logo
ALUULA Announces Option Repricing and Option Grant

ALUULA Announces Option Repricing and Option Grant

Yahoo15-05-2025

Victoria, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - May 15, 2025) - ALUULA Composites Inc. (TSXV: AUUA) ("ALUULA" or the "Company") announces that its board of directors has approved amending the exercise price of a total of 188,601 outstanding stock options held by non-insiders of the Company, with previous exercise prices ranging from $3.00 to $2.00, to $0.61 per common share. The Company proposed the reprice to support retention of valued team members by better aligning the exercise price with the current market price, which experienced a decline following the completion of the Company's rights offering in the first quarter of 2025. Repricing these non-insider options remains subject to approval of the TSX Venture Exchange.
The Company also announces the grant of 1,504,760 stock options, pursuant to the Company's share option plan, to certain directors, officers, and consultants to purchase up to 1,504,760 common shares of the Company. These options are exercisable at a price of $0.61 per common share until May 13, 2030. 533,725 of these options vested on grant, and the remaining options vest over a three-year period.
Stock options form a critical element of the Company's compensation policy and ALUULA wants to ensure adequate incentive is in place to attract and retain team members that will support the Company in meeting its growth objectives.
About ALUULA Composites
ALUULA is an ultra-light, high performance and recycle-ready composite materials brand that enhances the performance of outdoor gear. Proudly owned and manufactured on the Canadian west coast, ALUULA's innovation is driven by a deep understanding that equipment does not need to sacrifice performance for sustainability. ALUULA's materials are known for their unique construction capabilities and their ability to make products lighter, stronger, and more sustainable.
aluula.com | TSXV: AUUA
On behalf of the Board of Directors,Sage BerrymanChief Executive Officer1-888-724-2470
For ALUULA investor inquiries, please contact:
1-888-724-2470, ext. 4 IR@aluula.com
For ALUULA media relations, please contact:
media@aluula.com
TSX Venture Exchange
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Forward-Looking Statements
The information in this news release includes certain information and statements about management's view of future events, expectations, plans, and prospects that constitute forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: the TSXV's approval of the non-insider option repricing. These statements are based on assumptions subject to significant risks and uncertainties as described in the Company's management discussion and analysis. Because of these risks and uncertainties and as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing and receipt of all applicable regulatory, corporate third-party approvals, the actual results, expectations, achievements, or performance may differ materially from those anticipated and indicated by these forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurances that the expectations of any forward-looking statement will prove to be correct. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any intention and assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, changes in factors affecting such forward-looking statements or otherwise.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/252335

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We're 68 and just retired, but instead of downsizing like our friends, we want to upsize. Are we crazy?
We're 68 and just retired, but instead of downsizing like our friends, we want to upsize. Are we crazy?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

We're 68 and just retired, but instead of downsizing like our friends, we want to upsize. Are we crazy?

Janelle and her husband, both 68, recently retired and are ready to make the most of their golden years. They own a condo, which originally they thought would be ideal for retirement. But now, with an active lifestyle, and more time spent babysitting their grandkids, they're wondering if it actually makes sense to upsize during retirement. Janelle spent most of her career commuting to an office, while her husband spent long stretches on the road for work. Now that they're retired, they want to enjoy their home. Janelle, who recently took up watercolours, wants a space to herself where she can paint, preferably a sunroom overlooking a garden. Her husband wants a 'man cave' where he can watch football and Formula One. A vast majority of Canadians (94%) over 45 agree that aging in place would allow them to maintain independence, comfort and dignity throughout the aging process, according to an Ipsos poll. For some, that may mean downsizing. Nearly half (46%) of adults approaching retirement intend to downsize their home within two year of exiting their full-time career, according to a Royal LePage poll. However, 47% of respondents say they will not, which gives some credence to Janelle and her husband's retirement goals. But could it make sense for some retired couples? Here's what Janelle and her husband might want to consider before making a move. Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich — and 'anyone' can do it 5 essential money moves to help boost your net worth today — here's how to up your money game in 2025 (and you can complete each step within minutes) Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among Canada's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio Upsizing can enhance quality of life, providing more space for family visits or home-based hobbies as many retirees are 'realizing their dreams' of spending more time with family and friends and pursuing hobbies. It allows for flexibility along the continuum of life. It could make sense for multigenerational households, — say, if you're regularly babysitting your grandchildren — or if your adult children help out with caregiving duties. It could provide space for a live-in caregiver, or serve as an extra source of income if you rent out a room, basement apartment or garden suite. Moving is costly, from selling your home and buying a new one to moving costs themselves, which can range from $600 to $6455, depending on whether you use a professional moving service to relocate either locally or to another province, according to Move Advisor. You may not net as much from your sale as you hope, meaning you may have to dip into your retirement savings or borrow money to get a bigger home. Currently, it's a balanced market nationwide, with only Ontario is considered a buyer's market according to WOWA. Furthermore, the average home price across Canada has only dipped 1.1% over the past 12 months. Meanwhile, the prime rate in Canada for a mortgage is 4.95%, thanks to the Bank of Canada's decision to hold its rate at 2.75% Even if you buy a big home in a more affordable area, larger homes come with higher utility bills, maintenance and insurance costs. If you need to hire someone for maintenance and repairs, such as regularly mowing the lawn, you'll need to account for that in your retirement budget. While it may be unpleasant to think about, if one spouse dies sooner than expected, or if the grandkids don't visit as often as you counted on, then a big, empty house could also end up feeling rather lonely. Read more: Here are — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Before upsizing, Janelle and her husband may want to answer some key questions: Are there other expenses we need to budget for, such as more furniture to fill a larger home? Can we afford this while still preserving a financial cushion for emergencies and health care? Are we prepared for the extra work (such as maintenance) that comes with a larger home? Will we still want or be able to live in a bigger space in 10 to 15 years? Is this larger home suitable to an aging-in-place lifestyle (e.g., are there too many stairs)? How will this move affect our estate plan and heirs? Working with a financial advisor to run the numbers can help couples like Janelle and her husband determine whether upsizing would be the right move for their retirement years. 1. Ipsos: Nearly all Canadians (96%) Aged Forty-Five and Older Say Aging in Place Enables the Preservation of Independence and Dignity (May 16, 2025) 2. Royal LePage: The new real estate reality for retirees: Exiting the workforce with mortgage debt (May 27, 2025) 3. Move Advisor: What's the Cost of Moving Across Canada?, by Joshua Green (May 27, 2025) 3. WOWA: Canadian Housing Market Report I'm almost 50 and don't have enough retirement savings. What should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 solid ways you can catch up Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway bought nearly 26 million shares of this Canadian company in 2024 — here are 3 ways to help you invest like the Oracle of Omaha What would you do if you had an emergency vet bill worth $5,000 tomorrow? Here's how to protect your furry friend (and keep your wallet intact) Billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and Jay-Z have taken out mortgages for homes they can easily afford — here's why This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

McCormick CEO warns about harsh decision amid tariff threats
McCormick CEO warns about harsh decision amid tariff threats

Miami Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

McCormick CEO warns about harsh decision amid tariff threats

Imagine cooking a meal without seasonings and forcing yourself to eat plain foods to survive because purchasing condiments has become too expensive. Not only would this rob us of the enjoyment of eating, but it would also prevent us from trying new flavors from other cultures. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter After taking office for a second term, President Donald Trump implemented new tariffs on foreign-made imports in April, including an additional 10% baseline tariff. This has resulted in ongoing negotiations between foreign countries and the U.S., temporarily pausing increased tariffs on imported goods. Related: When you'll see empty retail store shelves due to tariffs However, the clock is ticking, and the 90-day suspension of baseline tariffs expires on July 9. Although some countries have reached agreements, others have yet to come to a mutual understanding. This threatens the supply chain of many products, which may lead to price increases. Companies have been strategizing and reorganizing their businesses, hoping to soften or prevent the potential blow tariffs might have on their finances. However, many remain concerned about negative financial repercussions, especially in sectors highly dependent on imported goods. Related: This might deliver the economy news people want to hear McCormick & Company (MKC) is a leading manufacturer, marketer, and distributor of spices, seasoning mixes, condiments, and extracts worldwide. After 136 years in business, the company has grown a portfolio of around 17,000 materials from over 90 countries. Although an American company, McCormick depends on foreign goods. Many of its products are not commercially available in the U.S. due to factors such as geographic location and climate. The new tariffs have hit the decades-old business like a train, leading McCormick to reveal plans that American consumers had been dreading. McCormick said it will raise prices during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2025, as the costs of certain products will be higher than expected. "Our total gross annualized tariff exposure is approximately $90,000,000 and in terms of 2025 in year exposure, it's about $50,000,000," said McCormick CEO Brendan Foley in the company's latest earnings call. More Retail News: Popular grocery store chain resumes store openings after 3-year hiatusHershey adds new products to move beyond chocolateBankrupt retail chain makes major comeback, reopens new stores However, the company will continue to look for lower-cost sourcing alternatives to keep up with demand and mitigate the tariff effects. McCormick understands that price hikes could decrease sales, as it would prompt consumers to seek cheaper options. "We are collaborating with our customers to implement surgical and strategic pricing, while also maintaining our volume momentum," said Foley. "Overall, our manufacturing location strategy, resilient supply chain, global sourcing capabilities, collaborative efforts across the organization and the strength of our brands continue to be a competitive advantage, enabling us to mitigate our costs and maintain our business momentum." Although McCormick has focused on decreasing its reliance on any one geographic area, Foley still warned that many products cannot be substituted because they aren't produced or available in the U.S. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

For Mark Carney, every decision has trade-offs — but that's not slowing him down
For Mark Carney, every decision has trade-offs — but that's not slowing him down

Hamilton Spectator

time8 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

For Mark Carney, every decision has trade-offs — but that's not slowing him down

OTTAWA—If there is a Carney 'doctrine' taking shape more than 100 days into the prime ministership of Mark Carney, maybe it is this: get it done, and damn the details. A few short months ago, Carney was blunt: 'I am a pragmatist above all. So when I see something that's not working, I will change it.' That's what the former central banker and UN climate finance envoy said when he captured the Liberal party leadership to replace Justin Trudeau. He went on to win the 2025 federal election on his outsider's pitch to rescue the economy from the threat of Donald Trump's tariff war. Pragmatism was how he justified abrupt domestic moves: ditching the consumer carbon tax, reversing capital gains tax hikes, and lowering income taxes while jamming 'nation-building' red-tape-cutting bills through Parliament to juice the economy. Pragmatism helps explain why, in his single mandate letter to cabinet ministers, Carney told them, 'We must redefine Canada's international, commercial, and security relationships.' But in an era where Trump is the one defining Canada's closest relationship, it's not clear if Carney's pragmatism can win over the U.S. president's chaos. On Friday, the unpredictable Trump cancelled talks towards a new deal with Canada, angry at Canada's deadline Monday for Big Tech giants to pay a digital services tax. Retroactive to 2022, it would collect $2.3 billion at first, and about $900 million yearly after that. Small potatoes compared to what Carney has already put on Canada's tab. In hopes of getting along with Trump, Carney in the past week promised to ramp up Canada's spending, along with NATO allies — all under intense pressure from the U.S. president — to a whopping $150 billion a year on military and related spending, a level almost unthinkable last year, as he vows to shift Canadian economic and security ties away from America towards Europe and beyond. In a spate of a few weeks, Carney signed what he calls a new economic, security and defence partnership with the European Union, increased aid to Ukraine, hosted a G7 summit where he offered backing of Trump's leadership efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and left a wide open runway for Trump to handle the Iran-Israel conflict as he saw fit. Carney defended his vow to lead where the U.S. does not, telling CNN it should be seen as a 'positive' not a negative reaction 'against' the U.S. or Trump. 'The way we would like to lead, the way European Union would like to lead, a number of Asian countries as well, is in a positive respect. If the U.S. is pulling back from multilateralism, as it is with respect to trade … effectively U.S. trade policy is now bilateral — if the U.S. is pulling back, there are others of us who do believe in multilateralism,' the rule of law, 'fair and open' trade, and in defence co-operation, said Carney. 'Do something,' seems to be the Carney mantra, said Kerry Buck, a former Canadian ambassador to NATO who welcomed the prime minister's commitment hit the new NATO military spending goal of five per cent of GDP. Although Justin Trudeau eventually committed to reaching the old NATO two per cent target at the end of last year's summit, he did so without a clear plan and with a 2032 timeline that was 'clearly going to damage our bilateral relations with the U.S. under Trump, where we're very vulnerable on trade,' said Buck, speaking before Trump's move Friday. In contrast, two weeks ahead of this week's NATO summit Carney accelerated action, said he'd hit two per cent this year, and at the summit adopted the bigger five per cent goal by 2035 with no hesitation. ' It was smart transactionally to do that. And I think in terms of content, it was also necessary,' Buck said. Others wonder how Carney is going to pay for it all. Questions remain about how the government will reach its two per cent promise this year, with the independent Parliamentary Budget Officer saying it can't verify Carney's plan to hit the old target. 'Some might start to think that he has a guns-before-butter kind of approach to foreign policy … a muscular foreign policy focused on defence,' but Buck said Carney had no choice, given it was 'our most vulnerable point' with the U.S. in ongoing trade talks. Forget the 'peace dividend' that Canada and other western allies hailed at the end of the Cold War, welcoming the ability to spend less on the military and more on social welfare systems. Now Carney and the other leaders challenged by Trump are embracing what NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called a 'defence dividend,' claiming that spending five per cent of GDP on defence will create 'an engine of growth for our economies, driving literally millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic.' Carney echoed the claim, acknowledging higher military spending may one day entail federal spending trade-offs or sacrifices, but for now, 'more of it will help build our economy at the same time as it improves our defence. And we'll get the benefits.' There is more continuity than many think between Trudeau and Carney: Carney continued the imposition of counter-tariffs against the U.S. that Trudeau launched. But he has withheld tit-for-tat retaliation against the 50 per cent steel and aluminum penalties Trump levied pending the outcome of trade talks. Carney has continued Trudeau's staunch support for Ukraine and its embattled president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Carney backs a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, a ceasefire in Gaza, and went so far as to sanction two Israeli cabinet ministers. Like Trudeau, Carney believes government has a role and responsibility to address climate change. That Carney has moved swiftly on foreign and defence files is partly due to the flow of the international summits that coincided with his first two months after winning the April 28 election. It's also due to the urgency of the threat posed by the 'tariff' president in the White House. Carney, though, has a view of the larger global economic imbalances and the roles of China and the U.S. in those imbalances, that he shares with leaders like France's President Emmanuel Macron, and as they try to persuade Trump to drop tariffs, Carney seeks to position Canada's critical mineral, AI and quantum computing sectors for a world in which those imbalances continue. Janice Gross Stein said it is too early to describe a Carney 'doctrine' but it's clear 'the fundamental thing for him is that he, like everyone, is defining a path to dealing with a very different United States.' Carney is of necessity pursuing a new more predictable economic and security deal with the U.S. at a time of crisis , 'but it's an eyes-open arrangement,' Stein said. 'Yes, we need to diversify our partnerships — that's not a new idea in Canadian foreign policy … and yes,' Carney is focusing especially on Europe and like-minded states, and NATO, 'but that's built in to dealing with the more demanding United States.' Stein sees a pragmatic streak too in Carney's overtures to countries like China, India and Saudi Arabia. Carney identified China as the biggest threat to Canada's national security during the federal election. But in office, he's taken steps to thaw relations and ease Beijing's penalties on Canadian agricultural products. At the same time he is moving to block Chinese steel dumping via higher tariff rates against transshipment countries — in line with U.S. concerns. He rolled out a G7 welcome mat to India's Narendra Modi as a criminal investigation struggles to probe India's role in the killing of a Canadian Sikh in Surrey. And Carney invited Saudi Arabia Crown prince Mohamed bin Salman, the kingdom's de facto ruler, who declined to attend, in a week where the Saudi regime executed a journalist. Those three countries, China, India and Saudi Arabia are key economic players that are ignored at Canada's peril, said Stein. 'Where he's a pragmatist is in the recognition that every decision has trade-offs. You cannot make it a high priority to diversify your partnerships when you are the smaller next-door neighbour to a country that you are sending 75 per cent of your exports to and buying 75 per cent of everything that you buy in defence from that one country, which is the United States, and then continue to exclude others in the international community.' In parallel, said Stein, Carney is acting to ensure that Canada's economy is 'fit for purpose.' The bill to fast-track 'nation-building' development projects is part of that effort, as is his move to do 'important' consultation with Indigenous groups, but done simultaneously with other reviews, 'not sequentially,' she said. Carney is 'connecting defence, foreign policy to the Canadian economy because that's his comfort zone,' said Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, a senior fellow in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. But she worries the emphasis on 'pragmatic' sends the wrong signal to countries like China, India or Saudi Arabia which will interpret it to mean Canada is ready to overlook human rights concerns in favour of doing business. Jonathan Berkshire Miller, director of foreign affairs, national defence and security policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said Carney is necessarily focused on 'two imperatives: mending the relationship with the United States and diversification from it.' And while Carney's experience gives him credibility in Washington 'where he is well known among economic and diplomatic elites,' Trump's second term makes traditional diplomatic approaches 'increasingly unrealistic,' he said. There is an inevitable geographic and economic reality, he said in a written response to the Star. 'America remains Canada's largest trading partner.' So rather than a drastic shift or severing of ties, he said, 'Expect, instead, a policy of pragmatic hedging: building multilateral ties while trying to be on balanced terms' with who is in the White House. For now, Carney may have some latitude, he believes. Increased defence spending can bring Canada greater strategic autonomy on Arctic sovereignty, cybersecurity and intelligence sharing. The narrow question is 'one of political will' where the requirements for sustained federal spending 'and public support' will be the big test, he said, particularly in an era where 'fiscal retrenchment' (Carney has vowed to bring the operating budget into balance) and 'domestic political division are the contemporary realities.' The broader question is whether Carney's pragmatic approach can secure both.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store