UK workforce exposed if global trade war gets worse
Households and businesses nonetheless remain resilient, and the UK banking system is equipped to support them even if conditions significantly worsen, the Bank's Financial Policy Committee (FPC) said in its latest report.
The FPC said there was a high degree of unpredictability about how global trade will evolve, with US President Donald Trump hiking tariff rates in April but negotiations with other countries over possible trade deals ongoing.
Conflict in the Middle East has also raised the risk of energy prices spiking, particularly if the supply of oil and gas were disrupted, it found.
This could particularly impact businesses that are more reliant on financing linked to global financial markets, which have faced turbulence in recent months.
"The potential for much higher trade tariffs increases the likelihood of corporate default in the most exposed sectors, and losses for their lenders," the FPC's Financial Stability Report read.
The outlook for the UK is weaker and more uncertain than it was in November, when the committee previously produced a report, it said.
An escalating trade war could weigh on UK businesses should global consumer demand weaken, lending conditions tighten, or reduced availability of funding causes firms to slow down investment.
"Further shocks could particularly impact firms in sectors dependant on demand from the US market, such as manufacturing," the report read.
These sectors, as well as others like retail, are more vulnerable to a drop in consumer demand and are less able to recover earnings by raising prices.
Analysis for the Bank of England suggests that firms in sectors likely to be more impacted by the global trade shock, either directly or indirectly, account for around 60% of UK employment.
However, the FPC concluded that despite pockets of vulnerability, UK businesses would typically be able to pay their debts even in the face of further global volatility such as lower demand and supply.
Furthermore, the report found that the UK banking system has the capacity to support households and businesses even if economic and business conditions became substantially worse than expected.
Meanwhile, the committee warned that intensifying geopolitical tensions could raise the risk of cyber attacks around the world.
It said this was a "global challenge" but that UK financial firms were generally prepared to deal with cyber incidents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump tariffs: In the US, ‘the EU' isn't a concept and Ursula von der Leyen is an unknown
There is a saying about new babies. When they sleep, you sleep. For the political commentariat in Washington DC, so it goes with covering the president of the United States . President Donald Trump 's tariff letter, addressed to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and dated March 11th was posted on his social media account in the early hours of Saturday morning. It arrived at the end of yet another furiously busy week of competing issues, news stories and agendas, all of which revolved around Trump. On Friday, he visited Texas in the aftermath of the appalling flood disaster , which left at least 129 people dead and 170 missing, with Trump trenchantly dismissing questions over the efficiency of the federal response. At the same time, an internal ideological war was brewing over the announcement by attorney general Pam Bondi that the files on Jeffrey Epstein would remain classified. Trump's Maga base has long held as an article as faith that Trump would release the documents, and that their wildest conspiracy theories would be substantiated. Elsewhere, Trump found time to once again pressurise Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell to either cut interest rates or resign. He received Binyamin Netanyahu in the White House on Monday. Sunday marked a year to the day since the assassination attempt as he gave a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. READ MORE So, Trump's resumption of his role as Champion of Tariffs, completed before he flew to his gold club in Bedminster this weekend, generated a muted response from both the US political media and political opponents within the Democratic Party. That is partly because the shock value of Trump's tariff threats has worn off. While the figure mentioned in the strangely-worded series of letters sent to world leaders were alarming – a 30 per cent tariff on all European Union goods and, separately, a threat to impose a 200 per cent tariff on all pharmaceutical imports – the number that was deemed most significant was the August 1st deadline date. Both the markets and those among the public who cared interpreted the letter as a trade-deal extension disguised as a warning letter. The 90-deals-in-90-days boast in the heady aftermath of the original 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements has, to nobody's surprise, not gone smoothly. Trump's pleased observation that the phones 'are ringing off the hook' in the White House, with world leaders desperately trying to make deals, unintentionally acknowledges that his administration cannot cope with the unprecedented task of striking new trade deals with the entire world at the same time. And given the relentless eventfulness of every single day of the Trump White House, August 1st seems like a long way off. The tariff threat against the EU, with a similar hike against Mexico, may or may not materialise. If it does, only then it will become the big talking point in Washington. Only then, when a sharp and sudden rise in the price of European and Mexican imports on American shelves and car sales lots will Democrat politicians see the value in warning the public about what lies ahead. The reply by Ursula von der Leyen achieved limited coverage in the US also. There are several reasons for this, one being that if you stopped 50 people in a random American town or city and asked them who Ursula von der Leyen is, the percentage of correct answers may represent a significant blow to European esteem. 'The EU', as a concept, rarely features in US discourse beyond financial media and business interests. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Photograph: Guillaume Horcajuelo/EPA That may change in the weeks and months to come. EU imports to the US were more than $553 billion in 2022, according to figures release from the Office of the US Trade Representative, exceeding more than any other single country. The US imported $454 billion from Mexico in the same year. Both partners provide the US with about a third of their total imports. But for those not directly involved in trading, it's an abstract concept. Von der Leyen did offer a measured warning to Americans in highlighting the guaranteed hurt to 'businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic'. 'At the same time, we are ready to safeguard EU interests on the basis of proportionate countermeasure.' It was a calm retort, echoing that of Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum who managed to talk Trump back from the brink during his initial bout of tariff-enthusiasm. 'We believe, based on what our colleagues discussed yesterday, that we will reach an agreement with the United States government and that, of course, we will achieve better conditions,' Sheinbaum told Bloomberg media. There is that hope. But Trump's impatience with the complexity and time span required to reshape global trading patterns is wearing thin. And he is ideologically wedded to his belief in that tariffs can, magically, become an all-win-and-no-pain elixir for the US economy and consumer.
RTÉ News
7 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Next fortnight crucial for Ireland amid US tariff threats
There's no doubt US President Donald Trump's threat of 30% tariffs is a significant blow to both the European Union and Ireland. Earlier this week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin expressed hopes that Brussels and Washington could agree a framework deal which would pause any escalation in trade tensions. But Mr Trump's letter to the EU, dated last Friday, suggests a positive short-term arrangement is less likely. The next two weeks will be crucial for Ireland and the EU. In the immediate term nothing changes - tariffs of 10% are still being imposed by the US on EU goods. The exceptions remain the pharmaceutical and computer chip manufacturing sectors, both enormously important to the Irish economy. Mr Trump's announcement now raises the damaging prospect of 30% tariffs being imposed if a deal is not reached by 1 August. His intervention to make the threat in the middle of EU-US negotiations has sent shockwaves through European capitals. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has warned of "proportionate countermeasures" if the US hikes its tariffs on imports from the EU. There is no guarantee Mr Trump will follow through on his ultimatum on 1 August - the deadline has already been shifted from 9 July. Nor is there any certainty the rate will be 30%. Previously, he has suggested tariffs of 20% and 50% on EU goods. The EU's position is to remain calm and continue negotiations - while turning up the rhetoric on the likelihood of reciprocal countermeasures. But for Irish exporters, the lack of certainty is now even more pronounced. Businesses don't know when to expect increased tariffs or what the rate might be. This unpredictability undermines the business rationale for making further investments - and further investments equal jobs. In parallel with the threat of 30% tariffs, the US is investigating trading arrangements for the pharmaceutical and computer chip manufacturing sectors. Nobody can presume their escape from tariffs to date will remain the position in future. Tomorrow morning, stock markets and bond markets will reopen - their response to Mr Trump's burst of letter-writing will be crucial. In April, when the markets took fright at the US president's tough talk on tariffs, leading to a jump in the US cost of borrowing, he quickly backed down. Now, however, the political and financial environments may have shifted. His success in having his tax cuts bill approved by Congress may have emboldened him to return to tariff threats on various countries, including EU member states.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
EU mulling how to respond to latest twist in Trump tariff row
There was one line at the end of Donald Trump's letter announcing new tariffs of 30 per cent on trade coming from the European Union that said a lot about the chaotic nature of his White House administration. The rate of US tariffs 'may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country,' Trump told European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. The EU, of course, isn't a country, but it seems nobody spotted the error before the letter was sent out and then later posted by Trump on his Truth Social platform. Trump fired out similar letters to Canada, Mexico, Brazil and more than a dozen other trading partners in recent days. READ MORE European leaders had been desperate to get a tariff deal over the line quickly and must now decide how to respond to this latest twist. EU and US negotiators had spent the past few weeks working on the outlines of a trade agreement that, among other things, locked in 10 per cent tariffs on EU goods, with some exemptions. Commission officials, diplomats and journalists in Brussels were on standby waiting for word that Trump had given the okay to the deal, which would have shielded the EU from higher trade levies. Instead the US president said tariffs of 30 per cent would be charged on EU trade from August 1st. Here is the letter Donald Trump sent Ursula von der Leyen, announcing plans to put tariffs of 30% on EU trade, in what is a significant setback to negotiations to work out a preliminary EU-US trade agreement — Jack Power (@jackpowerIT) The European Commission, which has been leading the negotiations, has two and a half weeks to get the US administration back to the table. The experience of this weekend has burnt a lot of goodwill. The EU had avoided antagonising Trump to date, to get a deal in the bag before a July 9th deadline, which the US pushed out to August 1st. Germany, Italy and Ireland had favoured a quick deal, even if that meant stomaching tariffs Trump had already introduced, without reply. Calls for the EU to take a more aggressive stance will get louder now. French president Emmanuel Macron said the 27-state bloc should turn to its 'anti-coercion instrument' to hit back hard, if a deal isn't agreed by August 1st. The anti-coercion instrument, known as the 'big bazooka' of the EU's trade arsenal, would give the commission powers to go after US multinational companies, slapping extra taxes on the digital revenues of tech firms. This is a major escalation the Irish Government wants to avoid. The EU's trade ministers had already been due to meet on Monday to discuss the tariff negotiations. That will feel more like an emergency huddle given the latest twist. Part of the problem is von der Leyen's commission does not have a direct line to Trump. [ EU to push for deal ahead of Trump deadline on tariffs, says Von der Leyen Opens in new window ] EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič was frequently talking to commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and trade negotiator Jamieson Greer on the phone, nudging the initial draft agreement into place. The about-turn by Trump has shown up the lack of influence US interlocutors have in his White House. Trump's letter demanded the EU eliminate its 'tariff and non-tariffs' barriers, to get a more favourable US rate. He has complained about value-added tax (VAT) charged on products and rules banning US chlorine-washed chicken from the European market. The commission will not budge on either point. One Government source said the letter appeared to be an attempt to squeeze the EU for more concessions. [ Donald Trump's EU tariffs letter: This is how trade wars start Opens in new window ] There should come a point where Trump will be in the mood to start signing agreements, to sell to his supporters as huge wins. Plenty of countries are jostling for spots in the queue to get tariff deals done, and European leaders might suddenly be feeling a little less confident about where the EU stands in that line.
