logo
Home Secretary says ‘gap in law' on violent attackers will be closed

Home Secretary says ‘gap in law' on violent attackers will be closed

Yvette Cooper said the new tools will enable the criminal justice system to 'close the gap' between terror suspects, who can be jailed for life for planning attacks, and individuals not driven by a particular ideology.
Police would be given powers to apprehend them before they carry out attacks.
Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's State of Terror series: 'There is a gap in the law around the planning of mass attacks that can be just as serious (as terrorism) in their implications for communities, their impact, the devastation that they can cause and the seriousness of the crime.
'We will tighten legislation so that that is taken as seriously as terrorism.'
She said legislation would be similar to that which allows police to arrest terror suspects for steps taken to prepare for an attack, such as research, which is not currently available without links to an ideological cause.
'We've seen cases of growing numbers of teenagers potentially radicalising themselves online and seeing all kinds of extremist material online in their bedrooms,' she said.
'We have to make sure that the systems can respond while not taking our eye off the ball of the more long-standing ideological threats.'
Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana, who killed three girls at a dance class, is among the individuals who could have been covered by the legislation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer accused of having an 'obsession with censorship' as it emerges that elite police units will monitor social media posts on migrants for early signs of unrest
Keir Starmer accused of having an 'obsession with censorship' as it emerges that elite police units will monitor social media posts on migrants for early signs of unrest

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Keir Starmer accused of having an 'obsession with censorship' as it emerges that elite police units will monitor social media posts on migrants for early signs of unrest

Keir Starmer was last night accused of an 'obsession with censorship' after it emerged an elite team of police officers will monitor social media posts to quell riots. Detectives are set to be drawn from forces around the country as the Government scrambles to crack down on potential violence by flagging up early signs of civil unrest online. It comes amid fears Britain could face another summer of disorder just 12 months after a wave of riots following the Southport murders. Demonstrations have flared up outside The Bell Hotel, in Epping, Essex, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexual offences against a schoolgirl. Protesters – and counter-protesters from Stand Up to Racism – gathered outside the hotel again yesterday, with more demos planned at other migrant hotels including in Wolverhampton, Cheshire and Canary Wharf, amid local concerns about hotels being used to accommodate single male migrants. The new National Internet Intelligence Investigations team, assembled by the Home Office, will aim to 'maximise social media intelligence' after police forces were heavily criticised for their handling of last year's riots. But critics say the social media crackdown is 'disturbing' and raises concerns for free speech. It also comes after footage emerged of Essex Police escorting pro-migrant protesters to the Epping hotel before clashes broke out. He has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper about the 'dangerous development', asking: 'Why is funding being prioritised for online speech surveillance instead of increasing front-line policing or addressing the causes of the migrant hotel protests?' Madeleine Stone, of civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, said the new unit to monitor social media was 'another example of this Government's obsession with censorship and eerily reminiscent of the Covid-era counter-disinformation units, which faced huge backlash.' The Home Office was contacted for comment. A National Police Chiefs' Council spokesman said: 'Forces will continue to facilitate the right to peaceful protest,' adding that they were 'closely monitoring the latest intelligence to ensure we are best placed to respond swiftly to reports of serious disorder. 'We have mechanisms in place, enhanced following last summer, to enable us to mobilise resources at a regional and national level if required.'

Why don't we just arrest the driver of every migrant boat? asks ROBERT HARDMAN
Why don't we just arrest the driver of every migrant boat? asks ROBERT HARDMAN

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Why don't we just arrest the driver of every migrant boat? asks ROBERT HARDMAN

So the Home Secretary is going to usher in 'new laws' to criminalise people traffickers who cram too many 'clients' on to a small boat. As Yvette Cooper told The Mail on Sunday yesterday, she is worried about women and children being 'crushed at sea', warning: 'If you storm a boat, trampling over the bodies of tiny children, you are complicit in putting other people in danger.' I'd love to know which beaches she has been on lately. The ones I have just visited in Northern France – and the makeshift camps just beyond the dunes – have precious few women and almost no children at all. The crowds who come charging over the sands each dawn when the latest 'taxi boat' looms into view are almost entirely adult young men. And in response to her latest proposal, I would simply ask the Home Secretary why she is bothering with any 'new laws' when she already has perfectly good laws at her disposal. Both the French and British authorities have the power to apprehend the driver of each and every migrant boat that takes to the Channel. France has particularly draconian laws. Its 'Transport Code' declares that anyone navigating a boat without the correct licence faces a fine of 3,750 euros, rising to 4,500 euros and six months in prison if the boat is carrying passengers. The most basic licence governs engines above six horsepower and these inflatable tubs have at least 50hp on the back. Meanwhile, Britain's Merchant Shipping Regulations dictate a 'substantial fine' and other penalties for unqualified skippers of a passenger vessel – which is anything with more than 12 people on board. Every smuggling boat I have seen has at least 50 people. 'It should be very simple. Anyone seen with their hand on the tiller should go straight to prison,' says the Shadow Home Secretary, Chris Philp. Reform Party leader Nigel Farage agrees. 'It is very easy to spot who is driving a boat – I have taken plenty of photographs of them myself,' he says. 'If you or I or anyone goes to sea in a private fishing boat, there is a whole raft of regulations we have to follow. The French rules are a lot stricter than ours. So what's stopping them?' A week on from asking the French authorities that question, I have received no reply. Seven days ago, I asked both our Department for Transport and the Home Office if anyone had been prosecuted in the past year for breaching the rules – and if not, why not? While the Home Office has yet to say anything, after several chase-up calls and emails, the DfT managed to come up with the following: 'International passenger vessels (i.e. a ship that carries more than 12 passengers, which visits foreign ports) need to comply with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). Border Force carries out enforcement when vessels reach UK shores.' For now, that enforcement seems to be a one-way ticket to places like The Bell Hotel, Epping. Of course, enforcement of these rules would not solve the problem overnight. However, in next to no time, you would find that no one is going to pull the starter cord on a small boat engine, let alone put it in gear and head to sea. Even if the traffickers get a migrant to drive the boat (as often happens), who will risk the fine – and a prison sentence leading to instant deportation? But, as long as the French simply wave off these illegal skippers and the British help them ashore, nothing will change.

Essex police boss demands to meet Yvette Cooper over migrant hotel
Essex police boss demands to meet Yvette Cooper over migrant hotel

Telegraph

time9 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Essex police boss demands to meet Yvette Cooper over migrant hotel

A police boss has demanded an urgent meeting with Yvette Cooper on Monday to seek the closure of the Epping asylum hotel at the centre of recent protests. Roger Hirst, the police and crime commissioner for Essex, said The Bell Hotel was an inappropriate location for asylum seekers and was costing his force 'hundreds of thousands of pounds' in officer overtime to police the protests. Hundreds of officers from Essex, the Metropolitan Police and forces across England were deployed on Sunday to police about 1,000 protesters who converged on the hotel. Essex imposed restrictions on the protests that required pro and anti-migrant groups to be separated on designated sites and banned anyone from wearing face coverings. A dispersal order runs from 12pm on Sunday until 8am on Monday, covering Epping town centre and nearby transport hubs. It gives officers the power to remove anyone suspected of anti-social behaviour. The Bell has become a target for protests after a resident Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old schoolgirl days after arriving in the UK. Ten people have been arrested after violence flared 10 days ago. Mr Hirst said: 'The Bell is not the right place for a hotel for asylum seekers. It's in the middle of a home counties market town and these are people who have a very different life experience arriving there. There are schools in the vicinity as well. It is not the right place. 'It's costing hundreds of thousands of pounds. It's a lot of police overtime. This is not what we need to be happening on a regular basis in the town. It's a diversion of resources from what police officers should be doing.' It follows similar calls for the hotel's closure from Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader and Essex MP, and Chris Whitbread, the Epping council leader, who said it had become a 'focus and battleground' for extremist groups. Tommy Robinson, the political activist whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, said on his X account on July 20 that he was 'coming to Epping next Sunday ... and bringing thousands more with me', but did not make the journey. Around 400 anti-migrant protesters were the first to gather outside the hotel before counter-demonstrators comprising pro-Palestine groups, unions and anti-racism campaigners arrived around an hour later at 3pm and were directed to a field nearby. Officers from as many as 30 police forces are believed to have been involved including Merseyside, Surrey, Lancashire, the City of London and Sussex were in attendance. The counter-demonstrators signs included: 'Don't let the far-Right divide us with their hatred, ' while anti-migrant protesters chanted: 'Protect our kids,' and 'Keir Starmer is a w-----.' Sarah White, 40, one of the protest organisers, said she would continue demonstrations until the hotel closed. The mother of three said: 'We won't stop. Today has been a great opportunity for our voices to be heard. 'We've got the message out there that we don't want these hotels. This I think has been the biggest and there's more to come. We need to feel safe, we don't currently. It's shocking. We won't stop until that hotel is closed.' Maureen Chapman, 73, who has lived in Epping for 50 years, said she felt 'under threat'. She said: 'I have grandchildren living locally. We want this closed and we won't stop until it is. It's shocking.' Police said three people were arrested: a 52 year-old man on suspicion of a public order offence; a 53 year-old woman for racially aggravated abuse; and a 27 year-old woman on suspicion of criminal damage and a public order offence. In Canary Wharf, around 150 protesters gathered on Sunday near the Britannia International Hotel in London's financial district, to which the Home Office plans to send asylum seekers. The 'silent protest' had been scheduled to start near the four-star hotel at 3pm, with online graphics reading: 'Save our kids, stop the boats,' and 'Everyone welcome. Stand in unity, make your voice heard – silently.' Two men have been charged with public order offences after a protest outside a hotel in Diss, Norfolk Constabulary has said. They were arrested on Saturday after police reviewed footage from both sides of a protest that took place on Denmark Street on Monday, the force said. James Harvey, 22, of Linden Drive, Hethersett, has been charged with a racially aggravated public order offence. Luke Sharman, 23, of Harcourt Close, Norwich, has been charged with a racially aggravated public order offence and possession of cannabis.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store