logo
Paramount to pay $16 million to settle with Trump in CBS News ‘60 Minutes' lawsuit

Paramount to pay $16 million to settle with Trump in CBS News ‘60 Minutes' lawsuit

Yahoo2 days ago
After months of legal negotiations and wrangling, the question was less about whether Paramount would settle with Donald Trump, and more about how much the president's lawyers would agree to. As NBC News reported, that question now has an answer.
Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump that had alleged an interview that aired on CBS's '60 Minutes' last year with Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent for the presidency, was deceptively edited. The agreement in principle, proposed by a mediator, includes plaintiffs' fees and costs and — except for fees and costs — will be allocated to Trump's future presidential library, Paramount Global said in a statement late Tuesday.
The company did not apologize as part of the deal or admit any fault. Nevertheless, the plaintiff wasted little time in gloating: In a written statement from a presidential spokesperson, Team Trump boasted that the settlement 'holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit.'
Except that's not what happened.
By now, the basic elements of this story are probably familiar, but to briefly recap, shortly before the 2024 presidential election, it's customary for the major party nominees to sit down for '60 Minutes' interviews. Last fall, Harris agreed, while Trump initially accepted the invitation before backing out soon after.
Harris' interview wasn't especially memorable — it was, however, nominated for an Emmy Award — though Trump has whined incessantly about it for several months, claiming that the program deceptively edited the segment. The Republican's claims have already been thoroughly discredited, but his hysterics have only gotten worse: The president recently accused '60 Minutes' of, among other things, 'unlawful and illegal behavior.'
Trump added that CBS should lose its broadcast license and 'pay a big price,' while calling on the Federal Communications Commission to 'impose the maximum fines and punishment.'
But it was Trump's civil suit against CBS that was of particular interest, in which he asked for $20 billion in damages (that's not a typo), based on his conspiratorial beliefs about the news magazine's election coverage.
Given the bizarre nature of Trump's assertions, and the fact that there really wasn't anything meaningfully wrong with the broadcast, it was unclear why anyone would take the civil suit seriously, or why the case would need to be settled at all.
Indeed, after Paramount Global entered settlement negotiations, critics expressed fears that the company was prepared to turn over millions of dollars, not because '60 Minutes' did anything untoward, but because Paramount wants the Trump administration to approve an unrelated merger deal.
Paramount on Tuesday cited a previous statement regarding the Skydance merger. 'This lawsuit is completely separate from and unrelated to the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process,' it said.
Those assurances are unlikely to quiet concerns that the corporation is writing a $16 million check to Trump's future presidential library because Paramount hopes to influence the Trump administration's decision-making process.
In fact, The Wall Street Journal reported last week, 'Over the past few months, Paramount leaders have been wrestling with how to pay to settle the lawsuit without exposing directors and officers to liability in potential future shareholder litigation or to criminal charges for bribing a public official.'
This dynamic was not lost on Capitol Hill observers. 'Paramount appears to be trying to settle a lawsuit that it has assessed as 'completely without merit,'' Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden said in a recent letter to Chairwoman Shari Redstone. 'Under the federal bribery statute, it is illegal to corruptly give anything of value to public officials to influence an official act. If Paramount officials make these concessions in a quid pro quo arrangement to influence President Trump or other Administration officials, they may be breaking the law.'
Now that the settlement is official, and Paramount is paying Team Trump to settle a case that appears baseless, it's likely these questions are poised to grow considerably louder.
This ongoing debacle has already cost the network — over the last couple of months, the head of CBS News and the executive producer of '60 Minutes' have both stepped down — and those costs now also include a steep price tag.
As for the specific figure, The New York Times reported, 'The size of the settlement, $16 million, is the same sum that ABC News agreed to pay in December to settle a defamation case filed by Mr. Trump against the network and one of its anchors, George Stephanopoulos.'
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur
Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur

Axios

time30 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur

President Trump on Friday morning said he was unaware that the word "Shylock" is considered by some to be antisemitic, after using it during a Thursday night rally in Iowa. What to know: Shylock, the villain of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice," was written as a greedy and vengeful Jewish moneylender who eventually is forced to convert to Christianity. What Trump said at the rally: "Think of that: no death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, Shylocks and bad people." What the Anti Defamation League said via X: "The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible. It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States." What Trump said the next day to reporters: "I've never heard it that way. To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way, you view it differently than me. I've never heard that." Flashback: In 2014, then-Vice President Biden used the term "Shylocks" to refer to rapacious bankers, after which he apologized for his "poor choice of words."

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy implies rainbow crosswalks could lead to traffic dangers
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy implies rainbow crosswalks could lead to traffic dangers

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy implies rainbow crosswalks could lead to traffic dangers

As Americans crowd highways and airports for the peak summer travel season, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has announced a sweeping national initiative that could put rainbow-painted crosswalks and broader debates over how cities express identity and inclusion squarely in the federal spotlight. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. In a letter on Tuesday, Duffy urged governors nationwide to comply with SAFE ROADS, a new Trump administration program aiming to eliminate 'distractions' from non-freeway arterial roads. 'Roads are for safety, not political messages or artwork,' Duffy wrote. Related: Pete Buttigieg, first out gay Cabinet secretary, to be replaced by antigay former reality star & Fox News host Although he conceded that, under the Biden administration, estimated traffic fatalities declined by 3.8 percent in 2024 compared to 2023 levels, Duffy emphasized that the estimated toll of 39,345 deaths remains 'unacceptable,' and pressed states to identify hazardous roads within 60 days, with fixes expected by the end of the 2026 fiscal year. Yet what defines a 'distraction' is far from settled. In Alexandria, Virginia, rainbow crosswalks were permanently installed last year after residents called for visible support for the LGBTQ+ community. 'I've heard from numerous residents who were excited to see Alexandria finally join the list of cities across the nation with this sort of permanent Pride artwork,' Councilman R. Kirk McPike told local outlet The Zebra in 2024. Relted: Fox News anchor appears to use antigay slur in rant about Pete Buttigieg The debate over colorful crosswalks goes beyond aesthetics—it touches on centuries of urban design and social meaning. The notion of the crosswalk dates back over 2,000 years to Pompeii, where raised stones allowed pedestrians to cross without stepping into traffic. Modern zebra crossings, first introduced in England in 1951, have become global symbols of pedestrian safety, thanks to their high-contrast stripes, which aid those with low vision in navigating busy streets. But cities are increasingly experimenting. From 3D optical illusions designed to slow cars to LED-lit pathways triggered by pedestrian motion, the crosswalk has evolved into a canvas of both technology and community identity. Advocates argue that colorful designs can heighten visibility and foster civic pride. 'There are hundreds around the country, if not thousands around the world, and I don't know of any study that has been able to show that they are actually causing any problems,' urban designer Michael Lydon told The New York Times in 2019. Lyndon has collaborated with cities to develop street art projects for over ten years. Related: Donald Trump's DOT will prioritize areas with higher 'marriage and birth rates' At the heart of Duffy's push is a long-running federal insistence on uniformity. The rules of the road are governed by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, a dense guide that dictates everything from the shape of stop signs to the width and color of crosswalk lines. Federal skepticism about colorful crosswalks is hardly a new phenomenon. A 2013 memo from the Federal Highway Administration warned that 'crosswalk art' might degrade the contrast of white markings and give pedestrians a false sense of security. The FHWA concluded that aesthetic treatments, particularly those with retroreflective properties or symbolic designs, risk confusing drivers and are 'contrary to the goal of increased safety.' Yet, even the agency has admitted that it lacks direct research showing that rainbow crosswalks cause crashes. Related: Pete Buttigieg blasts 'despicable' Donald Trump for blaming D.C. plane crash on DEI In 2017, the Federal Highway Administration ordered Lexington, Kentucky, to remove its rainbow-painted crosswalk installed downtown for Pride celebrations, warning it posed a legal liability and could confuse motorists. Yet LGBTQ+ advocates in Lexington pointed out that other cities—including Philadelphia, Boston, and Atlanta—had rainbow crosswalks without apparent problems, the Herald Leader reported. The Department of Transportation has not provided examples of crashes linked to rainbow crosswalks and did not respond to The Advocate's questions. This article originally appeared on Advocate: Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy implies rainbow crosswalks could lead to traffic dangers Pete Buttigieg blasts 'despicable' Donald Trump for blaming D.C. plane crash on DEI Donald Trump's DOT will prioritize areas with higher 'marriage and birth rates' Fox News anchor appears to use antigay slur in rant about Pete Buttigieg

The British Embassy's Shady Fourth of July Tweet Speaks Volumes Without Saying Much
The British Embassy's Shady Fourth of July Tweet Speaks Volumes Without Saying Much

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The British Embassy's Shady Fourth of July Tweet Speaks Volumes Without Saying Much

The British Embassy in Washington, D.C., didn't need fireworks to make its point this Independence Day. On Friday, centuries of unresolved transatlantic tension culminated in a simple tweet made by the U.K. diplomats — a reminder that dry wit remains one of Britain's most enduring exports. 'Enjoy your big day,' the post read, accompanied by an American flag. The well-timed dig was taken up a notch when the account attached a meme with scenes pulled from 2023 Netflix documentary 'Beckham,' in which Victoria and David Beckham engage in some domestic banter. The overlaid text offered quiet commentary on the national mood disguised as light internet mischief. 🇺🇸 Enjoy your big day!Honestly... — British Embassy Washington (@UKinUSA) July 4, 2025 The phrase 'big day' wasn't just about the Fourth. It was also a not-so-veiled nod to President Donald Trump signing of his so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a measure expected to slash healthcare coverage for millions while delivering tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans. This isn't the first time the embassy has extended its signature 'warm regards' to the American people. Back in 2022, it marked the holiday with a Spotify meme looping the 1977 hit 'Baby Come Back.' The tweet also featured an image of Jonathan Groff portraying King George III, the British monarch famously unwilling to part ways with the colonies, in the hit musical 'Hamilton.' Trump Pushes A July 4th Deadline For Big Tax Bill As Senators Dig In 'Hateful' Trump Trashed Over 'F**king Disgusting' Line About Half The Country For 4th Of July Trump Says He Will Delay EU Tariffs Until July 9

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store