Russian forces advance and take first village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, state media say
MOSCOW, June 30 (Reuters) - Russian forces have taken control of the first village in the east-central Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk, Russian state media and war bloggers said on Monday, after Russia took 950 square kms of territory in two months.
There was no immediate confirmation from Ukrainian sources or from the Russian Defence Ministry.
As Moscow and Kyiv talk of possible peace, the war has intensified with Russian forces carving out a 200 square kilometre (77.22 square miles) chunk of Ukraine's Sumy region and entering the Dnipropetrovsk region last month.
The authoritative Ukrainian Deep State map shows that Russia now controls 113,588 square kms of Ukrainian territory, up 943 square km over the two months to June 28.
Russia's state RIA news agency quoted a pro-Russian official, Vladimir Rogov, as saying that Russian forces had taken control of the village of Dachnoye just inside the Dnipropetrovsk region.
Russia has said it is willing to make peace but that Ukraine must withdraw from the entirety of four regions which Russia mostly controls and which President Vladimir Putin says are now legally part of Russia.
Ukraine and its European backers say those terms are tantamount to capitulation and that Russia is not interested in peace and that they will never accept Russian control of a fifth of Ukraine.
The areas under Russian control include Crimea, more than 99% of the Luhansk region, over 70% of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, all in the east or southeast, and fragments of the Kharkiv, Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk regions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
34 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Germany to help Ukraine make more weapons to strengthen hand in peace talks
Germany aims to help Ukraine manufacture more weapons more quickly as Kyiv looks to strengthen its negotiating position in peace talks with Russia about ending their more than three-year war, the top German diplomat said. 'We see our task as helping Ukraine so that it can negotiate more strongly,' foreign minister Johann Wadephul said during a visit to the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, on Monday accompanied by German defence industry representatives. Advertisement US-led international peace efforts have failed to make progress on halting the fighting. Our institutions are working on the synchronization of European and Ukrainian sanctions. We are also fully aligning the European sanctions package targeting the regime in Iran, which includes numerous individuals, companies, and entities not only involved in military production… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) June 29, 2025 Russian President Vladimir Putin has effectively rejected a ceasefire and has not budged from his war goals. 'When Putin speaks of peace today, it is pure mockery,' Mr Wadephul told a news conference with Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha. 'His apparent readiness to negotiate is only a facade so far.' Advertisement Russia's invasion shows no sign of letting up. Its grinding war of attrition along the roughly 1,000-kilometre (620-mile) front line and long-range strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine have killed thousands of troops and civilians. Ukraine is outgunned and short-handed on the front line and international aid has been vital for Ukraine's resistance against its neighbour's bigger army and economy. Germany has been Ukraine's second-largest military backer after the United States, whose continuing support is in doubt. Advertisement 'We want to build new joint ventures so that Ukraine itself can produce faster and more for its own defence, because your needs are enormous,' Mr Wadephul said while standing next to Mr Sybiha. German foreign minister Johann Wadephul, left, and Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha talk during their meeting in Kyiv, Ukraine (Efrem Lukatsky/AP) 'Our arms cooperation is a real trump card — it is a logical continuation of our delivery of material,' Mr Wadephul said. 'And we can even benefit mutually from it — with your wealth of ideas and your experience, we will become better.' Mr Wadephul was also due to meet with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. Advertisement The top German diplomat's trip to Kyiv came less than 48 hours after Russia launched its biggest combined aerial attack against Ukraine over the weekend, Ukrainian officials said, in an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in peace efforts. Ukraine's air force said on Monday it detected 107 Russian Shahed and decoy drones in the country's air space overnight. Strikes in Ukraine's north-eastern Kharkiv region left two civilians dead and eight injured, including a six-year-old child, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said on Monday. The aerial onslaughts are calculated by Russia to squeeze Ukraine into submission, according to the Institute for the Study of War. Advertisement 'Russia is continuing to use increasingly large numbers of drones in its overnight strike packages in order to overwhelm Ukrainian air defences and enable subsequent cruise and ballistic missile strikes,' the Washington-based think tank said late on Sunday. German foreign minister Johann Wadephul, left, and Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha stand at the entrance of St Michael Monastery in Kyiv (Efrem Lukatsky/AP) 'The increases in Russia's strike packages in recent weeks are largely due to Russia's efforts to scale up its defence industrial production, particularly of Shahed and decoy drones and ballistic missiles,' the institute added. Mr Sybiha thanked Germany for its contribution to Ukraine's air defence and urged Berlin to send more anti-missile systems. The Russians 'are attacking civilian targets in order to create panic, to influence the mood of our population', he said. 'The key is the air defence system.' Berlin has balked at granting Mr Zelensky's request to provide Ukraine with powerful German and Swedish-made Taurus long-range missiles, which could potentially hit targets inside Russia. That is due to fears such a move could enrage the Kremlin and draw Nato into Europe's biggest conflict since the Second World War. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz pledged in May to help Ukraine develop its own long-range missile systems that would be free of any Western-imposed limitations on their use and targets.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Russia has taken first village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk, state media claim
Russian forces have captured a village in the Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk for the first time in their three-year offensive, Russian state media and pro-war bloggers claimed on Monday, marking a potential psychological blow to Ukraine. There was no immediate confirmation from Ukrainian officials or from the Russian defence ministry. Russia's state RIA news agency cited an influential pro-Russian official, Vladimir Rogov, as saying that Russian forces had taken control of Dachnoye just inside Dnipropetrovsk. 'Our troops have advanced further in this direction and have already driven the enemy out of the village of Dachnoye. This is the first populated area in the Dnipropetrovsk region from which the enemy has been expelled,' Rogov wrote on Telegram. Three weeks ago, Russian officials similarly claimed their forces had entered Ukraine's eastern Dnipropetrovsk region, but Ukrainian authorities said the assault was repelled. Dnipropetrovsk, which lies to the west of the Donetsk region, is not among the five Ukrainian regions over which Russia has asserted a formal territorial claim. During recent peace talks in Istanbul between Moscow and Kyiv, Russian officials threatened Kyiv with taking more territory unless Ukraine signed a peace deal on Russian terms. Moscow has been pounding Dnipropetrovsk relentlessly, killing at least 17 civilians in a strike last week that damaged schools, hospitals and a passenger train. Russia now occupies roughly a fifth of Ukraine's territory and has been making steady progress in seizing more land, though Kyiv says Moscow's summer offensive is stalling. Over the weekend, Russian troops took over a major lithium deposit in Donetsk, cutting off a valuable resource that Kyiv had hoped to use in deepening its economic partnership with the US. In April, the US and Kyiv signed an agreement to share profits and royalties from the future sale of Ukrainian minerals and rare earths, sealing a deal that Donald Trump has said will provide an economic incentive for the US to continue to invest in Ukraine's defence and its reconstruction after he brokers a peace deal with Russia. But the agreement did not offer Ukraine any security guarantees or protection and Moscow's capture of the mineral deposits could further weaken Kyiv's leverage with Washington. Sign up to Headlines Europe A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day after newsletter promotion Areas under Russian control in eastern and south-eastern Ukraine include Crimea, more than 99% of Luhansk region and 70% of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. Russia also controls fragments of the Kharkiv and Sumy regions. Russia has shown no sign of winding down its offensive in Ukraine, even as it continues to claim interest in peace talks. The Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said on Monday that the Kremlin expected the timeline for a third round of talks with Ukraine to become clear soon, adding that the dynamics of the negotiations largely depended on Kyiv's position and the effectiveness of Washington's mediation. Meanwhile, Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, does not appear any closer to persuading the US to introduce sanctions on Russia. On Sunday, the US senator Lindsey Graham – one of Kyiv's staunchest supporters and a close ally of Trump – said the US had backed a bill he introduced targeting Russia's oil trade. Buthe US president has repeatedly suggested he would be reluctant to impose further sanctions on Moscow, arguing they could jeopardise peace negotiations.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Will Putin really reign in Russia's defence spending?
At the very time when those warmongering Nato nations are pledging to raise their defence spending substantially, that doveish peacenik Vladimir Putin is promising to reduce his. It's hard to know which of these two commitments is less plausible, but those anticipating the cranking down of the Russian war economy any time soon are going to have to wait rather longer. At the recent St Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), Putin said that: We are planning to reduce defence spending. For next year and the year after that and so on – for the next three years – we are planning to do so, although there is not yet a final agreement between the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Development, but overall everyone is thinking in that direction. The real risk for Putin is of prolonged economic decline, recession and stagflation In part, this was a response to the decision at last week's Nato summit to commit alliance members to a planned 5 per cent spend on defence. Of course, this is only a target and – just as not all members hit the previous 2 per cent figure – most will only slowly, if ever, reach this level. Spain, for example, has incurred the wrath of Donald Trump by already opting out, with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez saying that 2.1 per cent is 'sufficient and realistic'. Besides, Nato's new target is not really 5 per cent, but rather 3.5 per cent on core defence spending and 1.5 per cent on related line items. As this can include everything from Ukraine aid to fixing transport infrastructure (wouldn't it be wonderful if Britain's potholes could be filled in the name of defence as a result?), it is essentially meaningless. Nonetheless, some Russian propaganda has been juxtaposing the Nato decision with Putin's words to present him as the dove, especially to the Global South, which was something of a focus of the increasingly-marginal SPIEF. More important, though, have been the warning signs within the Russian economy. Although certainly no Communist, Putin has often held an almost Bolshevik line on the economy: that somehow market forces ought to be able to be made to bend to indomitable political will. This works no better in the mid 2020s than it did in the late 1910s. Even technocrats, generally excluded from Putin's innermost circle and expected to shut up and get on with keeping the engines of the ship of state turning, have begun breaking cover. Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov warned that Russia was already 'on the verge' of economic recession, while Elvira Nabiullina, the highly capable governor of the Central Bank, made it clear that previous 4 per cent economic growth reflected not just defence spending but the take-up of idle industrial capacity and that it would not continue. Of late, Nabiullina has come under growing political attack from the hawks for her 'pessimism', but now hers is no longer an isolated voice of caution. Alexander Shokhin, chair of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, has frankly admitted that many companies are on the verge of default. Even the oligarch Arkady Rotenberg, one of Putin's closest childhood friends, has obliquely criticised the impact of the war and sanctions as businesses struggle with the high interest rates necessitated by the need to control inflation. Putin has tried to dispel this talk with his usual mix of confidence and implied threat: 'Some specialists and experts are pointing to the risks of stagnation or even a recession. This, of course, must not be allowed to happen under any circumstances.' Nonetheless, while it is questionable whether the defence budget is likely to be reduced at all while the war in Ukraine still wages – and even after, it will by necessity remain high as Russia rebuilds its ravaged armed forces – his words at SPIEF do suggest a belated awareness that there are serious economic risks and long-term consequences. These risks and consequences are not, though, enough in and of themselves to force Putin to end the war. When Russia is doing well in the war, the call from Kyiv and its Western supporters is for more sanctions to turn the tide; when it is doing badly, it is for more sanctions to finish the job. The truth of the matter is that while sanctions are working in imposing extra costs on the Russian war economy, neither they, nor the impact of the conflict, are going to 'crash' the system. The real risk for Putin is of prolonged economic decline, recession and stagflation. The challenge is that this will force Putin to make the hard guns versus butter decisions he has so far largely dodged. Of course, he will choose guns, and this runs the risk of deepening public and elite discontent. The economic technocrats, after all, are not the only ones who are sounding warnings – those in law enforcement are too. Interior Minister Kolokoltsev, a career police officer, is admitting that his force is now heavily understrength. Prosecutor General Krasnov, who made his reputation as a skilled investigator, is reporting that corruption cases have risen by 25 per cent since the same quarter last year. These are no dissidents, but insiders trying to warn the monarch of stresses on the system. Putin may at least be hearing them, but considering that he still seems committed to his war, can he offer more than empty promises in return?
