Treasury boss gets £20k bonus as growth slumps and taxes soar
James Bowler, the most senior official managing the UK's economy, received the uplift last year on top of a £10,000 pay rise and £5,000 pension boost, taking his total remuneration to roughly £350,000.
Jessica Glover, the Treasury's director of growth and productivity, was also handed a bonus of up to £15,000 on top of a salary rise of roughly £10,000, taking her total pay including pensions to around £280,000.
It comes as Britain braces for a growth slump and unemployment hits its highest rate since the pandemic in the wake of Rachel Reeves ' tax raid on businesses.
Critics said the Treasury should not be rewarding 'bureaucrats' presiding over an economy that was 'performing atrociously' and warned taxpayers would be 'gobsmacked' by the revelations.
The pay rises for Mr Bowler, who took on the top Treasury job in 2022, and Ms Glover, who was appointed to her role in 2023, were revealed in the department's annual accounts for 2024-25.
They showed that Mr Bowler received a total salary of between £195,000 and £200,000 last year, up from £185,000-£190,000 in 2023-24.
He was also handed a bonus of between £15,000 and £20,000, which he did not receive last year, and pension benefits totalling £133,000, taking his total remuneration to between £345,000 and £350,000.
Ms Glover received a salary of £145,000-£150,000 last year, up from a full-time equivalent of £135,000-£140,000 the year before, as well as a bonus of £10,000-£15,000 and pension benefits of £117,000.
It comes just weeks after the Governor of the Bank of England poured cold water on the Chancellor's claim that Britain's economy has turned a corner, warning that growth is slowing as high taxes bite.
Official figures show GDP grew faster than expected in the three months of the year, but things are expected to slow down in the second quarter.
The number of people in jobs has also slumped at the fastest rate since the pandemic in the wake of Ms Reeves' tax raid on businesses at last year's Budget.
Meanwhile, experts have warned that Britain has suffered an 'almost unprecedented' plunge in productivity over the past five years in another setback for the Chancellor's growth ambitions.
Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, told The Telegraph: 'The Treasury seem confused. Performance-related bonuses are for when things get better not worse.
'Perhaps their failure to grasp this simple concept is why the country is going bust if they are in charge of our finances?'
Darwin Friend, the head of research at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'It should be a source of some embarrassment for the Treasury that they're handing out pay rises and bonuses to senior staff.
'The UK's economy has been performing atrociously over the past year, and while the Chancellor is the primary person to blame taxpayers will still be gobsmacked that her bureaucrats are seeing their pay packets boosted.
'The Treasury should be strictly linking the pay of all staff to economic performance from now on.'
Mr Bowler was unveiled as the Treasury's permanent secretary during Liz Truss' short premiership in 2022, taking over from Sir Tom Scholar.
He has spent much of his career in the department, with past briefs including director general for public spending and director general for tax and welfare.
He also served as principal private secretary to both Lord Darling and Gordon Brown when they were chancellor, as well as more recently playing a senior role in the Covid taskforce.
He was tipped to become the Cabinet secretary, the most senior civil servant in the country, when Ms Truss took over, but Lord Case, who has since stepped down, was kept in post instead.
A Government spokesman said: 'This pay increase is in line with those of permanent secretaries across Whitehall.
'Like all others, it was set for 2024-25 in line with the recommendations of the independent Senior Salaries Review Body - with a robust framework in place to assess pay and performance.
'Decisions this Government has taken to restore economic stability have seen interest rates cut four times, a pay rise for three million workers, 380,000 jobs created and a record £120 billion in private investment coming into the UK in the past year, while the UK was also the fastest growing economy in the G7 in Q1 2025.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
'Everyone's on edge': Epping braces for another hotel protest
Tracey's cheese toastie is getting cold. She's explaining to me how hacked off she is about the asylum hotel in Epping, there is a lot to get off her chest. This Essex commuter town has seen a series of protests around the Bell Hotel where asylum seekers have been housed for the past few years. The catalyst last week was an Ethiopian man, who had only recently arrived on a small boat, appearing in court charged with three counts of sexual assault on a local girl. Tracey was in the crowd demonstrating last Thursday when things turned violent, with some protesters clashing with police. Eight officers suffered injuries along with two hotel employees. Tracey told Sky News: "I've been here since I was four years old, I'm sixty now and we've never had any trouble like this before. "I'm sick to the skin of it all, I can't wait for it all to be over. "Everyone's on edge now. There's a lot of hostility so I think they (the migrants) should go. "I'm not a racist and I'm not prejudiced but this has just gone too far for this town. "You shouldn't relocate them, you should send them back to where they came from, simple as that. "Then it will be restored, the peace." She's angry at the government's response and the way she feels communities have not been listened to. She told Sky News: "They are going to have a lot of protests on their hands if they don't do anything about it. "So watch this space!" She went back to her cheese toastie and chips. Essex Police officers are preparing for another demonstration in Epping later with a march planned from the hotel to the council offices, where local politicians are due to discuss the problems. The chief constable has promised that his officers will facilitate peaceful protest while warning troublemakers they will be robustly dealt with. As we walked along the main shopping street with our camera, a man wound down the window of his partner's Mini and shouted about the violence last week. We asked him to stop and explain what he meant. It turned out Keith was at the protest too, his son was arrested and charged with criminal damage. "My son is actually going to court because he shook the Bell hotel sign and they are trying to do him with criminal damage," he said. "If they arrest somebody there will be five people to take their place," he warned - suggesting that people will show up regardless. "It will go on until it stops, it'll stop when they (the migrants) get moved out." Not everyone feels the same way - another woman who did not want to give her name said she strongly disagreed with the protests at the hotel. She told us: "I don't think an angry mob outside somewhere where people are staying within our community is the right way to go about it. "They could be demonstrating outside the Home Office." It is a divisive issue that the government clearly can't solve quickly. They are aiming to stop using hotels to house asylum seekers by 2029. Very few people in Epping feel they can wait that long. They want solutions now.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Gaps in Len McCluskey's memory must be filled one way or another
Len McCluskey has questions to answer RAY MCMANUS/SPORTSFILE In his last major investigation for The Times before his untimely death, Andrew Norfolk, the reporter whose work exposed the grooming gangs scandal, turned his forensic eye to the Unite trade union. In a series of reports for this newspaper, Mr Norfolk revealed that a company owned by a friend of the union's then general secretary, Len McCluskey, was paid at least £95 million for the construction of a hotel and conference centre in Birmingham initially meant to cost £7 million. This week an independent report commissioned by Sharon Graham, Mr McCluskey's successor at Unite, showed the situation to be even worse. Ms Graham had asked Martin Bowdery KC, a barrister specialising in construction, to investigate the hotel project, for which Mr McCluskey was a vocal advocate. The inquiry concluded that the cost of the hotel had in fact ballooned to £112 million. That was £74.5 million more than its market value. As a result, Unite has had to wipe £66 million from its accounts. An audit accompanying the KC's report concluded that under Mr McCluskey's leadership there was a 'pervasive fraud environment' at Unite. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is pursuing its own investigation. Mr McCluskey, an avowed socialist and admirer of Jeremy Corbyn, never shy of voicing his opinions on Labour politics, clearly has serious questions to answer. Mr Bowdery's report claims that the union leader was flown to watch his beloved Liverpool FC in two Champions League finals, in Kyiv and Madrid, by the Flanagan Group, the construction firm alleged to have overcharged Unite by at least £30 million when building the hotel. The report also lists five other occasions on which the union leader was taken to watch Liverpool, enjoying matchday hospitality courtesy of the Flanagans, whom he described as 'good friends'. Mr McCluskey said that as far as he could recall he paid his own way. Unite officials and lawyers were uneasy about Flanagan, which the report said had a history of 'poor performance, delays [and] cost overruns'. Mr McCluskey is said to have overruled them. He denies doing so, and through his lawyers has denounced Ms Graham's inquiry as 'inaccurate, selective and highly misleading'. The ultimate judgment will be made by the SFO but Ms Graham believes there is enough evidence to support criminal action against two 'very senior' former Unite officials. South Wales police are undertaking an investigation involving alleged bribery, fraud, money laundering and tax evasion. It is not often that The Times agrees with Ms Graham but she is to be commended for her courage in taking on vested interests within a vast and powerful union of some 1.2 million members straddling the private and public sectors. She told this newspaper of the 'horrendous' attacks she endured from supporters of Mr McCluskey after promising to investigate the hotel project. She has described being 'followed home' and subjected to 'despicable online abuse'. There is much to criticise about Unite's positioning under Ms Graham's leadership, not least its intransigence over refuse collection strikes in Birmingham, but whatever her politics, she is at least committed to uncovering the truth. As Ms Graham says, multiple investigations suggest 'rank incompetence … or something else' during Mr McCluskey's reign. It now falls to the SFO to establish what that 'something else' might have been. It should expedite its inquiry as swiftly as possible. Unite pays £1.5 million a year to affiliate to the Labour Party and contributes significant sums to individual Labour MPs. It is too significant a political player to remain under a cloud of suspicion about its past integrity. The facts as they pertain to Mr McCluskey must be established, even if recalling some of them appears to be beyond our Len.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
UK-wide strategy needed to tackle pensioner poverty, says committee
The Government should also decide on – and ensure – a minimum level of retirement income, the Work and Pensions Committee urged. Once set, a plan should be created for everyone to reach that level, it added. Given that the state pension is the core of the Government's offer to pensioners, a guiding principle should be that it provides the amount needed for a 'minimum, dignified, socially acceptable standard of living', the committee said. It urged the Government to commit to a UK-wide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society, that it said would help target support to tackle pensioner poverty. If it does not effectively tackle poverty as one of the causes of ill-health, 'the Government will not be able to achieve its goal of building a health and social care service that is sustainable', the Pensioner Poverty report warned. The report also highlighted longer-term trends that 'threaten to undermine pension adequacy', such as people renting into later life. The committee also called for a pension credit take-up strategy for England by the end of 2025. Despite being worth up to £4,000 a year, the take-up of pension credit has hovered between 61% and 66% for a decade, with an estimated 700,000 households being eligible but not claiming, the committee said. A taper to pension credit should also be considered to 'mitigate the cliff-edge effect' for those who currently miss out, the report said. Under current rules, some pensioners just above income thresholds could end up worse off than those with slightly lower incomes, it added. Pension credit can 'passport' recipients to other benefits such as housing benefit, council tax support, the warm homes discount, a free TV licence, help with dental treatment and, in winter 2024/25, the winter fuel payment. The committee argued that reliance on top-ups such as pension credit and housing benefit is not sufficient to ensure people do not fall below the poverty line. The report said: 'After a decline in pensioner poverty in the 2000s, the number of pensioners in relative low income started to rise again from 2010. This has been exacerbated by increases in the cost of living since 2021.' It continued: 'The number of people of pension age living in relative poverty (below 60% of median income) is 1.9 million or 16% of pensioners. 'Measures which factor in the cost of living show that between 2008/09 and 2022/23, the number of pensioners in households below the Minimum Income Standard (MIS)—the amount needed for a minimum dignified socially acceptable standard of living—rose from 1.5 to 2.8 million. 'The proportion of pensioners below 75% of MIS (where the risk of material deprivation increases substantially) rose from 5.9% in 2021/22 to 9.5% in 2022/23. 'In practice, this means cutting back on essentials, like food, energy use and seeing friends, in an attempt to manage costs. Health experts explained the implications for health. Financial hardship can accelerate the ageing process, making it more likely that an older person will enter hospital or need care.' The committee said that in some places, organisations are working together towards shared objectives. The report continued: 'However, not all areas do this. We heard that it would help to have a national cross-government strategy for our ageing society and older people. 'This could provide a framework to hold the different partners to account for their role in delivering the agreed outcomes. It could also ensure that central government departments developed policy with shared objectives in mind.' Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams said: 'To boost incomes, the Government needs to come up with a strategy to increase pension credit take-up. It's a scandal that so many have missed out for so many years, often through an aversion to claiming benefits altogether, or lack of support. 'The fairness of the pensions credit eligibility criteria where if you are a penny above the threshold, you miss out on thousands of pounds, also needs to be looked at. 'Ultimately, the Government should decide what it thinks is enough for a dignified retirement, and then work to ensure that all pensioners are on at least that level. 'Faced with a combination of high energy costs, ill-health and ever higher rates of pensioners in more costly privately rented accommodation, tackling pensioner poverty is not simply a DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) issue. So, we're calling for a nationwide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society that should be rooted in equity and wellbeing.' On Tuesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that a review into raising the state pension age is needed to ensure the system is 'sustainable and affordable'. The Government review is due to report in March 2029 and Ms Reeves said it was 'right' to look at the age at which people can receive the state pension as life expectancy increases. The state pension age is currently 66, rising to 67 by 2028 and the Government is legally required to periodically review the age. A Government spokesperson said: 'Supporting pensioners is a top priority, and thanks to our commitment to the triple lock, millions will see their yearly state pension rise by up to £1,900 by the end of this parliament. 'We have also run the biggest-ever campaign to boost pension credit take-up, with nearly 60,000 extra pensioner households being awarded the benefit, worth on average around £4,300 a year. 'But we know there is a real risk that tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, which is why we are reviving the Pension Commission, to tackle the barriers that stop too many people from saving.' Emma Douglas, wealth policy director at Aviva, said: 'The pensions industry – alongside a revitalised Pensions Commission – has a critical role to play in helping people save for retirement and then turn their hard-earned pension pots into lasting financial security. 'With many people likely to manage their money well into their 90s, we must ensure those savings work harder and stretch further – especially as later life can bring complex challenges like cognitive decline.' She said that Aviva and Age UK were exploring a 'mid-retirement MOT' to help give people tools, guidance, and confidence to stay financially resilient throughout retirement. Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: 'We warmly welcome this thoughtful and wide-ranging select committee report, which comes closer to providing a thorough and progressive strategic overview of the issues facing older people on low incomes and proposing workable solutions than anything successive governments have produced in recent years. 'When the Government announced the launch of the Pensions Commission earlier this week, ministers made it clear that its task is to think about the creation of a better system for future pensioners. 'This is necessary and important, but this committee report reinforces the point that there's work to do to improve the situation of today's pensioners on low incomes as well.'
