Open Letter To The Members Of Parliament
This winter, tens of thousands of students across Aotearoa are once again thrust into the impossible decision between heating their flats, or feeding themselves. This is not a matter
of budgeting or lifestyle. Rather, it is a matter of wellbeing, dignity, and fairness. The Winter Energy Payment, as it currently stands, supports some of our most vulnerable citizens. Yet it excludes one of the most financially precarious groups in our country: tertiary students. Despite facing the same rising power bills and cold, damp housing, students are left out of this essential support simply because of their age and their pursuit of education.
This exclusion is unjust.
Many students live below the poverty line. They juggle part-time work, high rent, and increasing food and transport costs. Many care for families or face additional barriers, such as disability, chronic illness, or being estranged from family support. Cold homes worsen these hardships. They make students sick, lower academic performance, and damage mental health.
Every winter, we hear stories of students wearing jackets to bed, studying under blankets, or choosing between heating their homes and eating three meals a day. The Winter Energy Payment for Students would be a simple and effective way to alleviate some of this hardship. By extending the payment to those receiving Student Allowance, Student Loan Living Costs, or enrolled full-time in tertiary education, the Government could make an immediate difference to the health, safety, and wellbeing of tens of thousands of young people.
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
This change would mean amending the Social Security (Winter Energy Payment) Amendment Act 2019 to include tertiary students, and the Student Allowance Regulations 1998 so that Winter Energy Payments would not be considered under the definition of personal income for the purposes of those regulations.
This call is backed by social service providers, tertiary education leaders, and students up and down the motu. It reflects a growing recognition that leaving students out in the cold is not only unfair but economically and socially short-sighted.
We urge the Government to act now. Students have been doing more with less for far too long. Students deserve warm homes, good health, and a fair go.
Don't leave students out in the cold. Extend the Winter Energy Payment to students.
Sincerely,
Josh Robinson - Campaign Lead, Winter Energy Payment for Students
Liban Ali - President, Te Aka Tauira – Victoria University of Wellington Students' Association
Aria Ngarimu and Kaea Hudson - Co-Presidents, Ngāi Tauira – Victoria University Māori Students Association
Gabriel Boyd - President, Te Rōpū Kahikatea – Auckland University Students' Association
Eloise Fleming and Nikita Van Dijk - Co-Presidents, National Disabled Students' Association
Caitlin Payne - Senior Administrator, Te Tira Ahu Pae – Massey Students' Association
Alicia Lemmer - President, Auckland University of Technology Students' Association
Richard Wagstaff - President, The New Zealand Council of Trade Unions
Paul Goulter - CEO, Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa New Zealand Nurses Organisation
Social Change Collective
Lola Fisher - Co-Executive Director, Gen-Z Aotearoa
Lauren Craig and Maioha Hunt - Co-Convenors, Young Greens of Aotearoa New Zealand
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
14 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Majority of Government's $231m spend on Advanced Technology Institute funded through planned research funding cuts
Funding is reallocated from: Endeavour Fund – $13.489m (from 2028/29) Health Research Fund – $11.487m (from 2028/29) Marsden Fund – $15.119m (in 2028/29) New to R&D Grant – $18.084m across 2025–2028 Callaghan Innovation Operations – $24.336m across 2027–2029 Contract Management – $3m across 2026–2029 In addition, $37.537m is being reprioritised from the Strategic Science Investment Fund from the 2025/26 financial year to the 2028/29 financial year, from contracts coming to an end over the three years. Funding for the new research agency is also being made up of $21.603m from unallocated funding for the National Science Challenge. In a statement, the Public Service Association union expressed disappointment in the move, adding the Government was 'trying to quietly cut funding from respected and established research funds'. PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said scientists rely on these funds for ground-breaking work and they deserve ongoing support. 'The Government says it wants kickstart our economy with investment in science, meanwhile chopping science off at the knees and hoping no one will notice,' Fitzsimons said. 'It's robbing Peter to pay Paul, raiding science funds without providing the increased funding science needs to drive growth. The economy will be worse off and we will keep losing scientists to other countries which value them.' Similar concerns were expressed by physicist Dr Ben Wylie-van Eerd, speaking for the Save Science Coalition. In an interview, he said it would have been nice if the Government was clear this was partially a reprioritisation when it made this announcement. 'It's quite disappointing,' he said. 'I feel massively let down by learning this.' Wylie-van Eerd said he was particularly upset about plans to reduce the total of the Marsden Fund, which he said was an area for 'complete blue-skies research' that did not necessarily have to have any commercial outcomes. Green Party science spokesman Scott Willis said the Health Research Fund supported research into kidney disease, diabetes and epilepsy. He also expressed concern over reduction in funding for the Endeavour Fund, which supports climate research. Willis said it appeared the Government was 'shuffling funding' and the changes seen last year and proposed over the coming years will weaken the science system and its capacity. 'We definitely need investment in science for the public good,' he said, and issues such as health, the climate and the cost of living would not be solved by 'science-for-profit'. In a statement, Reti, the minister in charge of the reforms, said what was taking place was important. 'Reform of our decades-old science system, including the establishment of the New Zealand Institute for Advanced Technology, is a priority for the Government's economic agenda,' he said. 'Previously, New Zealand has been slow to focus on the role of advanced technologies across the economy and investment in the potential of advanced technologies has been under-weighted within the research and innovation system.' Reti said the Government was continuing to support public good science and a strong economy would allow for more choices. When the announcement of the new institute was made, the Government said the importance of a return on investment was a significant focus. Last month, the Government announced it was committing $231m over four years to the new tech institute, aiming to focus on artificial intelligence, quantum technologies and innovation that could lead to economic growth. At the time of the announcement, Reti confirmed about $80m was being leveraged from Callaghan Innovation. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the country needed to embrace new technologies and that it 'will actually make our businesses and our research much more commercial and actually improve productivity'. Budget 2025 allocated $20m across two financial years for the establishment of four new Public Research Organisations (PROs), of which the Advanced Technology Institute is one. Last year, the then Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins said the contestable Endeavour Fund, which is proposed to lose about $13m in the advanced technology institute changes, was being updated to 'grow the economy'. 'Commercialisation is essential to realising the social and economic potential of our science, innovation and technology system. I look forward to learning more about the impactful projects funded through future funding rounds,' Collins said. Azaria Howell is a multimedia reporter working from Parliament's press gallery. She joined NZME in 2022 and became a Newstalk ZB political reporter in late 2024, with a keen interest in public service agency reform and government spending.
NZ Herald
14 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: AT needs to find a solution that works for disability card-holders
Nicky Foster, Blockhouse Bay. Two-tiered health system The health system has become two-tiered. One for the haves and another for the have-nots, or to use the PM's language, one for the wealthy and sorted and another for the bottom feeders. I had an aortic valve replacement 13 years ago. To begin with, as a result of this operation, I was required to have it checked every two years and, for the past three years, once a year. I was to have a check-up at the beginning of the year, and when my doctor put in a request for this I received a letter from Health NZ to say they were short-staffed and I would be put on a list. Eight months have gone by. I asked my doctor what I should do and he said I could go private as it was important that I have the valve checked. This will cost me over one month's government super. Fortunately, I had some savings but I would not be able to afford this on an annual basis. What about those who do not have any savings? Are they supposed to go into a corner and wait to die? I believe a good, well-paid health system is possible. It is about priorities. A good health system saves money in the end. Mark Beale, Wattle Downs. Act Party's legacy I have always regarded David Seymour as the most astute and sophisticated politician in the House, but his mana is diminishing by the day with the bizarre policies his party is pursuing. His legacy when he departs next year will be getting dogs into beauty salons, spending thousands of dollars training operators for the cone hotline, and on staff checking the safety of children collecting eggs, while hundreds of people cannot pay their power bills because the Government cannot control the cost of living. But his latest effort, changing the wording of the Early Childhood Education Regulations to get parents back into the workforce, will presumably only result in thousands more joining the more than 210,000 on the JobSeeker benefit! Fiona Downes, Hobsonville. Luxon needs time I fail to understand why there are so many people critical of Chris Luxon and his coalition Government. I feel they have a very strong team, are trying very hard to get New Zealand back on track, and are already achieving quite a lot. We all must be supportive and give them time, even though we are doing things tough at present. Those who are critical of them must have very short memories of our previous Government, which was extremely divisive and irresponsible with the public purse, plunging the country into an uncontrollable level of debt. Warren Cossey, Morrinsville. Ferries making waves So, Auckland Council has said that any new ferries it gets will be diesel-powered, not electric. Well, I imagine next Shane Jones will announce legislation, to be passed under urgency of course, that all new or replacement ferries throughout the country must be powered by coal. The new mines will be open-cast, making them excellent visitor attractions, particularly in our national parks. The brilliance of this should take your breath away, as will the air quality. Keith L Muir, Mount Maunganui. Ban sale of fireworks In three months we will yet again be subjected to fires, frightened animals, noise, and money which could be spent on essentials being squandered on fireworks Guy Fawkes Day has no relevance to New Zealand. There is still time to ban the sale of fireworks. It is a no-brainer which surely should receive cross-party support Ray Gilbert, Pāpāmoa Beach.
Scoop
44 minutes ago
- Scoop
Government Faces Legal Challenge For Under-Resourcing Of Fisheries Conservation And Research
The Environmental Law Initiative says the Government is under-levying the fishing industry by millions of dollars, which is contributing to the insufficient resourcing of marine conservation research and the decreasing deployment of fishery observers. Each year, the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries sets levies on the fishing industry, based on advice from Fisheries NZ. Levies were brought in by the National Government in 1994 with the support of the fishing industry, to replace resource rentals which until then had put a price on commercial access to fishery stocks. ELI's director, research and legal Dr Matt Hall says, 'The setting of levies should be determined by what services, including scientific research and observer coverage, are required to meet the purposes of the Fisheries Act. 'That core purpose is to allow for utilisation of fishery resources whilst ensuring sustainability.' 'Yet, we have a situation right now, where we have reduced levies and at the same time large gaps in our ability to gather information critical to the sustainability of New Zealand's fisheries. 'As an example, we have no observers for high-risk inshore fisheries for threatened species, such as hoiho yellow-eyed penguins. 'This means in some instances, we just don't know what interactions are happening because in some smaller vessels there are neither observers or cameras.' Data from the Department of Conservation shows the northern population of hoiho has collapsed 80% since 2008, from 739 breeding pairs to just 143. Meanwhile, the Government has reduced observer days in inshore fisheries from 1,953 days in 2020/21 to 250 in the current year. Across the board, observer coverage has been drastically reduced. 'These services are the backbone of sustainable fishing. They need to be properly resourced so that the Government can monitor and protect vulnerable marine species like dolphins, seabirds, and turtles from the impacts of fishing.' Dr Hall says, if the government had kept up with inflation, the levy should now be at $54.2 million. Yet Minister of Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones set the levy to $36.3 million in the 2024/25 year (this included the return of $3.2m in accrued overcharges to the industry). This was despite Seafood industry export earnings topping $2 billion. Government paying costs for industry research ELI is taking legal action against the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries, Minister of Conservation, the Ministry of Primary Industries and the Department of Conservation, alleging that the Government has wrongly paid the costs of numerous fisheries research projects, rather than requiring the fishing industry to pay. ELI says this breaches the cost recovery rules under the Fisheries Act. In the last two years, ELI alleges the Government paid at least $3,663,252 for projects and services, which should have been paid for by the industry, at least in part. Dr Hall says, these include paying for part of the costs of large-scale trawl surveys which the industry relies on to inform their fishing. 'This amounts to a subsidy for an industry that makes millions in profit. 'We are challenging the lawfulness of these decisions made by Ministers and Crown agencies in the High Court. 'It's important that the public interest and our taiao are defended.'
