logo
Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew's secrets, new book claims

Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew's secrets, new book claims

Times8 hours ago
Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew's 'most intimate secrets' to foreign intelligence agencies around the world, a new book has claimed.
Compromising material on the Duke of York is alleged to have been passed to Israel's Mossad, the Saudi Arabian authorities and the Libyan intelligence services under Colonel Gaddafi.
Details of the claims are made in a new book on the prince, by author Andrew Lownie, which describes how the royal was easy prey for a 'rattlesnake' like Epstein.
Victims of the US billionaire, who took his own life in 2019, have claimed for years that Epstein kept video recordings of his high-profile friends having sex with women. No proof of any recordings has ever been made public.
Lownie, in his new book, credits a documentary by the Canadian journalist Ian Halperin as the source of allegations that Epstein sold Andrew's secrets to foreign agencies in the Middle East and Libya. The claims were 'confirmed' to Halperin by 'many in Andrew's circle', Lownie wrote.
Halperin wrote about Epstein in his own book, Controversy: Sex, Lies and Dirty Money by the World's Powerful Elite, which was published on Amazon in 2020.
In his book, Halperin claims that he spoke to Epstein in 2001 and quotes the financier at length as he discussed the Duke of York and the rest of the royal family. Epstein is quoted as telling Halperin that he had met Queen Elizabeth and introduced Princess Diana to Dodi Fayed, among other eyebrow-raising claims.
The royal family were 'completely brilliant' because they were the 'richest motherf***ers' in the world, while collecting money from British taxpayers, Epstein is alleged to have told Halperin.
The Canadian journalist, who wrote a bestselling book about Michael Jackson in 2009, has a colourful past. A September 2007 story on the website Spiked Online, seven months after the death of the model Anna Nicole Smith, said Halperin claimed to have once slept with her in front of Marilyn Monroe's grave. Halperin told The Times that the incident happened.
He added: 'When I interviewed Epstein, he made numerous sensational claims. As I've said numerous times, Epstein was a complete sociopath who could not be trusted at all, as far as I am concerned.'
Lownie told The Times that he didn't 'buy everything' in Halperin's Epstein book, but added that the information he had put into his own book had been 'verified'. He said: 'The claim about the kompromat, I've got it from other sources.'
In his book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, Lownie wrote that 'other sources' alleged Epstein had Kremlin connections and may have been an 'agent of influence' for Vladimir Putin.
Epstein played Andrew, Lownie said. He wrote in his book: 'The prince was a useful idiot who gave him respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities. He found him easy to exploit.'
The book also quotes US businessman, and convicted fraudster, Steven Hoffenberg, who knew Epstein, as saying that Andrew was his 'Super Bowl trophy' and Epstein planned to sell Andrew's secrets to Mossad.
Hoffenberg said: 'Andrew had a weakness for the girls and fast life, Epstein provided that fantasy.
'Andrew would then give intelligence that Epstein would give to Israel. Andrew didn't understand that he was being used.'
The Duke of York, 65, who was friendly with Epstein and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell for years, was accused of sleeping with 17-year-old Virginia Giuffre, then known as Virginia Roberts, in London. He later settled with Giuffre in 2022, with no admissions, after she sued him in the US. Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year.
The Duke of York has been contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 100 journalists demand 'immediate and unsupervised' foreign media access into Gaza
Over 100 journalists demand 'immediate and unsupervised' foreign media access into Gaza

Sky News

time7 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Over 100 journalists demand 'immediate and unsupervised' foreign media access into Gaza

More than 100 journalists, photographers and war correspondents have signed a petition demanding "immediate and unsupervised foreign press access to the Gaza Strip". The petition is signed by leading journalists working for global news organisations. It is part of the Freedom To Report initiative, which was started by award-winning photographer Andre Liohn. Signatories include Sky News' special correspondent Alex Crawford, broadcaster Mehdi Hasan, CNN's Christiane Amanpour and chief international correspondent Clarissa Ward, as well as iconic war photographer Don McCullin. They are renewing calls for both Israel and Hamas to allow foreign journalists into Gaza to report independently on the war, something they have been barred from doing since the start of the latest conflict in 2023. The petition goes further to say if "belligerent parties" ignore the appeal, media professionals will be supported to enter Gaza without consent "by any legitimate means, independently, collectively, or in coordination with humanitarian or civil society actors". 1:56 It states: "Unrestricted, independent access for foreign journalists is urgently needed, not only to document the unfolding atrocities but to ensure that the truth of this war is not dictated by those who control the weapons and the narrative. "Gaza is the most urgent case, but it is not the only one. It reflects the gravest pattern of silencing journalists and restricting the press. If the democratic world truly intends to push back against this erosion of freedom, it must not turn a blind eye to Gaza. "Defending press access there is defending press freedom everywhere." Sky News along with other global news organisations has relied on Palestinian journalists, local reporters and humanitarian workers to provide details of what is going on inside Gaza. Despite the brave and crucial work these people do, the Freedom To Report initiative says nearly 200 mostly Palestinian journalists have been killed, making the Israel-Hamas war "the deadliest conflict for the press ever recorded". Last month, the Associated Press, AFP, BBC News and Reuters issued a joint statement saying journalists are also struggling to feed themselves and their families while working on behalf of their organisations in Gaza. It came after the chief of the World Health Organization (WHO) said Gaza is suffering "man-made mass starvation" because of an Israeli blockade on aid to the enclave. As well as immediate authorisation for foreign journalists to access Gaza, the Freedom To Report petition calls for respect for journalist's protected status under international law and for the support of governments and press freedom organisations.

Legal cases could prise open Epstein cache despite Trump's blocking effort
Legal cases could prise open Epstein cache despite Trump's blocking effort

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Legal cases could prise open Epstein cache despite Trump's blocking effort

On the campaign trail, Donald Trump vowed that his administration would release a tranche of documents in the criminal investigation into disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein. But since Trump returned to the White House, his promises have fallen flat, with few documents released – and backtracking about releasing more records. The lack of disclosure has prompted not only dissatisfaction among those seeking information about Epstein's crimes, but political flak Trump can't seem to deflect, especially about his own relations with the convicted sex trafficker. But where political pressures have so far failed, legal pressures that have largely sailed under the radar of the fierce debate about Epstein's crimes could yet succeed and bring crucial information in the public eye. Several court cases provide some hope that even if Trump's justice department fails to make good on calls for transparency, potentially revelatory records about Epstein, his crimes and his links to some of the most powerful people in the US might still see the light of day. Moreover, it is possible that the justice department's unusual request to unseal grand jury transcripts, in Epstein and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal cases, could also undermine opposition to it releasing records. One lawsuit brought by the news website Radar Online and investigative journalist James Robertson stems from their April 2017 public records request for documents related to the FBI's investigation of Epstein. This request came years after Epstein pleaded guilty to state-level crimes in Florida for soliciting a minor for prostitution – and before his 2019 arrest on child sex-trafficking charges in New York federal court. Radar and Robertson filed suit in May 2017 after the FBI did not respond to their request; the agency ultimately agreed that it would process documents at a rate of 500 pages per month, per court documents. 'Despite the FBI identifying at least 11,571 pages of responsive documents, 10,107 of those pages remain withheld nearly 20 years after the events at issue,' according to court papers filed by Radar and Robertson. Although Epstein killed himself in custody awaiting trial, and Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence, the FBI is fighting release of more documents. The agency has invoked an exception to public records disclosure that allow for documents to be withheld if their release would interfere with law enforcement proceedings. The Manhattan federal court judge overseeing this public records suit sided with the FBI's citation of these exemptions, but Radar is pursuing an appeal that could be heard in the second circuit court of appeals this fall. 'In court, they insist that releasing even one additional page from the Epstein file would hurt their ability to re-prosecute Ghislaine Maxwell in the event the supreme court orders a new trial,' a spokesperson for Radar said. 'It's a flimsy rationale and we are challenging it head on in the court of appeals. Our only hope of understanding how the FBI failed to hold Epstein accountable for over a decade – and preventing future miscarriages of justice – is if the government releases the files.' It's also possible that the justice department's request to release grand jury transcripts in Epstein and Maxwell's cases could bolster arguments for the release of records. 'The DoJ's core argument against disclosure for the past six years has been that it would jeopardize their ability to put – and keep – Ghislaine Maxwell in prison. They say that releasing even a single page could threaten their case,' the Radar spokesperson said. 'Naturally, any support they offer to release material undermines their claims.' Separately, developments in civil litigation involving Epstein and Maxwell could also potentially lead to the disclosure of more documents surrounding their crimes. A federal judge in 2024 unsealed a cache of documents in the late Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre Roberts's defamation case against Maxwell. Some documents were kept under seal, however, and journalists pursuing release of documents appealed against that decision. On 23 July, the second circuit decided that it found 'no error in the district court's decisions not to unseal or make public many of the documents at issue', but it also ordered the lower court to review possibly unsealing them. Robert's attorney Sigrid McCawley reportedly said she was 'thrilled with the decision' and also said she was 'hopeful that this order leads to the release of more information about Epstein's monstrous sex trafficking operation and those who facilitated it and participated in it', according to Courthouse News Service. Others who have represented Epstein victims have called for disclosure of public records – and voiced frustration about being stonewalled in their pursuit of documents. Jennifer Freeman, special counsel at Marsh Law Firm, who represents Epstein accuser Maria Farmer, previously told the Guardian she had made a public records request for information related to her client, with no success. Spencer T Kuvin, chief legal officer of GoldLaw and an attorney for several Epstein victims, hopes that public records battles could help pull back the veil on Epstein information. 'I think that the Foia requests will absolutely assist in the disclosure of information. The DoJ has made blanket objections citing ongoing investigations, but through Foia litigation the courts can test those objections by potentially reviewing the information 'in camera',' Kuvin said. 'This means that an independent judge may be appointed to review the information to determine whether the DoJ's objections are accurate or just a cover.' Roy Gutterman, director of the Newhouse School's Tully Center for Free Speech at Syracuse University, cautioned that calls for disclosures – and even government requests to release some files – might not be a panacea for access to extensive documents. 'This case is already complicated, and there were already too many cooks in the very crowded kitchen, and it's getting more crowded as more public interest grows in the grand jury materials as well as the now-settled defamation case,' Gutterman said. But stonewalling could also continue. With the public records requests, it's possible that US federal authorities could still successfully cite the investigation exemption and keep documents out of pubic view. 'Using Foia for FBI and law enforcement materials related to this case, might be a creative newsgathering tactic, but the law enforcement exemption the government is citing might be legitimate because some of the materials are grand jury materials and some other materials might include private or unsubstantiated allegations,' Gutterman said. 'The reporter in me thinks there is an important public interest in revealing these documents, but the law might end up keeping most material secret. Even with the widespread and growing public interest, it might be too big an ask to unseal a lot of this material. 'Practically speaking, the DoJ might also be very selective in which materials it would want to release as well because of the political element involved here, too.'

Backlash for Starmer after Hamas praises move to recognise Palestine
Backlash for Starmer after Hamas praises move to recognise Palestine

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

Backlash for Starmer after Hamas praises move to recognise Palestine

Sir Keir Starmer has suffered a fresh backlash from Labour MPs over his decision to recognise a Palestinian state after Hamas praised the move as 'one of the fruits of October 7'. Labour MPs, families of hostages and campaigners against antisemitism have called on the prime minister to delay recognition until Hamas has released the remaining hostages. Starmer announced last week that Britain would only refrain from recognising a Palestinian state at the UN general assembly next month if Israel allowed more aid into Gaza, stopped annexing land in the West Bank, agreed to a ceasefire and signed up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. He has not made the release of the remaining hostages a condition of Palestinian statehood. Israel says 49 hostages are still in Gaza, 27 of them believed to be dead.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store