hopes that the 20-month conflict could come to an end. The White House is putting increasing pressure on Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, to bring an end to the war, which began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct 7 2023. Also suggesting an end is in sight, Qatar, who have mediated ceasefire talks, urged Israel and Hamas to take the 'window of opportunity' for a new hostage deal in the wake of the end of Israel's 12-day war with Iran. Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, the IDF chief of staff, said on Friday that Israel's operation would soon 'reach the lines' defined by the government, which would see the military assert control over 75 per cent of Gaza territory. 'In the near future, we will reach the lines we defined for the current phase within the framework of Gideon's Chariots,' Mr Zamir said during a visit to the Gaza Strip. The IDF's operational plans for Gideon's Chariots, reported by The Times of Israel, had indicated that it would take two months to capture 75 per cent of Gaza. Now the government will need to decide if it pushes for full control or ends the operation, analysts have said, with the options expected to be put to the cabinet on Sunday. 'From there, operational options will develop that will be presented to the political echelon,' said Mr Zamir, adding that the IDF 'will continue to act with determination to achieve the two objectives of the campaign, the release of the hostages and the defeat of Hamas.' Mr Netanyahu has so far said only that Israel would carry on in its attacks until it had completely destroyed Hamas, and Right-wing members of his coalition – upon whom he relies in order to govern – have called for him to seize full control of the Strip. However, Donald Trump, the US president, is pushing Israel to conclude its offensive following what he has deemed a successful 12-day war against Iran. Speaking to reporters on Friday, Mr Trump suggested that a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal would be reached 'within the next week', having said earlier in the week that 'great progress' had been made in ceasefire talks. Mr Netanyahu may calculate that he must keep Mr Trump onside and therefore work towards a deal, secure the release of the remaining Gaza hostages, and call an election in an attempt to capitalise on a bump in popularity in the wake of the war with Iran. Mr Zamir also said of Israel's war with Iran: 'Iran took a heavy blow. There is potential that the blow caused to Iran will advance our goals in Gaza,' he said. Gaza mediators are engaging with Israel and Hamas to build on momentum from the ceasefire with Iran and work towards a truce in the Palestinian territory, Majed al-Ansari, a Qatar foreign ministry spokesman, said. 'If we don't utilise this window of opportunity and this momentum, it's an opportunity lost amongst many in the near past. We don't want to see that again,' said Mr Ansari, who is also an adviser to Qatar's prime minister. An official with knowledge of the situation said that Ron Dermer, the Israeli minister for strategic affairs, would arrive in Washington next week for talks on a Gaza ceasefire, Iran and other subjects. Mr Zamir's comments came the day before Israeli strikes killed at least 62 people across Gaza, according to reports from inside the Hamas-run territory. Three children and their parents were killed in an Israeli strike on a tent camp in Muwasi near the southern city of Khan Younis. They were struck while sleeping, relatives said. 'What did these children do to them? What is their fault?' said Suad Abu Teima, the children's grandmother, as reported by the Associated Press. Also among the dead were 12 people near the Palestine Stadium in Gaza City, which was sheltering displaced people, and eight more in apartments, according to staff at Shifa hospital. More than 20 bodies were taken to Nasser hospital, according to health officials. The war has killed over 56,000 Palestinians, according to the health ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. It said more than half of the dead were women and children, and that they included 6,089 people killed since the end of the latest ceasefire. Hamas massacred more than 1,200 Israelis, and took 254 hostages inside Gaza. About 50 remain in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Middle class youngsters chanting for death shows how sick Britain now is
The spectacle of massed crowds calling for the blood of Jews is more associated with Islamist dictatorships than our own democracies. On October 7, however, something foul awoke in the West. Less than two years later, we find thousands of white youngsters from the leafy suburbs of Middle England chanting 'death, death to the IDF' at the Glastonbury Festival of a Saturday afternoon. Would that be the same IDF that delivered us from the spectre of a nuclear-armed Iran with remarkably few civilian casualties? Which rescued us from the regime described by the head of MI5 as 'the state actor which most frequently crosses into terrorism' on our shores? Why, yes. Yes it would. Your average Glasto fan, it seems, would have no objection if Tehran's thugs brought the 'intifada' over here, perhaps with a nuclear bomb on London, so long as they brought death to Israel first. Such is the way with brainless trends, even when the fashion is for bloodlust. What Jewish festival-goers must have felt amidst that display of depravity is enough to make you ashamed of our country. Don't forget, this gory chapter began with a massacre of revellers at the Nova music festival; in a sane world, you'd have expected Glastonbury to fly the Israeli flag in solidarity and chant for the demise of Hamas. The cleanness of the Iran campaign shows how the IDF can operate when its enemy does not push civilians into harm's way for the benefit of the international media. Clearly, Israel is not trying to kill the innocent. Has that thought occurred to any of the Glasto cultists? Of course not. As transparent as it may be, Hamas propaganda is a roaring success when people get their kicks out of believing it. Depressingly, this has become the new normal. There literally is no evil so dark that it cannot find enthusiastic support on the Western Left, so long as that evil first wishes death upon the Jews. Astonishingly, that principle holds even if the evil happens to wish death upon us second. It's true what they say: antisemitism is a sickness and at bottom it is a hatred of ourselves. Whether Bob Vylan, the dreadlocked rapper who led Saturday's version of Orwell's Two Minutes Hate, was breaking the law is beside the point. Legislation is limited when the culture moves beyond it. Even the BBC's attempts at decorum – they had refused to broadcast the performance by Kneecap, the Irish band which has supported Hamas and Hezbollah and demanded that people kill their local Tory MPs – collapsed when put to the test. Shamefully, the 'death to the IDF' chant was beamed out by our national broadcaster into millions of homes. On Thursday, Sir Michael Eavis, the founder of Glastonbury, defiantly insisted that people should 'go somewhere else' if they did not like the politics of his festival. By Saturday, we saw what those politics meant: a carnival of bloodthirsty radicalism that would have been unrecognisable in the Britain of our parents. Jeremy Corbyn may have epitomised the vacuity of the Gaza Left by praising a banner saying 'build bridges not walls' that was literally pinned to a wall, but the joke is wearing thin. In May, a Palestine activist murdered two Israeli diplomats in Washington DC. Last week, Palestine activists sabotaged RAF aircraft vital to our national security. Yet still the simpering BBC fawns over the Eavis clan. For years, sensible people have scratched their heads at how the Left can have come to support jihadis. At the Glastonbury festival of narcissism, however, it has become difficult to tell them apart.
