Bengaluru stampede: One-man inquiry panel under retired HC judge to find persons responsible
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The one-man inquiry commission constituted by the Karnataka government under retired High Court judge John Michael Cunha to inquire into the June 4 stampede that killed 11 people, has been asked to identify the persons responsible for the omissions or deficiencies that led to this incident.As per the terms of reference to the commission from the government, it has also suggested precautionary measures that can be taken to prevent recurrence of such incidents in the future, among others.Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on June 5 announced that a one-man commission would be formed under Cunha to look into the procedural lapses in the issue, and the commission has been asked to give the report in 30 days.The stampede occurred on June 4 evening in front of the Chinnaswamy stadium here, where a large number of people thronged to participate in the RCB team's IPL victory celebrations. Eleven people died and 56 were injured in the incident."...the Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-rule (1) of rule 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, has constituted a one-man inquiry commission under the chairmanship of John Michael Cunha, retired Judge of the Karnataka High Court, to conduct an inquiry into the incident," the official notification dated June 5 said."The inquiry commission shall have all the powers to conduct inquiries under the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 and Code of Civil Procedure, and the government expects the investigation to be completed and a report submitted within one month," it said.The terms of reference in the notification include, to find -- whether the necessary permissions, rules and procedures were followed while organising the RCB team's victory felicitation ceremony at Chinnaswamy Stadium; the causes/causers of the rush and stampede that took place; the causes/causers of the incident that led to the death of 11 people and injury to more than 50 people based on the chain of events and circumstances.Also, to inquire into the measures taken as a precaution regarding the incident and the omissions/deficiencies that may have occurred in this regard and to identify those responsible for this incident; and to inquire regarding other relevant aspects related to this incident.As per the notification, the Director General and Inspector General of Police, Commissioner of Police - Bengaluru, and Deputy Commissioner - Bengaluru Urban district shall provide all the files/documents/etc that the Commission may require from time to time for the inquiry and shall be present during the inquiry and fully cooperate with the Commission.This inquiry commission is separate from the magisterial inquiry that has been ordered, and shall conduct a parallel and comprehensive inquiry, it clarified.The Chairman of the inquiry commission, if necessary, may take steps to obtain the services of one retired IPS officer and one retired IAS officer for technical and legal assistance. The salary/allowance expenses of the concerned officers shall be borne by the government. The Director General and Inspector General of Police, shall provide the necessary staff, materials, vehicles and office and furniture/telephone etc required for the commission of inquiry. PTI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rising concern over conduct of lawyers in virtual hearings
NEW DELHI Born out of necessity during the COVID-19 lockdown five years ago, virtual courtrooms are now grappling with a different challenge – growing indiscipline among lawyers and litigants who flout decorum during online hearings. A virtual court hearing functions like a regular court proceeding but is conducted via video conferencing platforms. Once a matter is listed, parties and lawyers receive a secure video link to join the hearing remotely. The system was introduced during the pandemic, when physical courtrooms were shut to curb the spread of the virus, but the judiciary needed to continue functioning. The facility has proven a boon for lawyers, who can now attend multiple hearings across different courts, and even cities, within a single day, without the burden of travel. For litigants too, it has eased the hassle of appearing in person for each hearing. Screen-time shenanigans However, the system's flexibility has also led to blatant misuse. One egregious example involved a man attending a Gujarat High Court hearing from his toilet. In another case, also in Gujarat, a video went viral showing a senior advocate appearing to sip beer during a virtual session. In Delhi, the High Court recently took strong exception to a female lawyer who joined a hearing via mobile phone while walking through a public park. Though she claimed to be at the Agra court complex, the judge was unconvinced. 'Despite repeated directions, certain sections of the Bar have failed to understand the decorum of the court,' observed Justice Girish Kathpalia. He urged Bar Associations across Delhi to sensitise their members regarding proper conduct during virtual appearances. Justice Kathpalia reminded that the videoconferencing facility was extended to enable counsel to appear from their offices, thereby sparing them the ordeal of rushing between multiple court complexes. Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, in February 2023, strongly supported the continued use of virtual hearings, saying, 'Technology is here to stay for the future, forever.' But recent developments underscore that its success depends not just on technical infrastructure, but equally on courtroom conduct. Senior advocate and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) president Vikas Singh did not mince words: 'Online hearing, which started more like a necessity, is being misused by lawyers. It is trivialising a solemn court function. Court hearings cannot be argued from a car, a park, or while having a beer. Strict guidelines must be enforced,' he told The Hindu. Missing penalties While the Delhi High Court, a pioneer in institutionalising video conferencing, issued comprehensive rules in 2021, these mainly focus on behavioural expectations. They mandate that 'participants wear sober attire', with advocates in professional dress as per the Advocates Act, 1961. The rules also state that participants must look into the camera, remain attentive, and refrain from multitasking. 'All proceedings conducted by a court via video conferencing shall be judicial proceedings, and all the courtesies and protocols applicable to a physical court shall apply to these virtual proceedings,' the rules say. However, no specific penalties are prescribed. Courts may invoke the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, or exercise their inherent powers in egregious cases. Senior advocate Sanjoy Ghose, whose post about the toilet incident went viral, advocated for clear penalties and their strict enforcement. 'There should be penalties prescribed, and they should be strictly enforced,' he told The Hindu. He also called for better awareness: 'Dos and don'ts must be clearly listed on court websites. Litigants may lack familiarity, but lawyers have no excuse.' Sharanya Tripathi, associate advocate at Jotwani Associates, called the trend 'deeply disrespectful to the court's dignity'. 'Everyone attending a virtual hearing, whether lawyer or litigant, must understand that appearing through a screen does not reduce the formality of the courtroom,' she asserted. 'If someone joins from an unsuitable location or behaves disrespectfully, the court should act promptly by removing the participant, imposing costs, or initiating contempt proceedings in serious cases,' Ms. Tripathi said. Courts could also hold legal representatives accountable for ensuring that their clients maintain proper decorum during virtual hearings, she added.
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
ThePrint Quiz, 6 July, 2025: The Dalai Lama
Washington, Beijing and New Delhi have their eyes set on Dharamshala in Himachal Pradesh, the headquarters of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile, where the 14th Dalai Lama is taking part in celebrations to mark his 90th birthday. The Dalai Lama is the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhists. He is considered the reincarnation of Avalokiteśvara, the Bodhisattva of compassion.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Farmers oppose takeover of land belonging to agricultural research centre near Aruppukottai
A farmers' federation has expressed shock over the contradictory policies of the State Government in bringing arid land in 2,482 villages into farming activity even as it was trying to acquire fertile land of the Regional Agricultural Research Centre at Kovilankulam. In a statement, Virudhunagar district functionaries of Cauvery Vaigai Kiruthumal Gundar Farmers' Federation, said the State Government should not weaken agricultural research in the name of industrial development. The Tamil Nadu Government in its first-ever budget on agriculture in 2021 had announced that 11.75 lakh ha of arid land should be brought into farming activities in the next 10 years as part of efforts to increase farming coverage. In 2024-25, the Government planned to retrieve arid land in 2,482 villages under Kalaignar All Villages Integrated Agriculture Development programme. 'However, contradicting such a programme with a long-term vision, 129 acres of invaluable land of the research centre in Kovilankulam has been proposed to be taken up for establishing industrial estate,' federation's Virudhunagar district president R. Rampandian and secretary Gopalakrishnan, said. The land in the research centre was being used for development of rain-fed crops like millets, pulses, cotton, horticultural crops and for rain-fed farming methodologies. The centre was supplying around 50 tonnnes of certified seeds to the region covering the 10 southern districts. Besides, the centre was biodiversity home for native breeds of animals, deer, peacocks and several varieties of trees. The farmers wondered why the Government was after this parcel of land for industrial development while 30 lakh hectares of arid land were available in the State. With climatic changes forcing uncertainty on the farmers, the State Government should not reduce but strengthen its support for farmers of rain-fed regions. 'We are in a state of compulsion of protecting the existing agricultural research and also expanding it,' The State Government should give up its proposal which will break the faith of farmers and agricultural scientists, the statement said.
