
Colleges are canceling affinity graduations due to anti-DEI policies. Here is how students are preserving the traditions
The ceremony was set to be a celebration of Black culture, featuring musicians, poetry readings, messages about the historic struggle for racial equality, and a speech by Nikole Hannah-Jones, the creator of the '1619 Project,' Martin-Smith said.
Students had reserved Harvard Memorial Church on campus for the event, she said.
But in early May, Martin-Smith said she received an email from university officials saying she would not be allowed to host the Black graduation on campus.
Harvard is among several universities across the country that have canceled affinity graduations amid threats from President Donald Trump to block medical research funding and revoke accreditation from schools that don't end diversity, equity and inclusion practices. Trump decries these programs as 'illegal and immoral discrimination.'
Affinity graduations are optional events typically led by students to celebrate different student identities and ethnicities. Commonly held ceremonies often honor Black, Hispanic, Asian, first-generation and LGBTQ+ students. Students say the events are significant because they honor the music, apparel, food, history, language and traditions unique to their identity.
Harvard and other elite universities have also clashed with Trump over his demands for crackdowns on student protests, including pro-Palestinian demonstrations and purported antisemitism.
The lost support for affinity graduations — coming just weeks before most universities were set to hold their commencement events — left some students scrambling to find ways to still host the events.
Martin-Smith said she was 'disappointed but not surprised' when the school canceled the Black student graduation hosted by her group, Harvard Undergraduate Black Community Leaders.
In late April, Harvard announced it was renaming its diversity, equity, and inclusion office and rescinding all funding from affinity group commencement celebrations. The move came after the Trump administration froze $2.2 billion in federal funding for Harvard when the Ivy League school initially said it would not follow policy demands from the administration.
'This isn't the first time the university has catered to PR (public relations) concerns rather than student concerns,' Martin-Smith said.
Martin-Smith was determined to hold the Black graduation and spent time between finals study sessions calling venues to secure a space off campus, she said.
She ultimately found a venue and obtained support from the Black Graduate Student Alliance and the Harvard Black Alumni Society. The event will be held on May 27 and will still feature a similar program to the initial event, Martin-Smith said.
'It's an undue burden that continues to be placed upon Black students to create the change that we want to see,' Martin-Smith said.
Students at the University of Kentucky faced a similar dilemma when the school announced earlier this year it was canceling all affinity graduations.
'Following a number of federal and state policy changes and directives, the university will no longer host identity-based or special-interest graduation celebrations,' university spokesperson Jay Blanton said in a statement. 'In the past, these were held outside of our official commencement ceremonies as optional celebrations and social events. We will continue to comply with the law, while celebrating all students and their distinctive achievements at our official commencement ceremonies.'
Kristopher Washington, a University of Kentucky graduate, said he was disappointed to learn that there would no longer be a Black student graduation on campus — an event he had looked forward to throughout his college career.
Washington collaborated with his fraternity brothers from Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. to find an off-campus venue where they could still host a cultural graduation for their peers.
He secured support from the Lyric Theatre & Cultural Arts Center in Lexington, where they held the event dubbed 'Senior Salute,' Washington said.
The ceremony was open to all graduates and Washington's fraternity encouraged students to wear items signifying their identity or culture.
'I feel it's important to show that there are people coming from other places, underprivileged areas and many different backgrounds and struggles and still making it over to UK (University of Kentucky) and still getting their degree,' Washington said. 'It's a tremendous achievement.'
One expert said graduations celebrating students' ethnic identities are important because most main commencement celebrations have European roots.
Antar Tichavakunda, an assistant professor of race and higher education at the University of California, Santa Barbara, pointed out that 'Pomp and Circumstance' — a song commonly played at graduations — is by English composer Edward Elgar. He also noted that the tradition of wearing graduation gowns originated in Europe during medieval times.
Many Black graduations have embraced Black culture by incorporating West African drums, strolling by Black Greek letter organizations, and featuring guest speakers who understand the Black experience, Tichavakunda said.
'Giving us a space to celebrate like we'd like to and not be policed, play music that feels more affirming and culturally responsive in a smaller setting really just makes that moment of completing a degree that much sweeter,' said Tichavakunda, who is also author of 'Black Campus Life: The Worlds Black Students Make at a Historically White Institution.'
'It definitely speaks to pride and not having to dim part of your identity to be palatable to others.'
Members of the LGBTQ+ community have also seen their traditional Lavender Graduations canceled at schools across the country due to anti-DEI policies at both the state and federal levels.
Last year, Utah Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed a bill banning diversity, equity and inclusion programs from higher education, the public education system and government employers.
Jacey Thornton, executive director of Project Rainbow Utah, said that the law led to the closure of resource centers focused on gender, race and identity at colleges and universities. It also meant that universities would no longer support the Lavender Graduations that celebrate the achievements of LGBTQ+ graduates.
Thornton said Project Rainbow helped LGBTQ+ students at Weber State University and the University of Utah find ways to gather with their community.
For example, Thornton said Project Rainbow sponsored an event at a church for the University of Utah's LGBTQ+ community where they hung pride flags and graduates wore the lavender stoles and rainbow tassels that are traditionally worn at Lavender Graduations on college campuses. Students from Westminster University and Salt Lake Community College were also invited, she said.
It's important for LGBTQ+ students to be able to celebrate their graduation in a space where they feel welcome and embraced, Thornton said, who graduated with a master of social work from Weber State this spring.
'We are holding space to celebrate the obstacles we have overcome as queer people,' Thornton said. 'It's important that we stand up and stand strong. A lot of us lose biological family in the process of transitioning or coming out as queer. This supports that space for us to come together and find a new chosen family.'
Tichavakunda said universities' withdrawal of support from affinity groups signals to students that they should consider schools that fully embrace their identity and offer programs to help them navigate college. For Black students, he recommended considering HBCUs.
Students who choose to attend universities despite the loss of DEI practices will need to work harder to preserve cultural traditions, Tichavakunda said.
'For future classes, I think this administration is forcing students and faculty to think creatively beyond the university and work around it,' he said. 'But I don't think this will be the end of culturally specific graduations. I just think it might be the end of universities supporting them.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFLPA's JC Tretter resigns after backlash against candidacy to replace executive director Lloyd Howell
J.C. Tretter was the other name scrutinized in the backlash that led to NFLPA executive director Lloyd Howell resigning. He's headed out too now. The former Cleveland Browns center, who was working as the union's chief strategy officer after two terms as president during his playing days, told CBS Sports on Sunday he is taking himself out of the running for the interim executive director position and resigning from the union, citing the impact on his family. He did so after it was reported he was in a two-man race for interim executive director alongside NFLPA chief player officer Don Davis. From CBS Sports: "I'm not resigning because what I've been accused of is true. ... I'm not resigning in disgrace. I'm resigning because this has gone too far for me and my family, and I've sucked it up for six weeks. And I felt like I've been kind of left in the wind taking shots for the best of the organization," he said. "… I got to the point this morning where I woke up and I realized, like, I am going to keep dying on this f—ing sword forever of, I'll never, ever be able to do what's best for me. And I will always pick what's best for the organization. And in the end, what's the organization done for me? Like, nothing. Tretter played a central role in Howell's hire, which has been increasingly questioned after it was reported the players might have known about a sexual discrimination lawsuit against him at his previous employer and that he had a massive conflict of interest as a Carlyle Group consultant. It was also revealed last week that a grievance successfully brought by the NFL against Tretter was covered up. The news that Tretter might have replaced Howell when the vote went to the players was met with disbelief and criticism from some former players, many of whom worked in NFLPA leadership or as player representatives. A text message was also reportedly being distributed among players railing against him as "the common denominator in all these scandals." Promoting Tretter to executive director would have represented an endorsement of the NFLPA's leadership in recent years, and it has become very clear that would be a hard sell. The NFLPA has had a very bad month The controversy began last month when Pablo Torre and Mike Florio reported that the NFL and NFLPA buried a ruling on a collusion grievance that saw an arbitrator conclude that the league encouraged its teams to reduce guaranteed money in 2022 after Deshaun Watson's unprecedented, fully guaranteed contract. The NFL actually won the grievance because the arbitrator, Christopher Droney, concluded he could not establish a "clear preponderance" that NFL teams acted on that advice, but he still left a damning sentence on page 55 of a 61-page document: 'There is little question that the NFL Management Council, with the blessing of the Commissioner, encouraged the 32 NFL Clubs to reduce guarantees in veterans' contracts at the March 2022 annual owners' meeting.' The NFL's reason for hiding that conclusion is obvious. It validates many critics' portrayals of a league willing to color outside the lines to suppress player compensation in any way it can get away with. What was less clear was why the NFLPA agreed with the NFL that the public, and more notably the players, didn't need to see that a neutral observer concluded its main adversary was acting in such a way. Questions abounded for Howell and the rest of the union's leadership, and it got worse as the weeks went on. After Howell finally resigned Thursday, it was reported Friday he had been discovered to have expensed more than $3,000 at strip clubs. The NFLPA has never been anywhere close to the most prestigious or effective player union in sports, but the latest developments were beyond the pale enough for many that Tretter couldn't escape the backlash either. JC Tretter compares himself to a 'Game of Thrones' character while defending decisions In a lengthy interview with CBS, Tretter defended himself on many of the above contentions, most notably the notion that he pushed Howell into the executive director role from the shadows. Howell was one of two finalists, alongside former SAG-AFTRA director David White. Tretter said that while Howell performed better in interviews, the NFLPA executive committee voted 10-1 in favor of White over Howell, with Tretter among the 10. However, the committee did not share its preference with the board of 32 player representatives, who voted for Howell. Tretter said her expects there will be changes to the approval process in the next go-around. From CBS Sports: "We did hundreds of hours of work, and we did multiple rounds of interviews. We had people flying into D.C. regularly to meet candidates in person. I don't think it's feasible to do that for everybody," he explained. "… The executive committee is in the day-to-day of it. The board has the approval rights. "It's a fair question. I think that's something that the board and the [executive committee] and the players need to wrestle with as they launch the next search is like, 'How is it set up?' I'm not saying we did everything right. I think we made decisions based off what we had done historically and wanted to do something different and thought what we were doing was the best option. We've learned more since then. There are probably going to be changes. There should be changes. They should do something that they feel confident in and they should learn from every experience they have." Tretter also said he regretted the quote that led to the covered-up NFL grievance, calling it a "dumb tongue-in-cheek remark" and denied having any access to the collusion grievance Howell agreed with the NFL to keep secret. Overall, Tretter had a comparison for his role in all this: Tyrion Lannister. Let's hear him out: Tretter has been thinking about one specific scene from "Game of Thrones" over the last few weeks. Tyrion Lannister is on trial for killing his nephew, King Joffrey, and though he didn't commit the murder, he says that he wished he had. "I wish I was the monster you think I am," Lannister says at his trial. "I felt a lot of that over the last six weeks," Tretter said Sunday. "I'm being accused of being this all-controlling, all-powerful person, and I'm not. And I f—ing wish I was because I don't think we'd be in the same place we are now if I was.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If Trump's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?
We hear numbers like 'billions' thrown around all the time, but what does that really mean for the average person? Let's break down what would happen if billionaire President Donald Trump split his entire net worth evenly among every American (and whether that could actually happen). Find Out: Read Next: What Is Donald Trump's Net Worth? Donald Trump is a real estate mogul turned reality TV star, turned president, turned…influencer? It's been quite a ride. Trump began his business career working for his father, Fred, who built affordable housing in Brooklyn and Queens. He later moved the business into Manhattan, building skyscrapers and casinos and eventually branding nearly everything from steaks to ties. As of June 2025, Trump's net worth is estimated at over $5 billion, according to Forbes. That figure includes: High-end real estate (commercial and residential) Golf resorts across the globe A winery A Boeing 757 known as 'Trump Force One' Stakes in companies like Trump Media & Technology Group (home of Truth Social) He's also made millions in recent years by selling NFTs, coffee-table books and shares in his social media company, despite it losing money. That said, a New York judge ordered him to pay $454 million in 2024 for allegedly inflating his assets to look more creditworthy. Trump appealed the ruling and is awaiting a final decision to be made. But until then, his net worth remains hovering above $5 billion. Discover More: How Much Would You Get? Now for the fun part. If Trump's $5.4 (or so) billion was evenly distributed among all 347,181,484 people in the U.S., every person would get $15.55. What Can $15.55 Buy You in 2025? In today's dollars, here's what you could spend your Trump dividend on: Three gallons of gas (maybe) One month of a streaming service (until you forget to cancel) A fast-food combo meal…with extra fries A high-quality phone charger 0.00016 shares of Nvidia A movie ticket So while $15.55 isn't quite yacht money, it's still a tangible amount of money for something many Americans could use. Could This Actually Happen? Not really. Most of Trump's fortune isn't sitting in a checking account but rather tied up in real estate and business equity. Meaning to give away his billions, he'd have to liquidate assets, sell property and cash out of his companies. And that's no easy task since many of his holdings, like golf resorts and commercial buildings, aren't exactly quick or easy to sell. It would take time, come with massive tax implications and could tank the value of his holdings in the process. Large-scale asset sales could trigger capital gains taxes in the hundreds of millions, depending on how long he's held each property and what he originally paid. Worse, the sudden flood of properties or shares could depress market prices, causing his remaining wealth to drop even further (and hurting others invested in the same markets). Plus, there's no legal or logical reason he'd want to do this. U.S. law doesn't require billionaires to redistribute their wealth, and most don't unless compelled by court order (or extreme personal conviction). Final Thoughts No, Trump's not going to hand you $15.55 any time soon, but it's still fun to realize just how small a billionaire's fortune becomes when it's shared across a population of hundreds of millions. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing This article originally appeared on If Trump's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?

Wall Street Journal
21 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Real Risk to the Electric Grid
Democrats are attacking the GOP's budget bill for phasing out subsidies for wind and solar power, claiming this will cause power shortages and higher electric rates. The evidence suggests the opposite, as a new Energy Department study illustrates. As we've been writing for years, the reliability of the U.S. electrical grid is in trouble. The Energy report projects potential power shortfalls in 2030, as 104 gigawatts of baseload power retire in the next five years. But here's the really bad news: That shortfalls will exist even if that production is replaced, as expected, with 209 gigawatts of the mostly solar and wind generation under development. Americans would lose power in 2030 for an average of 817.7 hours (34 days), assuming typical weather conditions. If heat waves or storms stress the grid, outages could reach 55 days. Even without plant shutdowns, Americans would lose power for 269.9 hours (11 days) amid demand growth. The power shortages would be worse in middle America, where demand is growing fastest owing to AI data centers and renewables are displacing coal and gas. How can this be? The answer is that the Inflation Reduction Act turbo-charged subsidies for wind and solar in ways that are distorting energy investment. Because the subsidies can offset more than 50% of a project's cost, solar and wind became more profitable to build than new baseload gas plants. The credits enable wind and solar to under-price coal and gas plants in competitive power markets.