At least 58 corpses found in Libyan hospital, ministry says
The corpses were found in a morgue refrigerator in Abu Salim Accidents Hospital in the densely populated Abu Salim neighborhood, following a report from the hospital, the ministry said in a statement.
Pictures of corpses with numbers and censored faces were posted by the ministry, showing remains in various states of decomposition on steel carriers and beds. Some of the remains were burnt. An investigation was underway to establish the identities of the deceased.
'So far, 23 corpses have been examined, and all necessary legal procedures have been taken, including documenting data and collecting samples,' the ministry said.
Abu Salim was home to a militia known as the Stabilization Support Apparatus, whose chief, Abdulghani Kikli, widely known as Ghaniwa, was killed in unconfirmed circumstances last Monday.
Kikli's killing led to the sudden defeat of the SSA by factions aligned to internationally recognised Prime Minister Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah of the Government of National Unity (GNU).
On Tuesday, al-Dbeibah ordered armed groups to be dismantled, triggering the fiercest clashes Tripoli had seen in years between two armed groups. The clashes killed at least eight civilians, according to the United Nations.
The corpses found on Monday are the second set of unidentified remains discovered in recent days. On Saturday, officials said nine corpses had been found in a morgue refrigerator in Al-Khadra hospital, another SSA-controlled hospital in the Abu Salim neighborhood.
The militia had not reported the corpses to the relevant authorities, the interior ministry said.
Al-Dbeibah said on Saturday that eliminating militias was an 'ongoing project,' as a ceasefire after last week's clashes remained in place.
The GNU posted a video on Monday showing bulldozers demolishing the so-called 77 camp, one of the biggest facilities that was under control of SSA. The camp is to be turned into a national park.
Libya has had little stability since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising ousted longtime autocrat Muammar Gaddafi. The country split in 2014 between rival eastern and western factions, though an outbreak of major warfare paused with a truce in 2020.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
28 minutes ago
- Arab News
America's AI energy revolution has global stakes
The next great American industrial revolution is not being shaped in think tanks; it is being built in real time. In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, once a powerhouse of steel and smoke, the US has launched a future rooted in artificial intelligence, energy innovation and industrial revival. What unfolded at the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit last week was not just a domestic policy pivot. It was a global declaration. With more than $90 billion in private sector commitments, this initiative, spearheaded by the President Donald Trump-aligned state administration and welcomed by leaders on both sides of the aisle, sends a clear message to the world: the US intends to lead the AI era with power, precision and pragmatism. That message matters far beyond American borders. For leaders across the Middle East, this moment is worth watching, not just because of its scale but because of what it signals: the future of AI will be forged by the nations that control the energy, infrastructure and values that guide its use. AI is not an abstract Western luxury. It will soon define everything from national security and energy management to education, agriculture and healthcare. AI is already reshaping global trade, defense and diplomacy. In the Middle East, governments are investing heavily in smart cities, surveillance systems, digital health and fintech, all of which are powered by AI. But AI is not magic; it demands enormous amounts of energy to train, deploy and sustain. The summit in Pennsylvania highlighted this reality with refreshing honesty. Rather than chasing slogans or downplaying the environmental and industrial demands of AI, American leaders there did something rare: they confronted the energy challenge head-on. Their answer? Build data centers adjacent to power plants, particularly those utilizing natural gas and nuclear energy. This strategy, known as co-location, dramatically improves efficiency and allows for rapid expansion. It offers a potential model for energy-rich nations worldwide to consider as they scale up their own AI ambitions. Many global commentators will ask: is this American model just a return to fossil fuels? Is it an environmental rollback? The answer is not that simple. Washington is not abandoning its climate goals. However, it acknowledges a simple truth: wind and solar are essential, but they cannot yet deliver the reliable, large-scale power that AI systems need. For now, only natural gas and nuclear energy can provide that kind of steady and scalable supply. This is not about giving up on renewables; it is a practical step. A way to keep innovation moving forward while the clean energy future catches up. For Middle Eastern countries, especially those investing in AI through sovereign wealth funds and national tech strategies, this approach resonates. Gulf states like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are threading this same needle: investing in renewables while recognizing the transitional role of hydrocarbons and nuclear energy. What the US is doing in Pennsylvania may not just inspire them but also offer a playbook. At its core, the summit's announcements promise more than megawatts and microchips. They offer a blueprint for economic dignity. America's heartland, often overlooked by globalization, is being revitalized through high-skilled, future-focused jobs in energy, cybersecurity, engineering and data science. This is a model the world can learn from. Instead of viewing AI as a threat to traditional labor, the US is building an industrial policy that connects digital growth to human opportunity. The lesson is clear: if AI is built in a vacuum, it will deepen inequality. If it is built alongside energy, training and infrastructure, it can be a ladder. A new partnership model could emerge, in which US AI expertise is combined with Middle Eastern energy foresight. Dalia Al-Aqidi For Middle Eastern countries investing in youth-driven economies, that distinction is crucial. The AI revolution must be both technological and human. There is a bigger reason the summit matters: it proves that who builds AI, and the values behind it, matter. By leading with clean energy and private sector strength, America is doing more than securing its own future — it is offering a better option for others. The global market now has a choice: work with a democratic AI system built on trust and cooperation or risk getting locked into one built for control, not collaboration. Washington is not looking to go it alone. At the summit, Trump and others emphasized the importance of international cooperation, especially with energy producers and tech innovators abroad. That is where the Middle East comes in. The region is home to some of the world's most ambitious AI visions, from Saudi Arabia's NEOM to the UAE's national AI strategy. It is also home to some of the world's most valuable energy assets. A new partnership model could emerge, in which American AI expertise is combined with Middle Eastern energy foresight, leading to shared leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This is not science fiction. It is strategic alignment. Of course, no policy is perfect. Environmental concerns must be addressed and the digital divide must be bridged, not just within nations but between them. However, what is clear is that a vacuum of leadership is no longer an option. The world needs bold ideas and, more importantly, the courage to act on them. What happened in Pennsylvania is not a solution for every country. But it is a signal to all: the AI energy era has arrived and the stakes are global. What happens in places like Pittsburgh will shape how AI develops, how energy is used and how the world moves forward. This is not a threat, it is an opportunity for several nations to work together on a smarter, safer and more connected future. As we enter a new industrial age, the real questions are: who will lead it and what values will shape the path ahead?
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Recognized, independent Palestinian state could unlock disputed gas wealth, expert says
LONDON: Official recognition of a Palestinian state would end legal ambiguities over the Gaza Marine gas field and secure the Palestinian Authority's right to develop its most valuable natural resource, according to energy expert Michael Barron. Barron, author of 'The Gaza Marine Story,' estimates the field could generate $4 billion in revenue at current prices, with the PA reasonably earning $100 million annually for 15 years, The Guardian reported on Sunday. 'The revenues would not turn the Palestinians into the next Qataris or Singaporeans, but it would be their own revenue and not aid, on which the Palestinian economy remains dependent,' he said. Gas was discovered in 2000 in the Gaza Marine field, a joint venture between BG Gas and the Palestinian Consolidated Contractors Co. Despite initial hopes of ending energy shortages in the Gaza Strip, the project has been repeatedly stalled over ownership disputes, lack of sovereignty, and political instability. 'The Oslo Accords agreed in 1993 clearly give the Palestinian National Authority jurisdiction over territorial waters, the subsoil, power to legislate over oil and gas exploration and to award licenses to do so,' Barron said. 'Control over natural resources was an important element of (the) state-building agenda of the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Israeli exploitation of Palestinian resources was and remains a central part of the conflict,' he added. Israel has historically blocked development over concerns that revenue could reach Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip. An Israeli court once ruled the waters a 'no-man's water' due to the PA's lack of sovereignty, and Israel has long claimed any license 20 miles off the Gaza coast should be seen as a gift, not a right. Barron said that if Palestine were recognized as a state, particularly by countries where major oil firms are based, it would 'effectively end the legal ambiguity' and allow the PA to develop the field and achieve energy independence from Israel. A separate controversy has emerged over Israeli-issued gas licenses in a disputed area known as Zone G. Lawyers acting for Palestinian human rights groups recently warned Italian energy firm Eni not to proceed with exploration, saying 'Israel cannot have validly awarded you any exploration rights and you cannot validly have acquired any such rights.' Eni has since told Italian campaigners that 'licenses have not yet been issued and no exploratory activities are in progress.' Activist group Global Witness also argues the East Mediterranean Gas pipeline, which passes through waters claimed by Palestine, is unlawful and does not provide any revenue to the PA. The 56-mile pipeline transports gas from Ashkelon in Israel to Arish in Egypt for export. The issue has gained new attention following a UN report by Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese. She warned corporations of their potential legal liability for supporting Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory, citing international court rulings. Her report concluded companies have a 'prima facie responsibility 'to not engage and/or to withdraw totally and unconditionally from any associated dealings with Israel, and to ensure that any engagement with Palestinians enables their self-determination.'' Israel has rejected the report in full. Barron argues that, with Israel now self-sufficient in gas, 'so long as a Palestinian state with unified governance is recognized, Israel will have no motive or legal right to block Palestine exploiting its single greatest natural resource.'
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Syria's unity should be off Israel's gambling table
In the aftermath of Israel's recent strikes on Damascus and destabilizing actions in Sweida, former British spy chief Sir John Sawers offered a sobering assessment: 'What Israel is looking for, I think, is a fragmented Syria — one which is weak and divided. That's a miscalculation … I don't think Israeli actions were at all helpful.' His words, delivered to CNN, cut through the fog of war and exposed a dangerous regional gamble. Sawers is right. The notion that Syria's internal tensions — particularly those involving various sects and tribal factions — are marginal or containable is a delusion. The breakup of Syria would be far more catastrophic than the disintegration of Yugoslavia. But the solution surely is for regional and international players to promote and enable national unity and cohesion; not bomb or attack the newly formed government as it tries to contain a situation. Syria is not just a country; it is a geopolitical keystone. Its collapse would send tremors through Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and even the Gulf. The region cannot afford another failed state, especially one that borders Israel, Turkiye and Iraq. This is precisely why moderate and reasonable actors in the region — led by Saudi Arabia — have stepped in swiftly and decisively. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's phone call to Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa was more than a diplomatic gesture; it was a signal of strategic alignment. Riyadh followed up by sending a delegation of high-ranking Saudi businessmen to Damascus, underscoring its commitment to Syria's reconstruction and reintegration into the Arab fold. The Saudi steps are aligned with its longstanding tradition of supporting the reigning government regardless of its religious leadership, be it Sunni-led in Syria, a Maronite one in Lebanon or even a Shiite one in Iran when Israel illegally violated its territorial sovereignty. Turkiye and the US also moved quickly — and rightly — to support the new Syrian government, recognizing that stability in Damascus is a prerequisite for regional peace. Washington, in particular, played a key role in brokering a ceasefire between militias and tribal factions in Sweida, helping to contain what could have spiraled into a full-blown civil war. The best antidote to Israel's destabilizing provocations is not retaliation — it is to go on with the reforms. Syria's new leadership understands this. Since taking office in December, President Al-Sharaa has made all the right moves: dissolving extremist factions, launching a national dialogue conference, and initiating constitutional reforms. But no one said rebuilding a country after 50 years of brutal dictatorship would be easy. Gambling with Syria's unity is not blackjack. It is Russian roulette. And the bullet does not just threaten Syria — it threatens the entire region. Faisal J. Abbas | Editor-in-Chief Spoilers — those who thrived under the old regime — are beginning to push back. Mistakes by enforcers of the government will naturally be made, and they will be costly. But legitimacy is not built on perfection; it is built on accountability. The Syrian government must continue to acknowledge its missteps, especially in Sweida, where the conflict was not sectarian but a localized rift that required careful containment. Israel's claim that its strikes on Damascus and Sweida were to 'protect the Druze' is taken with a pinch of salt by most observers. If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government were truly concerned about minority rights, it might have reconsidered its actions in Gaza, where over 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023. The same government that called Palestinians 'human animals' and floated the idea of nuking Gaza now wants us to believe it is acting out of humanitarian concern. Let us be clear: Israel sees opportunity, not altruism. The infancy of Syria's new government presents a strategic vacuum. Tel Aviv is playing a zero-sum game — grab land, accumulate leverage, and walk into future negotiations with a stacked deck. Of course, given Israel's recent military successes — from Gaza to Iran — one might understand Netanyahu's audacity. But gambling with Syria's unity is not blackjack. It is Russian roulette. And the bullet does not just threaten Syria — it threatens the entire region. The international community, especially the US, must curb Israel's appetite for chaos. Washington has leverage, and it must use it — not just to protect Syria, but to preserve the fragile architecture of Middle Eastern stability. Syria's new government is not perfect, but it is legitimate. It is trying to do what few regimes in the region have dared: reform from within. That effort must be protected — not just by Syrians, but by their neighbors and allies. Because if Syria falls, the region does not just lose a country — it loses its compass. And in a region already navigating storms, losing your compass is not a risk worth taking.
