NM Governor nixes new license plates, state bread, lobbying disclosure
So much for lowrider license plates and a new state bread. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, in veto messages Friday, made clear she wasn't in the mood for fun and games and rejected bills that would have created new license plates celebrating lowriders and New Mexico United, as well as one that would have designated tortillas the official state bread.
Breadwinner: Committee advances proposal to make tortilla NM's 'state bread'
'I am vetoing this legislation to send a clear message,' she wrote, 'in a time of extraordinary challenges New Mexicans need discipline and urgency from their elected officials. What they received this session was far too often the opposite.'
Hundreds of bills, the governor continued, 'never saw the light of day' due to time constraints or because lawmakers did not give the bills hearings. 'Some, like legislation to regulate synthetic cannabinoids and keep dangerous substances out of the hands of children, died while waiting for concurrence—a process that can take less than a minute.'
Moreover, she noted, in the final hours of the session and in the aftermath of the mass shooting in Las Cruces 'that went unacknowledged by House leadership, the House found time to debate the merits of a state bread. And the Legislature found time to pass not one, not two, but three separate license plate bills—despite already having 40 specialty plates on the books.'
The governor continued by saying that while she too enjoys 'celebrating our unique culture,' New Mexico already has a plethora of state symbols (cookies, songs, vegetables etc.) 'The question should not be how many more symbols we can collect—but whether we are meeting the moment with the gravity it demands. We are living in perilous and unprecedented times. The stakes for our State have never been higher. We need a Legislature that rises to the occasion and focuses on the work that truly matters to the people of New Mexico.'
In total, the governor vetoed the following 16 bills:
House Bill 143: Lobbying Activity Reports
This bill would have required lobbyists to file reports explaining what bills they had been retained to work on and what positions they hold on said bills. For instance, as Source previously reported, it remains unclear to this day why the Texas-based Cicero Institute and its advocacy arm Cicero Action decided to have a lobbying presence in the state during this last session. In her veto message, the governor wrote that she supported the bill's intent, but it needed work. For instance, she continued: 'It imposes an onerous requirement that lobbyists or their employers file these reports within forty–eight hours of commencing the lobbying activity— including any time their 'position on legislation has changed'— irrespective of weekends and holidays. It is also unclear how this requirement applies to lobbying activity that commences on legislation after the adjournment of a legislative session since another subsection of HB 143 simply provides that these reports merely need to be filed 'prior to the end of the time period in which the governor may act on legislation.' Moreover, she wrote, the bill does not make it clear what constitutes a 'change in position' for lobbyists. Lastly, she added, 'I think it is important that elected officials with a donor base such as legislators (and governors) also be required to disclose their changes in position. I look forward to working with the Legislature in the next session on a bill that really adds transparency and accountability.'
60 days later, Cicero Institute's reason for NM lobbying still hidden from public
House Bill 14: Earned Income Tax Credit (Tax Package)
Legislative watchers may recall a fair amount of last-minute wrangling over the tax package, which ultimately included a slight tax on alcohol sales, among tax credit expansions in fiscal year 2027 paid out of state reserves. The governor vetoed the entire package, writing 'New Mexicans deserve thoughtful, forward-looking policy-not last-minute dealmaking that delays relief, ignores economic opportunity, and undermines fiscal responsibility.'
House Bill 36: Board of Optometry Powers and Duties,
The bill would have allowed optometrists to perform several procedures that currently can only be performed by ophthalmologists. 'I am vetoing this bill because it sets a dangerous precedent for allowing non-surgeons to perform surgical procedures,' the governor wrote.
Eye doctors see problems with bill expanding optometry in NM
House Bill 77: Annual Federal SNAP State Outreach Plans
The bill would have required the Health Care Authority to develop annual outreach plans to promote the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which the governor wrote is 'unnecessary because the HCA already does extensive outreach promoting SNAP.'
House Bill 120: Accessibility of State Agencies
This legislation would have required state agencies to develop their websites to meet federal disability standards, and created a state office to enforce the digital standards. Lujan Grisham said in her veto message the bill duplicates an effort her office started and, 'enacting it into law will only disrupt the process that my Administration has already established to ensure accessibility.'
House Bill 181: State Trust Program Accountability Plan
The bill would have amended the Accountability in Government Act. The governor said she vetoed the bill because 'it does not achieve its stated goal of increasing transparency and accountability in the use of GRO Trust funds.'
House Bill 191: Wildfire Suppression & Preparedness Funds
This legislation would have created two wildfire-related permanent funds administered by the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD): the post wildfire fund and the wildfire suppression fund, with a $12 million appropriation attached to the first fund.
'The wildfire suppression fund is a good idea on its face,' the governor wrote in her veto message.. 'However, the Legislature did not provide any money for it, instead requiring all federal reimbursements for wildfire suppression costs or out–of–state assignments for state crews to be deposited into the fund. Given the snail's pace of federal reimbursements–which have only gotten slower in recent months–relying on that funding stream does not set this program up for success. I will, however, require the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department's Forestry Division and the State Fire Marshal's Office to collaborate on outreach to the public to educate homeowners on effective means to minimize the risk to private property from wildfires.' As for the $12 million appropriation, she wrote, 'put simply, that is not nearly enough money to even put a dent in post fire recovery operations.'
House Bill 219: Slot Canyon Riverlands State Park
This bill would have created a new state park in Southern New Mexico. The governor said she vetoed the bill due to existing state parks already being understaffed and undermaintained. 'Adding another state park will only spread stretched resources even further,' she wrote.
Proposal to designate a Southern NM hidden hiking gem into a state park heads to the Senate floor
House Bill 269: Health Care Authority Visit Verification
The governor wrote this bill is unnecessary as the HCA is already working on creating the type of system prescribed in the legislation, and with completing anticipated in October.
House Bill 433: Study Career & Tech Education
Also unnecessary, the governor said in her veto
House Bill 494: Tax Exemptions for Veterans
This bill 'purported to enable veterans to claim a property tax exemption,' the governor wrote in her veto. 'However, HB 494 actually makes it harder for veterans to obtain this important benefit by changing the current one–year window to apply to a mere 30 days. At bottom, this bill benefits county assessors more than veterans.'
Senate Bill 142: Grid Modernization Roadmap
Lujan Grisham said this bill duplicated efforts already in motion at the Energy Minerals and Natural Resources Department.
Senate Bill 220: Publication Of Legal Settlement Terms
The bill would have required the state's insurance arm the Risk Management Division and the public school insurance authority to post settlement data from alleged misconduct to the state's Sunshine Portal. Risk Management Division has been voluntarily posting the information since 2019, but SB220 would have added an additional layer of review in cases resulting in deaths, serious injury or losses over $250,000, and required reports to the legislature.
Lujan Grisham wrote the bill was unclear in the standards for the review, and that the Legislature 'failed to appropriate any funds support this significant workload increase, nor did the Legislature account for the resources needed to ensure a fair, thorough, and timely process.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
22 minutes ago
- Fox News
Gov. Abbott calls out Democrats for 'outrageous' protests to GOP-led redistricting
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott joins 'America's Newsroom' to discuss his reaction to Democrats' backlash against GOP-led redistricting efforts and the consequences lawmakers could be facing amid the feud.

22 minutes ago
Showdown in Texas as Abbott threatens Democrats who fled in protest of redistricting
A showdown is unfolding in Texas as Gov. Greg Abbott threatens to remove Democrats who have fled the state in protest of Republican-led effort to create a new congressional map. Abbott said Texas House Democrats have until 3 p.m. local time on Monday to return to the statehouse for the special session or risk losing their jobs. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton suggested Democrats who left should be arrested and forcibly brought back. The response from the Texas House Democratic Caucus to Abbott's threat was, "Come and take it." Democratic members who left the state are slated to hold various events throughout the day Monday in New York, Massachusetts and Illinois. The proposed congressional map, backed by President Donald Trump, could create up to five new Republican seats and help Republicans keep control of the House in the 2026 midterm elections. Consideration of the bill had been set for Monday, but cannot proceed if Democrats deny a quorum. The first press conference with Texas Democrats on Monday was with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul in Albany. "We won't sit on the sidelines while Republicans try to rig the system to give Donald Trump more unchecked power," Hochul said in a statement. "Texas Democrats are standing up for the future of our democracy, and I'm proud to stand with them in the fight against disenfranchisement." Texas House Democrats who have gone to Massachusetts for the National Conference of State Legislators summit will be joined by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker for a press conference in Boston on Monday at 1 p.m. ET. Then, Texas House Democrats who have gathered in Illinois will hold a press conference with Democratic members of Congress in Chicago. Pritzker on Sunday accused Trump of "rigging" the new Texas maps out of desperation and worry that due to his policies, he was in danger of losing House Republican majorities in Washington. The Illinois governor also warned the newly-proposed maps set a dangerous precedent across the country. "This is not just rigging the system in Texas," Pritzker said. "It's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come." Abbott, in his warning to Texas House Democrats, said leaving the state in protest amounted to "abandonment or forfeiture of an elected state office." "Real Texans do not run from a fight," Abbott said in the statement. "But that's exactly what most of the Texas House Democrats just did. Rather than doing their job and voting on urgent legislation affecting the lives of all Texans, they have fled Texas to deprive the House of the quorum necessary to meet and conduct business."


New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Texas Redistricting Fight, Explained
Democratic members of the Texas House left the state on Sunday in an effort to block Republicans from approving a redrawn political map of U.S. House districts in the state this week. The new map, drawn at the behest of President Trump, is meant to flip five seats now held by Democrats in the Republicans' favor. Without those Democratic members in attendance, the Texas House would not have a quorum needed to conduct its business and pass the bill to adopt the proposed map. Republicans say that Democrats are shirking their responsibilities as elected officials. The clash over the issue has been brewing in Texas for months, and it has drawn in other states because of the potential consequences for the entire country. Here is what we know about the fight. Why do Texas Republicans want this new map? Mr. Trump has pushed Texas Republicans to redraw the state's congressional districts so that Republicans would be likely to win more seats, and thus have a better chance of retaining control of the U.S. House after the midterm elections in 2026. Republicans currently have only a slim majority in the U.S. House, and voters in midterm elections have tended historically to side with the party that is not holding the presidency. Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas has gone along with Mr. Trump's request. When he summoned a special session of the Texas Legislature last month, redistricting was one of the issues he put on the agenda. A bill advanced in the special session would redraw boundaries so that congressional districts now held by Democrats in deeply blue Dallas, Houston and around Austin and San Antonio contain enough Republican voters to flip control. Two more competitive districts in the Rio Grande Valley along the U.S.-Mexico border would be easier for Republicans to capture. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.