If Anwar's constitutional questions are preposterous, absurd and legal nonsense, let the court say it — Hafiz Hassan
It says that qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity that protects a government official from lawsuits alleging that the official violated a plaintiff's rights, only allowing suits where officials violated a 'clearly established' statutory or constitutional right.
A plaintiff is the party who sues in a civil suit.
A defendant is the party sued.
It says further that qualified immunity balances two important interests—the need to hold public officials accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the need to shield officials from harassment, distraction, and liability when they perform their duties reasonably. (Emphasis added)
When determining whether a right was 'clearly established,' courts in the US consider whether a hypothetical reasonable official would have known that the defendant's conduct violated the plaintiff's rights.
Courts conducting this analysis apply the law that was in force at the time of the alleged violation, not the law in effect when the court considers the case.
Qualified immunity is not immunity from having to pay money damages , but rather immunity from having to go through the costs of a trial at all. (Emphasis added)
Accordingly, courts must resolve qualified immunity issues as early in a case as possible, preferably before discovery.
Qualified immunity only applies to suits against government officials as individuals, not suits against the government for damages caused by the officials' actions. (Emphasis added)
Although qualified immunity frequently appears in cases involving police officers, it also applies to most other executive branch officials.
Does qualified immunity apply to a prime minister in Malaysia?
That's the constitutional question proposed to be referred by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for a ruling by the Federal Court.
Some, even from the legal fraternity, have vilified Anwar and his legal team for the proposed constitutional questions which have been called preposterous, absurd and 'legal nonsense'.
But if they are such, let the court having the ultimate authority say it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trivial pursuit? Not anymore — Trump's tariffs are making tabletop gaming a costly business in US
ANNAPOLIS, July 27 — At a strip mall in Maryland, a miniature landscape extends across a table between Dash Krempel and his friend as a war game unfolds. But their hobby is becoming more expensive as US tariffs take a toll. Krempel, 29, told AFP the cost of models for tabletop games have surged from inflation, and continued rising since US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on trading partners this year. UK-made figurines that cost US$60 (RM255) around three years ago now go for US$94.50, he said. 'Prices have gotten bigger,' he added. 'It's a very expensive hobby to begin with, so it's maybe pricing a lot of people out.' Instead of buying more products, he now tries to support retailer Game Kastle College Park by renting tables to play in-store. For the shop's owner, Boyd Stephenson, stocking new board games, paints and hobby supplies has only become more challenging. To avoid the harshest of Trump's tariffs, some suppliers had to delay shipments or postpone new releases. As they raised their suggested retail prices, so has Stephenson at Game Kastle. About a fifth of his store's products have seen cost hikes, with increases ranging from 5 per cent to 20 per cent. 'If we see higher prices or higher tariffs, I'm going to see higher wholesale prices, and then I have to raise my prices accordingly,' he said. Asked what per centage of his store relies on imports, Stephenson replied: 'Almost all of it.' Games for sale that are made overseas, including in China, are seen for sale on a store shelf as Boyd Stephenson, owner of Game Kastle, speaks about the effects of tariffs on his store at his store in College Park, Maryland, July 24, 2025. — AFP pic No capacity Stephenson estimates some 7,000 board games were released last year from 5,000 different companies. 'You're really looking at 5,000 different approaches (to tariffs),' he said. 'Some producers are saying, 'We're going to eat the cost.' Some producers are saying, 'We're passing the cost through all the way.' And other producers are doing some sort of mix of that.' Like other US retailers, Stephenson could face more cost pressures come August 1, when steeper tariffs are set to hit dozens of economies like the European Union and India. The elevated rates mark an increase from the 10 per cent levy Trump imposed on goods from most economies in April. While China — a crucial manufacturing hub for games — is temporarily spared, Trump has separately imposed fresh 30 per cent tariffs on products from the world's second biggest economy this year. US tariffs on Chinese products could return to higher levels from August 12 if officials fail to extend their truce. Yet, there is no quick fix to return manufacturing to the United States. 'US manufacturers just don't have the capacity to do that anymore,' said Stephenson, showing an intricate board game figurine. 'Really, the people that are good at that, that's China,' he said. 'The best modelling paints come from Spain.' 'So if you see tariffs get put up on the EU, then all of a sudden I'm going to have to pay higher prices on modelling paint when I bring it into the country,' he added. Trump has threatened the bloc with a 30 per cent tariff. A player moves pieces of the game 'Star Wars Legion', which is mostly made in China, at Game Kastle in College Park, Maryland, July 24, 2025. — AFP pic 'Universally bad' Stephenson tries to absorb some cost hikes, but said: 'I have to be able to pay the staff, pay the electric company, pay the landlord.' Trump's on-again, off-again approach to duties has also made suppliers' price changes more unpredictable. 'What is always universally bad for business is uncertainty,' Stephenson said. He usually stocks up on inventory ahead of the year-end holiday season, but expects to be more strategic with purchases this year to avoid unwelcome surprises. Many companies are delaying merchandise imports as they lack certainty, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy at the National Retail Federation. 'When the product is brought into the country and entered into commerce, you have 15 days to pay your tariff bill,' he said. This causes problems when tariff rates change and businesses lack funds to pay for orders. Some businesses, and industry group the Game Manufacturers Association, have mounted legal challenges against Trump's blanket tariffs hitting various countries, noting nearly 80 per cent of tabletop games sold in the US are made abroad. But such complaints are an uphill battle. 'The damage, especially for small retailers, has been significant,' Gold said. — AFP
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump's immigration crackdown puts US food security on the line, California farmers warn
VENTURA, July 27 — Lisa Tate, whose family has been farming in Ventura County since 1876, cannot recall a threat to crops like the one emanating from Donald Trump's anti-immigrant onslaught. Tate fears that the crackdown on illegal workers, far from addressing the problems of this vital agricultural region north of Los Angeles, could 'dismantle the whole economy' and put the country's food security at risk. 'I began to get really concerned when we saw a group of border control agents come up to the Central Valley and just start going onto farms and just kind of trying to chase people down, evading the property owner,' the 46-year-old farmer, who grows avocados, citrus and coffee, told AFP in an interview. 'That's not something we're used to happening in agriculture,' she added. Lisa Tate Soury, owner of Rancho Filoso Farm, poses near avocado trees on her farm in Santa Paula, California, July 14, 2025. — AFP pic The impact goes beyond harvesters, she said. 'There's a whole food chain involved,' from field workers to truck drivers to people working in packing houses and in sales. 'It's just, everybody's scared,' she said — even a multi-generational American like her. 'I'm nervous and I'm scared, because we're feeling like we're being attacked.' Other farmers contacted by AFP declined to speak to the media, saying they feared potential reprisals from the Trump administration. Francisco Panfilo holds a 'plan de preparacion familiar' (family preparedness plan) in front of a strawberry field, in Oxnard, California, July 14, 2025. — AFP pic Worker shortages The agricultural sector has for years been trying to find permanent solutions for its perennial labour shortages, beyond issuing temporary permits for migrant workers. 'Some of the work we have is seasonal. But really, around here, we need workers that are year-round,' Tate says. The number of government certified positions for temporary agricultural workers practically tripled between 2014 and 2024, Department of Labor statistics show, underlining just how much American agriculture depends on foreign workers. On top of that, some 42 per cent of farm workers are not authorized to work in the United States, according to a 2022 study by the Department of Agriculture. Those numbers line up with the struggles many farmers go through to find labour. A farmworker poses in the middle of a strawberry field, in Oxnard, California, July 14, 2025. — AFP pic They say US citizens are not interested in the physically demanding work, with its long days under extreme temperatures, rain and sun. Against that backdrop, Tate warns that removing people who are actually doing the work will cause immeasurable damage. Not only will it harm farms and ranches, which could take years to recover, it will also send food prices soaring, and even endanger US food security, possibly requiring the country to start importing provisions that may previously have been grown at home, she says. 'What we really need is some legislation that has the type of program that we need, and that works for both the workers, that ensures their safety, it ensures a fair playing field when it comes to international trade, as well as as domestic needs,' Tate said. A farmworker checks coffee beans at Rancho Filoso Farm in Santa Paula, California, July 14, 2025. — AFP pic 'Everyone loses' Some farmworkers agreed to speak to AFP on condition of not being fully identified, for fear of being arrested. 'All we do is work,' a worker named Silvia told AFP. She saw several friends arrested in a raid in in Oxnard, about 10 miles (16km) west of Ventura. The 32-year-old Mexican lives in constant fear that she will be the next one picked up and, in the end, separated from her two US-born daughters. 'We're between a rock and a hard place. If we don't work, how will we pay our bills? And if we go out, we run the risk of running into them,' she said, referring to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. 'The way the government is working right now, everybody loses,' said Miguel, who has been working in the fields of southern California for three decades. A farmworker checks coffee beans at Rancho Filoso Farm in Santa Paula, California, July 14, 2025. — AFP pic The 54-year-old said that workers are losing jobs, farm owners are losing their labour, and as a result, the United States is losing its food. Miguel has worked in various different agriculture sector jobs, including during the Covid-19 pandemic. All of them were 'very hard jobs,' he said. Now he feels like he has a target on his back. 'They should do a little research so they understand. The food they eat comes from the fields, right?' he said. 'So it would be good if they were more aware, and gave us an opportunity to contribute positively, and not send us into hiding.' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline
US secretary of state Marco Rubio shakes the hand of Pakistani foreign minister Ishaq Dar in Washington. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : Pakistani foreign minister Ishaq Dar said on Friday the US and Pakistan were 'very close' to a trade deal that could come within days, but comments from the US after Dar met with secretary of state Marco Rubio mentioned no timeline. 'I think we are very close to finalising a deal with U.S. Our teams have been here in Washington, discussing and having virtual meetings, and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine-tune now,' Dar said in a discussion at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington. 'It's not going to be months, not even weeks, I would say (just) days,' he said. Under US President Donald Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterisation. The US state department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said the two stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. A post by Rubio on X after the meeting and the state department's statement mentioned no timeline for finalising a trade deal. The Pakistan foreign ministry also said Dar 'appreciated the pivotal role' played by Trump and Rubio 'in de-escalating tensions between Pakistan and India by facilitating a ceasefire.' The state department statement did not mention India. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10 after Washington held talks with both sides. India disputes Trump's claims that the ceasefire resulted from his intervention and trade threats. India's position is that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve problems directly with no outside involvement. An April 22 militant attack in India-administered Kashmir killed 26 men and sparked heavy fighting between the nuclear-armed Asian neighbours in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. India struck Pakistan on May 7, and the two nations exchanged hostilities, killing dozens across three days. The ceasefire was declared on May 10. New Delhi blamed the April attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility and called for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not blame Islamabad.
