How does Ann Arbor clean PFAS from its drinking water? City officials explain.
The river supplies the city with 85% of its drinking water.
"We traced it up to upstream manufacturing facilities and wastewater treatment plant discharges," said Ann Arbor Water Treatment Services manager Molly Maciejewski. "So, it was really industrial discharges that caused it, but we also know that there could be other sources of PFAS in the Huron River."
PFAS are highly stable, man-made chemicals used in many items. They're typically used to repel water, oil and grease from surfaces. PFAS spread easily and do not biodegrade naturally, making cleanup a challenge.
"Michigan was one of the first in the country to actually sample all of the drinking water supplies," said Abigail Hendershott, the executive director of the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team.
Hendershott said PFAS are all around us. They're found in clothing, furniture, cleaning products, outdoor gear, cosmetics and more.
"Most everybody in the country is going to have some concentrations of PFAS already in our blood because of the widespread use of PFAS in our everyday society," she said.
After extensive testing, officials at the Ann Arbor Water Treatment found an effective solution.
"We use granular-activated carbon filtration," said drinking water quality manager Becky Lahr. "So, you can see here the media inside the filter. The water travels from the top down through the filter, and the PFAS gets stuck within the media."
Lahr told CBS News Detroit the method filters out PFAS to below detectable levels in the drinking water.
"We are constantly monitoring the water quality before and after this process to make sure it's working right," Lahr said.
"Ann Arbor has been very aggressive in their actions, and we, of course, applaud them for that because they're being very proactive in protecting their residents," said Hendershott. "We want to make sure that the residents who are drinking this water are protected long term, that we're not just protecting for one or two chemicals, but we're protecting for the whole suite of PFAS chemicals."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Latest report shows Grand Forks' drinking water continues its safe streak
Jul. 5—GRAND FORKS — The latest report on quality shows Grand Forks' drinking water continues to meet federal and state standards. Grand Forks Environmental Management Director Lisa Botnen said the good grade is the result of the diligence of the city's water operators and the capabilities of the new water treatment plant. "Our water quality is excellent, safe and meets or exceeds all the required state and federal regulations," Botnen said. "I'm really proud of our water treatment facility and our operators at the facility. They do a great job testing." The Environmental Protection Agency requires Grand Forks to track 80 water contaminants. Of those 80, only 13 were detected and those were all within EPA guidelines for what is considered safe and treatable. "There are 72 different sites in the city that get monitored on a monthly basis to ensure that quality is maintained throughout the different reaches of the city," Botnen said. "It's just a real credit to our system, our operators and their diligence to make sure that our drinking water is safe and tastes good." The city also tracked two unregulated contaminants, lithium and perfluorobutanoic acid, a chemical often abbreviated as PFBA. In samplings, lithium was found on average at a 15.28 micrograms per liter concentration and PFBA at 0.0088 micrograms per liter. Botnen said emerging contaminants that have appeared in other water systems across the system have not made an appearance in Grand Forks. When testing, emerging contaminants have not been present in concentrations to get a reliable and statistically significant sample because of their trace amounts. PFAs, or forever chemicals, have become an issue in many areas. In the Twin Cities, contamination from these chemicals is especially of concern in the eastern and southeastern portions of the metropolitan area. A $850 million settlement with 3M has helped fund abatement and mitigation efforts for communities to enhance treatment, according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Nitrates, too, have become a problem for some cities in the Midwest. Agricultural runoff near Des Moines, Iowa, has impacted that city's ability to treat water from the Des Moines and Raccoon rivers. The Central Iowa Water Works has issued lawn watering bans this year to ensure that its facilities can keep up with the treatment of nitrates, according to a report from the Des Moines Register. Grand Forks currently doesn't have those issues from the water it pulls from the Red River. "To date, Grand Forks has performed very well on our source water and our finished water," Botnen said. "From a drinking water quality standpoint, I've been working on at the city for 10 years and we've never had an issue with any of the emerging contaminants." More information about the city's water quality report can be found on the city's website: Additional information about the city's lead service line inventory, which can impact a home's water quality, can be found there, along with the inventory the city has completed.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Michigan Avenue work will snarl routes to UM Health-Sparrow. Here are some work-arounds
LANSING — University of Michigan Health − Sparrow Lansing has released suggested alternate routes to get to its facilities as the Michigan Avenue reconstruction project moves westward. With a new work phase expected to begin after the first week of July, the health system said patients can use Kalamazoo Street, Pennsylvania Avenue and Eureka Street to reach various facilities, including the main hospital, the Herbert-Herman Cancer Center and the Sparrow Professional Building. The road rebuilding project began last year and is intended to make the Michigan Avenue corridor more pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly. The road is being converted from five to four lanes, with a center turn lane and one eastbound lane, with bike lanes added, sidewalks replaced and sewer and water mains upgraded, officials have said. The project is expected to be finished in October. Sparrow posted an advisory on its website concerning the project. "Starting the week of July 7, the project is expected to extend from Lathrop Street west to the traffic light at Holmes and Michigan Avenue," the health system said. "Starting in August, the project is expected to move toward the front of the hospital, where it will continue into the fall." A July 1 update on the city's website said final paving of the section between Fairview Avenue and Lathrop Street was delayed until July 8-10 because of rain. That section of Michigan will be closed during that time. "The intersections of Michigan Avenue/Clemens Avenue and Michigan Avenue/Marshall Street/Shepard Street will be closed to through traffic," the update said. "Detours will be provided. Local access for businesses and residents will be maintained but may be limited at times." The city told the hospital that Phase 5 of the project (the section from Lathrop to the pedestrian bridge) remained on track to start on July 7, with pavement milling set to begin July 9. Contact Ken Palmer at kpalmer@ Follow him on X @KBPalm_lsj This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: How to get to UM Health-Sparrow Lansing amid Michigan Avenue construction
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are whole-body MRIs worth the hype?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. In recent years, celebrities like Kim Kardashian have taken to social media to tout the supposed benefits of whole-body MRI scans. Companies that offer the service promise that the scans can spot a range of conditions, including cancer, aneurysms, liver disease and multiple sclerosis, in as little as an hour. And if the initial scan looks clear, the companies encourage clients to return periodically to check up on their health status. But are full-body MRIs really a silver bullet, or just another expensive health fad? According to Dr. Matthew Davenport, a professor of radiology at the University of Michigan, for most people, whole-body MRI scans aren't only unnecessary but can actually lead to their own set of problems. Structural MRI scans visualize the inside of the body using magnetic fields and radio waves. Because they render detailed 3D images of internal anatomy, they're useful for detecting various conditions, including blood clots, musculoskeletal injuries, tumors, and neurological or cardiovascular problems. But doctors normally order these scans only when they already suspect that something is wrong based on an individual's symptoms, medical history and other test results. In some circumstances, doctors may recommend regular whole-body MRIs for certain patients as a preventive measure, Davenport said. But this generally occurs only when patients are diagnosed with rare disorders that put them at high risk of developing cancer. Such conditions include Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a genetic disorder that increases the risk of developing cancer at a young age. The idea is that the regular scans could spot lesions in these high-risk individuals, potentially flagging them for further testing. However, for people without such conditions, there's little reason to get regular full-body MRIs, Davenport said. "There is no scientific evidence that whole-body MRI in asymptomatic, average-risk patients improves health," he told Live Science in an email. In fact, full-body MRIs may actually do more harm than good, he said. That's because tests that can be used for diagnostics, like MRI scans, are likely to discover incidental findings. Incidental findings are unexpected results that occur from a medical test ordered for a different reason. For example, a person might get an MRI of an injured rib and then have a suspicious mass pop up on the scan. Sometimes, these findings end up pointing to a previously undiagnosed condition that requires treatment. But more often, they're just benign abnormalities in the body that pose no threat. Related: The 10 deadliest cancers, and why there's no cure About 15% to 30% of diagnostic imaging tests raise at least one incidental finding, estimates suggest. That means people who get regular whole-body MRIs are likely to find abnormalities in their bodies that may not indicate any serious health issues. "The vast majority of findings identified by whole body MRI in a patient without specific risk factors will be findings that would not improve health if they had not been detected," Davenport said. Nevertheless, you may not know if an incidental finding is important without further tests, so these results can prompt additional diagnostic tests, biopsy procedures and even unnecessary surgeries — not to mention the health anxiety that can accompany those procedures. Because of this, Davenport argues that ordering too many medical imaging tests on otherwise healthy people is likely to backfire. Currently, no major medical societies recommend whole-body MRIs for people without conditions that put them at high risk of cancer. Davenport also pointed out that companies that offer full-body MRIs benefit from a highly profitable business model in that clients pay for the tests out-of-pocket. Full-body MRIs typically cost anywhere from $1,000 to over $4,000, depending on the provider and specific service they're offering. Some insurance plans may cover whole-body MRIs in high-risk individuals, but because the scans are elective for most and not backed by clinical guidelines, they're generally not covered by private or government insurance in the U.S. RELATED STORIES —Who needs more exercise: Women or men? —Can weight loss drugs help you drink less alcohol? —What is alkaline water, and does it have any benefits? While on one hand, whole-body MRIs may stoke health anxiety and lead to potential overtreatment, in some people, they may also provide a false sense of security, Davenport suggested. For many medical conditions, such as colon cancer and blood cancer, MRIs aren't used as a primary diagnostic tool because the scans don't necessarily pick up the diseases. Davenport recommended that the general public stick with established medical screening procedures recommended by physicians rather than relying on whole-body MRI. "It is possible we will see a future where imaging like whole body MRI is used for routine screening," Davenport said. "However, substantial research is needed before that." This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.
