Subaru boss backs emissions but won't say if price will rise
While rival brands such as Ford have cited NVES as the reason for the recent price hikes including a $5,000 jump for the Mustang, Subaru has held firm.
Subaru managing director Scott Lawrence said the automaker supports the Federal Government's NVES but declined to predict how the regulation might affect the wider market in years to come.
'I won't comment on the market outlook,' he said.
'Look, we've not lifted prices. I can't really speak to the future of price moves.
'Certainly, our intent is to have a product-first strategy, to make sure the product is right for consumers. Ultimately though, consumers will decide.'
Price hikes have become a major talking point across the industry as the NVES framework penalises high-emitting vehicles and incentives brands who offer low-emitting vehicles.
Hence why several brands have adjusted pricing, with the rising costs often passed on to consumers.
Lawrence explained that Subaru's plan to NVES is to provide more powertrain variety, with hybrid, electric and internal combustion models all available in its Australian line-up.
'Overwhelmingly, we support any initiative to reduce emissions,' he said.
'Our response is to keep working with Subaru Corporation to bring in the right products for Australian consumers.'
The brand's new 'strong hybrid' Forester joins the fully electric Solterra and other hybrid and petrol models.
Lawrence said hybrid tech is becoming the natural next step for traditional buyers as they offer 'more range and confidence', especially in regional Australia where EV infrastructure is limited.
However he did say 'EVs will grow'.
'That's why we've committed to providing a full spectrum of choice – from petrol to hybrid to electric,' he said.
Subaru has committed to launch eight EVs globally by 2028, though not all will reach Australia.
'EVs will form a bigger and bigger part of the future, but not the sole part,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Drought and ballooning water prices force wine growers to leave vineyards behind
Ballooning water prices in Australia's largest wine grape growing region are pushing farmers to the brink, with many unable to break even. Growers fear the soaring price on the water market will be the "nail in the coffin" for the industry. The low returns have been caused by a mixture of environmental and market conditions, including tariffs, a decline in wine drinkers and frost. A worldwide oversupply of red wine has also seen prices offered for shiraz, cabernet and merlot plummet to record lows. As drought continues to plague parts of southern Australia, growers are now faced with the increasingly tough reality of supply and demand on the water market. Growers are finding themselves needing more water to keep their crops viable during dry conditions as well as paying more to lease the finite resource. Some have told the ABC they have had to use 30 per cent more water, with prices as high as $350 a megalitre, and fear further rises could be on the horizon. Data by water consultancy Ricardo Group showed temporary water prices reached up to $350 per megalitre in the past year. Ricardo Group Market leads associate director Ben Williams said water trade prices fluctuated between $280 to $330 per megalitre between May and June. Prices were higher than the average water price in the lower Murray over the past decade, which sat around $200 per megalitre. Loveday grower Jim Giahgias is among growers feeling the impact of rising water prices, despite owning some permanent water rights. He has been forced to rely on the temporary water market — where water can be bought, sold and traded based on demand — which has seen prices increase partly due to the drought. It has left Mr Giahgias contemplating to pull out some of his red grape vines to cut costs, as he battles with the perception that grape growers are "millionaires". He said he wanted consumers to know while they might pay $50 a bottle at a restaurant, the grower does not see the profits. He explained the 20-cent gross amount did not account for farmers expenses, including water, leaving them "$150 a tonne out of pocket". While he said he found it difficult having to buy more water the situation was "a lot more dire" for those who leased every drop. Farmers in the Murray-Darling without permanent water rights, or those who do not own enough, rely on buying water from the temporary market. The longer it does not rain, the more water people need to buy, causing a spike in both demand and temporary water prices. In 2019-2021 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) conducted a water markets inquiry, following irrigators' claims that non-farming investors have driven up the price they pay for water. Since then, a Water Markets Intermediaries Code has been developed, and has partially come into effect from this month, regulating how eligible intermediaries water markets conduct themselves with current and proposed clients. Riverland Winegrape Growers Association board member Jack Papageorgiou said the situation on the ground was "serious" for those totally reliant on the market. He said some growers had inadvertently used more water than they were allowed, due to the dry conditions, and had no funds to balance their accounts. There are significant penalties for water overuse in South Australia, which has forced water suppliers to clamp down on growers who cannot pay their bills. Suppliers to Riverland growers include the Renmark and Central Irrigation Trusts, which are collectives of irrigators and farmers who share water supply infrastructure. CIT chief executive officer Greg McCarron said water supplies were only locked as a "last resort" to avoid exposing the collective to large fines. "Non-compliance from farmers … can result in us not being able to balance our water accounts with the state government and face significant overuse fines," he said. A Department for Environment and Water spokesperson said no water overuse penalties had been issued in the 2024-25 financial year. The spokesperson said penalties were "at least three times higher than the price of purchasing water on the water market" and could be higher in the River Murray. For growers like Amanda Dimas, who has already replaced vines in favour of more profitable varieties, the uncertainty of the water market remained troubling. "Growers are really struggling, their mental health isn't good." She called for government support to assist growers wanting to transition to other crops or exit the industry completely. "Vines are one of the hardest things to remove, they are so costly," Ms Dimas said. It costs about $7,000 per hectare to remove vines, partly because the treated pine posts are difficult to dispose of. Mr Giahgias said the only way for the industry to "survive and move forward" was to pull grape varieties which were no longer profitable. "We can't take anymore, we're at breaking point now," he said. "If the decision is to remove vineyards, to help the industry, I believe it has to be legislated … one grower can't be pulling while the other is planting." State Primary Industries Minister Clare Scriven said the state government was investing in ongoing work examining wine grape growers' transition. "Some of the funded work has been around what alternative crops might look like or what alternative varieties may look like," Ms Scriven said. As a member of the National Wine Working Group, she said some of the group's recommendations were a need for "structural changes" within the industry. "It's not necessarily a matter of government intervention, it's a matter of industry continuing to work through the issues." Ms Scriven said exit packages were not receiving "a great deal of support" at a state or federal government level, referencing the 1980s vine pull scheme as an example. "That sort of government intervention can have absolutely unintended consequences, which could make it worse for growers rather than better." Riverland Wine general manager Alexandra Cannon said financial support for growers to leave the industry was essential. The International Organisation of Vine and Wine's latest data showed the global vineyard area reduced for a fourth consecutive year. Spain and France are some of the world's largest wine grape growing countries and are among those ripping out vines. In France, the government launched a 120 million euro ($215.6 million) scheme to remove up to 30,000 acres of vineyards last year. Growers were offered a financial incentive of 4,000 euros ($7,190) per hectare. Mr Giahgias said similar subsidies were needed in Australia but felt growers were unheard, describing the situation at 'stalemate'.
ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
NSW government pushes back e-bike certification fine after industry 'confusion'
A safety requirement deadline for e-bikes that some believed would threaten food delivery, tourism and consumer options in NSW has been pushed back after outcry from the industry. Fines of up to $825,000 were meant to commence from August 1 for manufacturers and suppliers who did not have e-bike models and parts certified on time — including lithium-ion batteries or chargers. The new product standards introduced earlier this year were a nationwide first to tackle fire risk, also applying to hire e-bikes and similar micromobility products like e-scooters or skateboards. But stakeholders argued there would be adverse effects from the "unrealistic accreditation deadlines" and said the bigger concerns were homemade kits, illegal imported e-bikes and poor quality versions being bought online or overseas. Retailer 99 Bikes began clearing stock in preparation, while US manufacturer Trek said it would have been forced to withdraw from sales in NSW in order to comply by the original date. After some pressure, the NSW government quietly announced last week the cut-off was postponed until next February. Here's how the new date will affect customers trying to buy or rent e-bikes in the state. Like dishwashers or hair dryers, e-bikes must now meet international electrical standards and be approved before sale. NSW Fair Trading said the new standards — including providing information about safe use, storage, charging and disposal — would help ensure only compliant products were available on the market. Regulation and Fair Trading Minister Anoulack Chanthivong said it would also crack down on fires sparked by low quality batteries. According to Fire and Rescue NSW (FRNSW), there have been 166 lithium-ion-related incidents in the state so far this year. General manager of Bicycle Industry Australia Peter Bourke said the government's "one size fits all" approach bunched together "good quality" e-bikes with "lower end" alternatives. "This declared articles framework the New South Wales government utilises has been designed around household goods," he said. "They've actually compared e-bikes to the same electrical frameworks as toasters and electric blankets." After receiving feedback, NSW Fair Trading said consultation concerns included "delays in obtaining test reports, costs associated with testing, and confusion around the scope" of the process. Applying for certification with the consumer regulator costs about $1,200 per bike, but additional lab testing can be over $20,000 per model and take up to six months, Mr Bourke said. "The challenge is not about meeting the certification, it's about going through the testing protocols," he said. Chief executive of 99 Bikes, Andrew Garnsworthy said the chain was supportive of the "overall objective to have high quality e-bikes and a reduction in e-bike battery fires". He said the initial "unrealistic accreditation deadlines" would have led to safer models being pulled from the market. In turn, Mr Garnsworthy said consumers could resort to lower quality alternatives available online from overseas, which could "backfire and unfortunately increase the amount of battery fires". He welcomed the "sensible" extension, but said the testing costs, even pushed back, could "increase the costs of e-bikes in NSW" for consumers. Outdoors NSW said at the start of July that the implementation would "devastate cycle tourism, force business closures, and risk millions of dollars in government investment in regional adventure tourism". This is because hire e-bikes, used by tour companies and in food delivery, were not exempt from the certification rules. "Good quality hire bikes for food delivery … operate on a monthly hire process," Mr Bourke said. "So those [third party companies] wouldn't have been able to hire their product out either, and so the gig economy workers would also have been messed up." A spokesperson for NSW Fair Trading said the cost of certification was "expected to be borne by manufacturers, with small businesses primarily responsible for verifying that the products they sell are compliant". "Matters relating to illegally imported bikes fall under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Government," they said. NSW Fair Trading confirmed the new compliance deadline came after "feedback from industry stakeholders". "Despite the extension, all declared e-micromobility products must continue to meet the prescribed safety standards and NSW Fair Trading will maintain active market surveillance and enforcement action against suppliers found selling non-compliant products," the spokesperson said. Mr Bourke said for customers hoping to buy or upgrade their e-bike next month, it would be "business as usual". "Brands are looking to certify their product as fast as possible and over the coming months there will be an ability to replace stock," he said. Smaller fines of up to $5,500 will still be enforced on August 1 for suppliers who do not provide clear and accurate safety information alongside products. The final piece of the puzzle is the introduction of mandatory labelling, which is also set to kick off next February.
ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Why a seawall might not protect both beaches and homes from coastal erosion
Do home owners have a right to protect their home from coastal erosion, when it could come at the cost of neighbouring properties or public access to the beach? When it comes to protecting homes and even community assets like surf clubs, footpaths and roads along Australia's popular beaches, one coastal erosion expert put it like this: "How much is protecting my private land impacting broader society?" Some landowners feel they need to take matters into their own hands, with a businessman south of Melbourne building an unauthorised concrete seawall along his beachfront property in an effort to protect it from erosion and landslips. But experts say building individual seawalls can make the problem worse. So what can be done to protect homes, roads and surf clubs from coastal erosion, and does it come at the expense of the character of the beach? Professor David Kennedy is a geomorphologist — a scientist who studies landscapes — at the University of Melbourne. He said the first thing to know was, basically, you could not hold back the tide. "As soon as you put in one seawall, you just transfer the demand next door," he said. "The demand for the sand is still there." He said sea level rise caused by climate change would mean the issue was not going away, and Australians needed to consider what we valued about our coastline. Is it infrastructure like homes, roads and surf clubs, or is it the beaches themselves? "Otherwise, we'll end up with a giant wall around our beaches, or around our whole coastline," Professor Kennedy said. Professor Kennedy said governments of various levels were developing plans to manage coastal resilience, but development was happening too quickly to keep up. "We've got to slow down development and look at what we value about the beach," he said. But for a nation of beach-lovers, those are difficult discussions. For many people who live along Australia's coastline, it is a pressing issue, and a financial one, as finding insurance is becoming increasingly difficult. A spokesperson for the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) confirmed that "actions of the sea" were generally not covered by home insurance policies. That is even though an ICA spokesperson told the ABC "communities and properties are increasingly vulnerable to coastal erosion being made worse by climate change". In 2021, the ICA commissioned a report that confirmed Australia's exposure to current and future risks from the sea, including coastal erosion, king tides and rising sea levels, was "very high". It predicted the number of properties at risk of coastal erosion and inundation would increase and recommended investment in protection infrastructure, where environmentally and economically feasible. It also called for planning rules to limit new development in high-risk locations. Councillor Robert Szatkowski is the president of the Association of Bayside Municipalities — an alliance of councils that share the coastline around Melbourne's Port Phillip Bay. He said there was a clear need to "simplify and clarify who's responsible for what along Victoria's coastline". "Councils are on the front lines, but we can't be expected to foot the bill alone for emergency works like beach repairs and sand renourishment," he said. Mr Szatkowski said the current "tangle of agencies" involved in managing coastlines could cause delays when problems arose and fast action was needed. "This is not just about infrastructure … it's about protecting our communities, our local economies, and our natural environment. Without strong, unified action, all three are at risk." Along Australia's coast, communities have opted for various solutions to the problem eating away at homes, surf clubs and roads. On the NSW Central Coast, violent swells that hammered the beach in 2020 saw some homes partially collapse. Council workers have installed large bags of rocks and delivered sand to help replenish the beach — but some locals are calling for more urgent works. But it is not just homes that are at risk. In Victoria, there have been various efforts to shore up the iconic Great Ocean Road, including at Apollo Bay, where research in 2012 found the beach was eroding at a rate of 9 centimetres a year. Professor Kennedy said part of the appeal of the Great Ocean Road was being able to witness the Southern Ocean up close — for better and for worse. "The reason the Twelve Apostles is so impressive is, it's eroding," he said. At Inverloch, in Victoria's Gippsland region, locals say sand replenishment works and sandbags are no longer enough. They are calling for urgent action to protect their surf club from being swept into the ocean. Lighthouses are also at risk. At Robe, in South Australia, at least 10 metres of cliff collapsed in a weekend near the community's working lighthouse. In the aftermath of ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred, millions of cubic metres of sand were gouged from the coastline. But some experts said despite the dramatic erosion, it showed how good management could protect waterfront infrastructure in the face of severe weather. Back on the beach at Frankston South, landowner Gene Neill told the ABC he would like to see the council build a seawall along the coast to protect homes and act as a path for people to walk along, like the one in Melbourne's bayside suburbs. While Mr Neill previously denied the seawall was being built on public land, a government spokesperson told the ABC the Frankston South beach was "public land". Professor Kennedy said the legality of building seawalls on private property was a planning question for individual local councils. He said governments would need to consider buying back beachfront land and rehabilitating it, to protect both infrastructure and the beach. It means the Frankston South case is one to watch — with other coastal residents and beach users standing by to see how authorities handle it.
