2024 book review: Trump, Biden, Harris and a turbulent election full of what-ifs
Kamala Harris declined to speak. Joe Biden criticized his successor in a brief phone call, then balked. Trump talked, of course.
'If that didn't happen … I think I would've won, but it might have been a little bit closer,' he says of the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, which set the race alight.
Yet 2024 is about more than the horse race. It also chronicles how the elites unintentionally made Trump's restoration possible, despite a torrent of criminal charges against him, 34 resulting in convictions, and civil lawsuits that saw him fined hundreds of millions of dollars.
'Trump always drew his strength from decades of pent-up frustration with the American democratic system's failures to address the hardships and problems the people experienced in their daily lives,' Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf write.
'In 2024, [Trump's] supporters saw institutions stacked against them … leading them to identify viscerally with his legal ordeal, even though they had not experienced anything like it before.'
Dawsey is a Pulitzer prize winner, working political investigations and enterprise for the Wall Street Journal. Pager covers the White House for the New York Times. Arnsdorf was part of the Washington Post team that won a Pulitzer for coverage of the assassination attempt.
Dawsey and Pager are Post alumni. With Arnsdorf, they capture the aspirations and delusions of Trump and the pretenders to his Republican throne, of Biden and Harris too.
'In the weeks after the election, Biden repeatedly told allies that he could have won if he'd stayed in the race,' 2024 reports, 'even as he publicly questioned whether he could have served another four years.'
Really? Biden's approval rating fell below 50% in August 2021 and never recovered. From October 2023, he trailed Trump. A year out, the authors reveal, Barack Obama warned his former vice-president's staff: 'Your campaign is a mess.'
Biden's aides privately derided Obama as 'a prick'.
'They thought he and his inner circle had constantly disrespected and mistreated Biden, despite his loyal service as vice-president.'
As for Harris, Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf report that she 'knew that the race would be close, but she really thought she would win'.
Despite that, David Plouffe, a senior Harris adviser, admitted post-election that internal polls never showed her leading.
'I think it surprised people because there were these public polls that came out in late September, early October, showing us with leads that we never saw,' he said. Harris's debate win never moved the needle.
Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf contend that the outcome was not foreordained. Rather, they raise a series of plausible-enough 'what-ifs'. One is: 'If the Democrats got clobbered, as expected, in the 2022 midterms, and Joe Biden never ran for re-election.'
Except, by early 2022, according to This Shall Not Pass, a campaign book published that year, Biden saw himself as a cross between FDR and Obama.
A telephone conversation between Biden and Abigail Spanberger, a moderate congresswoman now the Democratic candidate for governor in Virginia, captures Biden's self-perception.
'This is President Roosevelt,' Biden begins, before thanking Spanberger for her sense of humor.
She replies: 'I'm glad you have a sense of humor, Mr President.'
Back to 2024. Biden bristled at being challenged. Pushback risked being equated with disloyalty. His closest advisers were either family members or dependent on him for their livelihoods. He lacked social peers with incomes and personages of their own.
Mike Donilon, a longtime aide, tells the authors: 'It was an act of insanity by the Democratic leadership to have forced Biden out.
'Tell me why you walked away from a guy with 81m votes … A native of [swing-state] Pennsylvania. Why do that?'
Because Biden's debate performance was a gobsmacking disaster. He also found navigating the stairs of Air Force One difficult and needed prompts to find the podium. In May 2025, Biden announced that he had been diagnosed with stage-four prostate cancer – a disclosure that came after 2024 went to press.
The authors of 2024 pose Republican hypotheticals too. One: 'If Trump never got indicted, or if Republicans didn't respond by rallying to him, or if the prosecutions were more successful.'
Ron DeSantis, Florida's governor, demonstrated a lack of nerve. Glaringly, he failed to use the initial E Jean Carroll trial, over the writer's allegation that Trump sexually assaulted her, to bolster his presidential ambitions. DeSantis didn't dispatch his wife, Casey DeSantis, to Manhattan to offer daily thoughts and prayers for the plaintiff, or for Melania Trump. If you want to be the man, first you've got to beat the man.
Another hypothetical: 'If Trump and Biden didn't agree to an early debate …'
That question hangs over everything.
Trump's pronouncements leave Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf anxious. After the 2022 midterms, he mused about terminating the constitution. Later, on the campaign trail, he spoke openly of being a 'dictator for a day'. When he was back in the West Wing, reporters asked: 'Are you a dictator on day one?' 'No,' he replied. 'I can't imagine even being called that.'
Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf then catalog Trump's unilateral actions on that first day, including stripping political opponents of security clearances. Later that month, he commenced his vendetta against law firms he deemed to be enemies. In February, Trump barred the Associated Press from the White House press pool unless the news agency referred to the Gulf of Mexico as the 'Gulf of America'.
2024 contains no mention of Hungary's Viktor Orbán. Perhaps it should have made space. Hungary's leader is an autocrat in all but name, an elected leader who has removed freedoms regardless. Republicans adore him.
2024 is published in the US by Penguin Random House
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lord Mandelson says Nigel Farage is 'peaking too soon' to become PM despite admitting that Keir Starmer's election landslide was down to 'anger'
Lord Mandelson has predicted that Nigel Farage is 'peaking too soon' to become PM despite acknowledging that Labour majority was down to a 'sense of anger'. The former Cabinet minister - now UK ambassador to the US - said Mr Farage is a 'highly effective populist' as polls show Reform with a significant lead. But he insisted that by the time of the election people will be choosing a government rather than 'having a fling'. The comments came in an interview with the Sunday Times - where Lord Mandelson also lavished praise on Donald Trump. The peer said Mr Trump was a 'phenomenon' who 'dominated' Washington and would be 'one of the most consequential presidents in American history'. He also argued that the Republican would get a 'warm welcome' from Brits on his state visit in September - and appeared to confirm for the first time that the trip will happen while Parliament is in recess. That would reduce the potential for protests as Mr Trump will not be able to give an address to both Houses - an honour that was granted to Emmanuel Macron last week. Lord Mandelson recounted a recent conversation he had with US vice president JD Vance. 'I explained to the vice-president that, yes, highly effective populists and political actors like Farage can take advantage,' the New Labour architect said. 'At the end of the day, at the election people will be choosing their future government - not having a fling, expressing a protest or demonstrating their impatience. 'And in that sense, I said, perhaps Nigel is peaking too soon.' Lord Mandelson compared the political situations in the UK and US as he tried to explain why the Labour government has been struggling to make headway. He said: 'The mandates that both President Trump and Keir Starmer won at their elections last year came from the same sense of anger that many voters have. 'That they've been overlooked: the system was not delivering for them, that they were being taken for granted. 'But what's different about Britain is that we seem to have been travelling through a long, dark tunnel for ten years, with no signs of light or hope. 'It has seemed one thing after another. And I feel people are emerging from that tunnel, almost blinking into the daylight.' Lord Mandelson said of the State Visit: 'He should expect a warm reception because he really does love Britain. He hugely admires it. 'He trusts Keir Starmer. It's not a question of expressing our gratitude. My lodestar here is to demonstrate respect, not sycophancy. I don't think the administration has any problem with that.' Reminded that Labour left-wingers have started a petition against Mr Trump addressing both Houses of Parliament, the peer said: 'Well there's a surprise... But I had assumed that at the time of the visit parliament won't be sitting.' Lord Mandelson said Mr Trump is a 'more nuanced figure than people appreciate'. 'Look, he's not only a unique politician - he's also going to be one of the most consequential presidents in American history,' the ambassador said. 'He has this sense of history, this grasp of power which I think perhaps recent inhabitants of the White House haven't quite seen. He is not a man for endless seminars and thinking. 'He's not a victim of analysis paralysis. He has a very quick, easy way of grasping the core points about an issue. And let's be honest: more often than not, there's a kernel of truth in everything he says.' Lord Mandelson joked that the MAGA crowd in Washington 'regard me as a slightly exotic target of their fascination'. He said a turning point in his job was when Mr Trump described him as 'handsome' during Sir Keir's visit to the White House. 'I've never been in a town or a political system that is so dominated by one individual,' he said.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK's ambassador in Washington says Trump ‘really does love Britain'
Donald Trump is set to make his second state visit to the UK in September, following an invitation from King Charles. Peter Mandelson, the UK 's ambassador in Washington, anticipates a "warm reception" for Trump, stating the US president "really does love Britain" and "hugely admires it". Due to the visit's timing during the political party conference season, Trump is not expected to address MPs and peers in Parliament, nor visit Buckingham Palace or have a ceremonial carriage ride. Lord Mandelson described Trump as a "phenomenon" and a "unique politician" with a strong grasp of power and a quick understanding of issues. Mandelson highlighted the UK -US trade deal, signed in May, which reduced car import tariffs, suggesting it was facilitated by the UK 's departure from the European Union.
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump ‘considering' taking away US citizenship from comedian Rosie O'Donnell
'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Mr Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that Ms O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her'. President Donald Trump has threatened to remove the actress's citizenship (Evan Vucci/AP) The two have criticised each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Mr Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Mr Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It is just the latest threat by Mr Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But Ms O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Mr Musk, who was born in South Africa. Ms O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to US citizenship. The US State Department notes on its website that US citizens by birth or naturalisation may relinquish US nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the 14th Amendment of the constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. 'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born US citizen,' Ms Frost said in an email on Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.' Ms O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Mr Trump defeated vice president Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she is in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Responding to Mr Trump on Saturday, Ms 'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn'.
