Bung Moktar, wife's final bid fails
As a result, Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette are scheduled to enter their defence on corruption charges before Sessions Court judge Rosli Ahmad on Aug 18.
A three-member panel of the Court of Appeal, led by Justice Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali, unanimously dismissed the couple's application yesterday stating that they had failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or a miscarriage of justice that would justify a review of the call for defence ruling.
Justice Che Mohd Ruzima sat with Court of Appeal judges Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid.
On Nov 18 last year, a Court of Appeal panel led by Justice Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the prosecution's appeal and overturned the High Court's decision to acquit Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette, and ordered both to enter their defence.
Justice Che Mohd Ruzima said the Court of Appeal has always exercised caution when invoking its power to review earlier decisions, as such a review, on the face of it, runs contrary to the principle of finality, Bernama reported.
The judge said that when counsel for Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette submitted that there had been an injustice in the case, the court observed that the couple had an alternative remedy.
'The point raised before us can be canvassed in an appeal from the Sessions Court, should a conviction subsequently be recorded.
'We are of the view that the threshold requirements for leave to review the prior decision of this court have not been met.
'We are also of the view that this is a point that may validly be raised at the end of the defence case.
'For these reasons, we find that the threshold requirement for leave to review this court's previous decision has not been fulfilled.
'Therefore, this application is dismissed,' he said.
In September 2022, the Sessions Court ordered the couple to enter their defence.
The couple succeeded in overturning the ruling through revision applications they then filed at the High Court.
This prompted the prosecution to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Bung Moktar, 65, who was then the non-executive chairman of Felcra Bhd, was charged on May 3, 2019, with two charges of accepting bribes of RM2.2mil and RM262,500 as an inducement to obtain Felcra's approval for a RM150mil investment in Public Mutual unit trusts.
He was alleged to have accepted the bribes from Public Mutual Bhd's investment agent Madhi Abdul Hamid through Zizie Izette, 46, at Public Bank Taman Melawati Branch, Kuala Lumpur, between 12.30pm and 5pm on June 12, 2015.
Bung Moktar was also charged with receiving RM337,500 in cash from Unit Amanah consultant, Norhaili Ahmad Mokhtar, under the name of Zizie Izette for the same reason and place on June 19, 2015, while Zizie Izette was charged with three counts of abetting her husband over the matter at the same place, date and time.
On April 9, this year, the Sessions Court allowed the couple's application to stay the defence proceedings pending the outcome of the review application.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysiakini
23 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Judges are appointed by law, not lobby
COMMENT | The appointment of judges to Malaysia's superior courts is neither a subject for partisan debate nor should it be shaped by public sentiment or political interpretation. It is a constitutional duty, carried out through a deliberate and structured process rooted in the Federal Constitution. The recent appointment of Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh as the chief justice of Malaysia, along with other senior judicial positions, has drawn public attention. While differing views are expected in a democracy, such appointments must be examined through the lens of law, not political bias or speculation. Article 122B of the Federal Constitution provides the legal framework for the appointment of judges to the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal, and the High Courts. It states that such appointments shall be made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the prime minister and after consultation with the Conference of Rulers.


Malaysian Reserve
27 minutes ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Wan Ahmad Farid named as 17th Chief Justice, swearing-in set for July 28
KUALA LUMPUR — On July 28, Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh (picture) will be sworn in as the country's 17th Chief Justice, succeeding Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who retired on July 2. This followed an announcement by the Office of the Chief Registrar of the Federal Court in a statement released late on Thursday. Hailing from Kuala Terengganu, the 62-year-old jurist was appointed to the Court of Appeal on Nov 12 last year. He holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B Hons) from the University of West London, earned in 1985, and obtained a Certificate in Legal Practice (Hons) from Universiti Malaya in 1986. He began his legal career as an advocate and solicitor with Messrs Adnan & Wee in Kuala Terengganu, serving from 1987 to 2003. Beyond his legal career, Wan Ahmad Farid has been active in public administration and politics. He served as political secretary to former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi from 2003 to 2008, before being appointed Deputy Home Minister from 2008 to 2009. He returned to legal practice between 2011 and 2015 as a partner at Messrs Wan Farid & Surin in Kuala Lumpur. Wan Ahmad Farid began his judicial career in 2015 as a Judicial Commissioner, serving in the High Courts of Shah Alam, Kuala Lumpur, and Kota Bharu until 2019. He was then elevated to High Court Judge from 2019 to 2024, with postings in Kota Bharu, Shah Alam (Special Powers Division), and Kuala Lumpur (Special Powers Division 3). In 2024, he played a key role in a landmark ruling involving a constitutional suit filed by lawyer Dr Syed Iskandar Syed Jaafar Al Mahdzar, which challenged the powers of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in declaring a state of emergency. In his judgment, Wan Ahmad Farid held that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's authority to declare an emergency under Article 150 of the Federal Constitution is a prerogative power that is non-justiciable and beyond the court's review. Wan Ahmad Farid was also among the members of the panel of judges who heard a case involving a dispute over 263.272 acres of land dubbed 'Duta Enclave' involving Semantan Estate Sdn Bhd in the Federal Court. — BERNAMA


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Seniority not a requirement for Chief Justice appointment, say experts
PETALING JAYA: Seniority does not play a role in deciding candidates for the position of Chief Justice, according to constitutional experts. Emeritus Prof Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi explained that the Federal Constitution does not specify requirements for a superior court judge to become Chief Justice. Article 123 of the Federal Constitution states that to serve as a judge of the superior courts, a person must be a Malaysian citizen with at least 10 years of experience as a lawyer or lower court judge. "Seniority is not relevant," Shad Saleem said. The superior courts encompass the High Court, Court of Appeal, and Federal Court. On Friday (July 18), the Federal Court Chief Registrar's Office announced that His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, has approved three judicial appointments, including Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh as the new Chief Justice. Wan Ahmad Farid is currently a Court of Appeal judge. Shad Saleem noted that a Chief Justice candidate could come from any superior court but must be elevated to the Federal Court, regardless of seniority. "While traditionally, the most senior Federal Court judge is appointed Chief Justice, it is not a strong tradition," he said, citing Tun Tengku Maimun, who was appointed without being the most senior. Tengku Maimun, the first female Chief Justice, retired on July 2 after a six-year tenure. Shad Saleem pointed out no precedent exists for appointing a Chief Justice directly from the appellate court, though it can occur. Constitutional expert Datuk Assoc Prof Dr Wan Ahmad Fauzi Wan Husain of ISTAC-IIUM affirmed no constitutional restriction exists for elevating an appellate court judge to Chief Justice. "As long as the appointment conforms with Article 122B of the Constitution, it is constitutional," he said. Assoc Prof Datuk Dr Shamrahayu Abdul Aziz echoed that the Constitution does not specify criteria for appointing the Chief Justice, noting the Prime Minister or Judicial Appointments Commission typically recommends the most senior Federal Court judge. However, she highlighted that Tengku Maimun's appointment was unprecedented as she was not the most senior but fulfilled the criteria. Two other judicial appointments were confirmed: Federal Court judge Abu Bakar Jais will be the new Court of Appeal President, and Court of Appeal judge Azizah Nawawi will be the new Chief Judge of the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak. The swearing-in ceremony is set for July 28 at Istana Negara.