logo
How Trump's tariffs could affect Fourth of July fireworks

How Trump's tariffs could affect Fourth of July fireworks

Independent2 days ago
Tariffs introduced by the Trump administration on Chinese fireworks are causing significant disruption for US suppliers and are expected to worsen by 2026.
With approximately 99 percent of US fireworks imported from China, businesses have struggled to navigate wildly fluctuating tariff rates, which have varied from 10 percent to 145 percent.
The industry anticipates severe challenges for the 250th anniversary of America's founding in 2026, as high demand will coincide with ongoing supply chain issues and the impact of these tariffs.
Fireworks industry figures, including the National Fireworks Association, warn that low profit margins and production disruptions could jeopardize future celebratory displays.
The White House has defended the tariffs, asserting that patriotism should not rely on 'cheap foreign-made firecrackers,' despite Trump's personal enjoyment of fireworks and a past exemption for them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's America Party could split Republicans, fear Trump allies
Musk's America Party could split Republicans, fear Trump allies

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Musk's America Party could split Republicans, fear Trump allies

Elon Musk's plan to launch a new US political party could split the Republicans, Donald Trump's allies have warned. On Saturday, the 54-year-old Tesla boss announced he was setting up the America Party after his social media followers backed the idea in an online poll. Mr Musk, who until recently was a key Trump ally, said the party would adopt a 'laser focus' on winning a handful of Senate seats and House districts in a bid to sway key votes on legislation. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people,' he posted on X. On Sunday, Musk responded to a post about how he could 'break the two-party stranglehold' by writing: 'Not hard tbh [to be honest].' Not hard tbh — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025 Laura Loomer, a leading Maga influencer who is close to Mr Trump, warned the move could trigger Republican defections and split the party's base. 'I predict Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie will join the new 'America Party' to spite President Trump,' she posted on X. Raheem Kassam, another prominent Maga supporter and former adviser to Nigel Farage, threatened to ditch Mr Musk's X platform if its algorithm skewed against Mr Trump. 'If Musk weaponizes X against Maga, I'm leaving this account as an automated news feed and shifting to TruthSocial tbh,' he wrote. Mr Musk said his decision to form the party stemmed from opposition to Mr Trump's new economic Bill, which includes tax cuts for the wealthy, significant reductions to Medicaid and the removal of subsidies for electric vehicles. The announcement follows the revival of his public feud with Mr Trump, who threatened to cancel the Tesla tycoon's government contracts and deport him back to South Africa. 'Elmo the Mook' Steve Bannon, Mr Trump's former chief strategist, questioned whether Mr Musk could even form a new party, given he was born abroad, and also repeated calls for him to be deported. 'The foul, the buffoon. Elmo the Mook, formerly known as Elon Musk, Elmo the Mook. He's today, in another smear, and this –only a foreigner could do this – think about it, he's got up on, he's got up on Twitter right now, a poll about starting an America Party, a non-American starting an America Party,' Mr Bannon said on his War Room podcast. He added: 'No, brother, you're not an American. You're a South African. We take enough time and prove the facts of that, you should be deported because it's a crime of what you did – among many.' Third parties have typically underperformed in US elections due to the country's first-past-the-post system, which favours Democrats and Republicans. Previous third-party presidential candidates like Ross Perot and Ralph Nader made headlines but little headway. But Mr Musk hopes that by securing a small number of Senate and House seats in next year's midterms, the America Party could act as kingmaker on tight legislative votes. Third party 'a mistake' Both main parties have struggled in recent years to push through laws because of internal dissent. This week, Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful Bill' met resistance from within, with Mr Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick voting against it in the House, before it eventually passed. Democrats have faced similar challenges, notably when Senator Joe Manchin blocked key parts of Joe Biden's climate legislation in 2022. Political strategists suggest Mr Musk's party could most damage Republicans. Dafydd Townley, a US politics expert, told Newsweek: 'Third parties do not tend to have a long lifetime in American politics.' He added that the America Party 'would likely split the Republican vote, potentially resulting in a Democrat-dominated House of Representatives, at least in the short term, due to the winner-takes-all electoral system'. Mr Musk's move has also attracted attention from existing third parties. Steven Nekhaila, chairman of the Libertarian National Committee, urged Musk to join their party instead. 'Making a new third party would be a mistake,' he told Politico. 'The Libertarian Party is the most set-up party to be the dissident subversive party.' Anthony Scaramucci, Mr Trump's former communications chief but now a vocal critic of the president, said he wanted to meet Mr Musk to discuss the new venture. The unveiling of the America Party has damaged Tesla, which has suffered in the stock market ever since Mr Musk entered the political fray and backed Mr Trump's re-election bid with hundreds of millions of dollars in support. Azoria Partner, an investment firm, said it would postpone plans to invest in Tesla and encouraged its board to rein in Mr Musk. 'I encourage the board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO,' James Fishback, Azoria's chief executive, said.

The TACO President? Why I refuse to bet against Trump the deal maker - or his chances of reeling in the biggest prize of all...
The TACO President? Why I refuse to bet against Trump the deal maker - or his chances of reeling in the biggest prize of all...

Daily Mail​

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The TACO President? Why I refuse to bet against Trump the deal maker - or his chances of reeling in the biggest prize of all...

The TACO President? Trump will Always Chicken Out? That's been the slur levelled by some financial traders amid the many twists and turns of the tariff wars waged by the 47th president against America's competitors. The big threats, the really big threats, simply never come true has been the claim. Take the plans for a gargantuan 145 per cent levy on Chinese goods. These have settled at an effective rate of around 30 per cent, which is serious, but not so very different from the 25 per cent charged on imports under the Biden administration. But no one is calling Trump a chicken after the extraordinary bombing mission that took out much of Iran 's nuclear processing capacity last month. Flying B2 stealth bombers loaded with 30,000lb 'bunker busting' bombs into the heart of Iran was truly audacious move and one that it was widely predicted no president would dare to make. In truth, however, the claim that Trump was the TACO president was always false – and that's because, even now, Trump's critics still have no idea about how he actually works. Why bomb Iran, at the risk of angering his own MAGA base? Why do it when serious experts were warning that even those giant payloads might not have been enough to seriously knock the mullahs off course? Iran is almost certain to acquire a nuclear bomb at some stage down the road. But when it comes to Trump, it's all about the deal, stupid. And the Middle East is a great example of the president at work. However intractable the war in Gaza might seem, Trump wants an end to it. Now wheels are in motion. Hamas and Israel are already talking in Doha. The Israeli Prime Minister is due in Washington this week and, although he's not yet landed, Benjamin Netanyahu already knows the terms. Trump bombed Iran and now Netanyahu must fulfil his part of the deal bring the hostilities to a close, even though to do so, could collapse his government - and place not just his political career but his liberty in jeopardy. Hence another Trump intervention: those extraordinary demands that Israel drop charges of bribery and fraud still faced by Netanyahu – which he denies. Unwarranted interference in the justice system of a friendly power? Another late-night rush of blood to the head by an insomniac president? No, a signal from Trump that an end to the Gazan bloodshed is imperative, even if that means Israel's Prime Minister avoids a trial. Perhaps it's a coincidence, but an Israeli court has just delayed the trial on undisclosed diplomatic and security grounds. Whatever the criticisms of Trump, he has a deep abhorrence of needless killing. And he is driven by this conviction: there has to be a deal to get the outcome that works all round, even if that means using threats, drama and brinkmanship. It's true, of course, that his play in the Middle East might not work – but there again, it might. And no one else has come close to striking at the heart of Iran or bringing Irael to heel. Sure, Trump didn't end the war in Ukraine on day one. Sure, the Israeli hostages have yet to be returned, despite his threats and promises. But if one thing was certain about his moribund predecessor, Joe Biden, it's that nothing at all was going to happen. With fire after fire breaking out in the world kitchen, meanwhile, someone has to act. Ukraine, China, the destructive forces of globalisation and immigration, the failure of the West to spend on defence… on these and many other issues, Trump has forced a conversation that simply wasn't taking place. Which means that however theatrical his initial boasts might have been, America is already in a better situation. There is also a personal stake for the arch deal maker - of course. Trump has made no secret of his wish for a Nobel Peace Prize, or his belief that he merits the award for his leadership in the Middle East. And however outlandish such a prospect might seem, I, for one, am unlikely to bet against it.

Donald Trump 'moaned about White House computers blocking adult films'
Donald Trump 'moaned about White House computers blocking adult films'

Daily Mirror

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Donald Trump 'moaned about White House computers blocking adult films'

Anthony Scaramucci, who was Donald Trump's director of communications for 11 days in 2017, claimed the US president complained he couldn't watch porn in the White House Donald Trump moaned about White House computers blocking porn, his former director of communications has claimed. Anthony Scaramucci worked with the US president during his first term in the White House but his stint as White House communications director lasted only 11 days before he was fired. Since then, he has been critical of Trump, voicing his support for Joe Biden and for Kamala Harris in the 2020 and 2024 elections respectively. ‌ Now the financier has claimed Trump complained to him that he couldn't watch X-rated films because computers at the White House blocked them. It isn't the first time this claim has emerged as back in 2018 Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski alleged a source told her the US president was frustrated with life in the White House as he couldn't watch porn. ‌ She made the comments while appearing on MSNBC Live with Stephanie Ruhle seven years ago, to talk to Stormy Daniels ' attorney Michael Avenatti. The former adult actress claimed she had sex with Trump while he was married in 2006, just months after the birth of his youngest son, Barron. Their alleged affair was at the centre of Trump's hush-money trial in New York, during which he became the first former American president to be convicted of felony crimes. A jury found him guilty of all 34 charges in a scheme to illegally influence the 2016 election through a hush money payment to Ms Daniels who said the two had sex. When Ms Daniels made the allegations, Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani said Ms Daniels didn't have credibility and didn't deserve "respect" because she was a sex worker. "I respect women - beautiful women and women with value - but a woman who sells her body for sexual exploitation I don't respect," said Giuliani. "Someone who sells his or her body for money has no good name." In response, a lawyer for Ms Daniels, who sued Trump for defamation - but lost the case - called Giuliani "an absolute pig". The comments were the topic of discussion on MSNBC in June 2018 and Ms Brzezinski called out the "hypocrisy" while mentioning the allegations about Trump complaining about computers blocking porn. She said: "The hypocrisy is astounding. Because I know someone who spoke to Donald Trump recently about life in the White House, and Donald Trump's biggest complaint was that he's not allowed to watch porn in the White House. So there you go, there's a little bit of news for you. He's upset, he's upset that he can't watch porn in the White House." ‌ The claims, now repeated by Scaramucci, emerged after Trump's "big, beautiful bill" passed this week. Supporters of the bill, predominantly Republicans, are championing the tax reductions as a bulwark against tax increases for families and a catalyst for economic expansion. They assert their commitment to recalibrating welfare programmes such as SNAP, Medicare, and Medicaid to better serve their original target groups – expectant mothers, the disabled, and children – while simultaneously eliminating what they describe as rampant inefficiencies and corruption. The bill's passage marked a significant achievement for the president and it is set to become a defining feature of Trump's second administration while it is testament to his strength, with Republicans holding majority control over both the House and the Senate, as well as the Executive Branch. Even the Supreme Court majority leans conservative. The bill essentially overturns Democratic policies from Trump's predecessors. It fundamentally rejects the agendas of the previous two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden. It chips away at the Medicaid expansion of Obama's Affordable Care Act and rolls back Biden's climate strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store