&w=3840&q=100)
UK may recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes action
Starmer spoke a day after talks in Scotland with US President Donald Trump, who said he did "not mind" if Britain recognised a Palestinian state, though Washington - Israel's closest ally - has long declined to do so.
Britain, if it acts, would become the second Western power on the UN Security Council to do so after France last week, reflecting Israel's deepening isolation over its conduct in its war against Hamas in Gaza, where a humanitarian disaster has set in and the Palestinian death toll has risen above 60,000.
Starmer said Britain would make the move unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, made clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank and committed to a long-term peace process that delivers a "two-state solution" - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Israel.
"The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering," Starmer told reporters. "Now, in Gaza, because of a catastrophic failure of aid, we see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. The suffering must end."
Starmer held a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu before making his announcement, said a source, who asked not to be named.
In response, Israel's foreign ministry said in a post on X that Britain's move constitutes a "reward for Hamas" and would harm efforts to reach a ceasefire in Gaza.
The sight of emaciated Gaza children has shocked the world in recent days. Earlier on Tuesday, a hunger monitor warned that worst-case scenario of famine was unfolding in Gaza and immediate action was needed to avoid widespread death.
Israel has denied pursuing a policy of starvation. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on Tuesday the situation in Gaza was "tough" but there were lies circulating about starvation there.
With international criticism intensifying, Israel announced steps over the weekend to ease aid access. But the UN World Food Programme said it was not getting the permissions it needed to deliver enough aid.
PARTY PRESSURE
Starmer's decision marks a striking reversal in policy after he last week disappointed many in his party by rejecting calls to recognise a Palestinian state, saying the timing must be right as part of a wider peace process.
In recent days, Starmer has been increasingly vocal about the crisis in Gaza, saying this week that the people there faced an "absolute catastrophe" and the British public were "revolted" by the scenes of mass hunger and desperation.
Starmer said that before taking a final decision his government would make an assessment in September on "how far the parties have met these steps", but that no one would have a veto over the decision.
He spoke after recalling his cabinet during the summer holidays on Tuesday to discuss a new proposed peace plan being worked on with other European leaders and how to deliver more humanitarian aid for Gaza's 2.2 million people.
Successive British governments have said they will formally recognise a Palestinian state when the time is right, without ever setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions.
Some lawmakers in Britain's governing Labour Party said they thought Starmer had been reluctant to formally recognise a Palestinian state because it would mean distancing itself from the position of its closest ally, the United States.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called France's announcement last week recognising a Palestinian state a "reckless decision".
China and Russia are the only other world powers that are permanent members of the UN Security Council to recognise a Palestinian state.
SHIFTING POSITIONS
The issue of recognition for a Palestinian state - seen as a powerful diplomatic lever to put pressure on Israel - came to the fore after President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday France would recognise Palestine as a state in territories Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war.
Israel and staunch supporter the United States blasted France's move, branding it a reward for Palestinian Hamas militants who ran Gaza and whose attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 triggered the current war.
At the start of the Gaza war in October 2023, when Starmer was the opposition leader, he fully backed Israel's right to defend itself. But his stance has shifted over the years to a tougher approach to Israel, especially since his election as prime minister just over a year ago.
His government dropped the previous government challenge over arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has suspended some weapon sales to Israel.
Last month, Britain sanctioned two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
More Israelis Question Morality of War in Gaza
TEL AVIV—Dor Eilon held up a poster of an emaciated Gazan child for the first time at an antiwar protest last week. The 29-year-old lawyer had joined dozens of other Israelis as they stood silently in the summer heat at a square in Tel Aviv with the photos in hand. 'It's not moral to ignore this,' said Eilon, who began attending protests to free the hostages several months ago, but now says she feels a duty to highlight the plight of Gazans. 'Usually I hand out stickers and people smile at me. And here people look away from me.' In recent weeks, more Israelis—including prominent public figures—have called to end the war in Gaza while decrying the dire humanitarian situation in the enclave, marking a shift in the public discourse. A majority of former directors of the Israeli military; Mossad; Shin Bet, the country's internal security agency; and the police, called on the Israeli government on Sunday to end the war against Hamas. The cause began as a just one after the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, they said. But now it has become futile. While polls in Israel have shown for months that a large majority of Israelis, including on the right, want to end the war in exchange for the hostages, dire conditions in the enclave and the worsening food crisis is spurring more dissent on moral grounds and leaving Israel more internationally isolated than ever. Dor Eilon, in Tel Aviv, demonstrated against the war in Gaza on Thursday. Nightly news reports have featured more Gazans talking about suffering in the strip. Photos of Gazans killed in the war are now more visible in some public spaces such as protests. More than 1,000 leading Israeli artists created a stir when they signed a petition calling to end the killing of children and civilians in Gaza. A large proportion of those who have been killed during the war, 60,000 in all, have been minors, according to Gaza health authorities who don't say how many are combatants. Heads of the country's major universities demanded Israeli authorities do more to help adequate food supplies enter the strip. Israel's most famous living novelist, David Grossman, and a former deputy director of the Mossad spy agency even called the war a genocide as did two Israeli human-rights groups for the first time. Analysts say the growing willingness by Israelis to question the morality of the war is connected to more Israelis asking hard questions about whether Israel can achieve its goal of destroying Hamas and freeing the hostages after almost two years of fighting. While Hamas has been substantially weakened, it is still capable of guerrilla warfare and 20 Israeli hostages remain captive along with the remains of 30 others. Cease-fire talks remain at a stalemate and many Israelis believe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is prolonging the war for his own political survival, which he denies. Netanyahu will convene a security discussion on Tuesday about the fighting in Gaza and its expansion into areas where hostages could be held, an Israeli official said. 'In light of what is happening, there is a need to make our voice heard—a voice of values, compassion,' said Eyal Sher, director of the Israel Festival, who helped organize the petition signed by over 1,000 Israeli artists and musicians in recent days. It is the first time such a large group of cultural figures has voiced its opposition to the war. Antiwar sentiment in Israel has so far been unsuccessful in persuading the country's government to change course. A street in Jaffa, in the south of Tel Aviv, displays photos of Palestinian children killed in Gaza. Some Israelis pushed back against the petition. One of the country's most popular singers, who was injured while fighting in Gaza as a reservist, accused the signatories of spreading lies. Eilon, the protester in Tel Aviv, and other activists were at times confronted by bystanders, telling them they should be ashamed of themselves for spreading lies about people starving in Gaza. Polling also shows that the rise in concern for the suffering is mostly found in Israel's political left and center, according to Tamar Hermann, a pollster and senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute think tank in Jerusalem. A new poll by the institute led by Hermann which was taken at the end of July, showed that 79% of Jewish Israelis weren't personally troubled by reports of famine and suffering by Palestinians in Gaza. But a breakdown of the result showed stark differences based on political views: 70% of Jewish Israelis on the left and 32% of those affiliated with the center said they were personally troubled by reports of famine and suffering in Gaza, compared with just 6% from those on the right. 'There is a very big difference between the camps,' Hermann said. 'It is really as if it isn't the same public opinion. These are people who think totally differently.' Significantly, voters on the right of the spectrum who comprise Netanyahu's core base have barely shifted. The recent outpouring of sentiment to end the war has so far been unsuccessful in persuading the Israeli government to change course. But some analysts say the fact that the dire situation in Gaza is being discussed at all means it has to be confronted. 'We moved from a stage where we really didn't see anything about what is happening in Gaza to public discourse—people are talking about it,' even if they don't agree, said Eran Halperin, a professor of psychology at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. 'It is a very significant change.' Up until recently, there was almost no graphic footage of Gazans killed or coverage of their suffering on major Israeli news channels as is widely featured in international media around the world. That is now beginning to change. After her show aired a segment on the way hunger in Gaza is covered around the world, Israeli news anchor Yonit Levi shocked many by saying the negative views of Israel weren't due to a failure of public diplomacy, but what she called 'a moral failure.' Demonstrators in Tel Aviv on Thursday protested against the war in Gaza. In the past few weeks, groups of protesters have held demonstrations outside the studio of Channel 12, Israel's most popular news channel and where Levi works, calling on it to cover suffering in Gaza. Now, more mainstream journalists are covering Palestinians in Gaza and even taking a stand against Israeli actions. 'It is an earthquake compared with what was covered before but it's also a tiny, minuscule movement when you look at what's happening on the ground and how it's being covered elsewhere,' said Ayala Panievsky, a media scholar at City St. George's, University of London. Panievsky's research found that out of over 700 news segments published on Channel 12, during the first six months of the war, only four mentioned civilian casualties in Gaza. Channel 12 declined to comment. In recent weeks there have also been more protests against the war by Israeli Arabs, who make up around 20% of Israeli citizens. While Hermann's poll found that 86% of Israeli Arabs are personally troubled or very troubled about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, this group had stayed mostly quiet up until recently, due to heavy-handed Israeli policing over shows of support for Gaza, even on social media. 'The situation was very difficult in terms of the combativeness of the police, arrests, questioning, intimidation for anyone who tried to show solidarity or protest against the war and the starvation in Gaza. People were very scared,' said Amir Badran, 53, a Jaffa city council member who helped organize a protest against the war attended by dozens of local Arabs and Jews on Friday. A change happened around two weeks ago starting with local protests, he said, and he hoped more people would join. 'People burst, burst out because they can't hold it inside anymore,' Badran said. Amir Badran, a Jaffa city council member, is organizing local demonstrations against the war in Gaza. Write to Anat Peled at More Israelis Question Morality of War in Gaza More Israelis Question Morality of War in Gaza More Israelis Question Morality of War in Gaza More Israelis Question Morality of War in Gaza
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia backs India, slams Trump's tariff threat over oil trade
The Kremlin on Tuesday criticised US President Donald Trump's threat to raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow's military offensive on Ukraine. Ukraine's Western allies have sought to hobble Russia's export earnings since Moscow launched its military offensive in February 2022. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Kremlin on Tuesday came out strongly against US President Donald Trump's warning that India could face higher tariffs for continuing to buy Russian oil, calling such pressure tactics 'illegitimate.'Trump's latest ultimatum gives Moscow until Friday to show meaningful movement toward a peace deal with Kyiv, or face fresh economic penalties. Those sanctions, he suggested, could extend to countries like India that have remained key buyers of Russian energy -- still a major source of funding for the war in a speech on Monday, Trump directly threatened India with new tariffs, prompting a sharp response from New Delhi, which labelled any such move 'unjustified and unreasonable.'On Tuesday, Russia echoed that view.'Sovereign countries have the right to choose their own trading partners,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters, as per naming the US president, Peskov criticised attempts to 'force countries to sever trading relations' with Russia, calling them 'illegitimate.'Western allies of Ukraine have long targeted Russia's energy revenues in a bid to squeeze its war economy. But since the 2022 invasion, Moscow has managed to reroute much of its oil and gas exports to Asia, with India and China stepping up as major buyers -- keeping vital funds flowing into Russian returning to the White House in January, Trump has not imposed any new sanctions on Moscow. Instead, he has pushed for direct talks between Russia and Ukraine, something that hadn't happened for over three years. But despite three rounds of negotiations in Istanbul, no real progress has been made on the diplomatic front.
News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Photography permitted inside MIA, restrictions in place at Dabolim airport: CM
Panaji, Aug 5 (PTI) Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant on Tuesday said photography by air travellers is permitted at terminal buildings of Manohar International Airport, while restrictions are in place at the international airport in Dabolim. Sawant was responding to Congress MLA Carlos Ferreira's calling attention motion regarding confusion over the prohibition of photography at the state's airports. Manohar International Airport is a civil airport, while the Goa International Airport in Dabolim serves as a runway for aircraft operating out of the Indian Navy's INS Hansa on the Western front. He said the earlier restrictions about photography at airport terminals and from inside aircraft have been revised. 'Photography by passengers of scheduled flights in terminal buildings of civil aerodromes and civil enclaves of defence aerodromes is now allowed," the chief minister said. He, however, clarified that photography and videography from inside an aircraft, particularly at defence airports (Dabolim airport), remain prohibited under directives issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The DGCA has also mandated that window shades be kept closed below 10,000 feet during take-off and landing at defence airports to prevent inadvertent capture of sensitive installations, Sawant said. He added that restrictions are particularly stringent at airports near the western border, including Dabolim (Goa), Leh, Srinagar, and Jammu. Sawant said that the airlines have been instructed to inform passengers of these restrictions via announcements and visible signage. 'The prohibition aims to safeguard national security by preventing any potential capture of sensitive military operations or infrastructure," he added. PTI RPS ARU view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
