Paul John Murdoch elected new grand chief of Eeyou Istchee
A Cree lawyer from Wemindji and Waskaganish, Que., Murdoch is stepping away from private practice to take on the Grand Council's top leadership role.
Official results from the election show Murdoch with 2,291 votes (52 per cent), defeating Norman A. Wapachee, the interim grand chief who earned 1,746 votes (39 per cent), and John Kitchen who received 410 votes (9 per cent).
Central to Murdoch's platform are housing reform, investments in justice and prevention programs, and a commitment to uniting the Cree Nation's leadership. He replaces Mandy Gull-Masty, who resigned in May to become Canada's minister of Indigenous Services.
"My priority from day one is going to be empowering the council, making sure everybody feels a part of leadership, and unite with all of the chiefs of the communities," said Murdoch.
Murdoch says regular in-person meetings have already been set up with the grand council of the Crees.
"Anything great the Cree Nation has ever achieved, it was always during the state of unity," said Murdoch.
Murdoch called it a "friendly" election campaign and said he has a lot of respect for fellow candidates Wapachee and Kitchen.
Housing has been a major issue discussed at general assemblies, according to Murdoch, and it has been a persistent struggle in every community for years. He says it will be another major priority for him, and that they have the tools to address the issue.
"The Cree Nation government can do more to support a private housing sector which would take pressure off of social housing," said Murdoch, adding that they can also develop more social housing.
Another priority for Murdoch is to better support the justice system, policing, and prevention programs.
"We gave the bands the power to adopt laws, to ensure peace and order in their communities, but we didn't give them the ability to enforce those laws," said Murdoch
Murdoch refers to the federal Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) Act, passed in 1984, which establishes local self-government for the Cree and Naskapi First Nations in northern Quebec.
"There are relatively simple things that we can do to empower communities so that they can adopt laws and policies to implement them, make sure that it is a reflection of what they want," said Murdoch.
Murdoch hopes to build relationships with fellow members of the Cree Nation Government before tackling important files with the federal government, like Bill C-5.
For Murdoch, this election is only the beginning. he says that he's not afraid to have hard conversations in the sprit of connecting and understanding one another.
"I find it rare these days that people are encouraged to get a little uncomfortable having a conversation you might not normally have with somebody else," he said.
As a former lawyer, Murdoch traveled over 100,000 kilometres to visit Cree communities. Although he struggled to find time for discussions during his trips, he found it especially meaningful to engage with people during the election campaign.
"That's the only way we're going to build bridges between communities or people who are so different from one another," said Murdoch.
The race for deputy grand chief is still ongoing, featuring Linden Spencer from Eastmain and John Henry Wapachee from Waswanipi.
In the first round, Spencer received 2,126 votes, accounting for 47 per cent of the total, while Wapachee followed with 1,432 votes, representing 32 per cent.
Voting for the run-off will begin on July 26, with the election scheduled for Aug. 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Trump-Epstein saga splinters the Murdoch empire
Rupert Murdoch's media empire is playing both sides of the Trump- Epstein scandal, breaking bombshell news with one hand and largely ignoring it with the other. Why it matters: The Wall Street Journal's scoop about Trump's alleged letter to Jeffrey Epstein drew national headlines — just not on Fox News. The divergence underscores how Murdoch's dual media arms serve different audiences, but the same bottom line. Driving the news: President Trump is suing the Journal and Murdoch himself and has expressed frustration with the conservative media mogul over the Epstein coverage. But there seems to be little he can do to stop one of the most unique and successful business strategies in media. In the years since Trump first took office in 2017, News Corp.'s stock has more than doubled. Shares of Fox Corp., which began trading independently in 2019 after Disney acquired 21st Century Fox, have surged 39%. Zoom in: For Trump, Murdoch's loyalty to his business goals has been both helpful and harmful. On one hand, Trump's symbiotic relationship with Fox News has been a key tenet of his campaign and governing strategy. On the other, he hasn't gotten a pass on critical reporting from the Journal. A Fox spokesperson directed Axios to its coverage of the Epstein files more broadly. In the examples Fox shared, the few that mentioned the Journal scoop focused on Trump's lawsuit or claims that the letter was fake. The Wall Street Journal did not respond to a request for comment. WSJ editor-in-chief Emma Tucker previously told Axios the Journal is "used to being gaslit by CEOs and people in power in response to its journalism." Yes, but: Trump has limited options to punish Murdoch for reporting he doesn't like. Because Fox News isn't a broadcast network, there are few regulatory levers the president can pull to retaliate when it does occasionally step out against him. And because of the Trump administration's reliance on the network for messaging to a broad swath of conservative Americans, urging the MAGA base to quit the network wouldn't be beneficial. News Corp. does occasionally require regulatory approval for small deals, but none of them have been big enough to fundamentally disrupt its business if Trump were to come after the company. While a majority of Republicans get their news from Fox, the Journal is read by both sides of the aisle, according to a recent Pew survey. Reality check: For Murdoch, one of the most successful foreign-born businessmen in American history, this power dynamic works in his favor.
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Ford to change parks law for Wasaga Beach redevelopment
The Ford government is proposing legislative changes to the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act to remove more than three per cent of Wasaga Beach Provincial Park from protection and transfer the land to the Town of Wasaga Beach and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming for development. Under the current Act , removing more than 50 hectares or one per cent of a provincial park requires a study, a report and approval by the Ontario Legislature. Experts say to enable this land transfer — which would remove more than 60 hectares — the province would first need to eliminate that key safeguard from the Act. Tim Gray, executive director of Environmental Defence, warns this change would make it easier for the province to quietly remove sections of parks without public scrutiny and could open the door to privatizing protected lands across Ontario. 'If that clause is repealed, the cabinet could quietly remove parts of any provincial park in Ontario whenever they want without the public knowing and without the legislature voting on it,' Gray said. In its public posting, the government mentioned an amendment to the Act but did not clarify which section would be changed. Canada's National Observer reached out to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks for clarification but did not receive a response in time for publication. The Ford government has previously introduced dozens of legislative changes to fast-track resource development and enable the transfer of environmentally protected public land to private interests, such as the Greenbelt land swap, the Ontario Place redevelopment and the proposed Dresden landfill. While the province says the Wasaga Beach move is intended to boost tourism, environmental advocates are raising alarms about both the local impact and the broader precedent. Gray said this fits a wider pattern under the Ford government: shifting public lands to private hands by rewriting laws. The lands being targeted include ecologically sensitive sand dunes, wetlands and nesting habitat for the endangered piping plover . Tony Morris, conservation director at Ontario Nature, says transferring these areas to the town puts both wildlife and long-standing conservation efforts at risk. Morris said Ontario Parks has managed the area for decades, restoring dunes and protecting habitat. Under town ownership, those protections could disappear. Without the Provincial Parks Act in place, Morris says the town would not be required to manage the land for ecological health. He questioned why the transfer is even needed, noting Wasaga Beach is already Ontario's most-visited provincial park. 'There's not a lot of information on why this is necessary. What's the business case?' Morris said. Both Environmental Defence and Ontario Nature plan to submit formal comments to the Ford government and notify the federal environment minister about risks to the piping plover — a federally protected species. Earlier this year, the Ford government announced a $38 million investment to build 'Destination Wasaga' — a tourism project that includes revitalizing Nancy Island, upgrading roads and transferring part of the provincial park to the town. The province says the goal is to boost tourism, support jobs and grow the local economy. The proposed changes do not say whether the transferred lands will be sold to private developers. In an email response, Brian Smith, mayor of the Town of Wasaga Beach, confirmed the town is seeking about 60 hectares as part of the proposed transfer from Wasaga Beach Provincial Park. Smith says the land is not being given to private developers but to the municipality, with the condition that the beach remains public. 'The plan is to collaborate with the province to reimagine the large swath of crumbling, paved parking lot at Beach Area 1,' Smith said. 'The Town and citizens of Wasaga Beach wouldn't have it any other way.' Smith said the goal is to create a sustainable, four-season waterfront destination focused on eco-tourism and public access. The town will work with ecologists, urban designers and the community to ensure shoreline areas — including dunes and piping plover habitat — are protected, he added. The Town has recently pursued redevelopment at Beach Area One, including selling several pieces of public beachfront land for millions to a private developer. On its website , the town says it is actively seeking 'a visionary partner to help reimagine our waterfront into a globally recognized destination.' It adds: 'The right partner will help us set a new benchmark for sustainable urban design.' Gray said that pattern suggests the new parkland would likely follow the same path. 'There's no guarantee these parklands won't be next,' he said. Ontario Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner says Ford is once again removing important protections, just like with Bill 5 — this time putting provincial parks at risk. 'He's doing it all to benefit wealthy insiders and putting the rest of provincial parks under threat,' Schreiner said. 'Ontario parks belong to the people, not wealthy Ford-connected insiders.' He urged the public to push back before more damage is done. 'Our parks are home to species at risk, vital wetlands and ecological features that protect nearby communities from flooding and extreme weather,' Schreiner said in a statement. 'They are also cherished spaces where Ontario families can camp, hike, swim, paddle and connect with each other and nature.' The proposed changes still need to be voted on at Queen's Park, but that won't happen until the legislature returns in late October. Gray is urging people to act now by contacting their MPPs and pushing back. He says provincial parks belong to the people of Ontario and should remain protected. 'It is appalling that the current government is trying to give away big parts of our most popular park and make it easy to give more park land away in the future,' Gray said. 'These beachfront lands on Georgian Bay are worth millions of dollars and owned by the people of Ontario. They should never be a gift to well-connected developers.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Carney pledges to uphold Indigenous rights as he meets with Inuit leaders in Inuvik
Efforts to move nation building projects forward faster will not infringe on Indigenous rights or treaties, says Prime Minister Mark Carney. That commitment was made as a day of nation-to-nation talks commenced in Inuvik on July 24. Carney is meeting with Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami President Natan Obed and Inuvialuit Regional Corporation chair Duane Ningaqsiq Smith. '(I'm) very pleased to be able to convene this meeting with the prime minister,' said Obed. 'Your leadership, and especially in convening this meeting so soon after the election and getting back to work within the ICPC (Inuit-Crown Partnership Committee) space is a real indicator that you are willing to work with Inuit in the process that we have set up with the Government of Canada for now eight years or so. 'We come as Inuit understanding that the Government of Canada will always have priorities, and the Inuit will always have priorities,' Obed added. 'Where we meet in the middle is where we can do the best work and implement our modern treaties ensure that we uphold Inuit rights in this country, and then also just build a better Canada.' Indigenous leaders raised concerns after the federal government pushed Bill C-5, the One Canada Economy Act. Carney said during the July 24 press conference that the act will not violate existing treaty rights. The prime minister said the federal government is working to establish a single point of contact in a major projects office, which he said would be up and running by Labour Day. Ottawa is also appointing an Indigenous Advisory Council that will operate out of the major projects office to ensure treaty rights are upheld. 'For too for too long, the attitude in Ottawa has been, why should a project be done, as opposed to in response to initiatives and requests for projects. How can we help the project to move forward?' Carney said. 'I want to be absolutely clear in this public forum what the (One Canada Economy) act could do and what it doesn't do. Want to be clear up front that the act fully respects treaty rights, including modern treaties, the modern treaties with Inuit treaty organizations. 'It fully respects treaty-based environmental assessment processes. In fact, those will be essential for anything that we move forward,' said Carney. 'Really, what the act does is it creates conditions for the federal government to be more effective and efficient in our part of the of the partnership.' The prime minister also touched on Arctic security, indicating that the federal government needed to hear from local stakeholders as to what infrastructure they desire, but hinted at a potential dual-use port in Tuktoyaktuk. 'The minister of National Defence does not sleep,' he quipped. 'I think we're starting to see the first phase of that reaction — 365-day presence in the Arctic, on land, sea and in the air; $6-billion investment in over-the-horizon radar; an expansion of our physical footprint, including with the potential on dual-use port infrastructure. 'Again, we need to hear from you what you think makes the most sense in that regard, so that we can make the right decisions,' the prime minister added. Carney, Smith and Obed will be continuing discussions throughout the day. Among items on the agenda are the Inuvialuit Energy Security Project, housing issues and the Inuvialut Child First Law. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
