US President Donald Trump 'caught off guard' by Israeli strikes in Syria
Israeli strikes in Syria
last week, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Monday, adding that he discussed the issue with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Israel had launched strikes on the capital Damascus and the southern Druze-majority city of Sweida, saying it aimed to put pressure on the Syrian government to withdraw its troops from the region amid ongoing clashes there.
Trump "was caught off guard by the bombing in Syria and also the bombing of a Catholic church in Gaza," Leavitt told reporters at a press briefing.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop And Nudges Her To Follow - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
"In both accounts, the president quickly called the prime minister to rectify those situations," she continued.
Netanyahu had visited the White House earlier this month, his third trip since Trump returned to power on January 20.
Live Events
"The president enjoys a good working relationship with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, and stays in, you know, frequent communication with him," Leavitt said.
"When it came to Syria, we saw a de-escalation there."
Israel and Syria on Friday entered a US-brokered ceasefire.
Also on Friday, PM Netanyahu called Pope Leo to express regret at the strike on the Catholic church in Gaza, blaming a "stray missile."
In May, Trump met with Syria's Islamist president Ahmad al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia shortly after lifting many longstanding US sanctions against Damascus.
Trump later praised the leader, who led a major armed group that was once aligned with Al Qaeda and toppled the Syrian government in December.
The United States removed a bounty on Sharaa's head after he came to power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's prosecution demand for Beyonce, Oprah Winfrey trolled by netizens: 'Deflecting from Epstein files'
President Donald Trump has accused Oprah Winfrey and Beyoncé of taking millions from the Democratic Party in exchange for endorsing candidates during the 2024 election. Trump claimed the two celebrities received a combined $14 million from Democrats, while TV personality Al Sharpton was paid a smaller amount, according to a Newsweek report. President Donald Trump claimed the two celebrities received a combined $14 million from Democrats and Al Sharpton was paid a smaller amount.(AP) Earlier, Trump alleged that Beyoncé got $11 million to briefly appear at a campaign event and endorse Kamala Harris without performing. On Saturday evening, he posted on Truth Social that he plans to investigate the payments. Also Read: Trump blasts California wildfire aid, questions missing $100 million FireAid money Donald Trump slams endorsement decision In his post, Trump wrote, 'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the Presidential Election, and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!), Three Million Dollars for 'expenses,' to Oprah, Six Hundred Thousand Dollars to a very low-rated TV 'anchor,' Al Sharpton (a total lightweight!), and others to be named for doing, absolutely NOTHING!' He added, 'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them.' Trump concluded the post with "All hell would break out! Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted!" Also Read: Trump to prosecute Beyonce, Oprah and Kamala Harris? POTUS warns 'All hell would break out!' Netizens react to Trump's claim Netizens on X shared their reactions, where one of the users asked, "What crime are you gonna charge Beyonce/Oprah for? Harris, sure. But what "crime" did the two H'wood demons commit?" Another user wrote, 'He is trying to distract from child rape." A user quipped, 'The contents of the Epstein files must really be damaging." Another user chimed, 'Trump falsely claimed Beyoncé and Oprah were 'illegally' paid to endorse Biden and said Kamala Harris should be prosecuted. No proof. Just distraction.' One user wrote, 'e paid the Chick-fil-A lady, he paid the original crowd when he came down the escalator, he also filled the black church with MAGAets. And let's not forget he paid Stormy Daniels, to name a few. So GTFOH with those accusations and stop deflecting from the Epstein files.' How much campaign pay Beyoncé? Federal Election Commission records do not show an $11 million payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé. However, the campaign did make a $165,000 payment to Parkwood Entertainment, Beyoncé's company, on November 19. That was a few weeks after she endorsed Harris at a rally in Houston. At that rally, Beyoncé said, "I'm not here as a celebrity. I'm not here as a politician. I'm here as a mother—a mother who cares deeply about the world my children and all of our children live in, a world where we have the freedom to control our bodies, a world where we're not divided." So far, the White House has not said whether any legal action will be taken.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Probably will know in an hour…': Donald Trump and EU chief begin trade deal talks in Scotland; seen as make-or-break
Donald Trump trade deals (AI image) US-EU trade deal: US President Donald Trump has begun trade deal talks with European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. Ahead of the talks, Trump spoke of the likelihood of a trade deal saying, '. .probably will know in an hour.' Trump and Ursula von der Leyen are looking to resolve a prolonged transatlantic trade dispute as the deadline approaches. Earlier Trump indicated a 50 percent probability of reaching an agreement with the European Union, which faces a reciprocal tariff of 30% unless a trade agreement is secured by August 1, with US officials confirming on Sunday that "no extensions" would be granted. Von der Leyen's European Commission, representing EU member states, is actively pursuing an agreement to protect trade relations valued at $1.9 trillion annually in goods and services. An EU diplomatic source told AFP that a framework for agreement emerged following late-night discussions on Saturday, several crucial matters remained unresolved. The ultimate decision remains with Trump. A diplomatic source was quoted as saying that while a political agreement exists, it awaits Trump's approval, who is maintaining negotiations until the final moment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute Navy Quest Undo The suggested arrangement includes a standard 15% tariff on European Union exports to the US, matching Japan's agreement, with exemptions for crucial industries such as aircraft and spirits, excluding wine. EU member states must ratify any agreement. Their ambassadors, whilst in Greenland, received updates from the commission and planned subsequent meetings following potential agreement confirmation. The EU representative indicated that the 27 nations broadly supported the proposed arrangement, whilst maintaining their established negotiating positions. The summit between Trump and von der Leyen is taking place at Turnberry along Scotland's southwestern shoreline, at the president's golf establishment, where he spent considerable time playing over the weekend. Trump, aged 79, expressed on Friday his aspiration to achieve a significant agreement with the EU. "I think we have a good 50-50 chance," the president stated, noting approximately 20 unresolved matters. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
SIR: EC gets 7.24cr responses, faces flak over 57L likely deletions
Patna: The Election Commission (EC) on Sunday said it received enumeration forms from over 91.69% of the Bihar's 7.89 crore electors even as its special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state has come under intense criticism from political leaders, academics and civil society members. The controversy arose from the EC's revelation that around 57 lakh electors have been marked as either "untraceable" or "dead" during the drive, raising serious concerns over the methodology and execution of the exercise. While the EC hailed the participation as significant, highlighting that 7.24 crore forms were collected, including 29 lakh submitted online, critics argued that the exclusion of such a large number of electors indicates potential systemic flaws in voter roll maintenance. "The untraceable section of 35 lakh electors are none other than our own migrant workers who have struggled for existence for years," said DM Diwakar, former director of A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies. "These people could not return home to submit documents manually or online. This is a denial of their constitutional right," he added. The EC, on the other hand, claimed that booth level officers (BLOs) visited every household thrice and held special camps in 5,683 wards across 261 urban local bodies to ensure no elector was left out. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo It further said no deletions would be made from the draft electoral rolls, set to be published on Aug 1, without due process. "As per Para 5(b) of SIR guidelines, no name can be deleted without notice and a speaking order of the ERO/AERO," the EC said, adding that any elector aggrieved by a decision may appeal to the district magistrate and subsequently to the chief electoral officer. Despite these assurances, scepticism abounds. "While the EC claims to increase voter participation, it is ruthlessly deleting names without giving people time or opportunity," said Diwakar. "No one can be deprived of voting rights due to lack of documents," he added. CPI-ML state secretary Kunal accused the EC of carrying out a "deletion campaign" rather than a revision. "SIR kuchh aur nahin, balki chhatni abhiyan hai," he said, citing the example of Khopira village in Bhojpur district where the number of registered voters dropped from 1,200 to 911 after the revision. "Three hundred villagers had only temporarily migrated for work, but they were wrongly marked as permanently gone," he alleged. RJD spokesperson Chitranjan Gagan questioned the EC's count of 22 lakh deceased voters. "How can 22 lakh people die within six months of the last summary revision in January?" he asked, pointing out that only 12.43 lakh deaths were recorded in Bihar between 2022 and 2024, according to official state data. "Where has this inflated death toll come from?" Gagan also expressed concern over the fate of nearly 45% of Bihar's electorate who reportedly lack any of the 11 identity documents required by the EC. "Deletion of their names looks inevitable," he said. The EC defended its outreach, saying that it issued full-page advertisements in 246 newspapers across India and instructed state CEOs to reach out to temporarily migrated Bihar workers. "Meetings were also held with political parties and BLOs engaged with booth level agents to facilitate form submissions. Each BLA was permitted to file up to 50 enumeration forms daily to ensure full party involvement," the EC said on Sunday. The commission added the scrutiny of received forms would continue till Aug 1 and the claims and objections period would run from Aug 1 to Sept 1. Volunteers are being trained to assist in filing appeals and a standardised format for this will be widely circulated.
