
eSIM-compatible phones - Top brands and how to best use a travel eSIM
Depending on where you live, or what phone you have, you may have never used an eSIM before or perhaps you are using one right now (you can check here whether your model is an eSIM-supported phone with Ubigi, for example). But eSIMs aren't just about getting connectivity to your phone for your day-to-day usage, they are also a must-have tool for travel. What is an eSIM?
The acronym stands for 'embedded Subscriber Identity Module'. SIM cards are what tells the network that a device is connected (and who to bill for a call or data used). The embedded variant is what it sounds like, it is essentially a SIM card soldered on your phone's circuit board, but the key part here is that regular SIMs are changed by physically swapping them out, while eSIM profiles are changed via software, in your device's settings.
Adding an eSIM profile to your phone can be as simple as scanning a QR code (this is of course provided you have an eSIM-compatible phone). Even better, some eSIM providers geared towards travelers have apps that help you manage data plans for multiple countries in one single eSIM; one such recommended provider is Ubigi. Why use a travel eSIM
In the olden days, getting a local SIM while on a trip required either looking around the airport to buy one when you arrive or having one shipped to you before you leave. Either way, it was always a bit of a hassle.
With an eSIM, there is nothing to ship – you can get one over the Internet from anywhere and at any time, which means you can just get an eSIM for your upcoming trips, and providing you set it up properly and get the correct data plan, you can have mobile Internet the moment you land from the plane in any country. Travel eSIMs are typically valid for a short period – from a few days to a month – so you can get one that lasts the duration of your stay without overpaying for a card that you won't need next week. And if plans change and you extend your stay or you underestimated how much data you will need, you can re-top up in a minute and keep going.
If you're going on a grand tour, you can get eSIMs for every country that you plan to visit and switch between them as you arrive in each one. Or, in the case of Ubigi for example, you keep the same eSIM forever for all destinations, and just add new data plans from a single app.
Ubigi is one of the leading eSIM providers for personal travel and business customers, and luckily GSMArena readers can benefit from the discounted offer below. eSIM-compatible phones – Top brands
As you will see in the next section, the top brands were the early adopters of the technology. It is not a premium feature anymore though, as even mid-rangers like the iPhone 16e, Pixel 4a and Galaxy A-series since the A54 have integrated eSIMs now. All Apple, Google and Samsung flagship phones have eSIMs too of course, and below are the overall top brands with the highest eSIM adoption rate
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra • Samsung Galaxy S25 • Samsung Galaxy A56 • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
It's quite common for smartwatches with network connectivity to use eSIM – in fact, the first device to feature an eSIM was the Samsung Gear S2 in 2015. Nowadays, the top models featuring an eSIM for Samsung are the flagship Galaxy S models and Z foldables, but also the A-series mid-rangers. Some specialty devices like the XCover phones also have eSIM support, which simplifies using company-owned subscriptions.
Apple
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max • Apple iPhone 16 • Apple iPhone 16e • Apple iPad (2025)
In 2022, Apple launched the iPhone 14 series and the models sold in the US lacked a physical SIM slot – they relied on eSIM exclusively. This has been the case for subsequent models too. However, iPhones sold in other regions have a SIM slot plus an eSIM. And in China they only have a dual-SIM slot. What phones use is heavily influenced by local carriers. Top models with eSIMs include..., and new iPhone models are all expected to be eSIM-compatible on a move forward basis (across most regions).
Google
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL • Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold • Google Pixel 9 • Google Pixel 9a
The first phone with an eSIM was the Pixel 2 in 2017. This launched on the search giant's own carrier, Google Fi. Since then, every Pixel phone from the cheaper "a" models to the Pro flagships has supported eSIM.
Xiaomi
Xiaomi 15 Ultra • Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Global) • Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Global) • Poco X7
While the technology is not particularly popular in China, Chinese brands do add eSIM to their models sold internationally – e.g. Xiaomi has it on devices ranging from the Xiaomi 15 Ultra to more affordable models like the T-series and the Redmi Notes.
Motorola
Motorola razr+ 2024 • Motorola ThinkPhone 25 • Motorola Edge 60 Fusion • Motorola Moto G (2025)
Motorola is an interesting case – the 2019 revival of the Razr was an eSIM-only phone and since then the company has used the technology on anything from its foldables to the cheap Moto G, these are models costing $200 or less. In other words, if you want a phone with an eSIM, you can get one at practically any price point. eSIM adoption statistics
The number of devices with eSIM support has been growing steadily since 2015 – smartwatches with cell connectivity almost exclusively use eSIM, more and more smartphones support it too and even larger devices like tablets often have eSIM as an option to add 4G/5G connectivity.
Looking at just the most popular devices in the GSMArena database, only 16 of the Top 100 devices for 2021 had eSIM. This jumped up to 24 the following year and for the last couple of years, a third of the Top 100 devices have eSIM.
We also looked at the raw count of eSIM-enabled devices launched by top brands since 2021, here is what that looks like:
We will see how 2025 shakes out, but the trend is pretty clear. By the way, here are all the phones with eSIM that have come out this year so far.
Interestingly, the adoption among the Top 100 most popular devices is stronger than it is among the whole field. Okay, maybe this is not too surprising, given how quickly the leading brands got into eSIM. The benefits of using an eSIM
Even if your subscription has generous limits for roaming, you may want to get an eSIM when traveling – they are cheap and there are plans for a few days, a week and even a month, so you can pick one to match the duration of your stay.
And you can even get unlimited data with some providers like Ubigi, so you can continue binging your favorite Netflix shows, stream music and upload tons of photos and videos from your trip. In an unfamiliar region, you will probably be relying on navigation, restaurant reviews, etc., things that depend on an Internet connection – this means that running out of data can be a major headache.
The flexibility of eSIM makes it a great tool to remove one of the pain points of traveling. As mentioned above, just about everything requires an Internet connection these days.
eSIMs are the way to go if you have an eSIM-compatible phone, and even more so if you need to travel. If you need to go abroad, we recommend checking out Ubigi which offers fast and affordable data plans in over 200 destinations. It even lets you top-up through the app if you run out of mobile data and can't connect to WiFi which is a very handy feature. GSMArena's travel eSIM deal
This is a sponsored post. Sponsorship is a form of advertising. The views and opinions expressed in this article are from the sponsor and might not reflect our own.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
vivo X200 FE's India launch teased Comments
vivo X Fold5 has the biggest battery (6,000mAh) and best protection (IP59+) of any foldable


GSM Arena
5 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Poco F7 vs Poco F7 Pro
The Poco F7 Series is here, and as usual, Xiaomi has released not one, but two near-flagship killers - the Poco F7 and the Poco F7 Pro. Both phones promise top-tier performance, premium features, and competitive pricing, staying true to Poco's legacy of delivering exceptional value. But while the regular F7 lands with a bigger battery and slightly larger display, the Pro model brings a sharper screen, superior cameras, and a more powerful chipset to the table. With just €100 between them, it's a tough choice - so which one offers the better deal? The Poco F7 arrives with a single flagship-grade memory option - 12 GB RAM paired with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 storage, offering a smooth experience and plenty of space for apps, media, and games. In the EU, the 12+256 GB configuration is priced at €449.99, while the 12+512 GB jumps to €499.99, with a similar launch price bracket in India under INR 35,000 (~US $399/449). The Poco F7 Pro offers again 12 GB RAM combined with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 internal storage. Pricing is set higher, with the global launch starting around US $499 (≈€499) for the 12+256 GB version and US $549 for 12+512 GB. Table of Contents: Design Display Battery Life Charging Speaker Test Performance Cameras Verdict For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following text. Size comparison Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro There's a modest size difference between the Poco F7 and the Poco F7 Pro. The regular F7 is slightly taller, wider, and heavier than the Pro, likely due to its larger battery and screen. Still, both phones remain comfortably within the slim and lightweight category for large-screen devices. The differences in hand are noticeable but not drastic - if you value a more compact feel, the Pro has the advantage here. Both phones have the same design language, and both have IP68 ingress protection. For materials, the front of both phones is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus. The back of the F7 Pro is made of glass, while the regular F7 uses high-quality plastic, giving the Pro a slightly more premium feel. The middle frame is plastic on both models, though it's finished nicely to resemble aluminum. Connectivity is also identical for the most part. Both phones support dual SIM functionality, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and have USB-C ports. However, the Poco F7 supports DisplayPort video output over USB-C, which is missing on the F7 Pro for some reason. Speaker setup is identical too, with both phones offering stereo speakers tuned for Dolby Atmos. They're using a hybrid stereo arrangement with a shared earpiece and bottom-firing secondary speaker. The setup delivers loud and balanced sound. And both phones also feature a quality haptic motor. Button placement is standard and consistent between the two phones - volume rocker and power key are located on the right side, while the left side remains clean. Both phones use an under-display optical fingerprint reader, so there is no difference there. It's worth noting that both models have an IR blaster, which is located near the camera island on the back instead of its usual location on the top frame. Display comparison Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Both phones feature high-quality AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates and Dolby Vision video support. The Poco F7's is a larger 6.83-inch display with a 2772 x 1280px resolution, while the F7 Pro opts for a slightly smaller 6.67-inch display but with a higher 3200 x 1440px resolution. So in terms of sharpness, the Pro clearly wins with its 526ppi density. Max screen brightness is comparable - 1525 nits on the F7 and 1478 nits on the Pro - so both are excellent in sunlight. It really comes down to whether you value more screen estate or extra pixel sharpness. The bezels around the screens are symmetrical and minimal on both phones. Battery life The Poco F7 has the larger battery of the two, at 6500 mAh, compared to the F7 Pro's 6000 mAh. However, that extra capacity doesn't pay off as the F7 Pro delivers longer or equal battery life performance across all of our tests except gaming, which is the only test in which the F7 takes the win. Charging speed Xiaomi Poco F7 5G 6500 mAh Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 6000 mAh Charging is equally impressive on both devices, with 90W wired charging supported out of the box. The Poco F7 Pro had a slight advantage in our charging speed test, reaching a full charge in just 34 minutes compared to the F7's 39 minutes. The Pro also manages to hit 53% in 15 minutes versus 50% on the F7. The differences are small and likely come down to battery size, but if we're splitting hairs, the Pro edges it. Speaker test Both phones offer stereo speaker setups and support for Dolby Atmos. In our loudness tests, they scored nearly identically, delivering powerful and well-balanced sound. The Poco F7 has slightly deeper bass presence, while the F7 Pro provides a cleaner midrange. There's not a huge difference, but audio enthusiasts might prefer the Pro's more refined tuning, whereas casual users will be happy with either. Performance The Poco F7 and Poco F7 Pro both aim for flagship-class speed, but they diverge significantly in processing power. The Poco F7 is equipped with the brand-new Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process with an all-big-core CPU architecture and peak clock speeds around 3.2 GHz. Despite trailing behind the full Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 inside the Pro, it punches well above its mid-range price, delivering robust performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. The F7 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, however, edges ahead with a stronger GPU, and superior sustained performance under intensive workloads. Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Memory-wise, both phones ship with 12 GB of LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking and future-proof headroom. Storage configurations are generous, offering 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 memory. Benchmark performance In synthetic benchmarks, the two phones are almost neck and neck in the compound AnTuTu test and even in the Geekbench CPU test. But the GPU-heavy 3DMark Wild Life test reveals a significant gap in performance - 4,795 vs. 3,953. In short, the two phones perform around the same and deliver more than enough speed for most users. However, the F7 Pro is the better performer in graphics-heavy scenarios like games. This, however, clearly comes at the expense of battery efficiency, as the F7 was able to last longer in our game battery test. Camera comparison Although both Poco F7 models deploy a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization and phase-detect autofocus, they actually use different sensors. The ultrawide cameras are identical on both phones: an 8 MP camera with a 15 mm lens focal length (read: not terribly wide). Neither camera supports autofocus, which is typical for a budget ultrawide sensor like this one. Selfies are captured by a 20 MP front camera (OmniVision OV20B, f/2.2) on both phones. There's no autofocus here either. Front-facing video is limited to 1080p. Speaking of video, both phones are capable of recording up to 4K at 60fps from the main camera. Ultrawide video remains capped at 1080p and lacks stabilization. Image quality In daylight, the Poco F7 Pro's main camera produces ever so slightly crisper photos. The F7 Pro also has better dynamic range with highlights coming out better preserved. The ultrawide cameras have quite a different output, despite using the same camera hardware. The Poco F7 appears to take less processed ultrawide photos, but we prefer the more sharpened look of the F7 Pro. As for the 2x shots, the ones by the vanilla F7, look decidedly better with superior sharpness and contrast than the Poco F7 Pro. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x In low-light photography, the two trade blows again. The F7 Pro's ultrawide camera really outshone the F7's with much sharper photos. But when it comes to the main cam, we'd give the nod to the Poco F7 this time around for its sharper output - a difference, which is visible upon closer examination. The F7's advantage continues at 2x zoom, too. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Both the Poco F7 and F7 Pro are equipped with the same 20MP front-facing camera, and as expected, selfie image quality is quite similar, but we did spot slightly better highlight retention by the F7 Pro. Poco F7 selfie Poco F7 Pro selfie Video quality Both phones can record up to 4K at 60fps from the main camera, but stabilization and image clarity are better on the F7 Pro. The Pro's footage exhibits better detail, more natural colors, and better dynamic range. The same holds true in low light as well. The F7 isn't far behind, but the Pro model offers slightly better video quality across the board. Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it's easier to compare to one another. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x low light Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x low light Verdict The Poco F7 and Poco F7 Pro are both compelling offerings, delivering flagship-grade hardware at midrange prices. Each phone focuses on different priorities, which makes choosing between them a matter of preference and use case rather than a clear-cut winner. The Poco F7 stands out between the two with its larger 6.83-inch display and lower price tag. It manages excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset and offers very good main camera performance with some great 2x digital zoom shots. The Poco F7 Pro, on the other hand, offers a more refined overall experience. It's also a bit lighter and more compact, and has a glass back instead of a plastic one. Its higher-resolution QHD+ AMOLED display is crisper, its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers slightly better performance, and its cameras are slightly more dependable with better HDR processing and better ultrawide performance at night. Video quality is also superior across all cameras. Ultimately, both phones are a great choice and rely on the same formula to provide a great user experience. The Poco F7 Pro is slightly more refined, and it's worth the extra cash if you value the stuff it does better. For everyone else, the F7 delivers some great value that's hard to beat. The larger display. The longer gaming battery life. The better 2x zoom shots. The identical user experience. The lower price. The slightly lighter and more compact body. The higher-res display. The slightly better chipset performance. The better camera HDR (highlight retention). The better ultrawide in low light. The superior video quality.


Phone Arena
19 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Galaxy Watch 8 Classic vs Galaxy Watch 8: it's coming back, but why?
Intro In early July, we are expecting a scorching hot Samsung Unpacked event that'll reveal the next generation of foldable phones from the company. However, as is tradition, we may very much also get new Galaxy Watches. But, in a bit of an unusual manner — there will be three models this time around! A reiteration of the Galaxy Watch Ultra and a base Galaxy Watch 8 — those are a given. But the Classic is also making a return, with its mechanical rotating bezel in tow! So, yes, we expect a Galaxy Watch 8 and Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. Typically, the regular one is more sporty whereas the latter one has a bit of a... classier look. And the aforementioned bezel. But, what else will separate them? Let's see what we know so far: Stainless steel vs aluminum build Rotating bezel and new crown-shaped button on Classic One size for Classic, two sizes for base model IP68, 5ATM for both 32 GB of storage for both Same sensors, including ECG, SpO2, temp on both Table of Contents: Design and Sizes Bands Software Battery Models Specs Summary Samsung isn't done spinning the bezel just yet — quite literally. The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is supposedly bringing back that clicky, tactile bezel that is just right enough to make it feel like a "real" watch. It picks up right where the Watch 6 Classic left off and should come in a premium build with a stainless steel body, available only in a 46 mm size. Meanwhile, the standard Galaxy Watch 8 will be playing it safe — and slim. Expect a sleeker, lighter aluminum build, likely offered in two sizes (think 40 mm and 44 mm), with a digital-only bezel and a more fitness-focused design. Supposedly, it will be only 9 mm thin and should be your go-to if you are more interested in the fitness tracking capabilities of a smartwatch. Both watches should be getting the usual Home and Back buttons. Early leaks show the Classic also sporting a digital crown-looking button right between them. It'll probably not be rotatable — we expect it to be something like the Quick Button of the Galaxy Watch Ultra. But we'll see. Samsung redesigned the band locking mechanism with the Galaxy Watch 6. Surely, we are not due for another redesign. So, whatever straps you bought for the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic or your regular Galaxy Watch since model 6, they should work with the new 8 generation. Hopefully, of course, hang tight for the official announcements. Software & Features If you've tried to follow Samsung's smartwatch software story over the years… well, grab a map. First, there was Tizen. Then came the big handshake with Google, merging it all into Wear OS — specifically, the Samsung-flavored version we've had since 2021. Then, despite new Wear OS being a joint effort, Samsung still felt the need to start dressing it up — thus, the One UI Watch interface was born. This year, we're expecting One UI Watch 8 to arrive baked into both the Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic, running on top of Wear OS 6. Either on launch, or it should come out within months after release. Think the same familiar foundation, but with a slicker Samsung skin, plus the usual sprinkle of Galaxy-only features. AI will be front and center, supposedly offering smarter fitness tips, more intuitive workout recommendations, and — maybe — better sleep insights. We'll believe it when we see suggest Samsung may go the subscription route for advanced metrics — stuff like detailed coaching plans, pro-grade insights, or even premium AI analysis. Nothing confirmed, but with Apple and Fitbit already dipping into the fitness feature subscription pool, it wouldn't exactly be the bright side, Samsung seems to be cooking up some truly futuristic health tracking. Noninvasive blood measurements — yes, actual biomarker reads like antioxidant levels — are rumored to be in testing. Plus, a new vascular load metric might show just how hard your heart and blood vessels are working. If real, these would land on all Galaxy Watch 2025 models, not just the high-end ones. The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is rumored to have around 425 mAh, so it may give us a day and a half easy. Of course, the Exynos W1000 energy efficiency may extend that further. The Galaxy Watch 8 , with its two sizes, is supposedly going to have ~300 mAh and ~425 mAh. So, its endurance and performance should be around the same as the Classic. The smaller one does have to feed a smaller screen, after all, so that may end up almost evening out. As mentioned above, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic will only come in 46 mm. In that case, you will have a choice between a model with cellular and one without. The prices should be around $400-$450, but we are leaving room for inflation to surprise us. The Galaxy Watch 8 should be available in 40 mm and 44 mm variants, again — with our without LTE. So, the most basic model should start at around $300, the bigger one — $320. Add $50 to the price tag if you want a cellular modem inside. Here's what we generally expect: It's kind of very clear who the Classic is meant for and who the base model is for. Going just by previous experience — the Classic variants are heavier, bulkier, and their mechanical parts click and clack. Thus, they are not very practical for workouts. But they are quite pretty — so that's the watch meant for an outfit. If you already have a fitness tracker or don't care to use one — the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic should be more up your alley. The base Galaxy Watch 8 will bridge that gap between stylish watch and fitness tracker, as its predecessors have. It is kind of big but not too big. Kind of sporty but doesn't look out of place when paired with casual wear. So, it casts a wider net, and it may just catch you in it.