logo
With need soaring, child-care vouchers remain frozen for more than a year and counting

With need soaring, child-care vouchers remain frozen for more than a year and counting

Boston Globe15-04-2025

Advertisement
Some families, including those involved with the Department of Children and Families or the Department of Transitional Assistance, are still receiving aid, as required by state law. But for parents like Tower, the waitlist is daunting.
'I'm looking at, if I don't get that voucher, waiting until my son goes to school, which makes me broke for another couple years,' said Tower, who will have to continue relying on rental assistance, food banks, toy drives, and other social safety nets to get by until she can work. 'It's almost impossible to get out of this low-income hole.'
The demand for subsidies is partly due to an unprecedented increase in DCF and DTA cases as the rising cost of living pushes more families to the brink of financial hardship — and because the system has expanded to provide care to more children than it used to.
Advertisement
The state more than doubled its investment over the past five years as lawmakers shored up early education following the pandemic, becoming the only state to fully maintain COVID-era relief funds after federal dollars ran out. This surge in funding, including increasing reimbursement rates for subsidized care, gave child-care providers the ability to open more classrooms and increase teachers' pay. These improvements helped add more than 17,000 more seats in the past two years, beyond pre-pandemic capacity, many in disadvantaged communities where struggling families qualify for financial assistance.
When it became clear that the state had maxed out its subsidies for income-eligible families, it froze the waitlist in March 2024. Since then, the number of children in line for financial assistance has jumped by more than 50 percent.
Last year, the Legislature approved expanding the eligibility requirements to allow more families to qualify for child-care subsidies, which would ease the burden on lower-middle-class households. But this proposed regulation change, which is currently in the
The cost of child care in Massachusetts is among the highest in the country, with families paying an average of nearly $20,000 a year for a toddler, according to
Advertisement
Kim Dion has been connecting families with child-care providers for 37 years at Seven Hills Child Care Resources in Worcester, and she's never seen the need for assistance so high.
'I have families in my region that have been on the waitlist since the summer of 2022,' she said. 'Those kids are going to be in public schools before I can get them a voucher.'
Governor Maura Healey proposed $1.1 billion for child-care financial assistance in the fiscal year 2026 budget,
a $192 million increase over the current fiscal year. But this would only subsidize new DCF and DTA cases and other families already being served by the system — not those on the income-eligible waitlist.
'We aren't anticipating at this funding level that we would be able to open up access to the income-eligible wait list,' said Amy Kershaw, commissioner of the Department of Early Education and Care, which administers subsidies, at a
At a recent EEC board meeting, Kershaw, who served as DTA commissioner at the height of the pandemic and previously worked at DCF, said caseloads were in a time of 'pretty significant flux.'
More slots have been added for priority populations, such as homeless families, and shifted to infants, where need has increased over the years — both of which cost more to provide.
The system is so strained that the governor recently asked
the Legislature for an additional $190 million to make it through the end of June.
The Massachusetts Association of Early Education and Care and other advocates have
also appealed to the Legislature to allocate more money in the next fiscal year to help waiting families. An additional $32 million could get 2,000 children off the waitlist, said William Eddy, executive director of the early education trade association.
Advertisement
'We must find a way to serve children of low-income working families who are languishing on our waitlist,' he said at the legislative hearing. 'Thirty-thousand children should be unacceptable.'
The state funding squeeze is unfolding, and at the same time, the Trump administration is making massive cuts, including closing the Boston Head Start office, which administers free care to families in need. At this point, there's no indication that federal grants that help fund state child-care subsidies will be added to the chopping block, said
Some home-based providers
— many of them women of color who rely heavily on low-income families —
are struggling to maintain enrollment and their income, given the lack of vouchers. Providers that contract with the Guild of St. Agnes in Worcester are serving 10 percent fewer children than they were a year ago, largely due to the lack of vouchers and the lack of families who can afford to pay out of pocket, said president Sharon MacDonald
Nurtury Early Education, which serves 1,100 children in the Boston area — almost
all of them eligible for financial assistance — has a waitlist of home-based providers who want to join Nurtury's system but can't until more vouchers are issued.
'Small businesses are the backbone of child care,' said Nurtury president Laura Perille. 'They are one of the few growing sources of supply.'
A number of centers are also struggling to get to full capacity because so many teachers, who make around $40,000 a year, qualify for vouchers for their own children but are stuck on the waitlist and can't work.
Advertisement
Torah Academy decided to invest in early education after the state expanded income eligibility, knowing the demand for vouchers would grow. The Jewish school converted a two-family home in Brighton into a child-care center, and is set to open this spring. But five of its seven teachers are marooned on the waitlist, and the school had to turn to private donors to fund their children's spots
at Torah Academy, said Rabbi Binyomin Mermelstein, the school's executive director.
'This is very basic,' he said. 'If there's no teachers, there's no programs.'
Daily and her son, Nathien, posed for a portrait together at their home in Westfield.
Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff
Deborah Dailey worked at a child-care center in Springfield for almost four years before she went on maternity leave last year when her son, Nathien, was born. She applied for a voucher in February, but only found out about the freeze when she was getting ready to return to work in mid-April.
'I was in total shock,' said Dailey, 38. 'I really can't afford to take a leave.'
Without a voucher, she said, returning to her low-paid, highly rewarding career teaching young children seems impossible.
This story was produced by the Globe's
team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter
.
Katie Johnston can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I quit my dream job to be a stay-at-home dad, while my wife works full time. It's the best arrangement for us.
I quit my dream job to be a stay-at-home dad, while my wife works full time. It's the best arrangement for us.

Business Insider

time9 hours ago

  • Business Insider

I quit my dream job to be a stay-at-home dad, while my wife works full time. It's the best arrangement for us.

Last year, I quit my dream job to be a stay-at-home dad while my wife worked full time. It was the best decision for our family, and I've loved every minute of it. My wife has always been the primary breadwinner of the family, so we decided I could step back from my career to work part time as a freelance writer and — most importantly — take care of our two little ones, a 3-year-old girl and a 5-year-old boy. It has been challenging in ways I couldn't have predicted, but I wouldn't have it any other way. We spent years trying to build two careers and a family I have been a healthcare journalist for nearly a decade, mostly working as a full-time editor or staff writer for various media companies. I have always loved this kind of work, and every new opportunity felt like a dream job. But everything started to change after my wife and I had our first kid at the end of 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic turned me into a work-from-home dad with a 4-month-old boy. I was suddenly a full-time editor and a full-time caretaker. In those days, my wife worked on the front lines of the pandemic as a physician assistant, while my son and I were trapped in a small two-bedroom apartment in New Rochelle, NY. It was the first time I had to suffer through the split focus of working and parenting full time. Even after the pandemic began to subside, my wife continued to work more than 50 hours a week at the hospital. So, I eventually settled into my role as a stay-at-home, work-from-home dad, with the help of grandparents and a local day care. But this was only the beginning of my work-life struggles. Working and caring for my kids only got more stressful By the end of 2022, a lot had changed for my family. We relocated to the Atlanta area. My wife took a new job at a local hospital that demanded slightly fewer hours. I landed an exciting new position as a medical reporter for a national publication, while our little girl was turning 1 year old. It was a happy time for our family, but the pressure to be a successful reporter and an always-available father started to become too much for me. Even though my wife's new role offered better hours, she still didn't have the flexibility to leave work at a moment's notice. We always knew it would be my responsibility to take care of any sudden, unexpected issues for the family. On sick days, I would balance trips to the pediatrician's office with phone interviews with sources. When holiday calendars between day care and work didn't match, I would serve snacks in between typing up paragraphs for my next article. It was a difficult balancing act. My new job required much of my mental energy, and the kids always needed more attention than I could give during workdays. It became clear that our family needed to make a change. It was time to put my family and my wife's career first After two years of balancing work and family needs with mixed success, my wife and I decided it was time for me to quit my job to focus on our family. The change had an immediate impact on all our lives. Now, I no longer have to split my attention between my kids and my work. When they get sick, I can drop everything to take them to the doctor, then bring them home to take care of them. I also have plenty of time to focus on chores to keep the house clean, cook healthy meals, and spend time with my kids and my wife without worrying about falling behind at work. I never have to worry about misaligned holiday schedules or hiding in my office to finish work assignments. It was nerve-racking to leave full-time employment after nine years, but after seven months of being a stay-at-home dad, I can't imagine doing it any other way.

Asking Eric: Friends didn't send my daughter a wedding gift
Asking Eric: Friends didn't send my daughter a wedding gift

Chicago Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Asking Eric: Friends didn't send my daughter a wedding gift

Dear Eric: My daughter got married a year ago and decided to have a wedding with immediate family members only due to the huge family on the groom's side (the wedding was still about 100 people). It was planned on the West Coast (we are on the East Coast). Some of my friends sent them a gift, knowing why they were not invited but three of my close friends didn't send anything (even a card would have been thoughtful). I've sent their kids very generous gifts. One, I couldn't attend (it was during Covid and the other was far away and very expensive to get to). One of the other ones, we traveled to her daughter's wedding, spent a fortune to stay in a hotel and gave her a generous cash gift. I mean, really, nothing from her? She wouldn't have gone to the wedding if she had been invited. I'm so disappointed. I feel like even a small gift would have been nice. They have known my daughter since she was little. I'm having trouble letting it go. It just feels cheap. Some of my friends are shocked that they didn't do anything. – Giftless Dear Giftless: You're right, it would have been nice if they'd sent a gift. When it comes to children and grandchildren of friends, wedding gifts and other gestures for special occasions can become extensions of the central friendship. A gift to your kid is also (perhaps, primarily) a gift to you. So, I can see why this stings. The answers to two questions might help de-escalate this situation. First, did your daughter send out wedding announcements? Even if other people know about a wedding or other special event, it simply may not occur to them to send a gift without the trigger of a piece of cardstock in the mail. It's a weird system, perhaps, but an announcement can serve as an indication that the couple is open to gifts, and help guests figure out where to send them. Without it, life can get in the way and gifts can fall to the wayside. So, if your friends didn't receive announcements, this may not be a one-to-one comparison with the weddings to which you were invited. The second question is, does your daughter have any feelings about this? Often, in life's biggest events, the gifts you get feel so thoughtful and generous that one doesn't really think about the gifts that one didn't get. Is it possible that your daughter doesn't have the same expectations of your friends? If so, you're still perfectly within your right to hold them to a different standard. But, for the sake of peace of mind, it's important to remember that everyone's expectations of themselves and of others are different. Dear Eric: This is not an earth-shattering question, yet I'd appreciate an opinion. We call our firstborn son by his middle name because his first is the same as his father's middle, who also goes by his middle name. This practice goes back generations on my husband's father's side. Imagine my confusion, years ago, when I learned of the tradition and discovered that our as-yet-unconceived son had already been given a first name (but we could choose the middle). I've made my peace with the tradition despite its oddness (personal opinion). Now our son is going on four, ripe for learning and spelling his entire name and I'm worried he'll be confused and in turn confuse others when we try to explain that his real first name is actually his daddy's. I'm already cringing. I may or may not have noticed your name as an example of an elegant solution, but is it? – Name Game Dear Name: Well, the elegance of my nomenclature is up for debate. In high school, when I first started using my first initial, a teacher told me, 'Eric, there's a thin line between class and pretension.' Can you believe that? The audacity still makes me laugh and laugh. Suffice it to say, your son will have plenty of opportunity to choose class, pretension or something else on his journey of self-expression. If you call him by his middle name, he may eventually choose to use his first. If you call him by his first name, he may choose his middle name. If he becomes a pop star later in life, he may choose a whole new name. All of those are just fine. But, for now, he'll be able to understand the concept of a full name and that some parts of the name are used conversationally and others aren't. A name is an offering from a parent. And like all the myriad offerings of parenthood, one hopes that it is of use. But even if that use changes, it doesn't make it less valuable.

UK-wide 2021 census data published for first time
UK-wide 2021 census data published for first time

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

UK-wide 2021 census data published for first time

A full set of UK-wide data collected for the 2021 census has been made available for the first time. Many details from the census have already been released, revealing a wealth of population information about the country's nations, regions and local areas. But a complete picture for the whole of the UK has only now been published. The delay in producing a set of UK-wide statistics is due to the unusual circumstances in which the 2021 survey took place. A census of the population has been held regularly since 1801, typically every 10 years and on the same day across the UK. The 2021 survey was disrupted by the Covid-19 pandemic, however. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the census occurred as planned on March 21 2021. But in Scotland it was postponed for 12 months because of the impact of the pandemic, eventually taking place on March 20 2022. This meant that, unlike for previous censuses, data had not been collected on the same date across the whole of the UK – and therefore Scotland's data was not directly comparable with that for the other nations. To solve this problem, the UK's statistical agencies have come together to create a full set of census numbers with a shared point in time of March 21 2021. Scotland's 2022 census data has been adjusted to create notional estimates for 2021, which have then been combined with the actual 2021 totals for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The three agencies involved – the Office for National Statistics, National Records of Scotland and the Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency – describe it as 'a solution that is conceptually simple, pragmatic, and creates numbers for a consistent time point'. The new figures show for the first time how key population trends such as religion, ethnicity and marital status compare in the four parts of the UK. For example, while 80% of the population of Northern Ireland on census day identified as Christian, the equivalent figures for the rest of the country are much lower, at 46% in England, 44% in Wales and 40% in Scotland. Some 17% of people in Northern Ireland said they had no religion, rising to 37% in England, 47% in Wales and 50% in Scotland. The proportion of people identifying as white was highest in Northern Ireland (97%), followed by Wales (94%), Scotland (93%) and England (81%). England has the highest proportion of people identifying as Asian (10%), then Scotland (4%), Wales (3%) and Northern Ireland (2%), while the figures for people identifying as black were 4% for England and 1% for the other three countries. There is less variation in the proportion of people who were married or in a civil partnership on census day, with 44% for Scotland and Wales, 45% for England and 46% for Northern Ireland. The figures for people who are divorced or who have had a civil partnership dissolved range from 6% in Northern Ireland to 10% in Wales, with 8% for Scotland and 9% for England. Census results are used by a variety of organisations including governments, councils and businesses, and underpin everything from the calculation of economic growth and unemployment to helping plan schools, health services and transport links. Planning is already under way for the next UK census, which is due to take place in 2031.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store