Speaker quashes talk of more Parliament seats via S'wak assembly
PETALING JAYA : Sarawak assembly speaker Asfia Awang Nassar has quashed rumours that the state government plans to increase the number of parliamentary and state seats in the state through a bill tabled in the legislative assembly.
Asfia said changes to the number of parliamentary and state seats in Sarawak fell under the purview of the Election Commission, not the state assembly, The Borneo Post reported.
'The state assembly doesn't (have any say). It's the EC. It's a federal power. It's not the state assembly that creates (new constituencies),' he was quoted as saying.
This follows a Dayak Daily report on rumours that the special Sarawak assembly sitting on July 7 would see the tabling of a bill to increase the number of parliamentary seats to 46 and state seats to 99.
Sarawak currently has 31 parliamentary seats and 82 state seats.
There has been a growing push for Sabah and Sarawak to be allocated one-third of the seats in Parliament, as per the Malaysia Agreement 1963.
However, in November, deputy prime minister Fadillah Yusof said the two East Malaysian states could only be given one-third of the Dewan Rakyat seats after the next general election.
Asfia did not dismiss the possibility that the redelineation of parliamentary and state seats could be brought up at the special sitting, but maintained that any execution of this would come under the EC's jurisdiction.
He also said he had yet to receive any bills from the state government.
'I have not received any bills yet. Once I receive the bill, I shall call for a press conference and brief (the media on) what this is all about,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
34 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
LFL rubbishes ex-chief judge's claim of pressure over constitutional ruling
LFL's N Surendran said judicial deliberation shouldn't be mistaken for interference. PETALING JAYA : Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) has rubbished claims of judicial interference after a former chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak said that a top judge pressured him to rule in favour of a litigant in a constitutional case against the federal government. Abdul Rahman Sebli, who retired last Thursday, claimed in his farewell speech that a 'very senior member of the judiciary' had emailed him, criticising his interpretation of the constitutional issue at hand. Rahman said judicial independence was not only about interference by the executive, but also about a judge's own peers in the discharge of judicial functions. In a statement today, LFL adviser N Surendran said such accusations were 'plainly wrong' and defied logic, particularly as the senior judge in question was part of the seven-member Federal Court panel hearing the case. 'How can a judge 'interfere' in a case which she herself was involved in deciding? Such a suggestion defies logic,' he said, without citing names. Surendran said unless someone outside the bench, such as from the executive, tried to influence the decision, it did not qualify as interference. He also argued that there was nothing 'sinister' about judges on multi-judge panels discussing cases and circulating draft judgments to persuade colleagues. 'In other words, there can be nothing wrong with any judge suggesting to his fellow judge in the same panel that his interpretation of the law is incorrect, and to try to change his position on it. 'This is part of the usual process of judicial decision-making, not just in Malaysia, but also of Supreme Courts in other common-law countries such as the UK or the US,' he said. Surendran also said it was 'strange' that a now former Federal Court judge was making a complaint that he was affected by 'peer pressure', adding that Federal Court judges enjoy security of tenure and constitutional protection. While acknowledging that judicial interference was a serious concern, Surendran warned against diluting its meaning. 'Judicial interference is a very serious matter. But it must not be confused with entirely appropriate and necessary internal processes of judicial deliberation,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
36 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar's replacement would face same economic headwinds, says veteran newsman
Anwar Ibrahim was the subject of a rally last weekend, calling for his resignation as prime minister. PETALING JAYA : Veteran journalist A Kadir Jasin today warned that any successor to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim would face the same economic challenges of creating a sustainable economy and ensuring the fair distribution of wealth. In a Facebook post reflecting on the Turun Anwar rally last Saturday, Kadir said Anwar's 'handicap' was a perceived lack of foundational knowledge in economics. A Kadir Jasin. 'The current economic hardship faced by the people is largely due to Anwar's over-reliance on technocrats and corporate figures who are disconnected from the general public. 'These elites operate based on profit and loss, taxes and revenue,' he said. He said such individuals did not feel accountable for the people's suffering as they saw it as a 'politician's job'. 'For them, if they manage to build strong economic fundamentals and earn praise from international rating agencies, they consider their job done,' he said. The Turun Anwar rally was organised by PAS Youth, with protesters calling for Anwar to step down as prime minister over the rising cost of living, among others. According to PAS, some 500,000 protesters turned up although Kuala Lumpur police estimated that only 18,000 people took part in the rally. Kadir said a single protest was not enough, and that the opposition must keep up the momentum if it was serious about removing Anwar. 'Especially since Anwar himself has 'challenged' them to do so,' he said, referring to opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin's hint that a vote of no confidence would be tabled. Charles Santiago. Meanwhile, DAP's Charles Santiago said it would be 'disingenuous' to ignore the fact that some of the protest's organisers were 'far from altruistic'. He said many of the loudest calls for Anwar's resignation came from 'disgraced politicians and their operatives', whom he said once drained the public purse and weaponised race and religion but now 'masqueraded as reformists' because they had been shut out of power. 'Their rallying cry isn't justice. It's vengeance dressed in street theatre,' the former Klang MP said in a Facebook post. He urged the people not to mistake opportunism for leadership, adding that protests lose moral authority when they are hijacked by 'those with dirty hands and no vision beyond their personal vendettas'. However, he also warned that the rally should serve as a wake-up call, not only for those in power but also for those aspiring to replace them. He said if the current government could not deliver on its promises of economic justice, inclusivity, and clean governance, it would continue to 'haemorrhage public trust, no matter how corrupt its critics are'. Adding that Malaysians were tired of being asked to choose the lesser evil, he said there was still time for Anwar. 'The remainder of his term must be spent on bold, redistributive policies that protect the most vulnerable and restore faith in the state,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
38 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Turun Anwar rally missed the point, says ex-Muda sec-gen
About 18,000 people took part in Saturday's 'Turun Anwar' rally in Kuala Lumpur, according to police, although the organisers, PAS Youth, claimed a total of more than 200,000 participants. PETALING JAYA : The opposition should have focused on credible alternatives and policy proposals in its July 26 rally instead of focusing on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's failures and demanding his resignation, says a former Muda secretary-general. Amir Hadi, now the executive director of civil society group Mandiri, said he had communicated his reservations to the organisers regarding the use of the Turun Anwar slogan. Amir Hadi. '#TurunAnwar is political. It's a message aimed at seizing power. Especially when Perikatan Nasional (PN) is known for its many manoeuvres to return to government, including efforts to topple a government without going through an election. 'This kind of approach turns people off. At least those on the fence. If you're a party member or sympathiser, of course, you'd want the government to fall. But for fence-sitters, it just looks like a rushed attempt to return to power,' he said in a Facebook post late last night. He said Malaysians might be frustrated with the current government, but were also weary of political instability that could do more harm. 'The fact is, people are sick of politicians. They may be angry at Anwar over various issues, but that doesn't mean they want him removed halfway through his term, plunging the country back into instability,' he said. Amir, who did not join the rally for the reasons given, said presenting concrete policy alternatives such as abolishing toll charges and repealing draconian laws was the strength of past oppositions. 'Even if they've failed to deliver now, back when they were the opposition, they presented solutions,' he said in a likely reference to Pakatan Harapan, which is now part of the unity government. Amir also said that questions about who PN would propose as Anwar's potential replacement were legitimate: 'And they still can't answer who will replace Anwar – even within their own ranks. So how can people trust them?' 'PN lacks direction' DAP's Liew Chin Tong also took aim at the opposition, saying PN had a significant presence in Parliament but lacked a clear leadership vision to be taken as a serious alternative. Liew Chin Tong. He said the Turun Anwar rally might have drawn a crowd, but did not capture the interest of middle-ground or non-partisan voters. 'Almost all were core supporters of PAS,' the deputy investment, trade and industry minister said in a Facebook post. He said PN could choose to be a constructive opposition, such as by cooperating on key issues like confidence and supply, as DAP did after the Sheraton Move. 'Their leaders should know that being the kind of opposition that can only manufacture outrage and anger to manipulate the people's emotions, especially among the Malays, will not bring the country anywhere,' he said.
