logo
Fast-track planning approval for 112 houses and apartments in Co Cork overturned by High Court

Fast-track planning approval for 112 houses and apartments in Co Cork overturned by High Court

Irish Times04-05-2025

A fast-track planning approval for more than 100 houses and apartments in Co Cork has been overturned after the High Court dismissed An Bord Pleanála's 'conveniently Jesuitical' reading of the county development plan.
The permission was quashed over the board's failure to justify, in accordance with planning law, its material contravention of objectives of the Cork county development plan (CDP) providing that it 'should' carry out a proper historic buildings assessment, in this case of a post-medieval heritage structure, Highlands House, and associated buildings, before granting planning approval.
The board defended its decision on the basis of the notion that the best interpretation of the wording, intention and purpose of the CDP was to say 'that 'should' means you don't have to do it' and the word 'assess' means to assess after the decision has been taken to knock the structure down, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys said.
Neither the developer nor board had inspected the interior of Highlands House, which appears on maps from the 1840s and therefore benefits from the protections in the objectives of the CDP, he said.
READ MORE
The board incorrectly placed 'outsize reliance' on the non-inclusion of the buildings in the Record of Protected Structures and the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage. The scheme of the CDP was clearly to extend protection for structures not included in those, he held.
In his judgment on Friday, he rejected the board's 'conveniently Jesuitical reading' of the CDP and upheld the challenge by a local resident, Deirdre Condon, to the permission granted in late May 2022 to Ruden Homes Ltd.
The permission was for demolition of existing buildings and the construction of 112 residential units – 72 houses and 40 apartments – on the site at Ballynaroon, Glounthaune.
Cork County Council objected to permission in the absence of an archaeological assessment of the site structures and the board's approval was made under what the judge described as the 'ill-fated', 'much-criticised' and since repealed strategic housing development (SHD) procedure.
This particular application was coming before the board as its record of SHD permissions in breach of development plans was 'coming to something of a crunch point, as its deputy chairperson [Paul Hyde] stepped aside on May 10th, 2022', he noted.
A board inspector had completed a site visit on May 16th 2022 and, in his report, had recommended permission be granted. The report said Highlands House and other buildings had been heavily modified over time, with 'little' remaining of importance, and disagreed with the local authority's view the house should not be among structures for demolition.
Having agreed with the inspector's report, the board directed on May 31st, 2022 that permission be granted.
The judge agreed with the board that the relevant CDP – which was replaced on June 6th, 2022 by the Cork County Development Plan 2022-28 – was not mandatory in relation to preserving historic buildings in situ. Before demolition, other options included preservation by a record or by recovered artefacts.
However, an assessment, in the clearly intended sense of a physical survey, was envisaged by the CDP as required in advance of demolition, he said.
In this case, the board had decided that a full physical survey was required but argued that did not have to be done before a grant of permission and could instead be addressed via a planning condition.
That logic was 'incompatible' with the view that there was compliance with the CDP, the judge held. The primary purpose of a survey of historic buildings can only be to guide whether development consent should be granted.
Otherwise, if anything of interest that would affect the permission to demolish was discovered in the survey, all that could then be done was to close an empty door 'with the runaway horse just a dot on the horizon'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman to get two-thirds of funds from family home sale, High Court orders in divorce case
Woman to get two-thirds of funds from family home sale, High Court orders in divorce case

Irish Times

time5 days ago

  • Irish Times

Woman to get two-thirds of funds from family home sale, High Court orders in divorce case

A judge has granted a warring couple a divorce and directed the sale of their family home, with two-thirds of the proceeds for the woman and a third for the man. The woman lives with the couple's children in the property, valued at about €475,000 but with an outstanding mortgage of about €100,000, and the man is in rented accommodation. The family home is the main financial asset of the marriage and it is 'unfortunate' its value is 'simply not enough' to comfortably or easily rehouse two families, the High Court 's Ms Justice Nuala Jackson said. For reasons including housing the children and that the woman takes primary responsibility for their daily needs, an equal division of the sale proceeds of the family home would not constitute proper provision, the judge held. READ MORE She assessed child maintenance of €150 weekly for as long as some of the children remain dependent and directed the man to pay all sports related expenditure for them. In her recently published judgment on divorce proceedings initiated by the man following the couple's separation after a long marriage, the judge also made access orders. Both parents will be joint custodians of their minor children, she ordered. She made additional orders concerning the father's access to the children, including for every second weekend and one regular overnight weekly. An assessor who met the children reported they were 'very alive to the fraught relationship' between their parents 'and would dearly like this not to be the case', the judge noted. Children who live within ongoing parental conflict 'become exhausted with the strain of it and often opt out of a relationship with one parent to make their lives less fraught', she said. The parents, particularly the father, with whom the children are not living on a daily basis, 'must be careful to avoid this'. The evidence showed the two older children had fluctuating relationships with their father and now have some animosity towards him. This was 'unfortunate' but hopefully would resolve with time and might be assisted by the finalising of the litigation. There appeared to be multiple causes for the fluctuating relationships but she considered the respective roles of each parent has an influence, she said. The evidence suggested the woman seemed to be the person 'offering stability and predictability, and engaging with the mundanities and necessities of everyday life' while the man appeared more attracted to the 'special events'. That was not a critique of either party, but the court believed these roles contributed to the animosity between the parties and the day-to-day dependency of the children on their mother, who seemed to be 'exhausted' and feeling very unsupported by the man. She found both parties to be hard workers who made equal contributions over the course of the marriage. They moved house a number of times and suffered as a result of the property crash. Both are in gainful employment. Based on the evidence, the judge believed the man was engaging in additional work and has earnings beyond his employment income and that the woman has some additional income from certain occasional work. She noted that the woman was receiving child benefit and the man was receiving housing assistance payment, she noted. Both had family support and maybe some modest borrowings available to them, she added. She believed the man did his best to pay maintenance during the Covid-19 pandemic. Another factor she noted was unsatisfactory financial documents provided by the woman. While the woman had testified the man was previously convicted of breach of a domestic violence order, confirmation of that was not forthcoming, she said. Nor was the court convinced there was any significant breach of access orders.

Duleek Linear Park in Meath set for green makeover as council seeks public feedback
Duleek Linear Park in Meath set for green makeover as council seeks public feedback

Irish Independent

time6 days ago

  • Irish Independent

Duleek Linear Park in Meath set for green makeover as council seeks public feedback

Coimisiún na Meán Today at 06:00 Meath County Council has announced redevelopment plans for Duleek Linear Park, aiming to transform the much-loved green space into a more accessible, and environmentally rich public amenity. Under the Part 8 planning process, the council has proposed a series of upgrades that include both hard and soft landscaping works, as well as the removal of several outdated structures currently in place. Local residents, community groups, and stakeholders are now being encouraged to have their say as part of the public consultation. The project is focused on enhancing the park's usability and visual appeal while preserving its natural setting. The plans include site preparation and clearance, which would involve the removal of old footpaths, timber fencing, a wooden stage, picnic benches, a short stone path, and a 'kissing gate.' Hard landscaping features, such as new buff tarmacadam walkways, two shaded seating structures, a feature stone entrance wall, age-friendly seating, and 235 metres of railings is said to be part of the plan. A new children's play piece will also be installed. Meanwhile soft landscaping enhancements, featuring new grass meadows, native hedges and shrubbery (including holly, hazel, wild rose, and ivy), and colourful wildflower beds. According to Meath County Council, the project has already undergone screening in line with environmental and habitats directives, and no Environmental Impact Assessment is required. However, members of the public have the right to request a screening determination from An Bord Pleanála within four weeks of the notice date. They can also submit their feedback online or in writing to Meath County Council. The consultation is open until Wednesday, July 16, 2025. Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme.

Plans for 18 new homes at former Mount Saint Joseph Orphanage in Passage West approved by An Bord Pleanála
Plans for 18 new homes at former Mount Saint Joseph Orphanage in Passage West approved by An Bord Pleanála

Irish Examiner

time10-06-2025

  • Irish Examiner

Plans for 18 new homes at former Mount Saint Joseph Orphanage in Passage West approved by An Bord Pleanála

An Bord Pleanála has granted planning permission for 18 new homes in Passage West. Parson Developments Limited got the green light from Cork County Council in January to construct 18 semi-detached homes at the site of the former Mount Saint Joseph Orphanage at Black Road, Passage West in January. The plans also allowed for the restoration and change of use of the former orphanage. The development included the demolition of former farm buildings and the annexes to the rear and southwest of the former institutional structure, as well as modifications to the existing vehicular entrance at the Black Road. It also included associated site works, such as roads, drainage, parking, footpaths and public amenity areas. However, the plans were appealed by several third parties to An Bord Pleanála, with objections citing 'excessive density and inappropriate scale and urban form of development' which would be 'out of character within the curtilage of the protected structure.' Concerns raised also included the development having a 'significant detrimental' impact on the visual amenities of the area. However, the board sided with the council, approving the plans with 24 conditions. In its decision, the board said the development "would not adversely impact on the character and setting of Mount Saint Joseph's or the Architectural Conservation Area, would constitute an acceptable density of residential development in this location, would not seriously injure the residential amenities of the area, would provide an acceptable standard of amenity for future residents, and would be acceptable in terms of traffic safety and convenience." "The proposed development would, therefore, be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area," the board said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store