logo
Tax Day: Three Facts About Small Business And Taxes

Tax Day: Three Facts About Small Business And Taxes

Forbes15-04-2025
Today is the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) tax filing deadline and if you have not filed your taxes yet, you have until the end of the day to either do so or file an extension in most states. Taxpayers in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, several counties in Tennessee and Virginia, Juneau, Alaska, and Chaves County, New Mexico, have until May 1 to file for 2024. In addition, individuals impacted by wildfires in Los Angeles County, California, have until October 15, while taxpayers in Kentucky and a number of West Virginia counties need to file by November 3. If you need any additional information, the IRS also offers a help center.
For small business owners, filing taxes can bring an additional set of challenges given the complexity of our current tax code. Here are three facts about small businesses you may or may not know.
1. Small Businesses Drive the Economy and Much Tax Revenue
Main Streets across America form the backbone of our country's economy. According to the Small Business Administration, small businesses represent 99.9% of all U.S. firms, employ 45.9% of all private sector workers, contribute 43.5% of the GDP, and generate 39% of the private sector's payroll.
'The entrepreneurial spirit in America remains strong, with nearly 20 million new business applications filed since 2021—a historic surge in new business formation,' said Anne Zimmerman, President & CEO of Zimmerman & Co CPAs, Inc., an accounting firm in Ohio and Co-chair of Small Business for America's Future, at a joint U.S. House and Senate Committee hearing on tax. 'These new entrepreneurs represent a tremendous opportunity for economic growth and job creation, but only if they receive the proper support to survive their crucial early years and thrive beyond them.'
2. Small Business Owners Need Up Front Tax Relief
The early years of a small business are critical to its success and growth and are also a period where cashflow may be even more limited. Because of this, it is not surprising that when given a list of potential tax policies that could benefit them, surveyed small business owners rated the most helpful one to be exempting the first $25,000 of small business profit from federal income tax.
'This policy would particularly benefit early-stage and smaller businesses, allowing them to reinvest more capital into growth,' said Zimmerman.
3. Small Business Owners Want a Simplified Tax Code
That same survey found that small business owners want the process of filing taxes to be easier for them. For example, 27% of business owners said that simplifying the tax code and reducing compliance burdens would be most helpful to them, while the top choice for another 17% was creating one standard small business deduction.
'Unlike large corporations with dedicated finance departments, small business owners often navigate tax compliance alone or at significant expense,' said Zimmerman.' Simplification would allow entrepreneurs to focus on innovation and growth rather than paperwork.'
For better or worse, tax season can be a point of reflection for individuals and business owners. As elected leaders make decisions about the tax code, it is critical that they consider meaningful reform that will help America's small businesses navigate the current economic environment while positioning them for future growth.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Really, really scary': Dave Ramsey urges caller not to join grandma's scheme to deceive IRS about $1 million debt
'Really, really scary': Dave Ramsey urges caller not to join grandma's scheme to deceive IRS about $1 million debt

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Really, really scary': Dave Ramsey urges caller not to join grandma's scheme to deceive IRS about $1 million debt

Sarah and her husband rent a place in Los Angeles and are expecting their first child. But she called into The Ramsey Show because of a tricky situation involving her mother-in-law, homeownership and the IRS — one that caught host Dave Ramsey off guard. Why? Because this caller's situation includes $1 million in debt and potentially deceiving the IRS. 'Sarah, there's just so much going on here that you're not talking about or you don't know,' Ramsey said in a clip posted July 12. 'And it's really, really scary. There's a line of crazy running through this conversation.' Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Here's what was revealed during the exchange. A questionable situation Sarah's mother-in-law currently lives with the couple in their rental home. However, Sarah says her grandmother-in-law has offered to buy her mother-in-law a house in Sarah and her husband's names so her mother-in-law 'is not docked by her unpaid debts from the IRS' — and the three would continue to live together in the new house. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership 'She has a lot of unpaid debts and so grandma is trying to take care of her by providing a home,' Sarah said. Her mother-in-law, 55, is going through a divorce and lost her job in September after a corporate restructuring. Right now she's making DoorDash deliveries to bring in some extra cash. She's also apparently $1 million in debt. When Ramsey asks why her mother-in-law is almost $1 million in debt, Sarah responded: 'I don't ask questions.' Sarah says she adores her mother-in-law, but wants to know if this setup would be a wise decision and, if so, what they need to 'have on paper.' Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Why this is unethical Ramsey answered clearly: 'I would not do this.' He said, by doing so, 'you are tying yourself to people you don't ask questions about, permanently, and you are taking away her reasons for getting back on her own feet. This is not good. It is not healthy.' He said Sarah's mother-in-law needs to recover from the grief that comes from ending a marriage and experience 'what's known as a life — not hiding at her son's house from reality.' Secondly, 'the whole reason to do this is to deceive,' he said. 'Your grandmother-in-law is teaming up with her daughter and using you guys to deceive the people that she owes,' Ramsey said. 'This is deception and I'm not going to participate in that. It's a lack of integrity. It's unethical.' Ramsey guessed the debt belongs to the mother-in-law's ex-husband — perhaps unpaid IRS debt from a failed business venture. It's possible the mother-in-law had nothing to do with it, in which case she could potentially get rid of the debt using innocent spouse relief. Innocent spouse relief can 'relieve you from paying additional taxes if your spouse understated taxes due on your joint tax return and you didn't know about the errors,' according to the IRS. 'I got a feeling she didn't buy purses to get to a million dollars [in debt],' Ramsey said. If the mother-in-law qualifies for relief and grandma wants to give her daughter some money to clean up any debt that's left over, 'I got a feeling it's not going to be that much,' Ramsey said. He also believes this is a better option than buying a house under deceitful circumstances. 'That would be the ethical thing,' he said. 'Try to settle it.' What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Accredited investors can now buy into this $22 trillion asset class once reserved for elites – and become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger without lifting a finger. Here's how Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The SBA's live-entertainment bailout was supposed to end two years ago. We still don't know how $1.5 billion was spent.
The SBA's live-entertainment bailout was supposed to end two years ago. We still don't know how $1.5 billion was spent.

Business Insider

time16 hours ago

  • Business Insider

The SBA's live-entertainment bailout was supposed to end two years ago. We still don't know how $1.5 billion was spent.

The Small Business Administration is still tracking down $1.5 billion in federal funds that it spent to keep the live entertainment industry afloat during the pandemic — two years after it was supposed to close out the program. The SBA inspector-general said in a new report that by June 2023 the agency was supposed to have made "every effort" to close out the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant, which doled out money to thousands of music venues, movie theaters, and other entertainment businesses. As of May 2025, however, 1,080 grants were still open, meaning the agency hadn't accounted for how those funds were used. About two-thirds of those grantees hadn't submitted audits or responded to questions about the use of funds, the report said. Business Insider revealed last year that at least $200 million from the program went to successful musicians, some of whom used the money for high-end hotels, private jets, and self-enrichment. By fall 2024, the SBA had identified $544 million in "potentially improper" payments that were supposed to be clawed back from hundreds of recipients, some of whom it determined were never supposed to get a grant in the first place. The SBA began moving earlier this summer to claw back hundreds of grants. Meredith Lynsey Schade, a theatrical producer who advocated for grantees, said the program has generally been a success, but some grantees were being pursued for clawbacks over issues with paperwork. "These recoupment letters are not necessarily about fraud," she said in an email. It's not clear whether any celebrities are among those whose grants are being clawed back. SBA emails that Business Insider received via a public information request last year said that about 70% of the grants spotlighted in BI reporting had already been closed out. Michael Strickland, who runs a lighting company and advocated for the program, said he's been contacted by "hundreds" of people who received clawback letters in recent months. "I've had managers, I've had agents, I've had venue owners, I've had production people, producers of shows," he said. "There's no single continuity to the rules they're being accused of tripping." The SBA has struggled to find a way to recover the money, the agency's internal watchdog said in its report. "As a result of not referring improper payments to the Treasury and not sending demand letters, there is an increased risk that the government will not be able to collect improperly paid SVOG funds." Sen. Joni Ernst, an Iowa Republican who leads the Senate's small business committee, said people who misused funds from the program should be held accountable. She is backing a bill that would give prosecutors an extra five years to bring charges in cases of SVOG fraud. "The Biden administration made almost no effort to recover more than $500 million in improper payments dispersed through the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant program," she said in a statement.

US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act
US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has expressed strong support for the Tax Fairness for Disaster Victims Act, introduced by Representative Timothy Kennedy. Known as HR 3975, the legislation aims to provide permanent relief for individuals affected by federally declared disasters by allowing them to use the prior year's earned income for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The bill's lookback rule has been included in several legislative packages in recent years but has not been made a permanent form of disaster relief. The AICPA said it has long advocated for the permanent establishment of such measures to aid those impacted by disasters. It explained that the EITC is a refundable tax credit for taxpayers with earned income below a certain threshold, which varies based on filing status and number of children. Natural disasters can disrupt work and reduce earned income, hindering taxpayers from claiming the EITC. AICPA senior manager for tax policy and advocacy Daniel Hauffe said: 'When natural disasters devastate local economies and impact taxpayers' ability to earn income, taxpayers should not lose eligibility for tax credits that would otherwise be available to them if not for their loss of income. 'The AICPA supports this bill because it would make permanent a provision that has been in numerous disaster tax relief legislative packages and, therefore, would offer clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners.' A recent AICPA survey found that 37% of Americans have experienced fraudulent activities after being affected by natural disasters. The types of fraud include identity theft (14%), government assistance fraud (11%) and loan scams (11%). The survey also highlighted that residents in the north-east and south (both at 40%) are more susceptible to fraud compared to those in the Midwest (31%). In a separate survey, the AICPA emphasised the need for enhanced tax relief measures for disaster victims. Additionally, the survey indicated a strong public preference for extending Internal Revenue Service tax relief measures beyond initial emergency declarations. More than a third (35%) of respondents valued extended tax filing and payment relief periods post-disaster. "US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act " was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store