
TalkTalk on the brink as dreams of budget broadband billions unravels
As the modestly named American pianist John Legend took to the stage at Old Billingsgate Market in the City of London last week, one onlooker attracted almost as much attention.
Sir Charles Dunstone was a special guest at an annual corporate jamboree hosted by Liberty Global, co-owner of the broadband and mobile giant Virgin Media O2.
Normally, the presence of the chairman of a partner and rival would be nothing unusual at such an event. But Sir Charles's own broadband business TalkTalk is on its knees and the main topic of telecoms industry gossip. It narrowly avoided collapse last year, and has now sparked turmoil across the sector after falling behind on payments to suppliers.
While Sir Charles indulged in some easy balladry, TalkTalk's future hung in the balance. Its predicament has sparked alarm in Whitehall over fears that more than three million customers could be left in the lurch if it collapses.
As the company struggles under an exodus of customers and crippling debt costs, Sir Charles is attempting one last throw of the dice: an ambitious scheme to break up the business and sell it off for parts.
It raises the prospect of an ignominious ending for Sir Charles, the founder and executive chairman whose shareholding risks being wiped out in any future deal. With TalkTalk on the precipice, can bosses carve a path to survival for the broadband supplier?
TalkTalk's troubles have been a long time in the making.
Sir Charles spun TalkTalk out of his mobile phone retailer Carphone Warehouse in 2010 and grew it into a major broadband provider targeting the budget end of the market.
But a series of acquisitions, coupled with a highly leveraged £1.1bn take-private deal in 2021, loaded the company up with debt.
As competition in the broadband market has grown more fierce and margins have narrowed, this balance sheet strain has taken its toll.
TalkTalk was saved from insolvency in an 11th-hour rescue deal last year, with Sir Charles and other shareholders including major investor Toscafund pumping in £235m to keep it afloat.
Yet the bailout has done little more than kick the can down the road.
TalkTalk, which has around 3.2m customers, is still grappling with eye-watering repayments on its debts of £1.2bn. Making matters worse, revenues are in reverse as the company haemorrhages customers amid deep job and spending cuts.
The cash woes are such that TalkTalk has fallen behind on payments to suppliers including BT's Openreach in recent months. In response, BT has reportedly threatened to block TalkTalk from putting new customers on its network.
TalkTalk argues that it has a fully-funded business plan and that its cost-cutting strategy has begun to pay off. But with the prospects of a turnaround looking slim, the company is now poised for a full break-up.
Bosses are hiring advisers to oversee a sale of the group's consumer and wholesale divisions. TalkTalk has already sold its business-to-business unit back to its shareholders in a £95m deal.
However, observers point out that the break-up could put off potential suitors as they would be hamstrung by complex agreements between the consumer and wholesale arms.
James Ratzer, an analyst at New Street Research, says: 'I think any buyer would be most interested in the whole company to give them flexibility to restructure it as they like.'
Should a sale not materialise, TalkTalk's bondholders – largely consisting of asset managers – could end up taking control of the company.
Either way, these outcomes would be likely to cement an embarrassing misstep for Sir Charles, who founded his telecoms empire from the boot of a car.
The tycoon has previously rebuffed attractive takeover offers, including a £3bn approach from Virgin Media O2 (VMO2) three years ago. Now with TalkTalk's equity value thought to be zero, he risks being left empty-handed.
'We struggle to see any scenario in which the sponsors will be able to get any equity capital returned to them,' said Ratzer.
'Surely last year they should have refused to put in new capital and handed the business over to the creditors at that stage, rather than injecting further money?'
That ship has sailed, however, and shareholders must now decide whether to pump yet more money into TalkTalk, or bail out now.
Bondholders, who would be likely to take a haircut as part of any deal, have been pushing shareholders to stump up more money.
A source familiar with the matter said the company was in 'advanced' talks to raise an additional £100m through a combination of existing investors and asset sales.
Some of TalkTalk's bonds have slumped to trade as low as 44p in recent weeks, indicating a lack of confidence that the company will be able to repay its debts.
While this has now risen to 58p, it remains well below the price of around 80p in April.
Ares Management, which owns a stake in TalkTalk and provided it with a £440m high-interest loan, is now thought to be in the driving seat given its dual role as shareholder and debtholder. It took additional security over the company in last year's refinancing.
A source close to Ares said it was still 'very supportive' of the company.
Beyond the corporate intrigue is a political headache for the Government. With financial troubles mounting, government officials have expressed concerns about the possibility of TalkTalk collapsing, according to multiple industry sources.
This would be of particular concern given TalkTalk is thought to have a significant number of vulnerable customers, including elderly people and those on lower incomes.
Regulator Ofcom has for several years been drawing up contingency plans in case of a supplier collapse, but these have largely been focused on the scores of 'alt-net' firms that have cropped up to challenge the dominance of BT.
'The expectation has always been that it would be an alt-net that would fail, not an established internet service provider', says Matthew Howett, at Assembly Research.
Karen Egan, at Enders Analysis, says: 'It will be worrying [the Government] because they do have a high proportion of vulnerable customers.
'I think there's a fear of a lot of disruption, but in the case of TalkTalk there's a lot of ways they can ensure the service doesn't ever go down.'
Potential options include a 'supplier of last resort' scenario, similar to the one used in the energy sector. This would see a trusted larger player, such as BT, appointed to take over TalkTalk's customer base should it collapse.
Alternatively, the Government could intervene to prop up the company for a limited period, giving customers time to switch to a different provider of their choosing.
Most people in the industry believe a full-blown insolvency is unlikely. 'I think everyone knows that there are safety nets in the market,' says one source.
But as TalkTalk's troubles deepen, larger rivals are starting to circle. Executives at BT have held early-stage discussions about a potential takeover amid concerns that the former monopoly's Openreach division is taking a hit from TalkTalk's customer losses.
VMO2 is also understood to be interested in a potential swoop after its previous approach failed. Mike Fries, the chief executive of VMO2's co-owner Liberty Global, is said to be close to Sir Charles.
However, any takeover bid by BT or VMO2 would trigger serious competition concerns and face protracted regulatory scrutiny. Sky, which has previously weighed up a bid for TalkTalk, is not thought to be interested.
As a result, Vodafone has emerged as a viable contender. The telecoms giant is in the throes of integrating mobile network Three following a £15bn merger and chief executive Max Taylor has insisted the company has 'no plans for inorganic activity' in its fixed business.
Nevertheless, VodafoneThree has earmarked broadband as a major opportunity for growth, so TalkTalk's sizeable customer base could prove an attractive proposition.
Any rescue deal would ensure continued service for customers and avoid a messy collapse, albeit while leaving Sir Charles high and dry. But with TalkTalk's survival far from guaranteed, officials will be keeping a close eye on how the crisis unfolds.
'The policy interventions in fixed broadband have been good up until now,' says Howett. 'It would be a shame to see the TalkTalk saga blemish that reputation.'
A spokesman for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on speculation, or commercial matters relating to specific companies.
'The UK broadband market continues to be a highly competitive market with plenty of choice for consumers. Our priority is ensuring customers, particularly those with vulnerabilities, are protected as the market evolves.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Shiploads of cars ready to set sail for US from UK as trade deal kicks in
Shiploads of Minis, Aston Martins and Range Rovers will set sail for the US on Monday as the UK-US trade deal kicks in, but British farmers say they have been used as collateral to save the car industry. Auto shipments across the Atlantic were down more than half in May after Donald Trump's imposition of a 25% tariff on 3 April on top of an existing 2.5% levy. However, as of one minute past midnight US time on Monday – 5am in the UK – that has been reduced to 10% for cars, and UK manufacturers expect pent-up demand to be unleashed. Aston Martin's chief executive, Adrian Hallmark, said the luxury carmaker had stopped shipping between April and June, something he said had been 'not catastrophic, but slightly uncomfortable'. The outline of the trade deal was agreed between Trump and Keir Starmer in early May, the first such bilateral pact to mitigate the president's import taxes. However, delays in agreeing the fine print meant the higher tariff had continued to apply, pushing the cost of British cars up by more than a quarter for US importers. Hallmark told a British car industry conference last week that he was 'planning to invoice three months' worth of sales in a 24-hour period', with stocks in the US down by 50% due to the pause. Aston Martin exports 90% of its cars, but its customers are wealthy and were willing to wait. 'The demand has been strong and will be in good shape when we start to invoice cars like fury on Monday next week,' he said. On the eve of the trade deal coming into force, the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, received reassurances from the sportscar maker Lotus that it had no plans to close its UK factory, in Hethel, Norfolk. Reynolds contacted Lotus bosses after it emerged that the carmaker was considering shifting production to the US – a move that would jeopardise 1,300 jobs. A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said Reynolds met Lotus and its owner, Geely, on Sunday to clarify the company's situation, and 'was reassured by management that they are committed to their UK operations and have no plans to close their Hethel plant'. A decision to relocate manufacturing abroad by a prestige brand such as Lotus would be embarrassing for the UK government. Labour's industrial strategy, published last week, singled out automotive production as among the strategic sectors it wants to support. The car industry welcomed the US-UK trade deal when it was struck, with it preventing job losses at JLR, the maker of the Jaguar and Land Rover brands. Range Rovers are particularly popular in the US. However, the lower 10% duty only applies to a quota of 100,000 cars a year – slightly below last year's export numbers – leaving little room for growth. JLR alone exported 84,000 cars in the year up to April 2025. The initial trade deal also included a promise of zero tariffs on steel but this has been held up by negotiations over the origin of some raw materials for smelting, particularly at Tata's plant at Port Talbot in south Wales. Concessions were won with new tariff-free quotas for British and US beef in each other's markets, as well the controversial removal of a 19% tariff on American ethanol imports, which the UK industry says leaves biofuel plants facing closure. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The president of the National Farmers' Union, Tom Bradshaw, said the government must stop using agriculture as a bargaining chip in talks and urged Starmer to take the sector off the table in the talks on steel and remove the 10% baseline tariff Trump has applied to all imports. 'Agriculture has borne the responsibility of removing tariffs for other sectors. At some point they've got to stop relying on agriculture to take the burden,' Bradshaw said. 'Agriculture has nothing left to give.' On the upside for farmers, they can now sell 13,000 tonnes of British beef to the US, but again there is a catch. They will not be able to sell until January next year because beef is part of a wider tariff deal with other countries, and this year's quota has already been filled by Brazilians who stockpile beef in storage near the Mexican border. The UK steel industry has at least won a temporary exemption from the 50% tariff imposed by Trump at the start of this month until 9 July, but it still faces a 25% tariff on exports. It is waiting anxiously for delivery of the promised zero rate tariff. 'Time is running out to secure a UK-US steel deal and remove damaging tariffs,' said Gareth Stace, the director general of UK Steel. 'Every day of delay costs our steelmakers dearly. Contracts are being lost, investment decisions remain on hold, and uncertainty is paralysing business decisions. We urgently need a swift, positive resolution to these talks to protect jobs, unlock growth, and restore confidence in the sector.' Yet even in a zero-tariff deal, Port Talbot may still face issues. The UK operations of the Indian conglomerate are relying on imports of steel melted and poured in its sister plants in India and the Netherlands while they move from a polluting blast furnace to the greener electric arc furnace to smelt steel. However, UK Steel is hoping there can be an exception to the tariffs agreed for the Welsh operation along with the five other plants in the UK. UK trade officials are understood to be optimistic they can secure such an exemption.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My boyfriend is 27 years older than me - people say our relationship is disgusting and I'm only in it for money but they're just jealous
A young woman who is dating a man twice her age has hit back at people criticising her relationship. Sass, 27, from London took to social media to reveal the romance with her 'silver fox' boyfriend, who is 54. The self-described 'spoiled girlfriend' enjoys a luxury lifestyle with her much older boyfriend, regularly jetting off for sun-soaked holidays and skiing holidays together. Sass often shares scenes of her glamorous life on TikTok, where she has 3,500 followers, but more recently she's been criticised for dating someone so much older. The content creator recently opened up about their romance online, posting a picture of the two snuggled together alongside a caption revealing their years of birth - 1970 and 1997 respectively. People in the comments have blasted what they described as their 'disgusting' relationship and urged her to choose 'self-respect over money'. But Sass said she couldn't be happier and has defended her boyfriend, describing him as 'highly educated, emotionally intelligent, financially secure, a great personality.' Hitting back at the hate comments, Sass said their relationship was 'supportive and happy' despite the 27 year age gap. 'His family are lovely! If you know us as individuals, us as a couple makes sense. Those we know in real life understand, are supportive and happy for us,' she said. Responding to hateful comments, she said she 'doesn't date younger like the majority of women'. She said the negative comments were 'unfortunate' but insisted she wasn't letting them get in the way of their blossoming romance. 'It is unfortunate but I'm having fun. I'm not letting them get to me because they literally don't know anything about me or my partner,' she said. Her family don't mind the relationship - though she said she would date her 'silver fox' regardless of their input. 'My family are chill and even if they weren't, it's me that has to live with my decisions. I'm happy with my life,' she said. Sass's partner supplies her with a steady stream of gifts, recently unboxing a brand new pair of of Louboutin's worth several thousand pounds. The couple enjoy five-star holidays, staying only at the most expensive hotels and dining on Michelin star menus. However, some didn't see the happy side of their romance, accusing Sass of 'using him for money' while others denied the pair were truly in love. One wrote: 'It's better to date a man that's a bit older but a 27 year gap though? Come on, it's a lifestyle choice - you can just admit you want a soft life provided to you.' A second remarked: 'My dad was born in 1977 and me in 1994 if they're old enough to be your parent it's not right sorry.' 'Nah, it's about money,' another wrote while a fourth told her to seek 'self-respect over money'. In one tongue-in-cheek 'get ready with me' video, Sass helped cut her boyfriend's hair and said, 'contrary to popular belief, I'm the one that groomed him'. However, others urged them to 'ignore the haters', sharing their similar stories of dating older men. One wrote: 'Trust me girl, you are in winning strike, people think younger woman go for older men for money, there is more wisdom to an older man, and not to mention the way they treat their younger woman is the exact way a real woman want to be treated.' She said the negative comments were 'unfortunate' but insisted she wasn't letting them get in the way of their blossoming romance A second said: 'I don't even know why people are mad. It's giving financial security.' Another remarked: 'People are projecting in the comment section. Two grown adults with mental capacity to make decisions. meaning, the both know what they want and if they're happy with each are you to judge them. 'Just because you wouldn't be in such age gap relationship doesn't mean the rest of the world wouldn't.' And things appear to going well for the couple, with Sass light-heartedly telling her followers to 'expect your invites soon' - appearing to refer to a potential wedding.


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cafe named after Princess Diana ‘employing illegal migrants'
A café named after Diana, Princess of Wales, could lose its licence for employing migrants illegally. The royal was a regular guest at Café Diana in Notting Hill Gate after it opened in 1989 close to Kensington Palace. She reportedly took Prince William and Prince Harry for breakfast. The Home Office has applied for the café's licence to be revoked after discovering seven staff members without the correct documentation from Egypt, Iran and Albania during four inspections between September 2019 and May 2025. Abdul-Basit Daoud, the venue's designated premises superviser, recalled that Diana first visited the café days after it opened. He said: 'She started coming more often, bringing the kids here sometimes for breakfast. The kids used to take breakfast, like English breakfast. 'Herself, she used to have cappuccino, cake, some croissants, something like this. But she sometimes had English breakfast too.' The café is now a popular tourist destination with photographs of the princess on the walls, including one that Diana gave as a gift. Documents submitted to the council by the Home Office and seen by The Telegraph showed that one employee was paid £40 for an eight-hour shift, equivalent to £5 an hour, while one chef who arrived in the UK on a business visa that ran out in 2015 said he was 'paid in food'. The report also revealed that one illegal worker had been employed at the premises for more than two years. The Home Office report said: 'This prolonged period of illegal employment is significant as it indicates a persistent undermining of the prevention of crime and disorder licensing objective.' The cafe was fined £10,500 in February 2020 for hiring illegal workers and another £135,000 in December 2024 for the same offence. On May 9, 45 tubs of illegal shisha tobacco were seized, and council Trading Standards Officials found smoking had taken place in smoke-free areas. The Home Office report added: 'It is clear to see that the premises licence holder/DPS, along with management, has failed to conduct mandatory employment checks in line with legal obligations to prevent illegal working. 'It is an offence to work when a person is disqualified to do so, and such an offence can only be committed with the co-operation of a premises licence holder or its agents. The management could have eradicated any doubt concerning right-to-work by the simple task of acquiring a share code from potential employees.' The Metropolitan Police asked the council 'to be mindful' in their decision, adding: 'To allow them the benefit of a premises licence would undermine the prevention of crime and disorder licensing objective.' Mr Daoud's company, Corporate Meeting and Event Services Ltd, ran the café but were evicted by SSW6 Holding Ltd which holds the licence. Mr Daoud's company was liquidated in June. Mr Daoud admitted recruiting staff from overseas but said all new hires were required to fill out a starter checklist and all underwent right-to-work checks. Paid with food He also said staff were verbally told which days to work and are paid in cash 'with some receiving free food in return for working at the premises'. Lawyers for SSW6 Holding Ltd said his client undertook 'swift and decisive action' by evicting the current tenants after becoming aware of the issues and suggested suspending the licence for three months. The company proposed hiring door security, carrying out regular immigration checks, and improving CCTV and training for staff. A legal letter read: 'We respectfully suggest that a suspension of the premises licence for a period of three months would represent an appropriate and proportionate response.'