India opposition slams Trump's F-35 offer, Russia makes its own pitch
The offer from both U.S. and India's long-time defence partner Russia comes at a time when the Indian Air Force's squadrons have fallen to 31 from an approved strength of 42 and it is seeking to acquire more jets to counter China, which is rapidly building its military.
After meeting Modi in Washington last week, Trump said the U.S. will increase military sales to India starting in 2025 and will eventually provide the fifth-generation F-35 fighters made by Lockheed Martin.
India's main opposition Congress party has used Trump ally and billionaire Elon Musk's past criticism of the fighter to target Modi's government.
"The F-35, which Elon Musk has described as 'junk', why is Narendra Modi hell-bent on buying it?" asked a post on Congress's official X account this weekend, saying that the aircraft was expensive and had high operational costs.
The U.S. government estimates that an F-35 costs around $80 million.
The Indian government has not said it intends to buy the plane and India's foreign secretary told reporters last week that the U.S. offer was at a "proposal stage", adding that the acquisition process had not started.
India's defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Congress post cited a November 2024 post by Musk on X in which he shared a video of a drone swarm and captioned it: "Meanwhile, some idiots are still building manned fighter jets like the F-35".
Musk later said in another X post: "Manned fighter jets are obsolete in the age of drones anyway".
Last week, Russia offered to make in India its fifth-generation Sukhoi Su-57 fighter, with locally sourced components, saying production could begin as early as this year if India agreed.
"Russia has never shied away from transferring technology," said Amit Cowshish, former financial adviser for acquisitions at the Indian defence ministry.
"The problem is not with Russia offering transfer of technology ... we will continue to deal with Russia and buy oil and maybe buy a couple of other things, but such a big (defence) deal is likely to create its own difficulties vis-à-vis (the) U.S.," Cowshish said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
House "crypto week" could change how Americans use, save money
A few years ago crypto was mostly a pariah in the financial services industry. Now, at the urging of the "first crypto president," Congress is on the verge of remaking American finance to embrace it. Why it matters: "Crypto week" could change everything from how Americans make payments to how they invest. It would also grant further legitimacy to an industry that has made the president and his family sudden billions of dollars. State of play: House Republicans declared the next five days Crypto Week, sending a clear message on legislative priorities after passing President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The agenda for next week consists of three bills. One is stablecoin legislation, and sources familiar with the plans tell Axios that the Senate-passed bill, known as the GENIUS Act, will get a straight-up vote next week. Stablecoins are how dollars go on blockchains, and they enable super-fast, super-cheap global payments. They started as liquidity for crypto traders, but now companies use them for global payroll. The bill would establish rules for who could issue stablecoins and how they manage them. It is expected to lead to a surge of new products and participation from traditional finance firms. How it works: The legislation would "spur more comfort among retailers and others to begin accepting stablecoins as payment," says Tony Tuths, tax principal in KPMG's alternative investment tax practice. Financial markets, meanwhile, could start to move funds in stablecoins — as opposed to cash — for faster settlements with less cost, he added. That could profoundly change how payments are made and processed in the U.S., putting pressure on traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. Market structure legislation is the other big one the table. It would create a framework for regulating broader crypto issuance and trading. If passed — the Senate is currently drafting its own version — it would establish a new category of registered digital assets, flashing a green light for traditional finance. More crypto related products would be expected to enter the mainstream market through retail brokerage accounts, Tuths says, "thereby opening a floodgate of retail capital into the crypto trading ecosystem." The third bill slated for this week is to prevent the Fed from ever creating a digital version of official U.S. currency, or a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Conservatives oppose the concept because they think it would mean more government intrusion into peoples' private lives. What they're saying: "It's one of these industries that, for a very, very, very long time has sought legitimization, either through getting these activities regulated at higher levels around the world, or through, of course, proving their real world use cases," Dante Disparte, head of global policy for stablecoin issuer Circle, tells Axios. Zoom out: So why now? For lawmakers, pressure to move is coming from a couple of different places — the president promising to deliver wins for the industry, plus a trio of linked PACs with more than $100 million on hand keeping tabs on how lawmakers vote. It's a whole different world from when the nation's leading crypto company, Coinbase, requested rule making and got sued by the Biden administration instead. Friction point: Several Democrats will be pushing back next week. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the top Dem on the House Financial Services Committee, is calling next week"Anti-Crypto Corruption Week," calling all three bills "dangerous pieces of crypto legislation." At the center of many Democrats' resistance is President Trump himself, due to his family's considerable personal investments in cryptocurrency putting a the specter of corruption risks over the process. The bottom line: Republican leadership is likely to relish these votes, because they know 90% of their members will fall in line.
Miami Herald
18 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Nissan has a genius plan to make money from auto tariffs
Nissan was not quite ready to become a subsidiary at the start of the year. On February 13, Honda CEO Toshihiro Mibe announced that the two Japanese carmakers would not consummate their merger agreement, which would have created the third-largest carmaker in the world by sales. Related: Toyota and Honda play a giant role in US-Japan trade negotiations Apparently, at the last minute, Honda proposed to divert from its original intention to one where "Honda would be the parent company and Nissan the subsidiary through a share exchange," a condition that broke down talks. Nissan and Honda (HMC) announced their intent to merge in December. Still, a month earlier, Nissan execs told the Financial Times that the automaker had "12 to 14 months" to survive if circumstances didn't improve. In May, Nissan announced it will be laying off 20,000 workers, about 15% of its workforce, including the 9,000 it announced in 2024 would be laid off through March 2028. Nissan is also closing seven of its 17 global factories. The moves are all part of a recovery plan to reduce costs by $3.4 billion. But instead of reducing costs, Nissan's latest move raises money by using the current tariff environment to its advantage. While President Donald Trump's administration has been in close contact with the auto industry throughout the process, the 25% auto tariffs he imposed in April have had long-lasting repercussions, as intended. Trump declared Liberation Day on April 2, 2025, but the auto industry, particularly in Japan, had been preparing for this eventuality for months. "We will be looking at how to absorb short-term shocks and what concrete measures we can take to deal with these shocks, as well as how to deal with them in an all-Japan manner," said Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association Chairman Masanori Katayama. Additionally, Katayama said the group discussed its strategies to absorb and mitigate potential tariffs with the country's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry officials. Nissan is reportedly negotiating a creative strategy to earn money while also helping a fellow Japanese automaker. Related: Nissan makes shocking move to battle tariffs Nissan is in talks to supply cars to Honda in the U.S., using the unused manufacturing capacity at its Canton plant in Mississippi. The company is considering building Honda pickup trucks at the Canton plant, where it currently builds models like its Frontier pickup. Nissan said in a statement viewed by Reuters that it would continue to work with Honda but would not speculate on any future plans. While Trump has pushed back his negotiations by another month, it appears that the U.S. and Japan are still far apart in negotiations. Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's lead trade negotiator, said Tuesday that negotiations must include auto industry concessions. Akazawa said he held a 40-minute phone call with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik, where "we are trying to agree on a package of measures." According to Reuters, those measures include expanded trade, non-tariff barriers, and cooperation on key economic security issues. However, the biggest issue on the table is Japan's auto sector. "There's no point striking a deal with the U.S. without an agreement on automobile tariffs," Akazawa said. "The two countries must garner trust through sincere dialogue, and reach common ground step by step. Through such a process, my job as negotiator is to agree on a full package as soon as possible." While General Motors still has the highest market share at 17% and Ford ranks third with a 13% market share, foreign models from Asia round out the top five, according to Cox Automotive data. Toyota ranks second with 15% U.S. market share, while Korean brand Hyundai ranks fourth with 11%. Toyota's fellow Japanese brand, Honda, is fifth in the market, with 9%. Related: President's latest interview gives US automakers much-needed boost The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Seniors get a tax break in Trump's megabill, but many will still pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Here's the real deal
Senior citizens are getting a tax break in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending cuts package, but it's not the one the president promised on the campaign trail last year. Congressional Republicans could not eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits in their megabill because it would not have been allowed under the process GOP lawmakers were using to pass the legislation in the Senate without Democratic support. (That hasn't stopped Trump and administration officials from claiming at times that the 'big, beautiful bill' did get rid of taxes on benefits.) Instead, the package gives senior citizens an additional $6,000 deduction on their federal income taxes between 2025 and 2028. Joint filers get twice that amount. The benefit begins to phase out for single taxpayers earning more than $75,000 and married couples earning $150,000. Individuals who earn more than $175,000 and couples earning more than $250,000 don't qualify. The beefed-up deduction will benefit fewer than half of older Americans, according to a recent analysis by the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. And it provides a smaller tax break, on average, for certain taxpayers than the elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits would have. 'On average, it's a modest reduction for older adults,' said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the center. 'The winners here are upper-middle-income people. People who could get nothing are very high-income people and very low-income people.' Those who will benefit the most are seniors earning between roughly $80,000 and $130,000. The provision will reduce their taxes by $1,100, on average, or about 1% of their after-tax income, according to the analysis. This group would have received a tax break of about $1,300 had Congress eliminated taxes on Social Security benefits. 'It's certainly a noticeable benefit,' Tom O'Saben, director of tax content and government relations at the National Association of Tax Professionals, said of the enhanced deduction. 'It will represent a savings, but not to the degree that senior citizens may have been expecting had they been able to exclude all their Social Security benefits from taxation.' Higher-income households won't benefit from the deduction because they earn too much to qualify, while lower-income taxpayers don't pay federal income taxes already because they earn less than the standard deduction, which was $33,200 for a married couple prior to the bill's passage. The Trump administration estimates two-thirds of recipients are already exempt. But higher-income taxpayers would have gotten a heftier tax break had Trump's campaign promise been included in the legislation. Still, there are people who could benefit from the deduction who would not have been helped by the elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits – namely senior citizens who have yet to start collecting the monthly payments. Conversely, Social Security recipients who are younger than 65 will not benefit from the deduction but would have received a tax break had taxes on benefits been eliminated. Most senior citizens who receive Social Security benefits will still continue paying at least some taxes on those benefits, albeit a smaller amount, the analysis found. The center expects about 29 million households will owe taxes on their benefits, down from about 31.2 million. What's more, even though the GOP package did not eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, the increased deduction will still indirectly hurt the finances of the program, as well as of Medicare, since the measure will reduce income taxes paid on the benefits. The levy on Social Security benefits is funneled into its trust fund and the Medicare Part A hospital insurance trust fund. The package is expected to speed up the insolvency of both trust funds to 2032, from 2033, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. At least some senior citizens remain confused about what's in the bill, said Larry Gray, partner at AGC CPA in Rolla, Missouri. Just last week, he had a casual conversation with several older Americans who thought that they would not have to pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. The confusion stems in part from the Trump administration and Capitol Hill's messaging about the package, which at times includes references to giving senior citizens a break on their Social Security benefits. Shortly after Congress approved the bill in early July, the Social Security Administration sent an email to many Americans noting that the bill significantly reduces the tax burden on benefits. Earlier that week, the White House posted an article on its website titled 'No Tax on Social Security is a Reality in the One Big Beautiful Bill.' Gray fears that scammers will try to take advantage of the confusion to prey on senior citizens. He is urging the Internal Revenue Service to set the record straight. 'This is a very simple tweak,' Gray said of the enhanced deduction.
