Faith groups promote economic justice, civil rights in Kansas City events
Kansas City events
Justice Renewal Worship Service featuring Bishop William Barber, 6:30-8 p.m. Feb. 13 at Oak Ridge Missionary Baptist Church, 9301 Parallel Parkway, Kansas City, Kansas.
From Redlining to Redemption: A Rally on Housing & Homelessness, 10:30 a.m. to noon Feb. 14 at Mt. Carmel Church of God in Christ, 2025 N 12 St, Kansas City, Kansas.
TOPEKA — Kansas faith groups say the impacts of historical redlining and discriminatory housing practices are alive in the Kansas City metropolitan area.
They recruited a national civil rights figure, Bishop William Barber II, to remind the public and local officials this week of their duty to poor and vulnerable people.
Barber is a Protestant minister, activist, author, public speaker and co-chair of the Poor People's Campaign. He is set to join faith groups Thursday in Kansas City, Kansas, to inspire justice in the community. Those faith groups will initiate a call at a Friday event to local public officials to take housing and homelessness issues more seriously.
Faith groups in Johnson and Wyandotte counties 'have separately identified the growing homelessness and shortage of affordable housing as (a) crisis with historical parallels to the exclusionary practices of redlining and racial covenants in the 1900s,' said a news release from a national network of grassroots organizations called the Direct Action and Research Training, or DART, Center.
The Rev. Bruce Draper, president of Churches United for Justice, a coalition of 17 churches in Wyandotte County, and one of the organizers of the events, said continuing disinvestment in portions of Wyandotte County and a denial of homelessness in Johnson County are the results of historical redlining and ignorance of poverty.
Redlining has an established history in Kansas City, Kansas, and metropolitan areas across the country. The discriminatory practice involved government, loan and insurance agencies withholding services to people — mostly Black people and other ethnic minorities — who lived in certain neighborhoods that were deemed financially risky.
'White folks would move out to the places where they could get loans,' Draper said. 'Redlined areas wouldn't have any investments.'
People moving into redlined neighborhoods weren't given loans, families couldn't build equity and property values declined. A strategic disenfranchisement and discrimination effort snowballed into generational poverty that still permeates areas like Wyandotte County, which has the highest poverty rate among counties in the Kansas City, Kansas, area.
In Johnson County, which Draper said has benefited from redlining, homelessness has become increasingly apparent.
'The government officials want to deny homelessness and they want to deny there's a housing issue,' Draper said.
Faith groups are pitching to officials in Johnson and Wyandotte counties the creation of affordable housing trust funds, which would dedicate steady revenue streams toward building new affordable housing or repairing existing housing so people can remain in their communities.
'We need affordable housing, particularly in historically disadvantaged areas,' Draper said.
In Lawrence, an affordable housing trust fund that was created in 2019 with the help of the DART-affiliated organization Justice Matters, the city has helped build an estimated 810 affordable housing units, according to a city of Lawrence dashboard. The city allocated $1.2 million from the trust fund in 2025 for a variety of projects including repairs for low-income seniors, rental assistance for families experiencing homelessness and new housing developments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
10 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump addresses pardon decision for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, but questions remain
President Donald Trump is breaking his silence on pardoning Sean "Diddy" Combs for the first time since he was acquitted of the most serious charges in a federal sex-crimes trial last month. In an interview that aired Friday, Aug. 1 on Newsmax with host Rob Finnerty, Trump discussed the possibility of presidential pardons for convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, Combs and former Rep. George Santos. After Finnerty asked, "Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Would you consider pardoning him?" Trump responded: "Well he was essentially, I guess sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do, he's still in jail or something. He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good of a victory." Trump 'should not pardon' Sean 'Diddy' 'Diddy' Combs, Megyn Kelly says On July 2, jurors found Combs not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking ex-girlfriends Casandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine and a woman known as "Jane" in his sweeping trial that nearly lasted two months. He was convicted July 2 on two of the five counts against him for transporting those same women for prostitution, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years per count. During the interview, Trump said "probably..." before pausing and revealing to Finnerty, "You know, I was very friendly with him, I got along with him great, seemed like a nice guy. I didn't know him well, but when I ran for office he was very hostile." The Newsmax host noted then that "he said some not so nice things about you, sir." "Yeah, and it's hard. You know, like you, we're human beings and we don't like to have things cloud our judgement, right?" the president continued. "But when you knew someone and you were fine and then you run for office and he made some terrible statements… so I don't know... it makes it more difficult to do." Then, Trump replied, "I'd say so," when Finnerty clarified by asking if it was "more likely a no for (pardoning) Combs?" In the interview, Trump was seemingly referencing Combs' expletive-filled 2017 comments in The Daily Beast, essentially saying that "(Black people) don't really" care about Trump. "The tomfoolery that's going on in D.C., that's just regular everyday business to Black folks," Combs told the left-leaning outlet in-part, adding later in the interview that he had to "keep it focused on that self-love that we need to give our race." Trump first weighed in on the possibility of pardoning Combs on May 30 in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." Despite last month's verdict, Combs' legal saga continues. On Wednesday, July 31, lawyers for Combs requested his acquittal, or a new trial altogether, in court documents reviewed by USA TODAY. A day earlier, conservative host Megyn Kelly urged Trump against potentially pardoning Combs. Kelly said in an X post on July 30 that "Trump should not pardon Diddy" because "he doesn't deserve it." "He's a Trump hater. He's a woman abuser. MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other. This would not help. GOP struggling w/young female voters, most of whom will HATE a Diddy pardon," Kelly wrote. Contributing: Taijuan Moorman
Time Business News
13 hours ago
- Time Business News
ITUC's New Report Spotights Prison Slavery in the United States
In a chilling revelation that has reignited national debate, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) has released a new report exposing the systemic use of prison labor in the United States — a practice the organization likens to modern-day slavery. The report, titled 'Prison Labor in the United States: The Business of Punishment' , details how incarcerated individuals are being exploited under forced labor conditions, often for pennies an hour, with little to no choice in the matter. The United States is home to less than 5% of the world's population — yet it holds nearly 25% of the world's prison population. With over 1.2 million people currently serving time in state and federal prisons, the U.S. correctional system has long been criticized for its mass incarceration rates. But what the ITUC's report brings into sharper focus is how that system is being monetized through what many call 'prison slavery.' The report outlines how incarcerated workers are often compelled to work in unsafe conditions, without proper training or labor rights, for shockingly low wages — sometimes as low as $0.13 an hour. In some states, prisoners aren't paid at all. Refusing to work can result in punishments such as solitary confinement, loss of visitation rights, or denial of parole eligibility. At the center of this issue lies a clause in the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. While the amendment abolished slavery in 1865, it included a significant exception: slavery and involuntary servitude are still legal as punishment for a crime. 'Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.' This clause has paved the way for what critics describe as a legalized form of slavery inside America's prisons — disproportionately affecting Black and brown communities. According to the Sentencing Project, Black Americans are incarcerated at nearly five times the rate of white Americans. The ITUC's findings suggest a complex web of beneficiaries — including private corporations, state governments, and correctional institutions. Prison labor is often used to manufacture everything from furniture to military equipment, and to provide services such as food preparation, laundry, and even customer service for government agencies. Some of the corporations linked to prison labor — either directly or indirectly — include major household names. While many of these companies have stated that they are unaware of or do not directly manage prison labor programs, the opacity of the supply chain often leaves room for unethical practices to go unchecked. Beyond the economics, the human cost of this system is enormous. Incarcerated individuals working in these conditions often lack basic labor protections: no right to unionize, no worker's compensation if injured, and no pathway to upward mobility. These jobs rarely provide the kind of training or education that would help with rehabilitation or re-entry into society after release. Furthermore, the emotional toll is immense. Many inmates describe their labor as coercive and dehumanizing, where the daily routine mimics slavery more than rehabilitation. Families of prisoners have also spoken out, saying their loved ones are being punished twice — once by incarceration, and again through exploitative work. The ITUC is not alone in sounding the alarm. Human rights organizations, lawmakers, and advocacy groups have been pushing for reform — calling for the removal of the 13th Amendment's exception clause and the implementation of fair labor standards within the prison system. States like California and Colorado have already taken steps to address these issues. In 2020, Colorado voters approved a ballot measure that removed the exception for slavery from the state constitution. In California, a similar measure failed to pass in 2022, but the push continues. Representative Nikema Williams of Georgia and Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon have introduced federal legislation — the Abolition Amendment — which seeks to end the 13th Amendment loophole. While support is growing, the road to constitutional change remains steep and politically charged. The ITUC's report serves as a critical reminder that reforming America's criminal justice system isn't just about reducing prison populations — it's also about protecting human rights within prison walls. Ending exploitative prison labor will require more than just public outcry. It demands legislative action, corporate accountability, and a cultural shift in how we view incarceration. Rehabilitation, not exploitation, must be the cornerstone of any just and humane correctional system. Until then, the voices of those inside — working against their will for next to nothing — will continue to echo the old abolitionist cry: 'Am I not a man and a brother?' TIME BUSINESS NEWS
NBC News
16 hours ago
- NBC News
Chicago Democrats issue warnings about their mayor amid Zohran Mamdani's rise
Before New York City mayoral primary winner Zohran Mamdani made a splash, another big-city Democratic mayoral candidate with progressive bona fides unexpectedly burst onto the national political scene. Two years later, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's tenure has captured so much negative attention (dubbed 'America's Worst Mayor' by The Wall Street Journal's editorial board) that Mamdani's campaign has taken note. Mamdani's camp is tracking Johnson's challenges and trying to avoid repeating Second City missteps, according to a person close to both Mamdani's and Johnson's teams. Johnson isn't the only progressive major-city mayor in the country, and his troubles wouldn't automatically translate to ideological allies. Mamdani himself has 'repeatedly cited' another progressive mayor as a role model, as The Boston Globe noted: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu. But Johnson's tenure in Chicago does serve as a useful early warning system for some of the issues Mamdani could confront in New York, whether in a multiway general election or as mayor, if he wins in November. Chicago Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, a strong campaign ally who has also criticized some of the mayor's early decisions, noted how critics often trot out the word 'socialism' to cast blame on Johnson for long-standing issues facing the city. It's a phenomenon, she added, that Mamdani could similarly face. 'People make this a bad word. People make this into something that it is not. Let's just call all of this what it is: This is the way the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor, because they get us fighting on s--- that just does not even matter,' she said. Johnson was a county commissioner, schoolteacher and union organizer when he leapfrogged far more battle-tested candidates to clinch the city's mayoralty. While Mamdani knocked out former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary in New York City, before Cuomo began a third-party run, Johnson with his rise. Johnson, who does not call himself a democratic socialist but believes in many of the same principles as Mamdani, was swept into office by a coalition underpinned by the powerful Chicago Teachers Union and the city's Black and brown voters. He vowed to unite fractured coalitions and lift up the most vulnerable. He represented change, and his strong roots in the community as an activist, a parent and a resident of a neighborhood that struggles with crime gave hope around new efforts toward equality across a city long deeply segregated by race and income. The young, energetic activist with a passion for fighting wealth inequality and lifting up the city's left-behind neighborhoods entered office with much promise. But it hasn't gone well since then. 'They lost the plot,' the person close to both Mamdani's and Johnson's teams said of Johnson's tenure. The person noted that while both Johnson and Mamdani have specific visions, they said Mamdani is 'pragmatic and he wants to succeed' but described Johnson as unbending at times. One of the most significant missteps, the person said, was whom Johnson brought into his administration, adding: 'Staffing is very important. You need professionals who can execute your vision. Those may not be the same people who ran your campaign.' One of Mamdani's recent communications hires comes with deep experience. Dora Pekec, who once served as a campaign manager for Chicago Alderman Bill Conway, also worked with House Majority PAC before heading communications for Brad Lander in his New York mayoral run. Former Mayor Bill de Blasio also recently suggested staffers under his administration would be ripe for picking. It was a point that Rep. Jesus 'Chuy' Garcia, D-Ill., also underscored. Garcia was among those who lost in the first round of Chicago's 2023 mayoral election. 'When progressives run for high office it's critical to be ready to govern,' Garcia wrote in a text message. 'Governing entails striking a balance between promises made (ideals) and making the wheels of government turn. Need to assemble a team that understands your priorities and deliver services, keep relationships with stakeholders especially a base while expanding through engagement. Intergovernmental relationships need to be really keen.' 'Experience in developing and executing plans is most important. This applies to Johnson and when Mamdani is elected,' he continued. Agendas and obstacles While attempting to make headway on his agenda, Johnson was confronted with a rash of challenges facing Chicago, and his popularity began to slide. With some exceptions, observers say it was less about Johnson pushing far-left policies and more about the mayor's confrontational style, his struggles to communicate and his inability to forge alliances with state and federal officials. Even as he made headway in the areas of public safety and mental health, Johnson grew entrenched in battles big and small, cultivating an air of drama over his City Hall. While Johnson eschewed criticism during his campaign that he would be owned by the teachers union, those concerns persisted. He did hammer out a teachers contract without a disruption to the school year — no small feat — but it proved to be a bad-tempered and messy ordeal that could bring lasting political reprisal. He went to war with and fired a popular schools CEO, and also saw the resignations of the entire board of education, which Johnson had appointed. Johnson almost immediately saw his coalition splinter over an influx of migrants whom Texas Gov. Greg Abbott bused into Chicago without warning. Like other major cities at the time, Chicago grappled with how to adequately house families vying for legal status. The city clashed with its own residents, including in neighborhoods of color, with much of the political backlash affecting Johnson. He and Gov. JB Pritzker, a fellow Democrat, share a frosty relationship at best. He locked horns with his city council over major policy decisions. He broke a campaign promise by seeking a $300 million property tax increase then suffered the humiliation of a 50-0 council defeat. William Daley, the son of longtime Mayor Richard J. Daley and brother of longtime Mayor Richard M. Daley, said Johnson's troubles at least partially stem from lacking experience in managing an expansive budget and overseeing tens of thousands of employees. He predicted that, if elected, the 33-year-old Mamdani could face similar political troubles as Johnson. 'It's a very tough job if you've never been in politics or in a job that manages something big,' Daley said, noting his brother's prior experience before his mayorship. 'Rich had eight years as state's attorney. … He had that experience for eight years — running something. It's not an easy task for these people who have never run anything.' Johnson's predecessors had their own shortcomings, from public corruption to massive civil rights failures, relentless crime and poor fiscal management that still haunts the city today. In 2008, then-Mayor Richard M. Daley sold the city's parking meters to private investors for a staggering 75 years, trading billions of dollars in future revenue to plug a budget hole for a one-time payment. Taylor, the Chicago City Council member, said that while Johnson 'made some rookie mistakes' he is unfairly getting the brunt of the blame for mistakes shared by predecessors. 'You think in 22 months we have dug a $1.5 billion hole?' she said of those blaming Johnson. 'The math ain't mathing.' New beginnings Politically, things have potential to look up for Johnson. Trump has sicced his Department of Justice on the mayor to investigate his hiring practices after Johnson had discussed hiring Black individuals for key positions. Johnson fired back that his hiring reflected the country and the city, while Trump's hiring reflected a 'country club.' It caught on in conservative circles, with cable news hosts bashing Johnson just as they had done with Lightfoot. In an interview, she said Mamdani could expect the same. Lightfoot often hit back, and that brought its own repercussions. 'It's hard to fight against the guy who's got the biggest megaphone in the world,' Lightfoot said. 'Many of us who were Black women, like me in Chicago, like Muriel Bowser in D.C., like Keisha Lance Bottoms in Atlanta, when he mentioned us by name in a disparaging way, candidly, the death threats went through the roof.' Moving into the second half of his term, Johnson can point to public safety as one of his biggest achievements. Observers largely applaud his choice of Superintendent Larry Snelling to lead the police department, as well as policies the mayor has put into place, like boosting mental health services, restructuring the detectives bureau and backing violence intervention methods. The number of murders in the city has fallen for two consecutive years, and Chicago could be on pace to reach the mayor's goal of having fewer than 500 homicides this year for the first time in a decade. 'Mayor Johnson's primary focus over his first two years in office has been on driving down violent crime in Chicago. Since taking office, Chicago has seen historic reductions in crime and violence under the Johnson administration's holistic approach,' a spokesperson from Johnson's office said in a statement, citing a 33% drop in homicides in the first six months of 2025 and a 38% drop in shootings in that same period. It also boasted of having the highest homicide clearance rate in more than a decade. As far as Johnson's poll numbers, 'the narrative that Mayor Johnson is unpopular has been constructed by a small number of well-funded political organizations opposed to the Mayor's progressive agenda,' the statement said.
