
Meet the man with one of the world's most dangerous civilian piloting jobs — flying solo across the Atlantic in tiny planes
And that's useful, because Kerry performs one of the most dangerous civilian piloting jobs on the planet — flying brand-new light aircraft across oceans and continents to the buyers. These are planes that are unable to fly above storms and aren't equipped with the sophisticated navigational aids found in jetliners. Plus, Kerry is on his own.
He explains: "If the new owner doesn't want to be the one that's stupid enough to fly it over the ocean, that's when they call a ferry pilot."
In any given year, three pilots die ferrying planes across the North Atlantic. And 63-year-old Kerry, who lives in Menomonie, Wisconsin, has known pilots duck out and hand the keys back before leaving the mainland.
When ferrying planes from North America to Europe or Africa, to "shrink" the Atlantic, a pit stop is made at the airport that's furthest east — St. John's International in Newfoundland.
Kerry — who's documented his ferry piloting daredevilry in two books, Ferry Pilot: Nine Lives Over the North Atlantic and Dangerous Flights — reveals: "There's lots of guys, they'll get to St John's, which is the last stop before crossing the North Atlantic, and they look out — you can see the ocean from the airport - and realize that's just way too much water.
"They'll turn around and land or not even go, just put the keys in the plane, and call the customer and tell them they can't do it, that it's a really stupid idea."
And many would agree that they're right.
Flying a light propeller plane across the Atlantic is risky in the extreme for several reasons.
First of all, they can't fly above storms like jetliners can. "Most of these small planes don't have the performance to get up there," remarks Kerry, who In Nine Lives over the Atlantic describes being "tossed around like a rag doll" by a storm over Africa.
At one point, his plane plunged a thousand feet in seconds.
He writes: "A strong downdraft made it feel like a trapdoor had opened beneath me. Loose items floated around the cockpit… as I tried to arrest the uncontrolled descent."
Ferry pilots do have access to weather reports, of course, but they can't always be relied upon and are often out of date by the time the destination is reached, with light aircraft flying at speeds of between 100 and 150mph taking many hours to travel vast distances.
And if things turn nasty, the pilot just has to deal with it.
Kerry explains: "The weather reporting thing, that's what's also challenging as a ferry pilot, because you're traveling these long distances, and many hours — I've had legs that are up to 14-and-a-half hours long. So, before your flight, you get a weather report that's already a couple of hours old and realize you're going to fly for 14 hours and won't really know what the weather's going to be like when you arrive at your destination, because that weather report is 15 or 16 hours old.
"And as you know, weather changes all the time. I mean, they can't get the afternoon right half the time on the forecast, so you have to be ready to deal with whatever you find."
Navigational aids in a light aircraft are also far inferior to airliners.
Kerry reveals: "My first ferry flight was in 1990 and that was before GPS was on the scene.
"I did eight crossings with nothing but a paper map, a winds aloft forecast [for winds and temperatures] and a stopwatch, just like Charles Lindbergh [who made the first nonstop transatlantic flight from New York to Paris in 1927]. I mean very literally, no difference.
"I actually had when I started, less navigation equipment than they had in the 50s and 60s. I would just get a winds aloft forecast for the whole North Atlantic, and I would get my huge paper map out and calculate each point, what my headings were supposed to be and what the winds are going to do, and make my own call.
"And if the weather was sufficient I'd just go for it and trust that my calculations were correct.
"And the problem with that? The winds aloft forecast is just that, a forecast. If that forecast is wrong, you can be blown hundreds of miles off course, or run into a headwind you didn't anticipate. And the problem with that is, with no navigation equipment, I don't know that I'm in trouble until I'm way deep into trouble."
Does GPS lower the risk? Not according to Kerry.
He explains: "When GPS started, more pilots got killed crossing the North Atlantic because that scary part of the navigation was taken out of it. Now, all these pilots who wouldn't dare do it in the past think they can't get lost and become suddenly brave enough to cross the Atlantic.
"But that's not the only part of ferry flying. You have to be a weather expert. You have to be a maintenance expert. You have to know your plane."
And that plane has propeller engines, far less reliable than jet engines on an airliner that Kerry remarks would be "maintained by a big field of technicians".
Light aircraft "just aren't designed for long-distance travel".
And once you're mid-Atlantic, there is very little chance of a rapid rescue.
Kerry reveals: "Once you're beyond about 150 to 200 miles, you're beyond the reach of helicopters. So, if you happen to go into the water, you can't be rescued by anything other than a boat.
"They can send a big search-and-rescue plane to go see you and maybe drop you a nicer raft than the one you're in. But if you go down 400 miles out into the ocean, you're waiting on a ship, and ships are slow. You might be in the water for 24 to 48 hours or more.
"And the North Atlantic is very cold. Even if you're in a survival suit, in a raft, 48 hours is a long time to be sitting in cold water."
Kerry, who runs a skydiving school, reveals that he's made over 100 ferry pilot trips, despite all the risks and numerous close calls, the most hair-raising of which was when he had a fuel emergency mid-Atlantic, while following Lindbergh's 1927 flight path.
He was flying a 1994 single-engine Beechcraft Bonanza to Paris, a "butt-numbing" 2,487 miles from St John's, when his fuel ran low and the reserve tanks in the cabin behind him failed.
The pilot recalls: "I was about four hours into the flight, past the point of no return, and I switched over to my ferry tanks — big metal fuel tanks to give the plane the range to cross the ocean. But the ferry tank wasn't working. There's no way I was going to make it back. And this is the middle of the night. I was at 15,000 feet with no one to help me.
"We almost always fly alone. We don't have a co-pilot most of the time, just because it's too expensive to bring somebody else along.
"I had to find a way to fix it, or I was going to die. I had a raft, but I was under no illusions about surviving. I was literally in the middle of the North Atlantic. There was no way someone was going to come and get me."
Kerry realized that the pressurization system for the tanks was broken — the fuel wasn't being pushed through to the wing tanks.
But Kerry remained calm.
"I didn't allow myself to panic," continues Kerry. "I've had a lot of emergencies, and I've learned over the years to take any panic and fear and set that aside."
It dawned on Kerry that he would need to manually pressurize the tanks to push the fuel through by blowing into a pressurization hose that was attached to them.
Kerry explains: "I thought, 'If I can blow up an air mattress, maybe I can blow up a steel tank.' And I just stuck that hose in my mouth and started blowing. And after a few minutes some fuel moved and I realized it worked. But I realized I was going to have to blow into that tank all night. So, I had to sit there at 15,000 feet with no oxygen, blowing into that tank for eight and a half hours with no help and gas fumes in the plane.
"I'm in high altitude, no oxygen, got super hypoxic, passed out three times. But there's nothing else to do. You don't have a choice. You have to dig inside yourself and find a way to find a way to survive."
The elephant in the room for some reading all this might be the question of why light aircraft aren't just shipped to their customers.
Kerry reveals that taking a plane apart and putting it back together again is not a sensible plan.
He explains: "It is possible to take the wings off an airplane and ship it in a container, but that usually doesn't work out very well. It's a lot more expensive. There's a lot of maintenance involved. And airplanes aren't designed to have the wings come off and back on again.
"A lot of times, parts get lost when they put the wings on. Sometimes, it never just flies quite right again. A lot of times you're going to a destination where they don't have the maintenance facilities for that. Plus, it could get damaged.
"So, the vast majority of the time a plane needs to be shipped overseas, it's flown by a ferry pilot."
Kerry explains that his full-time job at the moment is running his skydiving school, but he will still occasionally make a ferry pilot run.
He says: "I'm a lot pickier on what I'll do these days, because I don't need to prove anything anymore.
"I've done it over 100 times, and I've risked my life far too many times. But I'll still take a trip if it's a grand adventure, and if it's a cool airplane I want to fly, or it involves a cool destination.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Heathrow third runway will cost passengers £100 per flight, says BA
A third runway at Heathrow will add £100 to the cost of long-haul flights, boss of British Airways (BA) has warned. Sean Doyle, BA's chief executive, said the £50bn expansion plan revealed by Heathrow on Thursday would require a doubling of landing fees to cover construction costs. For long-haul flights, which attract the highest fees, that could take the charges facing passengers to more than £100, including the air passenger duty tax levied by the Government, the airline estimates. Mr Doyle said: 'Heathrow is already the world's busiest airport, yet we're looking at costs doubling from where they are today. Why should that be the case? 'It's not just what passengers pay on their ticket but also the cost of every operator going in and out of Heathrow, regardless of landing fees. 'We're concerned about the competitiveness and the value of money that we're able to give customers.' Airlines are worried that Heathrow has little incentive to deliver value for money with its expansion plans, with the costs set to be passed onto airlines and passengers in the form of higher landing fees. Luis Gallego, the boss of BA parent International Airlines Group, said the jump in charges could prompt some passengers to fly via rival European hubs such as Paris and Amsterdam, damaging both Heathrow and BA in the process. Mr Gallego said the level of spending required to deliver a third runway would be 'huge' regardless of whether the Government backed Heathrow's proposals or somewhat less costly plans pitched by hotel tycoon Surinder Arora. He said: 'We are going to work with both parties to understand the proposals they have presented. But any model that finally is selected requires a change in the regulatory model. 'We need to compete with other hubs in Europe. If we want to increase the number of passengers at Heathrow we need to be competitive. 'If the growth is at any price it is not going to happen. There is a risk of building a runway that is going to be empty. What we want is to build something affordable to guarantee the growth of Heathrow and London.' Mr Doyle said that the charging system was fundamentally flawed 'because the more you invest the more of a return is given to Heathrow, so it's not incentivising efficiency'. Landing fees at Heathrow are already set to increase to £33.26 from 2027 based on the airport's plans for £10bn of short-term improvement works before the runway is built. The Civil Aviation Authority, which has the final say over fees at Heathrow, has begun a review of the charging system with the runway proposals in wind. The regulator said last month that the review would seek to protect the interests of consumers and that alternative regulatory models would be considered. Virgin Atlantic, the biggest carrier at Heathrow after BA, said Heathrow was seeking to mask the full impact on fares of its plans by separating them into different capital programmes. It claimed other major airports had delivered far cheaper capacity improvements, including Hong Kong, which it said had built three runways for little more than £14bn. Operating profit at IAG jumped 43pc to €1.9bn (£1.65bn) in the six months through June, spurred by growth at BA. It said weakness in economy-class bookings in the US was largely offset by the continued strength of demand for premium travel.


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
The ideal flight time: Early shift, late show or something in between?
Among the many benefits claimed for Heathrow 's controversial third-runway proposal is this: 'A better selection of flight times to the most popular destinations.' It's always good to have choice, and offering multiple departures across the day is a passenger benefit. Yet is there a perfect time to fly? You will have a view on this. Consider a three-hour flight to somewhere in Europe from a major UK airport. What time provides maximum benefit? My excellent colleagues have their opinions, which I shall bring you in a moment. But I have two preferences. 6am: Many aspects of a dawn flight are hideous: waking in the early hours, handling intermittent public transport or driving through the night, security queues longer than the Great Wall of China... Yet once you arrive at your destination, all is forgiven: assuming a one-hour time difference, it's 10am. The whole day lies ahead of you, museums are opening and the first delicious lunch is only a couple of hours away. 4pm: No need for an alarm. Whatever your chosen transport to the airport, it is likely to be quiet – as is the security queue. With that one-hour time difference, you will arrive in time for dinner and a drink before sleeping soundly ahead of your first day's adventures. My excellent colleague, travel writer Natalie Wilson, could not be more at odds with these timings. She picks her perfect schedule exactly in the middle, five hours from each of mine. 'For a travel experience with the least hassle, an 11am departure time would be my sweet spot,' Natalie says. "Assuming I'm arriving two hours before boarding (something that's hotly debated on the travel desk), 9am promises several forms of public transport are running to get me to a London aviation hub for an overpriced airport breakfast on several hours of sleep. 'Say there's a three-hour flight to Europe, and there's a one-hour time jump, you're ideally timed to arrive just after the average hotel check-in.' It sounds relaxed – though I don't relish having so much of the day devoured by travelling. Global Travel Editor Annabel Grossman goes for the late shift: 'Morning flights, where I'm up at the crack of dawn, leave me exhausted. It's not a great way to start a holiday or any trip, as it often means the first couple days involve catching up on sleep. 'I recently discovered to joy of an evening flight. Airports are so much quieter, and everyone seems far more relaxed and less bad tempered than during the morning rush! 'Then there's no hanging around to check in when you arrive at your destination – if you arrive earlier it's usually a bit of a wasted day anyway. You can have a good night's sleep and you're ready to start your holiday. Plus, you have the morning for finishing up packing.' On the subject of relaxation: at the British end, you could choose a flight that departs after most passengers have already taken off. Fortunately I have asked all the big airports for the magic midpoint when exactly half of the day's passengers have departed. There is no clear pattern: the halfway point is reached as early as 8am at Birmingham and as late as 2.50pm at Southampton. At the big four UK airports, the sequence is: Manchester: 11am Gatwick: 12.30pm Stansted: 1.30pm Heathrow: 2.15pm At the first three, I know from experience that the 'first wave' of flights is tough going (as it is at Luton, Birmingham, Edinburgh and many other airports). Yet few people leave Heathrow in the first wave, so the early experience can be surprisingly calm. There is one more departure time for three-hour flights that, depending on how well you sleep on aircraft, can work to your advantage: the midnight plane going east. Athens and Istanbul are both three-and-a-bit hours flying time from the London area, and with a two-hour time jump. A departure (from an almost empty airport) around midnight gets you to your destination at around 5am. After an hour's journey into the city, drop your bags at the hotel, then start your day like the locals: watching the sun rise over the Bosphorus or the Parthenon. You've also saved on a hotel night. The energy of the city will propel you through to lunch, and with a cooperative hotel you can take a siesta before some more exploration and indulgence. What about coming home? As late as possible for me, please: ideally 8pm, with the time change working in my favour for a 10pm arrival at the UK airport. But last word to Natalie, who says: 'In a dream world, on the way home I'd reverse the process: checking out of my hotel room at 12 noon to guarantee I've got my money's worth, arriving to the airport at 1pm ahead of a 3pm take-off, arriving back in London for 5pm. Then there's plenty of time to make my way home and unpack.' Simon Calder, also known as The Man Who Pays His Way, has been writing about travel for The Independent since 1994. In his weekly opinion column, he explores a key travel issue – and what it means for you.


BreakingNews.ie
9 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Aer Lingus owner IAG beats second-quarter profit estimates
Aer Lingus owner IAG reported better than expected second-quarter earnings on Friday, helped by strong demand for its transatlantic routes despite fears of knock-on effects from US president Donald Trump's tariff war. Europe's airlines have broadly managed to dodge turmoil over tariffs, with Air France-KLM and Lufthansa reporting strong second quarters and confirming their annual forecasts this week. Advertisement IAG reported operating profit of €1.68 billion for the quarter, up 35 per cent from a €1.2 billion profit in the same period last year. Aer Lingus reported operating profits of €135 million for the quarter, a significant improvement on its operating profit of €91 million the same time last year. "We continue to benefit from the trend of a structural shift in consumer spending towards travel. We remain focused on our market-leading brands and core geographies, where we continue to see robust performance," chief executive Luis Gallego said in a statement. The group confirmed its full-year financial forecasts and said it was seeing strong demand in its core North Atlantic markets, as well as Latin America and Europe. Advertisement The airline group said it expected a slight rise in costs due to lower capacity growth tied to air traffic control issues in Europe as well as cancelled flights to destinations like Tel Aviv. While Gallego acknowledged volatility in the US economic situation, he said any weakness was mitigated by strengths in other parts of the business. Ireland Airport worker who told Aer Lingus rep to ' Read More "The US point-of-sale economy cabin is still weak but it's offset by the strong premium cabin we have ... but it has been improving in the past few weeks," Gallego told reporters on a media call. US airlines have not fared as well, with Delta pulling its full-year guidance this spring over worries about declining demand. Growth in the Latin American market has also continued to boost the business, Gallego added. IAG shares have been among the strongest performers among European airlines in recent years, but this year they have slightly lagged rivals Lufthansa and Air France-KLM as they have recovered from cost pressures.